BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 8- Part I Adaptation.
-
Upload
amice-bishop -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
Transcript of BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 8- Part I Adaptation.
What is adaptation?
1. Acclimatization
• refers to the physiological adjustment of individual organisms to different conditions (e.g., temperature, photoperiod). NO genetic change.
What is adaptation?
1. Acclimatization
• refers to the physiological adjustment of individual organisms to different conditions (e.g., temperature, photoperiod). NO genetic change.
What is adaptation?
1. Acclimatization
• refers to the physiological adjustment of individual organisms to different conditions (e.g., temperature, photoperiod). NO genetic change.
2. Adaptation
What is adaptation?
1. Acclimatization
• refers to the physiological adjustment of individual organisms to different conditions (e.g., temperature, photoperiod). NO genetic change.
2. Adaptation• a trait that allows an individual to leave more offspring than it would if it lacked that trait
What is adaptation?
1. Acclimatization
• refers to the physiological adjustment of individual organisms to different conditions (e.g., temperature, photoperiod). NO genetic change.
2. Adaptation• a trait that allows an individual to leave more offspring than it would if it lacked that trait
-Adaptations can be structural, behavioral or physiological.
How do we study adaptations?
There are three steps in carrying out the so-called “adaptationist program”:
1. Observe or describe some organismal trait.2. Formulate an adaptive hypothesis for the
evolution of that trait.3. Test hypothesis by experiment or by
collecting additional data.
How do we study adaptations?
1. The experimental approach
• hypotheses for the adaptive origins of traits are tested by experiments.
How do we study adaptations?
1. The experimental approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins of traits are tested by experiments. 2. The observational approach
How do we study adaptations?
1. The experimental approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins of traits are tested by experiments. 2. The observational approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins or traits are tested by making observations within species
How do we study adaptations?
1. The experimental approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins of traits are tested by experiments. 2. The observational approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins or traits are tested by making observations within species
3. The comparative approach
How do we study adaptations?
1. The experimental approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins of traits are tested by experiments. 2. The observational approach• hypotheses for the adaptive origins or traits are tested by making observations within species
3. The comparative approach • hypotheses for the adaptive origins or traits are tested by performing comparisons among species
The experimental approachStaring down your enemy…
Example: the tephritid fly, Zonosemata vittigera
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjUlPJk6rsU
The experimental approach
Example: the tephritid fly, Zonosemata vittigera
Initial observations:
1. distinctive dark wing bands
The experimental approach
Example: the tephritid fly, Zonosemata vittigera
Initial observations:
1. distinctive dark wing bands
2. wing-waving behavior
The experimental approach
Example: the tephritid fly, Zonosemata vittigera
Initial observations:
1. distinctive dark wing bands
2. wing-waving behavior
Initial hypothesis:
• markings and behavior mimics jumping spiders thus deterring other predators.
The experimental approach
Example: the tephritid fly, Zonosemata vittigera
Initial observations:
1. distinctive dark wing bands
2. wing-waving behavior
Initial hypothesis:
• markings and behavior mimics jumping spiders thus deterring other predators.
Alternative hypothesis:
• markings and behavior mimics jumping spiders to deter predation by jumping spiders.
The experimental approach
Question:
Do the traits actually mimic the threat display of the jumping spider thereby allowing the fly to escape predation?
The experimental approach
Question:
Do the traits actually mimic the threat display of the jumping spider thereby allowing the fly to escape predation?
Hypotheses:
The experimental approach
Question:
Do the traits actually mimic the threat display of the jumping spider thereby allowing the fly to escape predation?
Hypotheses:
HO: Flies do not mimic jumping spiders (null hypothesis).
The experimental approach
Question:
Do the traits actually mimic the threat display of the jumping spider thereby allowing the fly to escape predation?
Hypotheses:
HO: Flies do not mimic jumping spiders (null hypothesis).
H1: Flies mimic jumping spiders to avoid other predators.
