Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S....
-
Upload
mohammad-midgley -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S....
![Page 1: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting
November 29, 2005
Paul S. HerrnsonUniversity of Maryland
National Science Foundation grant 0306698 Carnegie Corporation grant D05008
![Page 2: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
Importance of Voting System and Ballot Design
Voting Systems Ballots Study Design Findings Implications
![Page 3: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Importance of Voting Systems and Ballot Designs
Individuals’ abilities to vote accurately Candidates selected Completion of the ballot Outcomes of some close elections Trust, confidence, and satisfaction with
elections Opinions about the legitimacy of government
![Page 4: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Voting Systems:Minimal Requirements
Enable voters to accurately register their voting intentions
Accurately record votes Accurately count votesPrevent coercion or vote tampering
![Page 5: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Ballot Design Matters
The “Butterfly Ballot” used in Palm Beach County, Florida
![Page 6: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Voting Technology Matters
Votomatic Vote III – Used in Palm Beach County,
Florida in 2000
Punch card systems used
by 28% of voters in 2000
![Page 7: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Poor Design Can Lead to Big Problems
Is this chad…Pregnant?
Dimpled?
Hanging?
For whom did this
person mean to vote?
Actually vote?
Florida canvassing board member Judge Robert Rosenberg. Source: Alan Diaz – Associated Press
![Page 8: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Overall Study Objectives
Test the usability and accuracy of existing voting technology and ballots
Create and test the usability and accuracy of new voting technologies
Assess the responses of different population groups
Develop recommendations
![Page 9: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Selected Collaborations
Governmental – Federal Election Commission – Board of Elections, State of Maryland– Board of Elections, Prince Georges County, Maryland– National Institute of Standards and Technology
Voting System Manufacturers– Avante– Diebold– ES&S– Hart InterCivic– Nedap
![Page 10: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
This is NOT a Consumer Report
Not all voting systems were tested Not all features were assessed Not evaluate:
– Security– Affordability– Durability– Transportability– Disabled voters
![Page 11: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Voting Systems
Selected to illustrate specific design principles
![Page 12: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ES&S Model 100
System Type: Paper ballot/optical
scan Intake similar to a fax
machine Warnings for overvotes No warning for
undervotes Can cast a flawed ballot
![Page 13: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Diebold AccuVote-TS
System Type: Touch screen Smart card activation Manual navigation Ballot review Impossible to overvote Highlights undervotes
![Page 14: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Avante Vote Trakker
System Type: Touch screen Automatic advance
navigation Paper printout for
verification Impossible to overvote Highlights undervotes
![Page 15: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Zoomable Prototype
System Type: Zooming navigation Overview of full ballot Voting decisions
replace names of offices
Impossible to overvote Highlights undervotes Developed at the
University of Maryland
![Page 16: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Zooming in on One Election
![Page 17: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Hart InterCivic eSlate
System Type: Mechanical buttons and
dial for navigation and candidate selection
Impossible to overvote Highlights undervotes
![Page 18: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Nedap LibertyVote
System Type: Full-face voting system Membrane buttons to
select candidates Blue lights indicate
selections Impossible to overvote Warning for undervotes
![Page 19: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Selected to illustrate specific design principles
Ballots
![Page 20: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Office Bloc Ballot
O O
O O
O O
O
O
OO
OO
OO
O
O
O O
OO
O
O O O
OO
O O
O O O
O
Edward Z. Jones--President
John Fisher--Vice-President
DemocratSteve Kaiser--Vice-President
Republican
Republican
____________________
Write-InState Senator District 5
(Vote for ONE.)of the United States
Republican
Democrat
Attorney General ____________________
Natural Law
Governor & Lt. Governor
Republican
Democrat
(Vote for ONE.)Secretary of State
Write-In
Matthew Prior
Libertarian
Alan Slocum
United States Senator
Jose RodriguezFrank Searer
Roger Laird, Jr.
Write-In
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER State Auditor
Phillip Knox--Vice-PresidentLibertarian
Rebecca Rehberg
(Vote for ONE.)
Republican
District 28
DemocratLarry Herman
William Petelos
(Vote for ONE.)
(Vote for ONE.)
Linda Fisher
Bill ForbesDemocrat
U. S. Representative(Vote for ONE.)
Democrat
Write-In
Michael R. McCloud
Nathan Davis--President
Curtis G. Tucker--President
Natural Law
1. To vote, completely blacken the CIRCLE (?) to the LEFT of the candidate. Do not vote for more than the authorized number of candidates. 2. Use only the #2 pencil provided. 3. To vote for a person whose name is not on the ballot, write in the candidate's name on the Write-In line AND completely blacken the CIRCLE (?) to the LEFT of your choice. 4. If you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot to the election official for a new one. A vote that has been erased or changed will not be counted.
