Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

download Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

of 33

Transcript of Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    1/33

    LECTURE 1Chapter 14Professors Notes:

    1) Trait variation is due to alternative version(alleles) of heritable fators(!enes)") for eah harater an or!anis# inherits " alleles$ one fro# eah parent%) &'N*NT alleles #as+ reessive alleles

    4) " alleles for a heritable harater ,E-RE-*TE durin! !a#ete for#ation . end upin di/erent !a#etes 0 L*2 '3 ,E-RE-*T'NPUNNETT ,5URE 0 %:1 R*T'6e!innin! of hu#an !enetis he#ophelia 7as reo!ni8ed as hereditar9 ;

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    2/33

    one fro# its father? 7hen this or!anis# for#s its o7n !a#etes$ eah !a#ete 7illreeive onl9 one of these alleles$ and this proess is rando#

    in the ase of " di/erent alleles at a partiular lous$ the or!anis#s phenot9pe 7illbe deter#ined b9 the do#inant allele$ 7hih is able to #as+ the e/ets of thereessive allele= n order for the reessive trait to be seen$ both alleles arried b9the or!anis# #ust be reessive

    PUNNETT ,5U*URE 0 dia!ra# used to deter#ine the ratio of di/= phenot9pes and!enot9pes in o/sprin!$ resultin! fro# rossin! parents 7ith di/erent o#binationsof !enot9pes=

    ''K@-'U, 0 " ,*E *LLELE, at a partiular !ene ETER'K@-'U, 0 " &33ERENT *LLELE, at a partiular !ene PEN'T@PE: or!anis#s appearane$ or observable harateristis -EN'T@PE: o#plete !eneti #a+e up

    Law of Independent Assortmentstates that alleles of di/erent !enes assort independentl9 of one another durin!!a#ete for#ation'N'@6R& CR',,0 #atin! bt7= individuals 7ho have di/= alleles at one !enetilous of interest&@6R& CR',,0 ross bt7= 31 o/sprin! of " individuals that di/er in " traits ofpartiular interest

    EF) 6b F 6b 0 6(bro7n)$ b(blue)$ 66(dar+)$ 6b(6ro7n)$ bb(blue),etion "Probability rules and simple Mendelian geneticsP( and @) 0 P() F P(@)P( or @) 0 P() M P(@),etion %omplex inheritance patterns from a single geneo#plete do#inane ours 7hen the o/sprin! al7a9s has the sa#e phenot9pe asone or both of its parents= one of the possible alleles is al7a9s do#inant over theother and al7a9s ditates the phenot9pes

    eF) 66(6ro7n) F bb(blue) 0 6b(6ro7n)no#plete do#inane ours 7hen the hetero89!ous individuals displa9 a di/erentphenot9pe than either the reessive or do#inant ho#o89!otes? neither of the allelesare o#pletel9 do#inant$ and the resultin! inter#ediate phenot9pe is usuall9 a blendof the t7o possible traits=

    eF) CRCR(Red) F C6C6(6lue) 0 CRC6(purple)Codo#inane: ondition in 7hih both alleles of a !ene pair in a hetero89!ote arefull9 eFpressed$ 7ith neither one bein! do#inant or reessive to the other=

    eF) **(T9pe *) F 66(T9pe 6) 0 *6(t9pe *6)PLETR'P@ 0 ours 7hen sin!le !enes #a9 a/et #ultiple phenot9pi haraters$suh as #ultis9#pto# diseases in hu#ans$ si+leell disease$ or 9sti Ibrosis,etion 4Tracing alleles through a family history

    a pedi!ree is a dia!ra# sho7in! the anestral relationships and trans#ission of!eneti traits over several !enerations in a fa#il9

    in pratial appliation$ pedi!rees an be used to predit the future ourrene of

    heritable disorders eFa#inin! the pattern of the inheritane of a trait in a pedi!ree an help deter#ine

    7hether it is bein! inherited as a do#inant or reessive trait

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    3/33

    6,C 1"< LECTURE N'TE "

