BEST PRACTICES FOR SURGICAL SITE INFECTION (SSI)Surgical Site Infection (SSI) 11/11/2013 31 For...
Transcript of BEST PRACTICES FOR SURGICAL SITE INFECTION (SSI)Surgical Site Infection (SSI) 11/11/2013 31 For...
BEST PRACTICES FOR SURGICAL SITE INFECTION (SSI)
Janet Sullivan RN, BSN, CIC
November 20, 2013
Discuss the impact of SSIs on patient safety
and the cost of healthcare
Describe the CDC’s surveillance methodology
for SSIs.
Apply the definitions of infection used for SSI
surveillance, including criteria for superficial,
deep, and organ/space infections
Use the surveillance data to generate infection
rates and reports that can be integrated into
your ASC’s QAPI program
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
This webinar will review key concepts of the
SSI option in NHSN
In addition, participants will become familiar
with the page content of NHSN’s
“Surveillance for Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Events
http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-
hospital/ssi/index.html
3 11/11/2013
IS YOUR FACILITY PARTICIPATING IN NHSN’S PATIENT SAFETY, PROCEDURE-ASSOCIATED MODULE: SURGICAL SITE SURVEILLANCE?
4 11/11/2013
Discuss the impact of SSIs on patient
safety and the cost of healthcare Describe the CDC’s surveillance methodology for SSIs
Apply the definitions of infection used for SSI surveillance,
including criteria for superficial, deep, and organ/space
infections
Use the surveillance data to generate infection rates and
reports that can be integrated into your ASC’s QAPI
program
Learning Objectives
5 11/11/2013
Despite advances in infection prevention practices, SSI
remains a substantial cost of morbidity and mortality in the
inpatient setting
SSIs are the most common healthcare associated infection,
accounting for 31% of all HAIs among hospitalized patients
Account for 42% of the extra dollar charges attributed to
HAIs ($5-10 billion annually)
Current data related to surgical site infections (SSIs) and
other HAIs come primarily from hospitals, which have an
established infrastructure with personnel dedicated to
infection control and prevention and HAI surveillance
Surgical Site Infection-Financial Cost
6 11/11/2013
The patient experience…. • The pain and ‘stinking’ leaking wounds lasted
for weeks and months leaving patients feeling in ‘utter despair’ and ‘wanting to die’
• The psychological stress on patients and their families was immense, coping with the infection as well as the financial costs of being off work
Surgical Site Infection-Human Cost
7 11/11/2013
Tanner J, et al. Patients’ experience of surgical site infection. Journal of Infection Prevention. July 2012;13(4).
ASC SSI reporting
8 11/11/2013
National estimates regarding the number of
HAIs originating in ASCs are not available
and little is known about infection control
and prevention practices in these settings
Massachusetts, Nevada, New Hampshire
and Texas, have state mandates for SSI
reporting in ASCs; the aforementioned
states are using NHSN to report SSIs in ASCs
Evaluation of these states’ experiences will
be needed to determine how the system
might be tailored to better fit the needs of
outpatient settings
Currently, all Medicare-certified ASCs are expected, as part of the CMS CfCs (Conditions for Coverage), to have a system in place to actively identify infections that may have been related to procedures performed in the ASC. To support a consistent approach to HAI surveillance in ASCs, by December 31, 2013, HHS, with stakeholder input, will perform the following
1. Identify a set of ASC procedures for which SSI definitions and methods should be developed; and,
2. Establish a multi-year plan and phased approach to support their routine surveillance
The tentative release date for NHSN’s new Outpatient Procedure
component for the
reporting of surgical procedures and subsequent SSIs by ASCs and
hospital
outpatient departments has been revised to July 2015
Updates will be provided via quarterly newsletter as they become
available
http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/newsletters.html
ASC SSI reporting
9 11/11/2013
http://www.dhhs.nh.gov/dphs/cdcs/hai/documents/hai2012-asc.pdf
10 11/11/2013
Discuss the impact of SSIs on patient safety and the
cost of healthcare
Describe the CDC’s surveillance
methodology for SSIs Apply the definitions of infection used for SSI
surveillance, including criteria for superficial, deep,
and organ/space infections
Use the surveillance data to generate infection rates
and reports that can be integrated into your ASC’s
QAPI program
Learning Objectives
11 11/11/2013
Step One: SSI surveillance
12 11/11/2013
A. Decide which procedures will be monitored and record them in a Monthly Reporting Plan
- CMS, State or Corporate required - The highest volume - Ones that you feel might carry a higher risk - Surgeon request
B. Is it considered a NHSN surgical procedure - require 30 day or 90 day post op surveillance - this is a change from the 2012 SSI criteria—no longer
follow implant surgery for one year. Only 30 day or 90 day
surveillance is required for 2013 procedures C. Complete denominator form(s) for each procedure monitored - Spreadsheet with data elements
