BioStar SuperSix Trials Report 2019...• 4 Small Plot Research on Corn • 5 Field Trials • Corn...
Transcript of BioStar SuperSix Trials Report 2019...• 4 Small Plot Research on Corn • 5 Field Trials • Corn...
BioStar SuperSix Trials Report 2019
2
Introduction
• Agronomic Terms
• N Cycle
• 2019 Report• Scope• Trends• Trials• Conclusions
Corn• Applications
• In-Furrow• Side-Dress
• Growth Stages
3
Agronomic Terms
Wheat• Applications
• Foliar
• Growth Stages• Tillering• Flag Leaf• Boot
4
Agronomic Terms
Alfalfa• Cuttings
• Depending on location up to 4 a year, or more
• Different cuts have different feed values
5
Agronomic Terms
Trials• Treatments
• Different applications being tested
• Control• A treatment or non-treatment used to
set a base for the trial
• Check Strip• How a farmer leaves a control in the
field
6
Agronomic Terms
Treatment 1
Treatment 2
Control
Randomize
d
Replicate
Randomize
d
Replicate
• Organic Systems• No synthetic N
• Manure• Manure is not where crops are grown
• Mineralization• Doesn’t start until soil reaches ~55o F
7
Nitrogen Cycle
• Closing the loop
• Nutrient Capture• Ammonium and Potassium would leave
in effluent water • Pump onto local fields• Collect, concentrate, relocate
• Organic Fertilizer• 95% Ammoniacal N• Plant/Microbe available regardless of
soil temp• Contains natural secondary and trace
elements.• Contains natural humic and fulvic
substances
8
Nitrogen Cycle
9
Scope
• 11 Trials in 2019
• 9 Finished• 4 Small Plot Research on Corn• 5 Field Trials
• Corn• Wheat• Alfalfa
• 2 Incomplete• 1 Flooded• 1 Drought
10
Trends
• Positive results on all organic managed ground, or when product was combined with a biological inoculant on conventional ground
• Percent increase as opposed to a strict N/Bu ratio of increase
• Strong results with alfalfa and wheat
• Positive ROIs on all positive yielding trials
11
Trends - Yields
9.06
16.69
28.14
12
18
5.00
7.00
12.00
9.00
18.00
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Andersons 10 Gallons 5-0-5 Whitewater 14 Gallons 5-0-5 Whitewater 28 Gallons 5-0-5 Monticello 3-0-3 Gottenburg 22 Gallons 3-0-3
Corn Trial Results 2019
Increase in Bu Over Check % Increase Over Check
12
Trends - Yields
54.8
97.9104.9
142.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Control 5 Gallons West 5 Gallons East 10 Gallons
Bush
els
Treatment
Wheat Yield 2019 Trials
13
Trends - Yields
299
243
189
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Alfalfa 3-0-3 Foliar Alfalfa Control 1 Alfalfa Control 2
Gram
s
Treatment
Alfalfa Yield 2019 Trials
14
Trends - ROI
1.85
2.09
1.76
2.45
2.10
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
Andersons 10 Gallons 5-0-5 Whitewater 14 Gallons 5-0-5 Whitewater 28 Gallons 5-0-5 Monticello 3-0-3 Gottenburg 3-0-3
ROI
Treatment
Corn Trial Calculated ROI
15
Trends - ROI
44.00
71.96
143.92
44.00
77.0081.54
150.21
253.26
108
162
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
Andersons 10 Gallons 5-0-5 Whitewater 14 Gallons 5-0-5 Whitewater 28 Gallons 5-0-5 Monticello 3-0-3 Gottenburg 3-0-3
Dolla
rs
Treatment
Product Application Cost and Value of Increase
Product Application Cost Value of Bushel Increase
16
Trends - ROI
25.00
21.95
4.49
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Wheat 5 Gallon Wheat 10 Gallon Alfalfa
ROI
Treatment
Wheat and Alfalfa Trials Calculated ROI
17
Trends - ROI
22.00 44.00 45.00
550
965.8
202
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.00
Wheat 5 Gallon Wheat 10 Gallon Alfalfa
Dolla
rs
Treatment
Product Application Cost and Value of Increase
Product Application Cost Value of Crop/Acre Increase
18
Trials
• Corn• In furrow starter
• Formulation• Rate Trials
• Side-dress• Rate Trials
• Alfalfa• Foliar spray, proof of concept
• Wheat• Foliar spray, proof of concept