    Chapter 1;

    endels hereditar9 fatorsD are loated on hro#oso#es

    earl9 studies of #eiosis sho7ed that the behavior of hro#oso#es parallels the

    behavior of endels fatorsD

    6oth hro#oso#es and fatorsD

    present in pairs in &PL'& ells

    se!re!ate durin! #eiosis

    halve their op9 nu#bers durin! #eiosis and double their op9 nu#bers at

    fertili8ation

    T'*, UNT 'R-*N, 3RUT 3L@ eFperi#ents provided the Irst stron! evidene

    that !enes are on hro#oso#es

    2@ 3RUT 3LE,O

    eas9 to rear in lab

    short !eneration ti#e(1

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    4/33

    e#ophilia

    &uhenne #usular d9stroph9

    Color 6lindness

    Chapter 1S

    2*T , TE -ENETC *TER*LO (PR'TEN 'R &N*O)

    -R33T et al= sho7ed that an un+no7n substane ould TR*N,3'R(C*N-E TE

    -EN'T@PE *N& PEN'T@PE) 6*CTER*

    ER,E@ *N& C*,E used bateriopha!e(a +ind of virus) to deter#ine 7hat

    substane the virus uses to repro!ra# baterial ells

    3R*NLN and 2LN, #ade ra9 di/ration i#a!es of &N*

    2*T,'N and CRC used the ra9 i#a!es to dedue the double heliF

    1>;%: 2*T,'N *N& CRC RE,'LQE& %& ,TRUCTURE '3 &N*

    ,@NTE,KN- * 3UNCT'N*L -EN'E: a tea# led b9 =CR*- QENTER hassueeded in reatin! a s9ntheti baterial !eno#e and usin! it to ontrol a ell

    &N* C'NT*N, % C'P'NENT,: NTR'-ENC'NT*NN- 6*,E$ * PENT',E

    ,U-*R(&E'@R6',E)$ *N& * P',P*TE -R'UP

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    5/33

    Leture %

    &*R2N*N REQ'LUT'N

    Top ; #9ths about C*RLE, &*R2N

    M!T" #$&ar7in 7as the Irst to propose that life on this planet evolved

    #an9 people proposed evolutionar9 ideas before &ar7in$ and #an9 otherspaved the 7a9 for his theor9$ even if the9 did not believe in evolution

    the#selvesEvolution ideas be!an 7G anient -ree+s

    E#pedoles believed plants a#e Irst$ then ani#al&eveloped a theor9 of stru!!le a#on! ani#als that foreshado7s natural seletion

    *R,T'TLE believed life for#s 7ere IFed$ but his ,ala Naturae inspiredevolutionar9 theoriesLNN*EU, developed a lassiIation s9ste# that pla9ed a role in &ar7insevolutionar9 ar!u#ents

    did not believe in evolutionused lassiIation s9ste# to reveal the divine order of lifeonsidered the father of taFono#9

    evolution 7as supported b9 the !eolo!i theor9 of -R*&U*L,$ but N'T b9C*T*,TR'P,

    CUQER$ a hard ore CatastrophistPaleontolo!istfound di/= fossils in di/= strata and inferred eFtintionbelieved boundaries bt7= strata due to atastrophes

    UTT'N and L@ELL advoated !radualis#believed earths features eFplained b9 proesses urrentl9 operatin!i#plied earth is S

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    6/33

    support$ and #an9 o/sprin! fail to survive or reprodue

    *LTU, 6*,C TE'R@: unless at or belo7 subsistene level$ a populationsfertilit9 7ill tend to #ove=

    M!T" %$

    &ar7in 7ent to the -alapa!os$ studied the bea+s of Inhes$ and thus disoveredevolution&ar7in didnt +no7 #an9 of his sa#ples 7ere Inhes until an ornitholo!istI!ured it out

    TE 'R-N '3 ,PECE,(1B;>);1% p!

    ; pa!es devoted to the -alapa!os 3inhes are never #entioned

    evidene for adaptive radiation in Inhes a#e #uh laterinstead$ &ar7in based his theor9 on a 7ide diversit9 of !eolo!ial and biolo!ialobservations

    M!T" &$&ar7ins 'n the 'ri!in of ,peiesD dou#ent nu#erous eFa#ples of naturalseletion in ation

    &ar7in observed eFtensive *RT3C*L ,ELECT'N

    ho7ever$ dou#entation of N*TUR*L ,ELECT'N in ation is #ore reent

    M!T" '$Evolution is a theor9 about the ori!in of life

    &ar7in did believe that all or!anis#s on Earth trae their ori!in to a sin!le anestorho7ever$ he 7as not at all lear on ho7 life itself ori!inated