PARTISAN OFFICES
President & Vice-President
James Milligan--Lt. Gov.
____________________
Write-In
____________________
Jonathan Davic
District 3
Libertarian
State Representative
Victoria Snyder Republican
Joseph A. Jackson
Democrat
____________________Write-In
Cheryl Adams(Vote for no more than TWO.)
Republican
____________________
____________________
(Vote for ONE.)
Write-In
Ethan J. Edwards--Lt. Gov.
Conrad Schweitzer--Gov.
Joyce McGrath--Gov.
Democrat
Samantha Bolin
Helen Barclay
____________________
Libertarian
Republican
Jeffrey Jones
Libertarian
Democrat
Leonard Arnold
![Page 21: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Office Bloc Ballot with Straight-Party Voting Device
O O
O O
O O
O
O
OO
OO
OO
OOO OOO O OO
OO
O
O O O
OO
O O
O O O
O
Helen Barclay
____________________
LibertarianJeffrey Jones
Republican PartyLibertarian PartyGreen PartyNatural Law Party
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER1. To vote, completely blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the candidate. Do not vote for more than the authorized number of candidates. 2. Use only the #2 pencil provided. 3. To vote for a person whose name is not on the ballot, write in the candidate's name on the Write-In line AND completely blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of your choice. 4. If you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot to the election official for a new one. A vote that has been erased or changed will not be counted. 5. To vote for every candidate of one party, blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the name of the party for which you wish to vote. To vote for non- partisan offices, blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the candidate for whom you wish to vote.
PARTISAN OFFICES
STRAIGHT PARTY VOTINGDemocratic Party
Republican
Attorney General
Republican
Libertarian
Write-In
Matthew Prior
____________________
Democrat
Libertarian
State Representative
(Vote for no more than TWO.)District 3
Democrat
____________________Write-In
Cheryl Adams
(Vote for ONE.)
Linda Fisher
Bill ForbesDemocrat
U. S. Representative
(Vote for ONE.)
Democrat
Write-InState Senator District 5
(Vote for ONE.)
State Auditor
Phillip Knox--Vice-PresidentLibertarian
Natural Law
Libertarian
Alan Slocum
United States Senator
Jose RodriguezFrank Searer
Roger Laird, Jr.
Write-In
Democrat
Democrat
Leonard ArnoldRepublican
Samantha Bolin
Democrat
Write-In
(Vote for ONE.)Secretary of State
____________________
Joyce McGrath--Gov.
(Vote for ONE.)of the United States
Natural Law
Governor & Lt. GovernorWrite-In
(Vote for ONE.)
____________________
Ethan J. Edwards--Lt. Gov.
Conrad Schweitzer--Gov.
James Milligan--Lt. Gov.
Republican
District 28
President & Vice-President
DemocratLarry Herman
William Petelos
Rebecca Rehberg
(Vote for ONE.)
____________________
Republican
Republican
____________________
____________________
Victoria Snyder Republican
Write-In
Michael R. McCloud
Jonathan Davic
Joseph A. Jackson
Edward Z. Jones--President
John Fisher--Vice-President
DemocratSteve Kaiser--Vice-President
Republican
Nathan Davis--President
Curtis G. Tucker--President
Straight-party device
![Page 22: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Party Column Ballot
O O O
O O O
O O
1. To vote, completely blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the candidate.
2. Use only the #2 pencil provided.3. To vote for a person whose name is not on the ballot,
A vote that has been erased or changed will not be counted.
Do not vote for more than the authorized number of candidates.
AND completely blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of your choice.4. If you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot
write in the candidate's name on the Write-In line
to the election official for a new one.
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER
PARTISAN OFFICES
President & Vice-President of The United States (Vote for ONE.)
Rebecca Rehberg
Democrat
Larry Herman
Nathan Davis -- President
United States Representative District 28 (Vote for ONE.)
Republican
Phillip Knox -- Vice-President
Edward Z. Jones -- President
Steve Kaiser -- Vice-PresidentDemocrat
Frank SearerLibertarian
United States Senator (Vote for ONE.)