Examples
13 11/11/2013
1. Your ASC center performs a high volume of laparoscopic inguinal
hernia repairs and
you decide you’d like to perform surveillance on this procedure group
2. A surgeon has noticed a spike in infections related to percutaneous
endoscopic gastrostomy tubes being inserted at your ASC facility. He
has requested
these be monitored for 6 months
First thing you need to know is the ICD-9 codes assigned to each
procedure. This determines which NHSN procedure code category it
falls into and guides the time period for post op SSI surveillance
B. How do I know which “category” the procedure falls into?
14 11/11/2013
Go to: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/ssi/index.html
Scroll down to ICD-CM Procedure Code Mapping to NHSN Operative Procedure Categories
NHSN 2014 changes
15 11/11/2013
Transition from ICD-9-CM codes to ICD-10-PCS and
CPT codes
• Previously: migrating to exclusive use of CPT
codes by
January 2015
• Current: Allow BOTH ICD-10-PCS and CPT
codes for 2015
SSI reporting
• Dual mapping to operative procedure
categories for both code
set by mid-to-late 2014
B. How do I know how long to follow the procedure for
development of SSI?
16 11/11/2013
Go to: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/acute-care-hospital/ssi/index.html
Scroll down to Protocols: SSI event
17 11/11/2013
Denominator list
18 11/11/2013
Knowledge check
19 11/11/2013
Columbia River ASC has chosen to monitor knee arthroscopy chondroplasty (ICD-9 80.96 –OTH code) procedures during the month of June. 40 procedures are performed in June and 2 of these procedures result in SSIs. If entering the denominators on an Excel spreadsheet, how many lines will be occupied with patient information, procedures, and additional information? Choose one: a. 40 b. 42 c. 2
a. 40
In
tr
o
d
u
ct
ion
S
ur
v
ei
ll
a
n
c
e
M
et
h
o
d
ol
o
gy
D
ef
in
iti
o
ns
&
Pr
ot
o
c
ols
Step Two: SSI surveillance
20 11/11/2013
Decide on a surveillance method that will be used to capture potential SSIs
• Surgeons: Self report, mailed/faxed form • Patients: Phone calls or mail survey • Micro data: Wound cultures • Pharmacy: Antibiotics prescribed • Coding data: Office visit
Method Potential Advantages Potential Disadvantages Routine wound examination by trained professional
High sensitivity and specificity Labor intensive, prospective only
Outpatient chart review by trained professionals
High sensitivity and specificity Labor intensive
Surgeon Reporting Self Initiated High specificity, resource efficient Poor sensitivity Mail Survey Acceptable specificity, relatively
resource efficient Suboptimal sensitivity
Patient reporting Mail Survey Relatively resource efficient Unreliable sensitivity and
specificity Telephone Survey Good public relations Labor intensive, unreliable
sensitivity and specificity Microbiological data Relatively resource efficient, may
“flag” potential SSIs Unreliable sensitivity and specificity.
Claims data algorithm incorporating discharge diagnosis codes, procedure codes, pharmacological Rx date*
Electronically available, increased sensitivity and positive predictive value
Changes in coding practices with changes in pay for performance practices, applicable in a limited, managed care type setting where patients follow up in the same system that they received operative treatment; poor sensitivity
Clinic notes text searching ** Can be individualized to discipline No widely accepted benchmark for f/u rates, definitions would need to be standardized by discipline, rate of f/u influenced by multiple factors, attrition bias (f/u response not representative of the original population)
Step two: Methods to identify potential SSIs TABLE 9. Summary of Literature Review of Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Practices Conducted in Non-Acute Care Settings*
Key References/Notes: Manian FA. Surveillance of in alternative settings: Exploring the current options. Am J Infect Control 1997;25:102-5. *Yokoe DS, et al. Enhanced identification of postoperative infections among inpatients. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2004;10:1924-1930. **Michelson J. Improved detection of orthopedic surgical site infections occurring in outpatients. Clin Orthop Rel Research 2005; 433:218-224.
21 11/11/2013
Sample: Surgeon Surveillance Form
22 11/11/2013
Discuss the impact of SSIs on patient safety and the cost of
healthcare.
Describe the CDC’s surveillance methodology for SSIs
Apply the definitions of infection used
for SSI surveillance, including criteria
for superficial, deep, and organ/space
infections Use the surveillance data to generate infection rates and
reports that can be integrated into your ASC’s QAPI program
SSI Learning Objectives
23 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
24 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
25 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
26 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
27 11/11/2013
Which of these is/are considered primary closure?
28 11/11/2013
Answer: A & B.
Per NHSN if any part of the
wound is approximated, it is considered a
primary closure
A
B
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
29 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
30 11/11/2013
Surveillance period for Deep Incisional or Organ Space SSI http://nhsn.cdc.gov/nhsntraining/courses/C08/page3934.html
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
31 11/11/2013
For any/all NHSN procedures:
In the first 30 days post op,
monitor for superficial, deep, or
organ/space
For a selected group of NHSN
Group of NHSN operative
procedures: up to 90 days post op,
monitor for deep incisional or
organ/space
32 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
33 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
34 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
35 11/11/2013
Knowledge check
36 11/11/2013
You are doing surveillance on breast expander
exchange to a silicone implant.