    M!T" ($&ar7in 7as an atheist bent on brin!in! do7n the Churh

    &ar7ins reli!ious vie7s 7ere o#pliated and han!ed throu!hout his liferaised as a Christian and studied to beo#e a ler!9#anver9 uno#fortable 7G onJit bt7= his theor9 and biblial teahin!s$ and thisli+el9 dela9ed publiation of TE 'R-NeFperiened a loss of faith after the death of his >9ear old dau!hter *nniein later life he desribed hi#self as an *!nosti$ but never an *theist

    Leture 4

    Ch="" ,etion % Case 3or and *!ainst Evolution

    *r!u#ent 1: Evolution annot be observed and therefore annot be proven

    Rebuttal: evolution is observed all the ti#eV

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    7/33

    7e ant observe the ENTRET@ of evolution and therefore rel9 on diverse lines

    of evidene$ Wust as 7e do in other Ields

    *r!u#ent ": There are no transitional fossils

    Rebuttal: The fossil reord is spott9$ but there *RE transitional for#s

    i=e= transition bet7een Ish and tetrapods? transition bet7een reptile and birds?

    transition bet7een horse speies? transition fro# land #a##als to 7hales?

    transitional fossil JatIsh 7ith partiall9 #i!rated e9es

    *r!u#ent %: Chane annot reate o#pleFit9

    Rebuttal:utations are rando#? but seletion is N'T

    *r!u#ent 4: the Irst step to7ard o#pleF adaptations ould not have been

    favored(0irreduible o#pleFit9)

    Rebuttal:nitial steps 7ill be favored if the9 o/er even a sli!ht advanta!e$ even

    for an entirel9 di/erent purpose

    *r!u#ent ;: Natural seletion violates the seond la7 of ther#od9na#is(entrop9

    7ill inrease in an isolated s9ste#)

    Rebuttal: The earth is not an isolated s9ste#

    *r!u#ent S: Evolution is onl9 a theor9

    Rebuttal: evolution is both a fat and an enor#ousl9 7ellsupported

    theor9(TE'R@02ELL,U6,T*NT*TE& EPL*N*T'N '3 * ,ET '3

    N*TUR*L PEN'EN* N ,CENCE)

    3at speies han!e over ti#e

    Theor9 speies han!e over ti#e due to the o#bined fores of #utation$

    #i!ration$ !eneti drift and natural seletion

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    8/33

    )*idence for )*olution+

    &iret observations of evolutionar9 han!e:

    Chan!es in bea+ si8e in -alapa!os Inhes

    Predationindued han!es in !upp9 oloration

    ndustrial #elanis# in #oths

    Evolution of resistane to antibaterial and antiviral dru!s

    Evolution of pestiide resistane

    Chan!es in soapberr9 bu! bea+ len!th

    o#olo!ous haraters

    ,i#ilarities due to o##on anestr9

    *nato#ial ho#olo!iesG oleular ho#olo!ies

    i=e= a##alian foreli#bs: ho#olo!ous strutures 7ith ver9 di/erent funtions

    Qesti!ial traits: historial re#nants of traits for anestors

    'LECUL*R ''L'-@: -ENETC C'&E

    3ossil reord

    2h9 does it #atter if evolution is true or notO

    Evolutionar9 thin+in! is ruial to a!riulture

    'ne 7a9 to slo7 the evolution of pestiide resistane is to provide RE3U-*

    Evolution thin+in! is ruial to #ediine

    Tre#endous inrease in antibioti resistane had led to:

    1) lon!er hospital sta9s

    ") hi!her treat#ent osts

    1) "% fold hi!her #ortalit9 in hospitali8ed patients

    6io#edial Ield tends to avoid the ter# evolutionD 7hen desribin! evolutionar9

    proesses

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    9/33

    3iFin! the antibioti proble# 7ill reHuire !reater evolutionar9 a7areness fro#

    dotors$ patients$ and far#ers=

    Leture ;

    Chapter "% ,etion 1"

    Populations evolve$ individuals do not

    ard92einber! Priniple an be used to test 7hether population is evolvin!

    Population: loali8ed !roup of individuals of the sa#e speies that an

    interbreed and produe fertile o/sprin!