Libertarian
Alan Slocum
Republican
Linda Fisher
Curtis G. Tucker -- President
John Fisher -- Vice-President
Democrat Republican
![Page 23: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Research Approaches
Review by human-computer interaction experts
Laboratory tests @ 50 participants Natural experiments Field experiments @ 1,500 participants
![Page 24: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Selected Voting Tasks
Vote for candidates for 18 offices and 4 ballot questions
Vote for more than two candidates in a multi-candidate election
Change a vote
![Page 25: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Experimental Procedures
Complete cue sheet that lists votes they intend to cast
Vote on system and fill out evaluation form for each system
Complete questionnaire on demographics
![Page 26: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Selected Dependent Variables
Voter satisfaction Need for assistance Accuracy of votes cast
![Page 27: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Voter Satisfaction
Rate six systems from 1 to 7 (negative to positive)– Confident vote recorded accurately– Ease of use– Comfort– Characters easy to read– Ballot easy to understand– Correcting mistakes easy– Changing vote easy– Casting write-in vote easy
Satisfaction Index (1 to 7)
![Page 28: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Findings for Voter Satisfaction
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Average Satisfaction with each Voting System
Notes: Based on a scale of 1 (least) to 7 (most) positive.
![Page 29: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Features Criticized
![Page 30: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Need for Assistance
Did you feel the need to get help when using the machine?
10
20
30
40
50
■ Office bloc ballot■ Straight-party device (party column ballot for Nedap)
Note: Percent of voters report feeling the need for help.
![Page 31: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
O
OO
OO
OO
OOO OOO O OO
OO
O
O O O
OO
O O
O O O
O
Helen Barclay
____________________
LibertarianJeffrey Jones
Republican PartyLibertarian PartyGreen PartyNatural Law Party
1. To vote, completely blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the candidate. Do not vote for more than the authorized number of candidates. 2. Use only the #2 pencil provided. 3. To vote for a person whose name is not on the ballot, write in the candidate's name on the Write-In line AND completely blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of your choice. 4. If you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot to the election official for a new one. A vote that has been erased or changed will not be counted. 5. To vote for every candidate of one party, blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the name of the party for which you wish to vote. To vote for non- partisan offices, blacken the CIRCLE (●) to the LEFT of the candidate for whom you wish to vote.
PARTISAN OFFICES
STRAIGHT PARTY VOTINGDemocratic Party
Republican
Attorney General
Republican
Libertarian
Write-In
Matthew Prior
____________________
Democrat
Libertarian
State Representative
(Vote for no more than TWO.)District 3
Democrat
____________________Write-In
Cheryl Adams
Bill ForbesDemocrat
U. S. RepresentativeWrite-In (Vote for ONE.)
Phillip Knox--Vice-PresidentLibertarian
Natural Law
Democrat
Leonard ArnoldRepublican
Samantha Bolin
Democrat
Write-In
(Vote for ONE.)Secretary of State
____________________
Joyce McGrath--Gov.
(Vote for ONE.)of the United States
Natural Law
Governor & Lt. GovernorWrite-In
(Vote for ONE.)
____________________
Ethan J. Edwards--Lt. Gov.
Conrad Schweitzer--Gov.
James Milligan--Lt. Gov.
District 28
President & Vice-President
DemocratLarry Herman
William Petelos
Rebecca Rehberg
(Vote for ONE.)
Republican
____________________
Victoria Snyder Republican
Write-In
Michael R. McCloud
Jonathan Davic
Joseph A. Jackson
Edward Z. Jones--President
John Fisher--Vice-President
DemocratSteve Kaiser--Vice-President
Republican
Nathan Davis--President
Curtis G. Tucker--President
O O O
O O O
O O
PARTISAN OFFICES
President & Vice-President of The United States (Vote for ONE.)
Rebecca Rehberg
Democrat
Larry Herman
Nathan Davis -- President
United States Representative District 28 (Vote for ONE.)
Republican
Phillip Knox -- Vice-President
Edward Z. Jones -- President
Steve Kaiser -- Vice-PresidentDemocrat
Frank SearerLibertarian
United States Senator (Vote for ONE.)
Libertarian
Alan Slocum
Republican
Linda Fisher
Curtis G. Tucker -- President
John Fisher -- Vice-President
Democrat Republican
O O
O O
O O
O
O
OO
OO
OO
O
O
O O
OO
O
O O O
OO
O O
O O O
O
Edward Z. Jones--President
John Fisher--Vice-President
DemocratSteve Kaiser--Vice-President
Republican
Republican
____________________
Write-InState Senator District 5
(Vote for ONE.)of the United States
Republican
Democrat
Attorney General ____________________
Natural Law
Governor & Lt. Governor
Republican
Democrat
(Vote for ONE.)Secretary of State
Write-In
Matthew Prior
Libertarian
Alan Slocum
United States Senator
Jose RodriguezFrank Searer
Roger Laird, Jr.
Write-In
INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTER State Auditor
Phillip Knox--Vice-PresidentLibertarian
Rebecca Rehberg
(Vote for ONE.)
Republican
District 28
DemocratLarry Herman
William Petelos
(Vote for ONE.)
(Vote for ONE.)
