14202104 ELSON JENA                   14202108 ALIYA SIZRA                   14202116 AKASMIKA BISWAL                   14202114 SAURAV MISHRA                   14202100 DIVYASHREE BHARATI                   14202118 PURNENDRA SHRIVASTAVA

THE STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF BIOCON

Case study review

THANKYOU…

Conclusion1. Organisation structure changes from time to time. Even if we consider

The case of Biocon, it’s structure also changed since the day of it’s establishment.

2. When Biocon was first established in India, it had a very Simple structure whose

Key part was the Strategic Apex. Formalization was Low, Complexity was low but Centralization was high

3. Biocon Opened it’s Subsidiaries Syngene in 1994 and Clinigene in 2000.Currently it has a Divisional Bureaucracy where Middle Line is the Key Part. Formalization has become high as well as the

Complexity.But Due to Middle line it has limited horizontal decentralization. It is highly functional.

4.Biocon is also having Adhocracy were the key part is the Support Staff in which 40% are holding a Master’s degree & 5% are holding a post doctoral degree with basic focus on R&D.

Question

Q.1)The evaluation of this organization and its thirty-year journey makes one wonder how the corporate and organizational structure will look by2015?

Answer

Q.2) Will kiran’s organization continue to be effective in the long run?

Answer

Conclusion