BioMed Central PowerPoint presentation title goes here · Publication models and open access Liz...
Transcript of BioMed Central PowerPoint presentation title goes here · Publication models and open access Liz...
Publication models and open access
Liz Hoffman, Journal Development Manager, BioMed Central
Diana Marshall, Publisher, BMC-series journals
19.05.2017
#BMCHSGweb
1
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Housekeeping Rules
To keep the technical process simple, we will not be using webcams for this session;
Please keep your microphones “Muted” while listening to a presenter to avoid background noise during the session;
Please submit your questions and comments through the Questions Box at the bottom of the GoToWebinar control panel. You can submit questions at any point during the webinar and there will be two answer sessions;
Panelists/presenters will collect all questions submitted by you during the session;
In case you did not get answer on your question during the live session, panelists will get back to you later via email;
In case of technical problems, please write to [email protected];
For other support, please contact [email protected];
Please complete the post-webinar survey
2
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Health Systems Global
HSG is a unique organization driven by a diverse, global membership of researchers, decision-makers and implementers who are dedicated to promoting health systems research and knowledge translation.
HSG now has over 1500 members from 96 countries.
http://healthsystemsglobal.org/
BioMed Central
For over 16 years, BioMed Central has been making scientific research freely accessible and discoverable through partnerships, innovation and collaboration with the scientific community. Dedicated to open research, we now publish over 290 quality peer-reviewed journals including BMC Health Services Research, which is affiliated with Health Systems Global.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/
3
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Updating image
To update the background image, click on the picture placeholder icon
1. Windows Explorer or Finder will open
2. Find your required image and click ‘Insert’
3. When cover image inserted, right-click in the grey area directly below this text box and select ‘Reset slide’
NOTE:
If an image is already in place and you want to change it:
1. Select the image, and hit your delete key
2. Follow steps 1-4 above
Diana Marshall
Publisher, BMC-series journals
Liz Hoffman
Journal Development Manager for the health services research journals at BioMed Central.
Hilary Logan
Editor for BMC Health Services Research and BMC Nursing
4
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Overview
1 Publishing models and what authors need to know
2 Open science and open data
3 Models of peer review
4 Innovations and looking ahead
#BMCHSGweb
5
1.0
Publishing models and what authors need to know
6
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
In many cases may not affect the decision on where you publish…
…but the model of the journal could impact:
• Whether you have to pay costs for publication and how much
• The future accessibility of your work
• How your work can be re-used (including by you)
Publishing models: why should authors care?
7
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Subscription
• Readers pay to access content
• Authors may still pay some publication charges
• Rights in the article, or licences, transferred from the researcher to the publisher
• Re-use limited by copyright and permissions
Open access (OA)
• Content is freely available to readers
• Authors pay an article processing charge for publication
• Author retains rights, publisher is licenced to publish the work
• Work is available for re-use for any purpose (depending on licence)
• Often called ‘gold’ open access
Hybrid
• Journal which publishes primarily subscription content offers an open access option
• Author may choose to pay an article processing charge in order for the work to be open access
Three broad journal models
8
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
9
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Institutions and funding agencies: “We already expect that our faculty and grantees share their ideas and discoveries through publication. This mission is only half-complete if the work is not made as widely available and as useful to society as possible.”
Libraries and publishers: “…works reporting the results of current scientific research should be as openly accessible and freely useable as possible.”
Scientists and scientific societies: “Electronic publication of research results offers the opportunity and the obligation to share results, ideas and discoveries freely with the scientific community and the public.”
Bethesda statement 2003
10
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
The different types of open access
• Self-archiving of content by the author, usually in a repository or pre-print – may be subject to embargoes
Green
• Open access provided at the journal as the model of publication – author pays an article processing charge
Gold
• Open access provided at the journal – article is both free to read and free to publish
Diamond
11
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Creative Commons licenses
Attribution CC BY Anyone can distribute, remix and build upon your work, even commercially, as long as they credit you for the original creation. Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA Anyone can remix, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms.
Attribution-NoDerivs CC BY-ND This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to you. Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC This license lets others remix and build upon your work non-commercially.
12
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
13
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Who pays?