    Evolution: han!e in the !eneti o#position of a population fro# !eneration to

    !eneration

    !iven a series of assu#ptions$ allele freHuenies and !enot9pe freHuenies 7ill not

    han!e bet7een !enerations

    *ssu#ptions: N' ,ELECT'N

    N' UT*T'N

    N' -R*T'N

    N3NTEL@ L*R-E P'PUL*T'N

    R*N&' *TN-

    if these assu#ptions are #et$ allele and !enot9pe freHuenies 7ill not han!e

    bet7een !enerations

    TERN'L'-@:

    i#a!ine a population #ade of 1

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    10/33

    ultipliation rule: o#bined probabilit9 of independent events ourrin! to!ether is

    the produt of their individual probabilities

    *ddition rule: o#bined probabilit9 of " #utuall9 eFlusive events is the su# of their

    individual probabilities

    pMH 01? p"M"pHMH" 0 1

    o7 to test 2:

    test 7hether observed !enot9pe nu#bers #ath eFpeted !enot9pe

    nu#bers(alulated fro# allele freHuenies)

    2 for#s the basis of #iroevolutionar9 studies

    it serves as a null #odel if a population does not onfor# to 2E 7e an loo+ at

    7hih assu#ptions are violated(i=e= 7hih evolutionar9 fores are atin!)

    pratial appliations in #ediine$ a!riulture$ forensis

    Evolutionar9 proesses

    utation and seFual reo#bination produe ne7 variation

    ,eletion$ drift$ and !ene Jo7 alter allele freHuenies in a population

    utation

    The ra7 #aterial of evolution

    a t7o ed!ed s7ordD #ost #utations are deleterious but a fe7 are beneIial and

    these provide the basis for evolutionar9 han!e

    inds of #utations

    1) Point #utation:

    sin!lebase substitutions aused b9 &N* pol9#erase errors in either &N*

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    11/33

    s9nthesis or &N* repair

    si+le ell ane#ia results fro# a sin!le point #utation

    1) nsertionsG&eletion(ndels):

    ndels an ause addition or loss of a#ino aids$ fra#eshifts$ or trunated

    proteins

    1) -ene dupliations

    &upliation of a short streth of &N*

    Caused b9 uneHual rossovers durin! #eiosis$ or strand slippa!e durin! &N*

    repliation

    &upliates #a9 either #aintain funtion$ !ain a ne7 funtion$ or lose

    funtion(pseudo!enes)

    -ene dupliation has !iven rise to variet9 of !ene fa#iliesD

    !ene fa#ilies are sets of !enes that have si#ilar &N* seHuene but var9 in

    o#position and funtions

    i=e= or!anis#s fro# bateria to hu#ans harbor a diverse fa#il9 of heat sho+

    proteins involved in foldin! and unfoldin! proteins$ transportin! proteins aross

    #e#branes and !eneral stress response

    1) Chro#oso#e inversions (results in ne7 !ene order: *6C&E3 *6E&C3

    ") Pol9ploidi8ation

    pol9ploid or!anis#s have #ore than " sets of hro#oso#es

    pol9ploid9 usuall9 ours bG of a failure in redution division at #eiosis 7hih

    results in a "n !a#ete=

    Pol9ploid9 an ause instant speiation

    7hen a #utant "n !a#ete fuses 7ith a nor#al 1n !a#ete$ the resultant %n

    o/sprin! is t9piall9 sterile due to proble#s at #eiosis

    if the #utant "n !a#ete is lu+9 enou!h to fuse 7ith another #utant "n

    !a#ete the resultant 4n o/sprin! is instantl9 reprodutivel9 isolated

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    12/33

    ,in!le #utations rarel9 produe si!niIant adaptive han!e= ost #utations are

    neutral or deleterious

    ,eF reshuXes the !ene pool

    1) rando# assort#ent of hro#oso#es

    7ith "% pairs of hro#oso#es hu#ans an produe B #illion o#binations of

    intat hro#oso#es

    1) Crossin! over 7ithin hro#oso#es

    2ith rossin! over$ a sin!le hu#an ouple is theoretiall9 apable of produin!