Agro-Research IntQLF• With and without biological inoculant
• Conventionally managed research farm
• 5-0-5 is SuperSix with a 15% inclusion rate of TerraFed
19
Trials - Corn
210.82213.21
215.45
227.51
238.96
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
CONTROL 5-0-5 7 GAL 5-0-5 14 GAL 5-0-5 7 GAL +STIMULAGRO + AGRO
GOLD
5-0-5 14 GAL +STIMULAGRO + AGRO
GOLDBu
shel
s /Ac
re
Treatment
Organic Corn Yield Agro Research Trial
The Andersons
• Same farm as the previous trial
• No biological inoculant
• 5-0-5 at 10 gallons per acre
• We are product 6
20
Trials - Corn
+14.16 +13.3 +13.01+11.14 +10.45 +9.06 +8.74 +7.98
+5.35+2.15 +1.95
182.21
-44.27
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -Manure
Only
13 - NoManure
Comparison of all research at Whitewater, WI
+14.16 +13.3 +13.01+11.14 +10.45 +9.06 +8.74 +7.98
+5.35+2.15 +1.95
182.21
-44.27
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 - M
anure
Only
13 - No M
anure
21
Trials - Corn
210.82213.21
215.45
227.51
238.96
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
CONTROL 5-0-5 7 GAL 5-0-5 14 GAL 5-0-5 7 GAL +STIMULAGRO +
AGRO GOLD
5-0-5 14 GAL +STIMULAGRO +
AGRO GOLD
Bush
els /
Acre
Treatment
Organic Corn Yield Agro Research Trial
Field Trials – Chad Kuhlman
• SuperSix added to a mixture of TerraFed, CX-1, Kelpak and Venerate
• SuperSix was ~50% of mixture when added
• Consistent with yield patterns from other trials
• Moisture levels were lower where SuperSix was included
22
Trials - Corn
97.56
103.79 105.11
115.67
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
11 G/Acre 11 G/Acre w/ SuperSix
22 G/Acre 22 G/Acre w/ SuperSix
Yiel
d in
bus
hels/
acre
Treatment
Yield
18.71 18.61
19.99
19.47
17.5
18
18.5
19
19.5
20
20.5
11 G/Acre 11 G/Acre w/ SuperSix
22 G/Acre 22 G/Acre w/ SuperSix
Perc
ent M
oist
ure
Treatment
Moisture Level
23
Trials - Corn
11 G/A w/o SS 11 G/A with SS 22 G/A with SS 22 G/A w/o SS
24
Trials - Corn
22 G/A 11 G/A
SD and Indiana In-Furrow
• SuperSix applied at stated rates in-furrow
• Stand suppression increases with higher rate applications
• Stand count does not change significantly with combination of SS and TF
25
Trials - Corn6.36
-5.51
-8.47
0.42
5.93
2.97
-10.00-8.00-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
Super Six5gal/A
Super Six 10gal/A
Super Six 15gal/A
SS + TF5gal/A
SS + TF10gal/A
SS + TF15gal/A
% C
hang
e in
Sta
nd C
ount
from
U
ntre
ated
Con
trol
Treatment
Percent Change in Stand Count, SD
-2.54
0.18
-12.32
-0.90
2.18
-1.27
-14.00-12.00-10.00
-8.00-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
Super Six5gal/A
Super Six 10gal/A
Super Six 15gal/A
SS + TF 5gal/A SS + TF10gal/A
SS + TF15gal/A
% C
hang
e in
Sta
nd C
ount
from
U
ntre
ated
Con
trol
Treatment
Percent Change in Stand Count, IN
QLF, Organic Valley
• 2nd year alfalfa following corn
• Foliar applied after 1st cut
• Combined 50/50 with TF and water
• Sample taken between 1st and 2nd
cutting of Alfalfa
26
Trials - Alfalfa
299
243
189
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Alfalfa 3-0-3 Foliar Alfalfa Control 1 Alfalfa Control 2
Gram
s
Treatment
Alfalfa Yield 2019 Trials
Chad Kuhlman
• 50/50 mixture TF and SS applied pre-boot at 5 gallons per acre
• One section of the field double applied for an application rate of 10 gallons per acre
• Reduction in moisture levels at harvest by 1-3 points
27
Trials - Wheat
Chad Kuhlman
• 50/50 mixture TF and SS applied pre-boot at 5 gallons per acre
• One section of the field double applied for an application rate of 10 gallons per acre
• Reduction in moisture levels at harvest by 1-3 points
28
Trials - Wheat
54.8
97.9104.9
142.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Control 5 Gallons West 5 Gallons East 10 Gallons
Bush
els
Treatment
Wheat Yield 2019 Trials
29
Trials - Wheat
Treated to the right of the red line.