35% 46%
24%
19%
8%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Agriculture andForestry
Business andEconomics
Chemistry, EarthSciences, Physics,and Astronomy
Education, SocialSciences, Law, and
Political Science
Health Sciences,Biology, and Life
Sciences
Technology,Engineering,
Mathematic andStatistics,
Computer Science
Other
Fee waived
Personal funds
Discretionary funds(institutional)
Institutional funding (OApolicy)
National funding (OA policy)
Grant or contract
Solomon, D. J. and Björk, B.-C. (2012),
Publication fees in open access
publishing:
Sources of funding and factors
influencing choice of journal.
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 63: 98–107.
doi: 10.1002/asi.21660
14
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Public access policies: funders
15
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Marks of quality for journals:
• Named Editors and Editorial Board Members
• Clear ownership
• Thorough peer-review policies
• Inclusion in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
• Members of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA)
• More information also available at Think Check Submit
Who can you trust?
16
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
17
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association
• Promotes best practices for maintaining and disseminating OA scholarly communications, and ethical standards of publishing
• Members meet strict criteria relating to integrity and commitment to open access publishing
• Members must also be members of COPE
• http://oaspa.org/
18
2.0
Open science and open data
19
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
What is open science?
By Andreas E. Neuhold - Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=33542838
20
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
What does open science look like in practice?
IDEAS – HYPOTHESES – EXPERIMENTS – DATA ANALYSIS - COMPREHENSION - DISSEMINATION
Authoring
Tools Lab
Notebooks
Software Analysis
Tools
Visualization
Scholarly
Communication
Diagram loosely based on “A few overarching thoughts on digital publishing and how you can participate” by P Bourne http://www.slideshare.net/pebourne/ismb2013
21
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Enable reproducibility
• Accelerate scientific progress
• Give researchers more credit
• Get more citations
…but remember to be careful with any individual patient data
Why share data?
Roche DG, Lanfear R, Binning SA, Haff TM, Schwanz LE, et al. (2014) Troubleshooting Public Data Archiving: Suggestions to Increase Participation. PLoS Biol 12(1): e1001779. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001779
22
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB (2007) PLoS ONE 2(3): e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308
Sharing gets you cited
23
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
http://www.springernature.com/gp/group/data-policy/repositories#c10106444
Not sure how to share data?
24
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Get seen
• Meet funder requirements
• Increase citations to your work1
• Spurs collaboration, a common aspect of most high-impact research2
• Show your research is robust3
• Accelerate speed of research
• Speed up peer review time of your manuscript
• Public benefits
Why be open?
1. Piwowar HA, Day RS, Fridsma DB (2007) Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate. PLoS ONE 2(3): e308. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000308 2. Figg, W. D., Dunn, L., Liewehr, D. J., Steinberg, S. M., Thurman, P. W., Barrett, J. C. and Birkinshaw, J. (2006), Scientific Collaboration Results in Higher Citation Rates of Published Articles. Pharmacotherapy, 26: 759–767. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.6.759; Frenken, K., Ponds, R. and Van Oort, F. (2010), The citation impact of research collaboration in science-based industries: A spatial-institutional analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 89: 351–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00309.x 3. Wicherts JM, Bakker M, Molenaar D (2011) Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results. PLoS ONE 6(11): e26828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026828
25
Questions so far…
26
3.0
Models of peer review
27
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Models of peer review
• Authors do not know who reviewers are
• Readers do not know who reviewed the paper
• Reviewers know who the authors are
• Same as single-blind AND reviewers do not know the authors are
• Authors know who reviewers are
• Readers know who reviewed the paper
• Reviewers know who the authors are
28
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Anonymity of authors as well as reviewers could level field for women and minorities in science (Daniel Cressey, Nature, 2014 doi:10.1038/nature.2014.15564)
• Removes the opportunity for subconscious bias
• Poll in our last webinar over 60% of participants preferred double-blind peer review over single-blind or open
… but can reviewers still guess who the authors are?