Linda Fisher
Bill ForbesDemocrat
U. S. Representative(Vote for ONE.)
Democrat
Write-In
Michael R. McCloud
Nathan Davis--President
Curtis G. Tucker--President
Natural Law
1. To vote, completely blacken the CIRCLE (?) to the LEFT of the candidate. Do not vote for more than the authorized number of candidates. 2. Use only the #2 pencil provided. 3. To vote for a person whose name is not on the ballot, write in the candidate's name on the Write-In line AND completely blacken the CIRCLE (?) to the LEFT of your choice. 4. If you make a mistake while voting, return the ballot to the election official for a new one. A vote that has been erased or changed will not be counted.
PARTISAN OFFICES
President & Vice-President
James Milligan--Lt. Gov.
____________________
Write-In
____________________
Jonathan Davic
District 3
Libertarian
State Representative
Victoria Snyder Republican
Joseph A. Jackson
Democrat
____________________Write-In
Cheryl Adams(Vote for no more than TWO.)
Republican
____________________
____________________
(Vote for ONE.)
Write-In
Ethan J. Edwards--Lt. Gov.
Conrad Schweitzer--Gov.
Joyce McGrath--Gov.
Democrat
Samantha Bolin
Helen Barclay
____________________
Libertarian
Republican
Jeffrey Jones
Libertarian
Democrat
Leonard Arnold
Sources of confusion
Least problematic
![Page 32: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Accuracy Measures
Correct Vote– Selection matches candidate indicated in booklet
Types of errors– Vote incorrectly cast for the candidate listed
before or after candidate in booklet (slip)– Vote cast for some other candidate– No vote cast– Write-in incorrectly cast
![Page 33: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The Impact of Voting Systems on the Accuracy of Voting
OfficeES&SModel
100
DieboldAccuVote
TS
AvanteVote
Trakker
ZoomablePrototype
Hart InterCivic
eSlate
NedapLiberty
Vote
US President 95.7 96.6 96.6 97.4 96.2 96.2
Vote for Two
State Rep. (1) 95.0 97.0 94.6 97.5 88.6 94.1
State Rep. (2) 94.0 95.3 93.7 95.2 88.3 92.9
Change Vote
Probate Judge 84.2 85.0 79.6 84.8 86.3 85.1
![Page 34: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Multivariate Hypotheses
Digital divide– Computer use, education, age, English as primary
language, sex, race/ethnicity Previous voting experience
– Voted previously– System voted on (touch screens, wheels and buttons, paper
trails, etc.) Partisanship
– Democrat, Republican, Independent, other– Strength of Partisanship
Ballot Design – Office bloc, straight-party device (party column for Nedap)
![Page 35: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Overview of Multivariate Findings
All systems performed well Paper vs. Touch Screens
– Voters just as confident votes were recorded accurately on touch screen systems
– Paper ballots and paper receipts did not inspire more confidence or result in greater accuracy
Office bloc ballots performed better regardless of voting system
– Voter satisfaction– Need for help– Accuracy of votes cast
![Page 36: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Voter Satisfaction
Few variables consistently influence voter satisfaction across systems
Some evidence of the digital divide– Frequent computer users preferred touch screens– Elderly disliked mechanical and zoomable
interfaces
Partisanship had no impact
![Page 37: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Request for Help
Significant evidence of the digital divide – Computer usage– Education– Age– English as primary language– Sex
Partisanship had no impact
![Page 38: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Accuracy of Voting
Significant evidence of the digital divide– Computer usage– Education– Age– English as primary language– Sex– Race/ethnicity
Strength of partisanship Prior voting experience had no impact
![Page 39: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Impact of Study
Voting system manufacturers have changed some aspects of their systems– Auto-advance– “Standard” ballot layout– Notification of undervotes
Election officials purchase systems, design ballots, and deploy resources
Others replicate research (Utah, NIST)
![Page 40: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Conclusions
Voting technology and ballot styles influence– Voter trust, confidence, & satisfaction in general– Need for assistance when voting– Accuracy with which votes are cast
The way people cast their votes is important– Can influence some close elections– Influences confidence and faith in the political
system
![Page 41: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Research Team
Paul Herrnson, PI, Center for American Politics and Citizenship, University of Maryland
Benjamin Bederson, Center for Human-Computer Interaction, University of Maryland
Richard Niemi, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester
Michael Hanmer, Department of Government, Georgetown University
Frederick Conrad, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan
Michael Traugott, Center for Political Studies,Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan
![Page 42: Beyond the Hanging Chad: The Promise and Performance of Electronic Voting November 29, 2005 Paul S. Herrnson University of Maryland National Science Foundation.](https://reader036.fdocuments.net/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649c8f5503460f949489d7/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
For More Information
www.capc.umd.edu
Thank you!