    #ore a nu#ber of o#binations !reater than the total nu#ber of people that

    have ever lived

    1) 3ertili8ation

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    13/33

    Leture S

    Chapter "% ,e= %4

    Natural ,eletion

    di/erential survival andGor reprodution results in ertain alleles bein! passed to the

    neFt !eneration in !reater proportions

    Rando# -eneti &rift

    han!es in allele freHuenies 7ithin populations 7hih result fro# hane variation

    in individual survival and reprodution

    #ost i#portant in s#all population

    an result in #aladaptive evolution

    ,a#plin! Error alters allele freHuenies in Inite population

    fro# ;

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    14/33

    -ene Jo7

    onsists of !eneti additions or subtrations fro# a population$ resultin! fro#

    #ove#ent of fertile individuals or !a#etes

    auses a population to !ain or lose alleles

    tends to redue di/erenes bet7een populations over ti#e

    Natural seletion is the pri#ar9 #ehanis# of adaptive evolution

    natural seletion au#ulates and #aintains favorable !enot9pes in a population

    depends on eFistene of heritable$ !eneti variation

    odes of ,eletion:

    ,tabili8in!

    &iretional

    &isruptive

    ,eFual:

    natural seletion for #atin! suess

    an result in seFual di#orphis#

    seFuall9 seleted traits #a9 be bad for survival

    Preservation of -eneti Qariation

    various #ehanis#s help to preserve !eneti variation in a population

    1) diploid9: #aintains !eneti variation in the for# of hidden reessive alleles

    ") balanin! seletion: ours 7hen natural seletion #aintains " or #ore for#s in

    pop=

    leads to a state alled balaned pol9#orphis#

    hetero89!ote advanta!e is one for# of balanin! seletion

    ne!ative freHuen9dependent seletion is another for# of balanin! seletion

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    15/33

    Natural seletion doesnt produe perfet or!anis#s

    i=e=) hu#ans have fondness for fats$ su!ar$ alohol$ tobao$ sloth? poorl9

    desi!ned +nees? ba+ proble#s? fra!ile e9es? helpless infants? useless appendiF

    Leture Z

    Chapter "4 ,e=1"

    *re speies realO

    speies are the funda#ental unit of or!ani8ation in nature

    'rnitholo!ist Ernst a9r identiIed 1%Z birds in Papua Ne7 -uinea

    Native Papuans alread9 had na#es for 1%S speies= There are about B=Z MG 1=%

    #illion ,E

    No sin!le speies onept an be applied in all situation

    1) #orpholo!ial: deInes a speies b9 strutural features

    ") eolo!ial: vie7s a speies in ter#s of its eolo!ial nihe

    %) ph9lo!eneti: deInes a speies as the s#allest !roup of individuals that share a

    o##on anestor

    4) biolo!ial: atuall9 or potentiall9 apable of interbreedin!

    6iolo!ial speies onept is #ost popular$ but does not 7or+ in all situations

    aseFual taFa

    fossils

    taFa not a#enable to breedin! studies

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    16/33

    No speies onept 7or+s in all situations

    #an9 speies have fe7 distin!uishin! #orpholo!ial haraters

    often have too little infor#ation to appl9 eolo!ial or ph9lo!eneti onepts

    fossils rarel9 distin!uish taFa do7n to the speies level

    T7o t9pes of reprodutive barriers

    1) Pre89!oti barriers i#pede #atin! or hinder fertili8ation if #atin! does our:

    *= habitat isolation(7ron! plae)

    " speies enounter eah other rarel9$ or not at all$ bG the9 oup9 di/erent

    habitats

    i=e= #arine i!uanas vs= land i!uana

    *= te#poral isolation(7ron! ti#e)

    speies that breed at di/erent ti#es of the da9$ di/erent seasons$ or di/erent 9ears

    annot #iF their !a#etes

    i=e= 1% vs 1Z 9ear iadas

    *= behavioral isolation(no attration)

    ourtship rituals and other behaviors uniHue to a speies are e/etive barriers

    i=e= La9san albatross ourtship

    *= #ehanial isolation(ant opulateGpollinate)

    #orpholo!ial di/erenes an prevent suessful #atin!

    i=e= anthers not positioned to put pollen on a bee$ but 7ill put pollen on a bird

    *= !a#eti isolation(ant fertili8e)

    sper# of one speies #a9 not be able to fertili8e e!!s of another speies

    i=e= #an9 broadast spa7nin! #arine invertebrates

    1) Post89!oti barriers prevent h9brid 89!ote fro# developin! into a viable$ fertile

    adult

    *= Redued h9brid viabilit9

    -enes of the di/erent parent speies #a9 interat and i#pair the h9brids

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    17/33

    develop#ent

    i=e= Rana pipiens F Rana s9lvatia h9brids do not survive #ore than a da9

    *= Redued h9brid fertilit9

    even if h9brids are vi!orous$ the9 #a9 be sterile due to proble#s at #eiosis

    i=e= Li!ers(#ales sterile)

    *= 9brid brea+do7n

    so#e Irst!eneration(31) h9brids are fertile$ but 7hen the9 #ate 7ith another 31

    h9brid or 7ith either parent speies$ o/sprin! of the neFt !eneration are feeble or

    sterile(i=e= the tidepool opepod Ti!riopus alifornius)

    odes of ,peiation

    1= *llopatri(allos0other$ patra0ho#eland)

    !ene Jo7 i#peded b9 ph9sial or !eo!raphi barrier

    seletion and drift lead to reprodutive isolation

    1= ,9#patri(s9#0sa#e$ patra0ho#eland)

    ta+es plae in !eo!raphiall9 overlappin! population

    an our throu!h hro#oso#e han!es or throu!h nonrando# #atin!

    nstant speiation throu!h pol9ploidi8ation

    pol9ploid9: eFtra sets of hro#oso#es due to aidents durin! ell division

    an autopol9ploid has #ore than " hro#oso#e sets$ all derived fro# one speies

    an allopol9ploid has hro#oso#es derived fro# " di/erent speies

    i=e= o/ee$ su!ar ane$ bread 7heat$ potatoes$ bananas$ peanuts$ apples

    ,9#patri speiation via #ehanis#s other than pol9ploid9 is #ore ontroversial

    ould our b9 s7ithes in habitat$ food preferene or #ate hoie

    debate ontinues over 7hether this is o##on$ and 7hether isolation an persist in

    the fae of !ene Jo7

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    18/33

    ,9#patri speiation in #a!!ot JiesO

    subset of U, populations s7ithed hosts fro# ha7thorn to apple [ "

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    19/33

    1) PUNCTU*TE& E5UL6RU not eFplained b9 &ar7inian theor9

    rebuttal: puntuations that appear abrupt in the fossil reord #a9 ta+e tens of

    thousands of 9ears

    periods of apparent stasis #a9 belie eFtensive biohe#ial han!es not detetable

    in the fossil reord

    sli!ht !eneti han!es #a9 result in #aWor phenot9pi han!es

    The evolution of !enes ontrollin! develop#ent(evodevo) is responsible for

    partiular lar!e phenot9pi han!es

    Chan!es in Rate and Ti#in!(eterohron9)

    nludes:

    han!es in the relative !ro7th rates of di/erent bod9 parts(allo#etr9)

    han!es in the ti#in! of reprodutive vs= so#ati develop#ent

    relativel9 rapid reprodutive !ro7th results in paedo#orphosis seFuall9

    #ature adults 7ith Wuvenile #orpholo!9

    *llo#atri !ro7th: di/erential !ro7th rates in di/erent bod9 parts

    han!es in allo#etri !ro7th lead to di/erenes in hu#an vs= hi#p adults

    Paedo#orphi pets

    relative to anestral 7olves do#estiated do!s have

    softer fur$ lar!er head.e9es$ droopier ears$ sub#issive behavior$ shorter

    #u88le

    Chan!es in ,patial Pattern

    alteration in !enes ontrollin! the plae#ent and or!ani8ation of bod9 parts ause

    #aWor evolutionar9 han!e

    ho#eoti !enes ontrol bod9 plans b9 ontrollin! the develop#ental fate of !roups

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    20/33

    of ells

    the produts of one lass of ho#eoti !enes$ alled oF !enes$ provide positional

    infor#ation in ani#al e#br9os

    han!es in oF !enes ontrolled evolution fro# Ish Ins to tetrapod li#bs

    dupliation of oF !enes a/eted the evolution of vertebrates fro# invertebrates

    oF !enes drove evolution of inset bod9 plans

    all#ar+s of aroevolution

    1) Evolution is not !oal oriented

    fossil reord often sho7s apparent trends

    i#portant to onsider not Wust the survivin! branh$ but the entire evolutionar9 bush

    the appearane of an evolutionar9 trend does not i#pl9 that there is so#e intrinsi

    drive to7ard a partiular phenot9pe

    1) Evolution &'E,NT eHual pro!ress fro# si#ple to o#pleF

    bG all or!anis#s evolved fro# a o##on anestor$ 7e all have as #an9 9ears of

    evolution behind us= ,o#e linea!es beo#e #ore o#pleF$ others beo#e si#pliIed

    Chi#ps are #ore hi!hl9 evolved than 7e areV

    1) Novel features often arise throu!h inter#ediate sta!es$ eah of 7hih serve a

    funtion(partial 7in!s an be adaptive)