Benefits of double blind peer review
29
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Open peer review
30
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Open peer review at BioMed Central
31
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Open peer review provides credit for reviewers
32
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Asking reviewers to consent to the author being informed of their identity had no effect on quality of review or their recommendation (van Rooyen et al. 1999, BMJ 1999;318:23–7)
• Telling reviewers their signed report may be available online did not affect review quality (van Rooyen et al. 2010, BMJ 2010;341:c5729)
Increases transparency and accountability
• Reviewers get credit
• Reviewers more accountable – their name is on the report
• Editors also more accountable – decisions not behind closed doors
• Can be used to train new peer reviewers
Open peer review model reports provide
• Better comments on study design
• Improved supplying of information to substantiate comment
• More constructive reports (Kowalczuk et al. 2015, BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008707)
Benefits of open peer review
33
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Which do you think is the best of the three models of peer review which were just described?
• Single-blind
• Double-blind
• Open
Poll question
34
4.0
Innovations and looking ahead
35
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Criticisms of peer review – targets for innovation
36
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
eLife and Frontiers journals enable reviewers to discuss the manuscript among themselves before communicating a unified decision to the authors
Collaborative peer review
37
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Peerage of Science:
• Peer review of peer review – reports are scored by other reviewers in terms of their quality
Publons:
• Reviewers can record, showcase and verify their peer review activity
• BMC Health Services Research has a systems integration with Publons so that this process is easier for the reviewer
Reviewer credit
38
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• With reviewer agreement, reviewers’ reports may be transferred if an article is rejected and transfer recommended
Portable peer review
39
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Portable/ decoupled peer review
• Authors submit manuscript to Peerage of Science, before submitting to any journal
• Submitting Author decides the deadlines for every stage of the process
• Once submitted, any qualified, non-affiliated Peer can engage to review the manuscript
• Peer reviews are themselves peer reviewed, increasing and quantifying the quality of peer review
• The peer review process is available concurrently to all subscribing journals, with automated event tracking
40
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Usually in addition to usual peer review process
• Comments
• Social media
F1000 Research
• Only conducts post publication peer review
• Article status summary
Post publication peer review
41
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Pilot at BMC Psychology
• Addresses the problem of reviewers and editors judging studies more harshly if they report a negative result
• Encourages detailed assessment of the methods and rationale
Results-free peer review
Review of manuscript
without results and discussion
Decision – reject or accept in
principle
If acceptance then results and discussion added
Review of complete
manuscript Final decision
42
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Stat Reviewer – developed by Tim Houle and Chadwick DeVoss
• Tool developed using machine learning techniques
• Can check for adherence of manuscripts to common reporting guidelines CONSORT, STROBE, STARD, ARRIVE
• Produces a report for authors to highlight missing information
Artificial intelligence: a peerless review?
43
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Which innovation in the process of doing peer review interests you most?
• Collaborative peer review
• Portable/ decoupled peer review
• Post-publication peer review
• Results-free peer review
• Automated peer review using artificial intelligence
Poll question
44
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
What other kinds of innovations are happening?
Innovations
New metrics
Public involvement
Artificial intelligence
45
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
46
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Research ideas
Study proposal
Methodology
Ethical approval Communication materials
Peer Review
Dissemination/ Lay summaries How?
Building public input into research
47
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Crowdsourcing/citizen science
• Patient/public perspectives in clinical practice guidelines
• Patient/public peer reviewers (Research Involvement and Engagement/BMJ)
• Lay summaries
• Commenting on research proposals/applications
• Co-applicants on a research projects
• Involvement in identifying research priorities
• Helping inform the design of data collection tools, for example, piloting a questionnaire
• As members of a project advisory or steering group
Public involvement: what is happening now?
48
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
Artificial intelligence: suggesting the next step?
49
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
• Webinar 4, 9th June: Research and publication ethics Presented by Stephanie Boughton, Medical Editor, Research Integrity Group at BioMed Central.
• Webinar 5, 23rd June: Being a peer reviewer – guidance and how to approach your first review Presented by Hilary Logan, Editor for BMC Health Services Research and academic editors from BioMed Central journals.
Future webinars
50
Webinar 3: Publication models and open access #BMCHSGweb
Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates may not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to check and manually update other slides
50 Updating footer To update the footer: • Click into the text box on the slide
master page and update the information
Checking updates • The text updates will not flow
through to all the slide layouts as some have been placed manually. Therefore you may need to manually update other text boxes such as the divider slides etc
Thank you – and more questions #BMCHSGweb @DrDiMarshall @LizHoffmanbmc @tallscientist