The experimental approach
Question:
Do the traits actually mimic the threat display of the jumping spider thereby allowing the fly to escape predation?
Hypotheses:
HO: Flies do not mimic jumping spiders (null hypothesis).
H1: Flies mimic jumping spiders to avoid other predators.
H2: Flies mimic jumping spiders to avoid predation by jumping spiders.
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Observation: Polar bears are white!
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Observation: Polar bears are white!
Hypothesis: Polar bears evolved a white coat as an adaptation to hunting in a white environment
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Observation: Polar bears are white!
Hypothesis: Polar bears evolved a white coat as an adaptation to hunting in a white environment
Prediction: Polar bears should hunt in a manner that takes advantage of this camouflage
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Stirling (1974) described the hunting strategies of 288 polar bears:
“sneak and pounce” “jump and crush” “sit and wait”
The obseravtional approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Stirling (1974) described the hunting strategies of 288 polar bears:
1 “sneak and pounce”
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Stirling (1974) described the hunting strategies of 288 polar bears:
1 “sneak and pounce” 54 “jump and crush”
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Stirling (1974) described the hunting strategies of 288 polar bears:
1 “sneak and pounce” 54 “jump and crush” 233 “sit and wait”
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Stirling (1974) described the hunting strategies of 288 polar bears:
1 “sneak and pounce” 54 “jump and crush” 233 “sit and wait”
Why then are polar bears white?
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Observation: polar bears are black when photographed under UV light (i.e., the coat absorbs UV light)
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Observation: polar bears are black when photographed under UV light (i.e., the coat absorbs UV light)
Hypothesis: Polar bears evolved a white coat to serve as a “solar heat collector”
The observational approach
Making observations within species – the polar bear
Observation: polar bears are black when photographed under UV light (i.e., the coat absorbs UV light)
Hypothesis: Polar bears evolved a white coat to serve as a “solar heat collector”
How could this be tested?
The comparative approach
Performing comparisons among species
Observation: Testes size is highly variable among species.
The comparative approach
Performing comparisons among species
Observation: Testes size is highly variable among species.
Hypothesis: Males have evolved large testes in some taxa due to sperm competition.
The comparative approach
Performing comparisons among species
Observation: Testes size is highly variable among species.
Hypothesis: Males have evolved large testes in some taxa due to sperm competition.
Prediction: A positive relationship should exist between testes size and social group size.
The comparative approach
Performing comparisons among species
Observation: Testes size is highly variable among species.
Hypothesis: Males have evolved large testes in some taxa due to sperm competition.
Prediction: A positive relationship should exist between testes size and social group size.
(Assuming that sperm competition is more intense in larger social groups.)
Adaptation Reminders
• Polar bear example= Must be careful in carrying out the adaptations program.
• Cannot just accept a hypothesis because it is plausible.
Adaptation Reminders
• Polar bear example= Must be careful in carrying out the adaptations program.
• Cannot just accept a hypothesis because it is plausible.
• Have to test alternative explanations
Adaptation Reminders
• Polar bear example= Must be careful in carrying out the adaptations program.
• Cannot just accept a hypothesis because it is plausible.
• Have to test alternative explanations• Differences among species are not always
adaptive!
Adaptation Reminders
• Polar bear example= Must be careful in carrying out the adaptations program.
• Cannot just accept a hypothesis because it is plausible.
• Have to test alternative explanations• Differences among species are not always
adaptive • Not every adaptation is perfect
Adaptation Reminders
• Polar bear example= Must be careful in carrying out the adaptations program.
• Cannot just accept a hypothesis because it is plausible.
• Have to test alternative explanations• Differences among species are not always
adaptive • Not every adaptation is perfect• Not every trait of an organism is adaptive.
Adaptation questions:
• If a trait is not an adaptive trait how can it persist?
• Why certain populations (or species) do not possess certain traits that might be obviously advantageous for them in the given/ changing environment?
• If a trait is adaptive, is it always adaptive? Is the organism stuck with the trait forever?