Treated on left, untreated on right
30
Trials - Wheat
31
Interpreting Results
• Percent increase in yield as opposed to a bu/lbs of N bump
• Lack of response in conventionally managed fields
• Response beyond regular N usage efficiency
32
Interpreting Results – Percent Increase
• Percent increase in yield as opposed to a bu/lbs of N bump
5.00
7.00
12.00
9.00
18.00
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
Andersons 10 Gallons5-0-5
Whitewater 14Gallons 5-0-5
Whitewater 28Gallons 5-0-5
Monticello 3-0-3 Gottenburg 22Gallons 3-0-3
Corn Trial Results 2019
% Increase Over Check
33
Interpreting Results – Conventional Fields
• Lack of response in conventionally managed fields
201.70 189.90 183.50 191.00 198.40 196.10 195.80
132.10
0.00
50.00
100.00
150.00
200.00
250.00
Untreated Product 15gal/A
Product 1 10gal/A
Product 1 15gal/A
Product 25gal/A
Product 210gal/A
Product 215gal/A
No Nitrogen
Bu/A
cre
Treatment
Yield ABG South Dakota
34
Interpreting Results – Conventional Fields
• Lack of response in conventionally managed fields
210.82213.21
215.45
227.51
238.96
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
240
245
CONTROL 5-0-5 7 GAL 5-0-5 14 GAL 5-0-5 7 GAL +STIMULAGRO + AGRO
GOLD
5-0-5 14 GAL +STIMULAGRO + AGRO
GOLD
Bush
els /
Acre
Treatment
Organic Corn Yield Agro Research Trial
35
Interpreting Results – Nitrogen Efficiency
• Response beyond regular N usage efficiency
Treatment Total N Applied in lbs/A Increase over Control in Bu/A N Use Efficiency
5-0-5 7 Gal 3.15 2.39 75.87%
5-0-5 14 Gal 6.3 4.63 73.49%
5-0-5 7 Gal w/BI 3.15 16.69 529.84%
5-0-5 14 Gal w/BI 6.3 28.14 446.67%
36
Interpreting Results – Nitrogen Efficiency
• Cost of Fertility
Fertilizer Cost Application in Study Cost
Chicken Manure $100/Ton 2 Ton/Acre $200
5-0-5 $5.14/G 14G/Acre $71.96
Total $271.96
Yield in Bu/Acre $/Bu $/Acre Value
215 $9 Gross $1,935
Net $1,663.04
37
Conclusion
• Positive results across multiple crop types.
• Appears to be boosting the entire system plant soil system.
• Strong returns to farmers.
• Used to inform 2020 trials.• Rice• Corn• Wheat• Barley• Broccoli• Spinach• Baby Greens• Kale• Brussel Sprouts• Hemp• Celery
Leading a global transition to cost effective renewables
creating a sustainable earth.
BioStar Renewables, LLC9400 Reeds Road, Suite 150
Overland Park, KS 66207(913) 369-4100
www.biostarrenewables.com©2020
The information contained in this document is proprietary and strictly confidential. We are providing you with this information for preliminary review purposes only and the information contained in this presentation is subject to change. No money or other consideration is being solicited and no units are being offered to you at this time. Although we believe that expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance they will be achieved. There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein.