Binder9 - Greenville County Redevelopment Authority · 2017 CAPER Greenville County Consolidated...

2017 CAPER

Greenville County

Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report

Program Year 2017

July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018

Prepared by Greenville County Redevelopment Authority

CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes

Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. 91.520(a) This could be an overview that includes major initiatives and highlights that were proposed and executed throughout the program year.

As the administrator of HUD entitlements for the Greenville County, the Greenville County Redevelopment Authority (GCRA) expended a total

of $ 4,430,648.17 of its CDBG, HOME and ESG funds to implement fiscal year 2017 programs and projects in the County’s unincorporated areas

and five participating municipalities: Greer, Simpsonville, Mauldin, Travelers Rest, and Fountain Inn . The funding expenditure breakdown

consists of $ 2,904,403.69 in CDBG; $1,336,416.59 in HOME and $ 189,827.89 in ESG fund. The FY 2017 Community Development Financial

Summary (PR-26) report indicates that a total 95.97 % of the Greenville County’s CDBG fund was used to directly benefit low and moderate

income households in the County for the reporting year, of which 8.40 % of the fund was used for public service activities and 18.51 % was used

on planning and administrative actives. The County's CDBG expenditure are in in compliance with the statutory requirement for fund.

Additionally, the County’s HOME and ESG funds were used to benefit low and moderate income households and individuals. Approximately

forty-four (47%) of the ESG fund was used to address shelter and outreach activities and 7.5% was expended on administration. All of the ESG

subreipients' funds were matched at a ratio of 1:1 with Private and Greenville County general fund dollars.

The following are highlights of priority area accomplishments and progress towards planned goals:

The County accomplished 72% of its annual housing goal by completing 142 of 196 units projected. The affordable housing units are provided

via new construction of homeownership and rental units, rehabilitation for homeownership and rental opportunities, owner-occupied

rehabilitation, home repairs for seniors or persons living with disabilities, direct financial assistance as downpayment or closing cost for First

Time Homebuyers towards the purchase of their homes and tenant rental assistance for families or individuals at risk of homelessness or

literally homeless. The County continues to far exceed the required HOME Match obligation. The County’s HOME Match liability for FY 2017

is $209,462.58. However, the County’s HOME match contribution reported for FY 2017 is $463,165. This exceeds FY 2017 obligation by

$253,702.42

The County in coordination with its CoC partners assisted a total of 2,827 persons with its ESG program for shelter, outreach, HMIS and HPRP. A

total of 54 households were assisted with Prevention and Rehousing (HPRP), consisting of a total of 124 persons.

Special Needs: The County assisted 38 seniors and persons living with disabilities with emergency home repairs. The Engineering and permitting

has been completed for infrastructure projects in Simpsonville (Woodside area), Fountain Inn (Rosemary Street in Sanctified Hill in Fountain Inn

and facility improvement project - ADA Facility improvement project for the Mauldin Senior Center.

1

Economic Development: Two Business loans were provided to 2 small businesses owners in the City of Greer and City of Fountain Inn.

Additionally, three businesses were provided with façade funding.

Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan and

explain, if applicable, why progress was not made toward meeting goals and objectives. 91.520(g) Categories, priority levels, funding sources and amounts, outcomes/objectives, goal outcome indicators, units of measure, targets, actual

outcomes/outputs, and percentage completed for each of the grantee’s program year goals.

-See attached Table---

Goal Category Source /

Amount

Indicator Unit of

Measure

Expected –

Strategic

Plan

Actual –

Strategic

Plan

Percent

Complete

Expected –

Program

Year

Actual –

Program

Year

Percent

Complete

Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date

2

Goal Category Source / Amount Indicator

Unit of

Measure

Expected – Strategic Plan

Actual-

Strategic Plan combined

Combined

2015 - 2017 Years

Percent completed

2015 Annual

Percent

Complete

Expected

2016

Actual

2016

2016 Annual

Percent

Complete Expected 2017 Actual 2017

2017 Annual

Percentage

Complete

DH-1 Homeownership Affordable Housing

CDBG: $ 412,814

HOME: $481,435

MLF - $300,000

Homeowner

Housing Added

Household

Housing Unit 55 29 44 80 53% 20 10 50 24 15 63


CDBG:$239,169/

HOME:$322,963

Homeowner

Housing

Rehabilitated

Household

Housing Unit 30 2 6 20 7% 6 0 0 7 4 57


CDBG:$239,169/

HOME:$322,963 Home Repair Housing unit 233 0 38 16 0% 0 0 0 76 38 50

DH-2 Rentals Affordable Housing

CDBG: $260,020/

HOME: $214,170

Rental units

constructed

Household

Housing Unit 73 16 17 23 22% 18 0 0 18 1 6

DH-2 Rentals Affordable Housing

CDBG: $260,020/

HOME: $214,170 Other - Repair Housing unit 55 7 10 18 13% 3 2 67 3 3 100

DH-3 Homebuyers Affordable Housing

HOME: $656,768/

CDBG $316,855

Direct Financial

Assistance - First

Time Homebuyers

Households

Assisted 120 55 80 67 46% 30 27 90 25 25 100

DH-3 Homebuyers Affordable Housing MLF: $150,000

End Mortgages -

Direct Financial

Assistance Other 13 5 7 54 4% 3 1 33 3 2 67

DH-4 Special Needs -

Housing

Non-Homeless Special

Needs

CDBG: $320,000/

HOME: $50,000

Rental units

constructed

Household

Housing Unit 5 0 0 0 0% 6 0 0 0 0 0


Housing


Needs

CDBG: $320,000/

HOME: $50,000

Rental units

rehabilitated

Household

Housing Unit 30124 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0 0 0


Housing


Needs

CDBG: $320,000/

HOME: $50,000

Homeowner

Housing

Rehabilitated

Household

Housing Unit 250 128 166 66 0% 60 67 112 76 38 50


Housing


Needs

CDBG: $320,000/

HOME: $50,000 Other Other 20 3 3 15 15% 0 0 0 0 0 0

DH-5 Homelessness -

At Risk Homeless ESG: $25,459.98

Homelessness

Prevention Persons Assisted 250 158 209 84 63% 40 92 230 50 51 102

DH-6 Homelessness -

Rehousing Homeless ESG: $25,459.38

Tenant-based

rental assistance /

Rapid Rehousing

Households

Assisted/Persons

Assisted 300 153 228 76 51% 60 43/84 #VALUE! 50 75 150

DH-7 Homelessness -

Transitional/shelter homeless needs ESG: $82,943

Homelessness

needs Persons Assisted 4430 3558 4632 105 80% 600 637 106 650 1074 165

Outreach Homeless ESG: $15,000 people 0 1629 #DIV/0! 0% 30 0 0 1700 1629 96

ED-1 Job Training Homeless

Jobs

created/retained Jobs 133 0 0 0 0% 10 0 0 0 0 0

ED-2 Business

Establishment

Non-Housing

Community

Development CDBG:$25,000 Businesses assisted

Businesses

Assisted 9 1 3 33 11% 5 0 0 2 2 100

ED-3 Mortgages -

Homebuyers Affordable Housing MLF: $150,000

Direct Financial

Assistance to

Homebuyers

Households

Assisted 13 5 7 54 38% 3 1 33 2 2 100

ED-4 Facade

Improvement

Non-Housing

Community

Development CDBG - $35,000 Businesses assisted

Businesses

Assisted 22 10 13 59 45% 5 4 80 8 3 38

3

Goal Category Source / Amount Indicator

Unit of

Measure

Expected – Strategic Plan

Actual-

Strategic Plan combined

Combined

2015 - 2017 Years

Percent completed

2015 Annual

Percent

Complete

Expected

2016

Actual

2016

2016 Annual

Percent

Complete Expected 2017 Actual 2017

2017 Annual

Percentage

Complete

NR-1 Neighborhood

planning

Non-Housing

Community

Development Other Other 8 5 7 88 63% 3 3 100 2 2 100

NR-2 Neighborhood

GAP

Non-Housing

Community

Development CDBG - $6,655.06 Other Other 49 11 16 33 22% 5 6 120 5 5 100

PA-1 Project

Management Affordable Housing

CDBG/MLF:

$642,233

HOME:$138,541

ESG: $16,430.40 Other Other 5 2 3 60 40% 1 1 100 1 1 100

SL-1 Blight

Elimination Affordable Housing $210,000

Buildings

Demolished Buildings 175 23 23 13 13% 13 13 100 16 0

SL-10 Fair Housing Affordable Housing CDBG: $35,000 Other Other 886 3596 4854 548 406% 1000 3402 340 1574 1258 80

SL-11 Housing

Counseling Affordable Housing 0 Other Other 886 1361 2426 274 154% 500 1234 247 800 1065 133

SL-2 Public Safety

Non-Housing

Community


SL-3 Public Facilities

Non-Housing

Community


SL-4 Public Services

Non-Housing

Community

Development CDBG- $310,500

Public service

activities other

than

Low/Moderate

Income Housing

Benefit Persons Assisted 20000 19929 31753 159 100% 12000 12558 105 9,640 11824 123

SL-5 Infrastructure

Improvements

Non-Housing

Community

Development CDBG: $924,689

Public Facility or

Infrastructure

Activities other

than

Low/Moderate

Income Housing

Benefit Persons Assisted 3000 2520 5495 183 0% 5000 0 0 2975 2975 100

SL-6 Homelessness

Services Homeless ESG: $25,000

Services -

Homelessness

Prevention & Rapid

Rehousing Persons Assisted 2200 2120 2245 102 96% 1700 1956 115 100 125 125

SL-7 Relocation Affordable Housing Other Other 5 0 0 0 0% 2 0 0 0 0 0

SL-8 Brownfield

Assessment and

Cleanup

Non-Housing

Community

Development

Brownfield acres

remediated Acre 2 11 12 600 550% 1 0 0 1 1 100

SL-9 Tree Planting

Non-Housing

Community


4

Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan,

giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified.

Provide Decent Affordable Housing: One of the needs identified in the Greenville County Housing Study prepared in 2017 is the extremely high

housing cost burden on families making less than $25,000 per year for low to very low income families. This is also consistent with the County

priority objective to provide assistance to households with annual income of 50% or below of the Area Median Income (AMI) and for

particularly seniors or persons living with disability to have access to affordable housing, opportunities to age in place, or suitable living by

addressing handicap accessible means to the house. The County completed a total of 88 housing units with HOME and CDBG funds, of which 48

of the units were HOME funded and 40 units were CDBG funded. Fifty one (51%) percent of the housing units assisted with CDBG and HOME

funds are occupied by households with income 50 percent and below of the AMI. Ten of the HOME assisted homeownership units are occupied

by families with income of 50% and below of the AMI. These units are all occupied by low and moderate income households.

Promote Suitable Living Environment: A total of 6 substandard properties were demolished, eliminating blight and creating redevelopment

opportunities in Greer, Brutontown and Fountain Inn. The infrastructure improvement for Miller Place Court, an 18 unit (duplex style) mixed

income development in Mauldin was completed. Used $482,500 for infrastructure improvements on Spring Street in Needmore community in

Greer. The Greenville Legislative Delegation Transportation Committee (GLDTC) will match 1:1 of CDBG funds. The completion is targeted for

early 2019. The engineering design, permitting fees and right of way acquisition for the sidewalk and drainage Improvement in Simpsonville

(Woodside community) and Fountain Inn (Sanctified Hill neighborhood) and for the Mauldin Senior Center facility improvement addressing ADA

requirements are completed. A total of $310,500 in CDBG fund, consisting of 8.4% of total CDBG expended funds was used to provide public

services activities for youth/senior recreation and enrichment activities, medical prescriptions for uninsured seniors, fair housing services,

weekend meals for the homebound and mentally challenged, and a myriad of relief and referral services for low income households and

veterans benefitting 11,824 persons.

Expand Economic Development Opportunities: The exterior of three commercial buildings were renovated with façade fund and 2 small

business owners received business loans. These businesses created and or retained low and moderate income jobs.

Address Homelessness: 54 households or 124 individuals were assisted with rental assistance to prevent homelessness via the homelessness

prevention and rapid rehousing program and casemangement services. Additionally, a total of 2,703 homeless persons were assisted via

Continuum of Care Partners with shelters, and outreach opportunities.

Promote Neighborhood Revitalization: Provided Grant Assistance Program funds to five low and moderate neighborhoods in the County with a

total of $6,665 for capacity building initiatives in their communities.

5

CR-10 - Racial and Ethnic composition of families assisted

Describe the families assisted (including the racial and ethnic status of families assisted).

91.520(a) Table 2 – Table of assistance to racial and ethnic populations by source of funds

Narrative

In fiscal year 2017, the County assisted 10,191 families with CDBG and families with HOME programs

that address priority goals such as affordable housing, a suitable living environment and special

needs. The majority of beneficiaries were served by the CDBG program. The CDBG program benefited

10,143 people and the HOME program 48. Whites represent the largest percentage of families assisted

by CDBG & HOME programs. A total of 6,859 white families were assisted representing 67 percent of all

beneficiaries. African American families at 29 percent follow whites as the second largest racial group

benefitting from CDBG & HOME programs with a total of 3,008 persons served. Asians and other multi-

racial groups represent the smallest share at .07 and 2 percent respectively for a combined total of 432

beneficiaries.

While 67 percent of whites make up the largest beneficiary group for CDBG, African American families

represent the largest beneficiary group for the HOME program. 58 percent of families assisted by the

HOME program were African Americans. Whites and Asians make up the remaining share of HOME

beneficiaries at 37 percent and .04 percent respectively. Hispanic families represent .08 percent of all

families served with CDBG and HOME programs.

CDBG HOME ESG

White 6841 18 797

Black 2980 28 1922

Asian 73 3

Other 249 2 38

Mult i 67

Hispanic 855 n/ a

Non-Hispanic 9288

6

CR-15 - Resources and Investments 91.520(a)

Identify the resources made available

Source of Funds Source Resources Made

Available

Amount Expended

During Program Year

CDBG CDBG 5,669,400 2,907,404

HOME HOME 3,082,242 1,336,417

HOPWA HOPWA

ESG ESG 219,072 189,828

Other Other 789,404 423,909

Table 3 - Resources Made Available

Narrative

The County expended a total of $4,857,558 during FY 2017, of which $4,433,649 is from the County's

entitlement funds (CDBG, HOME and ESG) and $423,909 from various private financing (bank loans) and

public funds to achieve the proposed outcomes enumerated on the goals and outcome table.

Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments

Target Area Planned

Percentage of

Allocation

Actual Percentage

of Allocation

Narrative

Description

Belle Meade

BRANDON

BRANDON/FREETOWN

COMMUNITY

BRUTONTOWN COMMUNITY 12 9.64

Strategic

Neighborhood

Conestee

Dunean

FOUNTAIN INN 5 2.96 MUNICIPALITY

FOUNTAIN INN SANCTIFIED HILL

GREENVILLE COUNTY -

UNINCORPORATED 35 43.02 COUNTYWIDE

GREER 18 28.99 MUNICIPALITY

GREER NEEDMORE

JUDSON COMMUNITY

MAULDIN 13 11.94 MUNICIPALITY

MONAGHAN

NEW WASHINGTON HEIGHTS

POE

7

Simpsonville 13 1.87 Municipality

STERLING

Travelers Rest 4 1.59 Municipality

VICTOR

WEST BRANDON

Table 4 – Identify the geographic distribution and location of investments

Narrative

Brutontown continues to be GCRA’s current Strategy neighborhood. Tremendous amount of work has

been completed in a phased schedule in order to implement the Community’s Master Plan.

Approximately 80 percent of the proposed housing units has been completed and occupied. Three new

housing units consisting of 2 homeownership and one rental were completed and occupied. The City of

Greer has two active neighborhoods being redeveloped, namely ‘Creekside and Needmore’. Three new

homeownership units were completed and sold. Additional units are in progress and under various

stages of construction. A major Street improvement (Spring Street project) in the Needmore community,

involving new road pavement, storm drains, electric pole relocations, curbs and gutters is in progress.

Completion is anticipated at the end of the year or early 2019.

Miller Place development in the City of Mauldin, an 18 unit rental development, a partnership project

between the City of Mauldin and GCRA is currently in the vertical building stage. The project is a mixed

income development, consisting of 9 duplex buildings of approximately 1400 square feet (3 bedrooms

and 2 baths). All infrastructure work has been completed. The project is anticipated to be completed by

end of 2019. Engineering designs and permitting phases of infrastructure and facility improvement

projects in Simpsonville (Woodside – sidewalk/storm drains), Fountain Inn (Rosemary Street – sidewalk

and storm drain) and Mauldin Senior Center - ADA improvement have been completed. Bid processes

are also completed for the Simpsonville and Mauldin projects. These projects are anticipated to start in

the fall of 2018. The completion of the Brownfield remediation process for the Poe Mill Site is in process.

GCRA received $100,000 from the Appalachian Regional Commision (ARC) to leverage CDBG fund.

8

Leveraging

Explain how federal funds leveraged additional resources (private, state and local funds),

including a description of how matching requirements were satisfied, as well as how any

publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that were used to address the

needs identified in the plan.

All funding provided to housing partners or non-profit agencies in support of affordable housing and

public services are provided as gap funds. Additionally all Subrecipients awarded ESG funds are required

to provide a 1:1 match for their grants awards. As part of the underwriting criteria, the GCRA evaluates

project feasibility and recommends funding considering the amount of funds leveraged using other

public and or private funds. For fiscal year 2017, GCRA expended a total of $4,430,648 of CDBG, ESG

and HOME funds and leveraged approximately $6,019,449 dollars from various partners, private

funding and public agencies towards the implementation of the FY 2017 Annual Action Plan, providing

affordable housing and improving the quality of life of Greenville County Citizens.

A listing of some of the projects leveraged with other funding sources is as follows:

Housing: Total leverage amount $4,799,165

• · Habitat for Humanities – Leveraged CHDO funds of $128,000 with $463,165 from private

donations.

• · Community Works Carolina – First Time Home Buyers Program ($115,000), leveraged with

$2,500,000 from various lending or banking institutions providing end – mortgages.

• · Miller Place Project (9 duplexes- 18 units total) leveraged with $1,836,000 construction

loan from County Bank

Infrastructure/Public Facilities Improvement: Total leverage amount: $997,500

• · Spring Street road improvement project in Needmore, (Greer) leveraged with $572,500

from Greenville Legislative Delegation Transportation Committee

• · Poe Mill Brownfield Clean-up – leveraged with $100,000 from the Appalachian Regional

Commission

• · Mauldin ADA Facility Improvement – Leveraged with $325,000 from SC Governor’s Office

of Aging – PIP grant awarded to the City of Mauldin

Homelessness: Total leverage amount: 197,784: The five ESG Subrecipients, United Ministries, Step by

Step Ministries, United Housing Connections, Greenville County Human Relations Commission and

Greenville County Redevelopment Authority leverage the ESG fund with a total of $197,784 from private

donation, County General fund and private investments fund.

Other: The Greenville County Administration annually provides a total of $25,000 to the Greenville

County Redevelopment Authority for administrative support.

9

Fiscal Year Summary – HOME Match

1. Excess match from prior Federal fiscal year 7,551,162

2. Match contributed during current Federal fiscal year 463,165

3. Total match available for current Federal fiscal year (Line 1 plus Line 2) 8,014,327

4. Match liability for current Federal fiscal year 209,463

5. Excess match carried over to next Federal fiscal year (Line 3 minus Line 4) 7,804,864

Table 5 – Fiscal Year Summary - HOME Match Report

10

Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year

Project No. or

Other ID

Date of

Contribution

Cash

(non-Federal

sources)

Foregone

Taxes, Fees,

Charges

Appraised

Land/Real

Property

Required

Infrastructure

Site

Preparation,

Construction

Materials,

Donated labor

Bond

Financing

Total Match

IDIS 2579 06/30/2017 463,165 0 0 0 0 0 463,165

Table 6 – Match Contribution for the Federal Fiscal Year

HOME MBE/WBE report

Program Income – Enter the program amounts for the reporting period

Balance on hand at begin-

ning of reporting period

$

Amount received during

reporting period

$

Total amount expended

during reporting period

$

Amount expended for

TBRA

$

Balance on hand at end of

reporting period

$

0 827,632 566,722 0 0

Table 7 – Program Income

11

Minority Business Enterprises and Women Business Enterprises – Indicate the number and dollar value

of contracts for HOME projects completed during the reporting period

Total Minority Business Enterprises White Non-

Hispanic Alaskan

Native or

American

Indian

Asian or

Pacific

Islander

Black Non-

Hispanic

Hispanic

Contracts

Dollar

Amount 1,261,920 0 0 375,300 0 886,620

Number 28 0 0 5 0 23

Sub-Contracts

Number 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dollar

Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Women

Business

Enterprises

Male

Contracts

Dollar

Amount 1,261,920 335,000 926,920

Number 28 7 21

Sub-Contracts

Number 0 0 0

Dollar

Amount 0 0 0

Table 8 - Minority Business and Women Business Enterprises

Minority Owners of Rental Property – Indicate the number of HOME assisted rental property owners

and the total amount of HOME funds in these rental properties assisted

Total Minority Property Owners White Non-

Hispanic Alaskan

Native or

American

Indian

Asian or

Pacific

Islander

Black Non-

Hispanic

Hispanic

Number 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dollar

Amount 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table 9 – Minority Owners of Rental Property

12

Relocation and Real Property Acquisition – Indicate the number of persons displaced, the cost of

relocation payments, the number of parcels acquired, and the cost of acquisition

Parcels Acquired 0 0

Businesses Displaced 0 0

Nonprofit Organizations

Displaced 0 0

Households Temporarily

Relocated, not Displaced 0 0

Households

Displaced

Total Minority Property Enterprises White Non-

Hispanic Alaskan

Native or

American

Indian

Asian or

Pacific

Islander

Black Non-

Hispanic

Hispanic

Number 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table 10 – Relocation and Real Property Acquisition

13

CR-20 - Affordable Housing 91.520(b)

Evaluation of the jurisdiction's progress in providing affordable housing, including the

number and types of families served, the number of extremely low-income, low-income,

moderate-income, and middle-income persons served.

One-Year Goal Actual

Number of Homeless households to be

provided affordable housing units 40 54

Number of Non-Homeless households to be


Number of Special-Needs households to be


Total 196 142

Table 11 – Number of Households

One-Year Goal Actual

Number of households supported through

Rental Assistance 40 54


The Production of New Units 47 16


Rehab of Existing Units 84 46


Acquisition of Existing Units 5 26

Total 176 142

Table 12 – Number of Households Supported

Discuss the difference between goals and outcomes and problems encountered in meeting these goals.

The County accomplished 72% of its annual housing goal by completing 142 of 196 units projected. The

affordable housing units served homeless families, provided with permanent housing units,

seniors/disabled persons through minor home repairs, homebuyers via down payment assistance and

home sales and renters via rehab and new construction. All of the homeownership units - new

production units were sold to households with annual income of 60 percent and below of the

AMI. Approximately 65 percent of all units served low income families earning 50% or below AMI. The

remaining units benefitted low and moderate income families earning up to 80% AMI.

14

The 54 unit shortfall was reflected in the performance of the County’s Minor and Major Home Repair

program, new construction sales and rental units developed by GCRA and its housing partners. In

recent years, the Major HRP program has experienced a decline in homeowners interested in home

repair debt and qualified applicants. The Housing Partner Projects such as Greenville Housing Futures (6

units) and Nehemiah (6 units) encountered funding delays from the State and private bank. Habitat for

Humanity constructed 4 of 5 proposed homeownership units with two closings expected in the Fall

2018. The infrastructure improvement in GCRA’s 18 unit rental duplex project known as Miller Place

Court in Mauldin was completed in 2017 and housing construction has just started. The housing

construction portion was bid twice, due to the extentive construction cost increase received from

bidders. Major development budget adjustment was necessary in order to accommodate the increased

construction cost. However, vertical construction is finally in progress.

Discuss how these outcomes will impact future annual action plans.

GCRA and Housing Partner Projects that experienced delays in their project will be reflected in future

annual action plans. Future annual action plans may also reflect more partnerships to address housing

repair needs of low income homeowners, seniors and persons living with disabilities. Additionally,

potential changes and increased marketing for the owner-ocuupied and repair program is being

inititiated for the future.

Include the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income persons served by each activity where information on income by family size is required to determine the eligibility of the activity.

Table 13 – Number of Households Served

Narrative Information

15

CR-25 - Homeless and Other Special Needs 91.220(d, e); 91.320(d, e); 91.520(c)

Evaluate the jurisdiction’s progress in meeting its specific objectives for reducing and ending

homelessness through:

Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their

individual needs

The County assisted 124 homeless individuals or households with permanent housing and case

management through Human Relations Commission to find affordable housing and various assistance

offered, including rental and utility deposits/payments. Through the United Ministries, the County

sponsored street outreach by engaging and providing critical services to 1629 homeless persons. United

Ministries offers a day shelter that provides showers, lockers, phones, mail boxes, case management

and one-on-one counseling. The agency also provides emergency assistance for food, rent, utilities,

prescriptions, food stamp assistance and employment readiness training etc.

Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons

The Continuum of Care (CoC) agencies assist each other by coordination of their programs and support

services. The CoC agencies provide emergency shelters and transitional housing with support services

such as: job training, employment readiness, housekeeping, financial literacy and other services to help

clients reach the goal of independent living. The County supports CoC members by providing ESG

funding for street outreach, case management, maintenance, rehabilitation and operating cost for

emergency shelter and transitional housing and data collection via the HMIS system. Through the

County’s 2017 ESG Subrecipients: SHARE, United Housing Connections, Human Relations Commission,

and United Ministries and Step by Step women’s ministry; the County was able to aid 1074 homeless

persons with transitional and emergency shelter, 1629 via street outreach and 124 homeless individuals

or households with direct financial assistance for permanent housing.

Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely

low-income individuals and families and those who are: likely to become homeless after

being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care

facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections

programs and institutions); and, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that

address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs

The Greenville County Human Relations Commission administers the County’s Fair Housing and

Employment activities which involves investigating housing discrimination complaints, housing solution

referrals, and conducting educational programs on landlord tenant-relations, financial literacy, and

substandard housing. These activities, in addition to the case management provided for the Homeless

Prevention and Rapid Rehousing program, help individuals and families avoid homelessness and obtain

permanent housing.

16

Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families

with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to

permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that

individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals

and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were

recently homeless from becoming homeless again

Our partners SHARE, Step By Step, and United Ministries assist those that have been incarcerated and

other chronically homeless persons that have health care issues and mental health problems. SHARE

and United Housing Connections focus primarily on individuals, many of which are veterans and some

are unaccompanied youth. United Ministries through its partnership with local congregations provides

emergency shelter and essential services for families. These organizations help with education and

employment as a means for preventing future homelessness. Additionally, through the Homeless

Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program, we assist homeless individuals and families, from seniors and

those with disabilities, to veterans, single parent families, and victims of domestic violence with case

management and permanent housing.

17

CR-30 - Public Housing 91.220(h); 91.320(j)

Actions taken to address the needs of public housing

The most notable accolades include:

• Preservation and Creation of 407 Affordable Housing Units. Comprehensive Renovation & New

Construction totaling $40 Million (94% private dollars). Projects included Manor at West

Greenville, Heritage at Sliding Rock, Harbor & Gallery of West Greenville and single family units.

• Portfolio Increase of 173 Units to include the acquisition of 48 units and the new construction of

115 units

• Successfully Conducted Temporary Relocation of 249 Families

• $16.9 Million in Rental Assistance paid directly to private landlords throughout Greenville

County

• Ending Homelessness for 139 Veteran Families through the HUD-VASH program

• Awarded the following Project Based Voucher (PBV) Contracts to the following developments

Project Based Voucher (PBV) & Rental Assistance

Stratham Place Apartments 19 (PBV) 55(RAD-PBV) 74 total

Valley Creek 23 (PBV) 25 (RAD-PBV) 55 Total

Reedy Place II 8 (PBV) 0 8 Total

Forest View 21 (PBV) 29 (RAD-PBV) 50 Total

Total 187

Actions taken to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in

management and participate in homeownership

The Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program provides opportunities to residents of the Public Housing and

Housing Choice Voucher Programs to become financially independent. In 2017, the FSS graduated 12

participants and holds $153,000 in an escrow account which is made available to graduates for

purchasing a home, starting a business or paying for college tuition.

TGHA also has a Section Eight Housing Choice Voucher Program. Currently, there are 8 individuals who

have purchased homes using their voucher.

18

TGHA partners with Greenville County Human Relations Commission to provide Homebuyer Education

Course to families interested in becoming a homeowners.

Actions taken to provide assistance to troubled PHAs

• Allowing other PHAS to piggy-back on existing TGHA contracts

• Sharing forms of solicitations with other PHAS

• Assisting and training staff of other PHAS as needed

• Available for oversight and management of other PHAs during the transitional stage.

19

CR-35 - Other Actions 91.220(j)-(k); 91.320(i)-(j)

Actions taken to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as

barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning

ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the

return on residential investment. 91.220 (j); 91.320 (i)

The Greenville County, GCRA and Hollingsworth foundation partnered to hire a consultant CZB, LLC to

conduct Affordable Housing Study for the County of Greenville. According to the Study, approximately

45,000 households in the County have income of less than $25,000 per year and 34,502 households earn

less than $20,000 per year. These target population experience an extremely high cost burden on

housing and in the future will find it hard pressed to find affordable, safe and decent rental units. As a

result the following goals were recommendations were as established in the report: (1) Preservation and

Improvement of existing housing stocks. (2) Helping qualified low and moderate income working

households employed in Greenville County become home owners in the County. (3) Add to supply of

affordable rental housing through new rental housing development.

The following barriers are identified:

• Cost burden on affordable housing development relating to impact fees assessed on projects.

• Lack of suitable or non-existence of infrastructure to support affordable housing development.

• Large lot zoning requirements in urban areas with historically small lot sizes.

• High cost of property and land:

• Relax zoning requirement to allow for smaller lots in LMA neighborhoods for affordable housing

development.

• The County to relax zoning to allow for attached housing on smaller lots for homeownership

units.

• Excessive frontage and setback requirements in urban areas with historically small lot sizes.

• Lack of funding sources to help with the development of affordable housing units. Inability to

compete with investors on over-priced property costs. This concern continues to increase, as

land & property cost have substantially increased.

• High cost of utility connections and permit fees.

• Specific actions are recommended by GCRA to County Council to address barriers to

affordable housing as a result of the Housing Study report.

• Continue to work with County Council and the Planning Department to establish overlay districts

that encourage investment and relax non-essential zoning and subdivision requirements that

impede affordable housing development.

• Continue to coordinate and work with public utility agencies to reduce infrastructure

improvement costs related to affordable housing development.

• County to assist with infrastructure improvement for affordable housing developments.

• The County to establish alternative funding source to support the development of affordable

housing or acquisition of properties.

20

• Continue to work with public utility agencies to waive impact fees for affordable housing

• Continue to find alternative funding sources to help gap fund affordable housing projects and

substantial supplement the entitlement funds in the County

• Partner and seek funding from several large companies (Manufacturing, Hospitals, hotels,

Financial Institutions, Schools, Corporate offices etc. in the Greenville) to investment and

support programs that will promote affordable or workforce housing productions for their

employees.

Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

· The GCRA administers an emergency rehab program that provides grant funds to seniors and

persons living with disabilities. This program provides up to $10,000 to address code issues and/or

improve handicap accessibility allowing residents to age in place. This program particularly assist our

clients that are below 30 percent of AMI and on fixed and limited income to address these code issues

and help them to remain in their homes.

· The GCRA partners with the Continuum of Care agencies to address homelessness in the County.

The ESG fund is used to help families at risk of homeless or literally homeless with permanent housing

by providing deposits to their rentals, pay off delinquent or outstanding utility bills that would prevent

families from obtaining future housing and pay their rents. Some of the measures are identified in the

Homeless White paper prepared in March 2015 are being implemented via a coordination with the

continuum care agencies. Individuals or families assisted are very low income families (30% or below of

AMI).

· Additionally, addressing barriers to affordable housing must continue to be a comprehensive

approach and commitment from public officials, private donors, and the public and as well coordinated

efforts of various county and city agencies. Education on affordable housing needs and gentrification

should continue to discussed and addressed. Providing opportunities such as donated

properties/developable lands with improved infrastructure are extremely helpful to the attainment of

affordable housing. Private foundations/donors providing grant funds towards affordable housing

development also helps to reduce the burden/dependency on Federal funds.

· Since, the completion of the Housing study, a coordinated effort by GCRA, Greenville County

departments, the City of Greenville, Greenville Housing Authority and Housing providers and partners

have joined together, and presented these recommendations to both City of Greenville and Greenville

County Council members for consideration and approval of various recommendations and initiatives to

assist in achieving the much need affordable housing in Greenville County.

Actions taken to reduce lead-based paint hazards. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

The GCRA reduces lead-based paint hazards through its home repair policy which consist of risk

education for rehab program clients and varying levels of lead assessment and abatement based on the

extent of repair work. Policy guidelines to reduce lead-based paint hazards are as follows:

• All home repair participants with homes constructed before 1978 receive a brochure about the

hazards of lead based paint and must sign acknowledging receipt of the brochure. Safe work

21

practices are used on all repair jobs of less than $5,000. For roof jobs regardless of cost, a lead

paint clearance test is performed by a lead risk assessment firm after the roof is replaced. For all

jobs exceeding $5000, a lead risk assessment is performed and the results of the test are

incorporated into the scope of work for the job. A lead clearance test is performed by a risk

assessment firm upon the job’s completion. For jobs exceeding $25,000, abatement of lead

paint would occur.

Actions taken to reduce the number of poverty-level families. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

Assets such as savings and homeownership are essential to a family’s economic security. The County’s

downpayment assistance program helps low-income families build assets that are otherwise difficult to

attain due to limited resources and inability to save. GCRA also provides end mortgages,

using Mortgage Loan Fund to help households that are experiencing difficulty obtaining affordable

mortgage from traditional banks, due to no credit history or higher interest rate offered by bankers but

are however creditworthy to purchase their home. All participants are required to attend Financial

literacy, budgeting and pre-purchase and post homeownership classes with Greenville County Human

Relations Commission.

Actions taken to develop institutional structure. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

• GCRA partnered with various development partners (non-profit and for profit agencies) and as

well as other public agencies, leveraging funds and resources to successfully accomplish the

Consolidated and Annual Action.

• GCRA provided technical assistance to the five cooperating municipalities participating in the

Greenville County urban county program.

Actions taken to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service

agencies. 91.220(k); 91.320(j)

The Greenville County Planning Department administers the County’s zoning and subdivision

regulations, and is responsible for comprehensive and specialized planning efforts, including the County

General Development Plan. The Planning Department Commission staff also administers zoning

ordinances and prepares plans for the Cities of Greenville, Fountain Inn, Greer, Mauldin, Simpsonville

and Travelers Rest, including elements related to land use and housing. The County Priority Investment

Area (PIA) 3 consists of majority of the County’s Redevelopment Area. The PIA promotes and

encourages coordination of public services and resources. The County’s Planning Department completes

master plans for the County’s Redevelopment Areas. Additionally, the GCRA coordinates with Code

Enforcement to demolish substandard properties in County redevelopment areas. The combination of

these coordinated efforts creates opportunities for the implementation of neighborhood master plans

by GCRA and its housing partners. The Greenville County Planning is in the process of a Comprehensive

Master Plan, which will include a comprehensive approach to the housing element compoenet. The

recommendations identified in the Greenville Housing study report will be an execellent resource to the

comprehensive master plan.

22

Identify actions taken to overcome the effects of any impediments identified in the

jurisdictions analysis of impediments to fair housing choice. 91.520(a)

The Greenville County Human Relations Commission (GCHRC) provides Fair Housing counseling and

education to low income and minority populations. However, minorities in Greenville County and the

City of Greenville continue to be targeted by discriminatory and predatory practices. GCHRC promotes

fair housing choice for all persons, regardless of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status

or handicap. Fair housing education and outreach, however, is targeted towards those who are most

likely to be discriminated against, including African-Americans, Hispanics, the elderly, and the disabled.

The GCHRC provided assistance to 2046 clients, consisting of 800 households with landlord-tenant

issues. A total of 409 clients were assisted with homeless prevention issues, 306 clients with pre-rental

counseling housing placement, and 409 clients received eviction process/prevention, 307 clients

received emergency assistance to prevent disconnect/deposits, and 260 served in outreach/educational

serves. This number includes claims of discrimination cases. Claims of discrimination were forwarded to

SC Human Affairs Commission.

Workshops

The GCHRC held or participated in workshops and events targeting racial and ethnic minorities,

specifically the Hispanic and African-American populations. The organization held twenty Hispanic

community outreach events focusing on fair housing, ESL, literacy, homeownership, and employment

opportunities. This includes 72 financial stability and pre-purchase homebuyer education

workshops. During this period GCHRC also conducted 38 community workshops. Topics covered at

these events focused on fair housing, the South Carolina Landlord/Tenant Act, “buyers beware”

consumer education, identity thief prevention and affordable housing opportunities. GCHRC celebrated

the April Fair Housing month with 95 people in attendance.

ESG Program

The ESG program has assisted 124 households and or (71 adults & 53 children) persons. Four families

were victims of domestic violence. Fifteen elderly clients were served. Twelve clients were

disabled. Five veteran’s households were assisted. All ESG qualifying families received case

management. All families are now stable as they have moved into permanent housing. There were 100

families that received rapid rehousing assistance and 24 families received prevention funds.

23

CR-40 - Monitoring 91.220 and 91.230

Describe the standards and procedures used to monitor activities carried out in furtherance

of the plan and used to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs

involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning

requirements

GCRA is responsible for monitoring the performance of each grantee under the terms of its contract and

Memorandum of Understanding. Each project is reviewed for its compliance with applicable CDBG,

HOME and ESG program regulations. Monitoring procedures for applicable programs are described

below.

Economic Development Business Loan

During the application process, each business/project is evaluated to ensure that it meets the CDBG

National Objective of low and moderate income job creation or retention. GCRA staff prepares an

environmental review record per the National Environmental Protection Act, conducts a site visit and

compiles loan file with all the credit, financial, and underwriting information needed to verify program

eligibility. A bi-annual monitoring review and site visit is also conducted for all funded projects funded

which includes

• Employment Income Verification Forms completed for all employees hired or retained

• Proof of payment for all jobs created or maintained

• Balance sheet

• Cash flow statement and 1-year projection

• Certificate of liability insurance for the business

• Summary of loan expenditures and receipts.

CDBG-Public Service & ESG Partners

Subrecipients for CDBG and ESG are monitored continuously throughout the year. All federal

regulations and laws listed in their contracts are monitored including but not limited to Davis

Bacon, Hatch Act, conflict of interest, and procurement guidelines. Additionally, all reimbursement

documentation is carefully reviewed and projects environmentally reviewed before work begins on a

project. Throughout the year, staff attends various events or visit projects to monitor progress and

evaluate contract compliance. During each application cycle, applicants are scored on past history,

capacity, project feasibility, and matching funds etc. Staff maintains a file of each applicants score

card. Inspections also occur for any rehabilitation or maintenance related projects. There is also desk

monitoring and on-site monitoring that occurs annually toward the end of the fiscal year. This ensures

that on site procedures for security and organization are being met. Files and equipment/goods

24

procured are reviewed and documented. Staff also captures intake forms and procedural processes for

client assistance.

