BINP Tau-Charm Project
description
Transcript of BINP Tau-Charm Project
1
BINP Tau-Charm Project
3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba
E.Levichev
For the BINP C-Tau team
2
Outline
1. Introduction of Crab Waist collision approach2. Scientific program and specifications3. Optics4. FF and QD05. Polarization insertions6. Energy calibration
3
Crabbed waist is realized with a sextupole inphase with the I P in X and at / 2 in Y
2z
2x
z
x
2x/
2z*
e-e+Y
1. Large Piwinski’s angle = tg(z/x
2. Vertical beta comparable with overlap area y x/
3. Crab waist transformation y = xy’/(2)
Crab Waist in 3 Steps
1. P.Raimondi, 2° SuperB Workshop, March 2006
2. P.Raimondi, D.Shatilov, M.Zobov, physics/0702033
M.Zobov, Tau08, Novosibirsk
4
x
y 2
x
y 2
Crabbed Waist Scheme
x
x
yy
K
*
*
1
2
1
Sextupole (Anti)sextupole
20 2
1yxpHH
Sextupole strength Equivalent Hamiltonian
IPyx , yx ,** ,
yx
*
2* /
yyy
xs
M.Zobov, Tau08, Novosibirsk
5
Collisions with and without Crab Sextupoles
1. Bigger blowup
2. Sharp lifetime reduction for bunch currents > 8 -10 mA
February
2009
Courtesy G. Mazzitelli
6
Frequency Map Analysis for CW
7
Scientific case for the BINP C-tau project
► D-Dbar mixing► CP violation searches in charm decays► Rare and forbidden charm decays► Standard Model tests in leptons decays► Searches for lepton flavor violation →► CP/T violation searches in leptons decays► Production of the polarized anti-nucleons E = 1 GeV (may be with reduced luminosity)
Requirements: L > 1034 cm-2 s-1, longitudinal polarization, beam energy range from 1 GeV to 2.5 GeV
8
Specifications
► Variable energy Ecm= 2 – 5 GeV
► Luminosity L = 1÷2×1035 cm-2s-1
► Electrons are polarized longitudinally at IP
► No energy asymmetry
► No beam monochromatization
► Energy calibration with medium accuracy
is sufficient (Compton backscattering)
9
Facility key features and principles
► Two rings with a single interaction point► Crab waist collision► SC wigglers to keep the same damping and emittance in the whole energy range (optimal luminosity)► Polarized e- injector and spin control to get the longitudinally polarized electron beam at IP► Wide re-using of the existing structures and facilities tosave the cost
10
Layout
Injection facility exists
Tunnel for the linac and the technical straight section of the factory is ready
11
Main ring
12
Main ring: tunnelReady-built tunnel FF region
Technical reg. (RF and injection)
Damping wiggler sections
13
Main accelerator parameters
6 m of the SC wigglers with 20-cm-period are used to control the beam parameters at different energies
Energy 1.0 GeV 1.5 GeV 2.0 GeV 2.5 GeV
Circumference 783 m
Emittance hor/ver 10 nm/0.05 nm @ 0.5% coupling
Damping time hor/ver/long 30/30/15 ms
Bunch length 20 mm 13 mm 10 mm 10 mm
Energy spread 10.5·10-4 10.4·10-4 8.8·10-4 7.6·10-4
Energy loss/turn 174 keV 261 keV 349 keV 430 keV
Momentum compaction 1.00·10-3 1.06·10-3 1.06·10-3 1.06·10-3
Synchrotron tune 0.013 0.014 0.012 0.010
Wiggler field 5.4 T 4.0 T 2.8 T 0
RF frequency 500 MHz
Harmonic number 1260
Particles/bunch 7·1010
Number of bunches 294
Bunch current 4.3 mA
Total beam current 1.3 A
Beam-beam parameter 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.12
Luminosity 0.55·1035 0.81·1035 1.08·1035 1.08·1035
14
Main ring: arc cellFODO but close to the theoretical minimum emittance
x, y
15
Main ring: injection section
x, y
16
IR optics
L1/2 = 75 m
x, y
IP
FF telescope
Y Section of chroms correction
X Section of chroms correction
Crab Sext
End of the telescope
17
Luminosity D.Shatilov
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
Crab ON: ξy=0.13
Lbeam=2.76·1032 @ Np=7·1010
Lmax=1.05·1035 @ Nb=380
Crab OFF: ξy=0.06
Lbeam=4.94·1031 @ Np=3·1010
Lmax=0.44·1035 @ Nb=890
y=750 um, Θ=50, mrad, σz=1cm, x=10 nm·rad, 0.5% coupling
18
Polarization scheme
IP
snake1
snake2 snake3
dampingwiggler1
dampingwiggler2
Polarization scheme with 3 snakes (arc=1200
+2 damping wigglers in the arc’s middle )
19
Polarization vs energy
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.60
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Beam Energy, GeV
Po
lari
zati
on
Deg
ree
5 snakes
1 snake
3 snakes
20
QD0
SC iron yoke twin aperture magnet Excitation current 1150 ASingle aperture 2 cmGradient 150 T/m
21
Damping wigglers
Field amplitude at 1.0 GeV 5.4 T
Period length 0.2 m
Total length 8 m
Damping integral i2 at 1.0 GeV 12.4 m-1
Excitation integral i5 at 1.0 GeV 0.08 m-1
The damping wigglers keep the damping time x =30 ms and thehorizontal emittance (εx=10 nm) in the energy range 1.0 – 2.5 GeV
Wiggler field amplitude vs energy
Wiggler with similar parameters produced by BINP
22
Energy calibration
Compton backscattering Ecalibration (~10-410-5)
Spectrum edge 5105 E
E
Na24 (1)=1368.625 keV Na24 (2)=2754.008 keV
Na24 (1+2)=4122.633 keV
23
Injection facility
24
Injection facility upgrade
• Today:• 21010 e-/pulse (1.5% conversion) 3 108
e+/pulse 50 Hz = 1.51010 e+/s
• Upgrade:• e- current increase ( 3)• Better focusing in positron linac ( 1.5)• Debuncher usage ( 2)• = 1.351011 e+/s
• Reserve: electron energy can be increased by 100 MeV ( 1.3)
25
Summary
► Crab Waist collision seems a very promising idea to enhance a circular colliders luminosity beyond the present value by factor of 10-100 without current increase.
► CW approach was successfully proved experimentally at DAFNE in the end of 2008
► Novosibirsk SuperCT project is under way. The key issues like IR design, DA optimization, polarization scheme, QD0 design, etc. seem solved successfully
► In 2010 we hope to finish a CDR and in parallel apply for funding to Russian Government.