    ") Evolution re9les features and puts the# to ne7 uses

    #an9 haraters evolved for purposes other than those for 7hih the9 are urrentl9

    used( 0DeFaptationD)

    feathers evolved for insulation$ oopted for Ji!ht

    protein used for ell adhesion in #ultiellular or!anis#s Irst evolved in sin!le

    elled hoano9tes

    1) Evolution leaves ba!!a!e behind

    appendiF(hu#an evolutionar9 ba!!a!e)

    trahea and esopha!us share openin!(leads to ho+in!)

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    21/33

    blind spot

    Leture >

    Chapter "S ,e 1% : Ph9lo!eneti ,9ste#atis

    Ph9lo!en9: evolutionar9 histor9 of a speies or !roup of related speies

    TaFono#9: siene of na#in! and lassif9in! or!anis#s

    ,9ste#atis: sientiI s9ste# for lassif9in! or!anis#s

    Ph9lo!eneti s9ste#atis: lassiIation of or!anis#s b9 their order of branhin! on

    an evolutionar9 tree

    'ldshool taFono#9

    developed b9 Carolus Linnaus in 1Bth entur9

    inludes " part for#at for sientiI na#es(bino#ial no#enlature) and hierarhial

    lassiIation s9ste#(e=!= in!don$ Ph9lu#$ Class$ 'rder$ 3a#il9$ -enus$ ,peies

    still in use toda9(althou!h &o#ain has been added as the #ost inlusive hierarhial

    ate!or9)

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    22/33

    TaFono#i tips

    DspeiesD is both the sin!ular and the plural for#

    D!enusD is sin!ular$ !eneraD is plural

    in a bino#ial na#e$ the Irst letter of the !enus(but not the speies) is apitali8ed$

    i=e= o#o sapiens

    the entire bino#ial is italii8ed or less o##onl9$ underlined

    'ldshool Linnaean ate!ories have been ritii8ed beause the9 dont al7a9s for#

    #onoph9leti !roups

    *= #onoph9leti

    6= paraph9leti

    C= pol9ph9leti

    Ph9loCode

    proposed lassiIation s9ste#

    onl9 #onoph9leti !roups 7ould be reo!ni8ed

    #ost speies na#es 7ould re#ain unhan!ed

    traditional taFono#i ran+s(fa#il9$order$lass===) 7ould no lon!er eFist

    o7 to read ph9lo!eneti tree

    node: branh point 7here linea!es diver!e

    sister taFa

    basal taFon

    pol9to#9: an unresolved pattern of diver!ene

    Ph9lo!enies are inferred fro# ho#olo!ous haraters not analo!ous haraters

  • 7/26/2019 Bisc120 Lecture 1-14

    23/33

    *nalo!ous strutures or #oleular seHuenes that evolved independentl9 are also

    alled ho#oplasies

    o7 are ph9lo!eneti trees onstrutedO

    *= Cladistis is one approah to reonstrutin! ph9lo!en9

    !roups speies into lades(anestor and all its desendants)

    fouses on shared$ derived haraters

    uses priniples of #aFi#u# parsi#on9 or #aFi#u# li+elihood

    *= 'ut!roup

    a speies or !roup of speies that is losel9 related to the !roup of speies bein!

    studied$ but learl9 not as related as an9 stud9 !roup #e#bers are to eah other

    = aFi#u# parsi#on9: the best tree reHuires the fe7est han!es

    evolution #a9 not be parsi#onious for an9 !iven harater

    = aFi#u# li+elihood is an alternative approah to reonstrutin! ph9lo!en9

    the bestD tree is the tree 7G the hi!hest li+elihood !iven ertain rules about ho7

    &N* han!es over ti#e

    #ore o#putationall9 intensive than #aFi#u# parsi#on9 apprahes

    Leture 1