Housing Partners:

All housing development projects funded with HOME funds are ‘gap financing’ to ensure that the

projects have sufficient funding to be implemented. The proposals submitted to GCRA for approval

contain total development project, proforma (rental), sources and uses of fund, All construction projects

are inspected by GCRA construction officials to ensure compliance and consistent with contract and

payment request. GCRA staff conducted desk audit and site visit to partners. Annual performance

reports are obtained from partners on all HOME assisted projects. Staff conducts monitoring visits to

review partners' files on projects/programs management and beneficiaries’ data to ensure compliance

with program regulations.

Citizen Participation Plan 91.105(d); 91.115(d)

Describe the efforts to provide citizens with reasonable notice and an opportunity to

comment on performance reports.

On September 8, 2018, staff posted a public notice for the draft CAPER in the Greenville News. The draft

of the CAPER summary was published on GCRA’s website on September 14, 2018. A public hearing was

held on September 18, 2018 in GCRA office Board Room and no one attendance. GCRA did not receive

any comments during the public review period from September 14, 2018 through September 28, 2018.

25

CR-45 - CDBG 91.520(c)

Specify the nature of, and reasons for, any changes in the jurisdiction’s program objectives

and indications of how the jurisdiction would change its programs as a result of its

experiences.

During the Fiscal year 2017, the County did not make any changes its program objectives for

CDBG. However, in August 2018, an amendment was made to expand the boundary jurisdiction for the

Façade improvement program for the unincorporated area to include Woodside, alongside the existing

Poinsett Corridor. Furthermore, marketing plans are being initiated to strategically market the following

programs to increase participation – Owner-occupied Rehabilitation and the Business Loan programs.

GCRA is considering having an investor’s program that will specifically target land lord to rehab and rent

to low and moderate income families – County wide.

Does this Jurisdiction have any open Brownfields Economic Development Initiative (BEDI)

grants?

No

[BEDI grantees] Describe accomplishments and program outcomes during the last year.

26

CR-50 - HOME 91.520(d)

Include the results of on-site inspections of affordable rental housing assisted under the

program to determine compliance with housing codes and other applicable regulations

Please list those projects that should have been inspected on-site this program year based upon

the schedule in §92.504(d). Indicate which of these were inspected and a summary of issues

that were detected during the inspection. For those that were not inspected, please indicate

the reason and how you will remedy the situation.

The GCRA staff has taken in the oversight and management of its rental properties in house. The

addresses listed below reflect rental units that are complete and inspected annually. Any deficiencies

are noted using the International Property Maintenance Code, repaired and reinspected. Inspectors are

either licensed homebuilders or certified ICC housing inspectors. Parker at Cone, a 64 unit apartment

building, is inspected every two years and is scheduled for inspection in October 2018.

Single Family Detached Rental Units

• 7 Saco Street

• 6 Bryant Street

• 130 Marie Street

• 106 2nd Street

• 107 Alice Avenue

• 111 Arnold

• 7 Malone Street

• 3 14th Street

• 324 E. Arlington Avenue

• 6 Hardin Street

• 108 Harris Street

• 106 Lanford

• 511 Trade Street

• 125 Will Street

• 133 Will Street

• 137 Will Street

• 6 D Street

• 105 Goodrich Street

• 106 Heatherly Drive

• 279 Moore

• 321 Tremont Avenue

• 31 Norwood Street

• 15 Speed Street

• 114 Westwood Drive

• 105 Hodgens

27

Single Family Attached Units (Brutontown, 5 Duplex Buildings)

• 10 Marie Street

• 12 Marie Street

• 18 Marie Street

• 20 Marie Street







Provide an assessment of the jurisdiction's affirmative marketing actions for HOME units.

92.351(b)

GCRA sells its homes built with HOME funds by listing them with local realtors who specialize in working

with first time homebuyers that are within the low to moderate income range. In addition to the

information on GCRA’s website, we also sell homes as a result of receiving referrals from GCRA

homeowners and also from housing partners including Homes of Hope, United Housing Connection, The

Greenville Housing Authority, and Greenville County Human Relations Commission.

GCRA manages all of its rental units. Tenants are referred to us from area shelters, United Way, and

other local organizations. Our units are also placed on the GCRA website. We keep a list of individuals

and families requesting rental units and as units become available, we place the tenants accordingly.

As there is a high demand for both our homeownership and rental units, they are filled as soon as they

become available.

Refer to IDIS reports to describe the amount and use of program income for projects,

including the number of projects and owner and tenant characteristics

During Fiscal 2017, GCRA expended approximately $460,138 in HOME program income. These Program

Income funds were used in combination with the HOME grant fund to provide a total of 19 housing

units . HOME program income was not used for the Habitat – CHDO funded project and the First Time

Home buyers program.

28

Describe other actions taken to foster and maintain affordable housing. 91.220(k) (STATES

ONLY: Including the coordination of LIHTC with the development of affordable housing).

91.320(j)

• Gap financing to affordable housing providers and developers for new housing construction and

rehabilitation projects for low and moderate income households. All subsidy agreements include

a period of affordability clause based on program affordability requirements.

• Homeowner grants under the Minor Home Repair program for minor repairs to single family

dwellings not exceeding $10,000 in expenses related to prolonging the structure’s useful life

and/or improving handicap accessibility.

• Rehab loans to improve the substandard housing stock of low and moderate income

homeowners in Greenville County.

CR-60 - ESG 91.520(g) (ESG Recipients only)

ESG Supplement to the CAPER in e-snaps

For Paperwork Reduction Act

1. Recipient Information—All Recipients Complete Basic Grant Information

Recipient Name GREENVILLE COUNTY

Organizational DUNS Number 077991206

EIN/TIN Number 576000356

Indentify the Field Office COLUMBIA

Identify CoC(s) in which the recipient or

subrecipient(s) will provide ESG assistance

Greenville/Anderson/Spartanburg Upstate CoC

ESG Contact Name

Prefix Mr

First Name Douglas

Middle Name 0

Last Name Dent

Suffix 0

Title Interim Executive Director

ESG Contact Address

Street Address 1 301 University Ridge

Street Address 2 Suite 2500

City Greenville

State SC

ZIP Code -

29

Phone Number 8642429801

Extension 114

Fax Number 0

Email Address [email protected]

ESG Secondary Contact

Prefix Mrs

First Name Imma

Last Name Nwobodu

Suffix 0

Title Program Manager

Phone Number 8642429801

Extension 115

Email Address [email protected]

2. Reporting Period—All Recipients Complete

Program Year Start Date 07/01/2017

Program Year End Date 06/30/2018

3a. Subrecipient Form – Complete one form for each subrecipient

Subrecipient or Contractor Name: GREENVILLE COUNTY

City: Greenville

State: SC

Zip Code: 29601, 3636

DUNS Number: 077991206

Is subrecipient a victim services provider: N

Subrecipient Organization Type: Unit of Government

ESG Subgrant or Contract Award Amount: 63043

Subrecipient or Contractor Name: GREENVILLE COUNTY HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION

City: Greenville

State: SC

Zip Code: 29601, 3613

DUNS Number:


Subrecipient Organization Type: Unit of Government


30

Subrecipient or Contractor Name: United Ministries

City: Greenville

State: SC

Zip Code: 29601, 3320



Subrecipient Organization Type: Faith-Based Organization


Subrecipient or Contractor Name: SHARE

City: Greenville

State: SC

Zip Code: 29603, 0204



Subrecipient Organization Type: Other Non-Profit Organization


Subrecipient or Contractor Name: Step by Step Ministry Hope Project

City: Greenville

State: SC

Zip Code: 29609, 4256





Subrecipient or Contractor Name: United Housing Connections

City: Greenville

State: SC

Zip Code: 29607,

DUNS Number:




31

CR-65 - Persons Assisted

4. Persons Served

4a. Complete for Homelessness Prevention Activities

Number of Persons in

Households

Total

Adults 11

Children 13

Don't Know/Refused/Other 0

Missing Information 0

Total 24

Table 16 – Household Information for Homeless Prevention Activities

4b. Complete for Rapid Re-Housing Activities


Households

Total

Adults 60

Children 40



Total 100

Table 17 – Household Information for Rapid Re-Housing Activities

4c. Complete for Shelter


Households

Total

Adults 795

Children 257



Total 1,074

Table 18 – Shelter Information

32

4d. Street Outreach


Households

Total

Adults 1,626

Children 3



Total 1,629

Table 19 – Household Information for Street Outreach

4e. Totals for all Persons Served with ESG


Households

Total

Adults 2,492

Children 313



Total 2,827

Table 20 – Household Information for Persons Served with ESG

5. Gender—Complete for All Activities

Total

Male 1,752

Female 1,064

Transgender 4



Total 2,827

Table 21 – Gender Information

33

6. Age—Complete for All Activities

Total

Under 18 311

18-24 78

25 and over 2,415



Total 2,827

Table 22 – Age Information

7. Special Populations Served—Complete for All Activities

Number of Persons in Households

Subpopulation Total Total Persons

Served –

Prevention

Total Persons

Served – RRH

Total

Persons

Served in

Emergency

Shelters

Veterans 28 1 4 23

Victims of Domestic

Violence 150 0 4 146

Elderly 50 3 12 35

HIV/AIDS 8 0 0 8

Chronically Homeless 70 0 0 70

Persons with Disabilities:

Severely Mentally

Ill 126 0 0 126

Chronic Substance

Abuse 55 0 0 55

Other Disability 164 0 0 164

Total

(Unduplicated if

possible) 651 4 20 627

Table 23 – Special Population Served

34

CR-70 – ESG 91.520(g) - Assistance Provided and Outcomes

10. Shelter Utilization

Number of New Units - Rehabbed 0

Number of New Units - Conversion 0

Total Number of bed-nights available 14,934

Total Number of bed-nights provided 12,800

Capacity Utilization 85.71%

Table 24 – Shelter Capacity

11. Project Outcomes Data measured under the performance standards developed in

consultation with the CoC(s)

All of our subrecipients are also members of COC. All COC members meet monthly to discuss the

homeless needs such as outreach activities, housing/shelter needs and support services. Efforts are

coordinated between the members.

A Place of Hope – United Ministries received $60,000. This agency provided day shelter, shelter for

families and street outreach for homeless people, of which 2090 persons were assisted with basic

services including, food, shelter, clothing assistance and also case management services. Interfaith

Hospitality Network provided both emergency and interim housing for families with children, 38 families

were assisted. Their matching private funding sources were Outreach activities for $15,000 and Shelter

for $45,000.

United Housing Connections (UHC) provides shelter services to individuals. The UHC utilized a total

of $9,525 ESG funding allocation to provide intake and referral for housing. They completed 320 VI-

SPDAT assessments serving 553 persons with intake and referral services to facilitate the allocation of

housing opportunities to those who are most vulnerable. UHC's matching funds were $9,525 for shelter

essential services.

SHARE leveraged its $11,657 allocation to provide assistant 29 clients. SHARE provided shelter facility

support by replacing the washer and dryer, and flooring in 2 units, and replacing the kitchen sink

cabinets in 4 units. Additional assistance to clients included food vouchers, bus tickets to work,

transportation to doctor's appointments. Furthermore 4 homeless families moved into permanent

housing. Private funding sources matched their ESG funds with $8,000 for essential services and $3,657

for operations.

35

Step by Step Ministry Hope Project, expended $18,761 for their group home residence. The program

assisted 31 women coming out of prison and would be homeless without assistance. Step by Step

Ministry matching total was $28,559.

Greenville County Human Relations (GCHR) provides casemangement and HPRP services. They

conducted the intake of the clients to establish eligibility for homeless prevention and rapid rehousing

activities. The GCHR was provided a total of $25,000 for the services and as a result assisted a total

of 124 individuals. Greenville County General Fund was used to match their ESG of $25,000

for Prevention and Rapid Rehousing case management services.

Greenville County Redevelopment Authority provided to third party agencies direct assistance

for housing deposits, rent assistance or utilities for a total of $63,043. Greenville County General Fund

was the matching fund.

36

CR-75 – Expenditures

11. Expenditures

11a. ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention

Dollar Amount of Expenditures in Program Year

2015 2016 2017

Expenditures for Rental Assistance 0 0 0

Expenditures for Housing Relocation and

Stabilization Services - Financial Assistance 20,003 43,250 20,460

Expenditures for Housing Relocation &

Stabilization Services - Services 10,000 12,500 12,500

Expenditures for Homeless Prevention under

Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0

Subtotal Homelessness Prevention 30,003 55,750 32,960

Table 25 – ESG Expenditures for Homelessness Prevention

11b. ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing


2015 2016 2017

Expenditures for Rental Assistance 0 0 0

Expenditures for Housing Relocation and

Stabilization Services - Financial Assistance 30,115 33,960 25,495

Expenditures for Housing Relocation &

Stabilization Services - Services 10,000 12,500 12,500

Expenditures for Homeless Assistance under

Emergency Shelter Grants Program 0 0 0

Subtotal Rapid Re-Housing 40,115 46,460 37,995

Table 26 – ESG Expenditures for Rapid Re-Housing

11c. ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter


2015 2016 2017

Essential Services 42,330 5,981 36,286

Operations 42,978 56,519 37,052

Renovation 15,918 7,100 11,605

37

Major Rehab 8,964 11,900 0

Conversion 0 0 0

Subtotal 110,190 81,500 84,943

Table 27 – ESG Expenditures for Emergency Shelter

11d. Other Grant Expenditures


2015 2016 2017

Street Outreach 16,238 13,500 15,000

HMIS 3,077 2,500 2,500

Administration 16,181 16,223 16,430

Table 28 - Other Grant Expenditures

11e. Total ESG Grant Funds

Total ESG Funds Expended 2015 2016 2017

621,565 215,804 215,933 189,828

Table 29 - Total ESG Funds Expended

11f. Match Source

2015 2016 2017

Other Non-ESG HUD Funds 182,400 0 142,906

Other Federal Funds 734,308 186,684 186,864

State Government 0 143,500 0

Local Government 0 25,000 0

Private Funds 154,094 215,280 358,807

Other 80,878 206,118 215,985

Fees 51,103 32,623 92,044

Program Income 0 0 0

Total Match Amount 1,202,783 809,205 996,606

Table 30 - Other Funds Expended on Eligible ESG Activities

38

11g. Total

Total Amount of Funds

Expended on ESG

Activities

2015 2016 2017

3,630,159 1,418,587 1,025,138 1,186,434

Table 31 - Total Amount of Funds Expended on ESG Activities

ESG Sub Recipient ESG Amount Match Amount Source of Match

SHARE 11,657 11,657 private donations

Step By Step 18,761 28,559 private

UHC 60,0000 9,525 private

United Ministries 25,000 60,000 private donations

Human Relations 25,000 25,000 Greenville county general fund

GCRA 63,043 63,043 Greenville county general match fund

Table 14 - ESG Sub recipient Match Source Funds

39

Attachment

Greenville County CAPER Cover page

40

PR- 26 CDBG Financial Summary Report

42

PHIHCPDHousing

Grant/Project Number or HUD Case Number or other

identification of property, subdivision, dwelling unit, etc.

7a.

Amount of Contract or Subcontact

7b.

Type of Trade Code

(See below) 7c.

Contractor or Subcontractor

Business Racial/Ethnic (See below)

7d.

Woman Owned Business (Yes or No)

7e.

Prime Contractor Identification (ID) Number

7f.Sec. 3

7g.

Subcontractor Identification (ID)

Number 7h

Sec. 3 7i.

State ZipM17-UC-45-0205 103,400 1 1 No 57-1039633 No SC 29687M17-UC-45-0205 17,450 1 1 No 57-1039633 No

B17-UC-45-0001 10,000 4 1 No 57-1059164 No SC 29681

B17-UC-45-0001 15,000 4 1 Yes 57-0931840 No SC 29603

M17-UC-45-0205 115,000 4 2 Yes 26-0421563 No SC 29607

B17-UC-45-0001 82,535 5 1 No 57-0535108 No SC 29601

B17-UC-45-0001 10,000 4 2 No 58-2061227 No SC 29652

B17-UC-45-0001 48,300 0 1 No 56-0897274 No SC 29171

M17-UC-45-0205 105,800 1 2 No 26-0729140 Yes SC 29615M17-UC-45-0205 104,500 1 2 No 26-0729140 Yes

B17-UC-45-0001 80,000 4 1 Yes 57-0855205 No SC 29604

CPD:1 = New Construction 6 = Professional

2 = Education/Training 7 = Tenant Services3 = Other 8 = Education/Training

0 = Other

Greenville, SC 29601

Douglas Dent

Greenville Free Medical Clinic PO Box 8993 Greenville

864-242-9801 Oct. 1 - Sept. 30 (Annual -FY)

Contractor/Subcontractor Name and Address 7j.

Name Street CityApostolic Construction, Inc 306 Wood River Way Taylors

Greenville County Redevelopment Authority Suite 2500

Contract and Subcontract Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No.: 2577-0088 OMB Approval No.: 2502-0355

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The Information is voluntary. HUD may not collect this information, and you are not required to complete this form, unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

Executive Orders dated July 14, 1983, directs the Minority Business Development Plans shall be developed by each Federal Agency and the these annual plans shall establish minority business development objectives. The information is used by HUD to monitor and evaluate MBE activities against the total program activity and the designated minority business enterprise (MBE) goals. The Department requires the information to provide guidance and oversight for programs for the development of minority business enterprise concerning Minority Business Development. If the information is not collected HUD would not be able to establish meaningful MBE goals nor evaluate MBE performance against these goals.

Privacy Act Notice = The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Housing Administration, is authorized to solicit the Information requested in this form by virtue of Title 12, United States Code, Section 1701 et seq., and regulation. It will not be disclosed or relesed outside the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development without your consetn, except as required or permitted by Law.

Check if:301 University Ridge

GreenvilleCommunities in Schools PO Box 10308

Center for Community Service 1102 Howard Dr Simpsonville

Craig, Gaulden & Davis, Inc 19 Washington Park Greenville

Creative Advancement Centers PO Box 2474 Greer

Greenville

7c: Type of Trade Codes: 7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes: 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only):

DH Griffen PO Box 3046 West Columbia

Durham Home Services, Inc 110A Darrell Dr

5 = Section 2021 = New Construction 2 = Black Americans 2= Flexible Subsidy 6 = HUD-Held (Management)

2 = Substantial Rehab. 3 = Native Americans 3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-HFDA 7 = Public/India Housing

Community Works Carolina 107 W Atrum Greenville

Previous editions are obsolete. form HUD-2516 (8/98)

4 = Service 9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans5 = Project Mangt. 6 = Hasidic Jews

3 = Repair 4 = Hispanic Americans 4 = Insured (Management) 8 = Section 811

Housing/Public Housing: 1 = White Americans 1 = All Insured, including Section8

1. Grantee/Project Owner/Developer/Sponsor/Builder/Agency

3a. Name of Contact Person 3b. Phone Number (Including Area Code) 4. Reporting Period 5. Program Code (Not applicable for CPD programs.) See explanation of Codes at bottom of Page Use a separate sheet for each program code.

6. Date Submitted to Field Office

2. Location (City, State Zip Code)

52

PHIHCPDHousing



7a.


7b.

Type of Trade Code

(See below) 7c.



7d.


7e.


7f.Sec. 3

7g.


Number 7h

Sec. 3 7i.

State ZipB17-UC-45-0001 15,000 4 1 Yes 23-7279894 No SC 29652

M17-UC-45-0205 128,648 1 1 No 57-0827063 No SC 29602

M17-UC-45-0205 16,185 3 1 No 57-0987402 Yes SC 29605B17-UC-45-0001 23,585 3 1 No YesB17-UC-45-0001 13,430 3 1 No YesB17-UC-45-0001 21,925 3 1 No YesB17-UC-45-0001 24,315 3 1 No YesM17-UC-45-0205 24,980 3 1 No Yes

B17-UC-45-0001 35,000 4 2 Yes 57-6000356 No SC 29601

B17-UC-45-0001 36,092 0 1 No 46-3353592 No SC 29644

B17-UC-45-0001 45,355 5 1 No 57-0621794 No SC 29606

B17-UC-45-0001 10,500 4 1 No 57-0944841 No SC 29662

B17-UC-45-0001 60,000 4 1 Yes 57-0531378 Yes SC 29605



0 = Other

Hellams and Assoc Builders 7 Horseshoe Cir Greenville

Greenville Human Relations 301 University Ridge, ste 1600 Greenville

5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only):

MauldinMauldin Foundation

7c: Type of Trade Codes:

Greenville15 Oregon StMeals on Wheels

Industrial Power Corporation 503 N Weston St Fountain Inn

Contract and Subcontract Activity

Greenville County Redevelopment Authority


Name Street City

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Check if:

OMB Approval No.: 2577-0088 OMB Approval No.: 2502-0355



864-242-9801 Oct. 1 - Sept. 30 (Annual -FY)Douglas Dent

PO Box 249



Suite 2500

PO Box 1373

Habitat for Humanity PO Box 1206 Greenville

Housing/Public Housing:2= Flexible Subsidy1 = All Insured, including Section8 5 = Section 202

6 = HUD-Held (Management)2 = Black Americans1 = New Construction

GreerGreer Community Ministries

301 University Ridge


JL Rogers & Colcott PO Box 5655 Greenville

7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes:

1 = White Americans

5 = Project Mangt.4 = Service

6 = Hasidic Jews

2 = Substantial Rehab.3 = Repair

3 = Native Americans4 = Hispanic Americans

9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans8 = Section 8114 = Insured (Management)

3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-HFDA 7 = Public/India Housing





53

PHIHCPDHousing



7a.


7b.

Type of Trade Code

(See below) 7c.



7d.


7e.


7f.Sec. 3

7g.


Number 7h

Sec. 3 7i.

State ZipB17-UC-45-0001 14,920 2 1 No 42-1606557 No SC 29301

B17-UC-45-0001 55,000 3 1 No 20-8296408 Yes SC 29601B17-UC-45-0001 30,000 3 1 No Yes

B17-UC-45-0001 15,000 4 2 Yes 20-4593516 Yes SC 29605



0 = Other

Upstae Circle of Friends 29 Ridgeway Dr Greenville

MP Services 400 Kent St Spartanburg

Rebuild Upstate 601 Green Ave Greenville

5 = Project Mangt. 6 = Hasidic Jews


3 = Repair 4 = Hispanic Americans 4 = Insured (Management) 8 = Section 8114 = Service 9 = Arch./Engrg. Appraisal 5 = Asian/Pacific Americans

1 = New Construction 2 = Black Americans 2= Flexible Subsidy 6 = HUD-Held (Management)

2 = Substantial Rehab. 3 = Native Americans 3 = Section 8 Noninsured, Non-HFDA 7 = Public/India Housing

7c: Type of Trade Codes: 7d: Racial/Ethnic Codes: 5: Program Codes (Complete for Housing and Public and Indian Housing programs only):Housing/Public Housing: 1 = White Americans 1 = All Insured, including Section8 5 = Section 202


Name Street City


Stanley Wilson 864-242-9801 Oct. 1 - Sept. 30 (Annual -FY)

Greenville County Redevelopment Authority Suite 2500

Contract and Subcontract Activity U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OMB Approval No.: 2577-0088 OMB Approval No.: 2502-0355




Check if:301 University Ridge





54

Binder9 - Greenville County Redevelopment Authority · 2017 CAPER Greenville County Consolidated...

Documents

Transcript of Binder9 - Greenville County Redevelopment Authority · 2017 CAPER Greenville County Consolidated...