You find that the ICD 9 code for this procedure is 85.96
– BRST code.
Mrs. Doe underwent this procedure on July 15. She
returned to the surgeon’s office on September 1 for a
routine check.
The surgeon recorded “purulent drainage from the
superficial surgical site”.
Does this meet criterion for superficial incisional SSI? No—doesn’t occur within 30
days post op
Is 30 day or 90 day surveillance performed on
this procedure?
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
37 11/11/2013
38 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Knowledge check
39 11/11/2013
You are doing surveillance on cervical laminectomy
procedures with 03.09
ICD 9 code – LAM code.
Mr. Doe underwent this procedure on July 18. He returned to
the surgeon’s office on September 15 with purulent wound
drainage, the superficial wound was opened and culture was
taken. He was admitted to the hospital from the surgeon’s
office and underwent an exploration. They opened the incision
with several retractors and cut the fascia to expose the dura.
No frank purulence was found in the wound. Deep wound
cultures were taken. The thecal sac was inspected with no
evidence of CSF leak. All the wound cultures were positive for
MSSA.
Does this meet criteria for superficial incisional SSI?
No-outside the 30 day window for surveillance
Does this meet criteria for deep incisional SSI?
No-surveillance for this procedure past 30 days post
op is not performed
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
40 11/11/2013
http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/17pscNosInfDef_current.pdf
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
41 11/11/2013
Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
42 11/11/2013
http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/ambulatory-
surgery/ssi/index.html
Knowledge check
43 11/11/2013
You are doing surveillance on shoulder arthroscopic repairs.
(ICD 9 is 81.83- OTH code)
Mrs. Post underwent this procedure on 9/24 for repair of the labrum
(tennis player). She returned to the surgeon’s office on 10/25 with
concerns of serosanguineous drainage from incisional site
accompanied with joint pain and limitation of movement which began
on 10/23.
The surgeon cleans the site with sterile gauze and sterile normal
saline, aseptically obtains a culture as he expresses more fluid from
wound, and then aspirates synovial fluid for analysis and culture. The
incisional and synovial cultures are positive for S. epidermis.
Microscopic exam of the synovial fluid revealed a WBC count of
15,000 with neutrophil at 77%, very low glucose and high protein
level. Surgeon diagnosis patient with a surgical site infection.
Does this meet criteria for superficial incisional SSI?
Does this meet criteria for Organ/Space infection?
Yes—organism isolated from aseptically obtained
culture of fluid
Yes—meets criteria b. of organ/space and #1
of JNT criteria
Is 30 day or 90 day surveillance performed on this
procedure?
Which one would you report it as?
Organ Space-JNT Always report the deepest level
Same patient-little different info
44 11/11/2013
Mrs. Post underwent this procedure on September 24th
for repair of the labrum. She returned to the surgeon’s
office on October 25 with concerns of serosanguineous
drainage from incisional site accompanied with joint
pain and limitation of movement which began on
October 23rd.
The surgeon cleans the site with sterile gauze and
sterile normal saline, aseptically obtains a culture as he
expresses more fluid from wound, and then aspirates
synovial fluid for analysis and culture. The incisional
and synovial fluid cultures were negative. Synovial fluid
was purulent and microscopic exam of that revealed a
WBC count of 15,000 with neutrophil at 77%, very low
glucose and high protein level
Does this meet criteria for
Organ/Space infection?
Yes-meets c. of Organ/Space
Meets #2 and # 3c of JNT
SSI scenario
45 11/11/2013
Mr. Rottman underwent a laparoscopic left inguinal
hernia with mesh via total extraperitoneal (TEP)
approach on October 28th. The ICD-9 code was 17.12
– HER code. He returned to the surgeon’s office on
November 30th with increasing pain/discomfort in left
groin site. The surgeon re-explored the site for fear of
strangulated recurrent left inguinal hernia. “An incision
was made extending from the pubic tubercle just to
beyond the deep inguinal ring and revealed an infected
pre-peritoneal mesh that was submerged in a lake of
pus”. Culture of the pus revealed no growth.
Surgeon diagnosed patient with surgical site infection. Does this meet criteria for superficial SSI?
No-past 30 days post op and below superficial layers anyway
Does this meet criteria for deep incisional SSI?
Yes-occurs within 90 days post op, involves the deep tissues and includes
a. purulent drainage from the deep incision (DIP)
SSI scenario
46 11/11/2013
Mrs. Sullivan underwent a open reduction and internal
fixation of right displaced radius fracture on October 1
(fx due to fall). The ICD-9 code was 79.32 – FX code.
She returned to the surgeon’s office on October 15th
with increasing redness, pain, heat and scant
serosanguineous drainage at her surgical incision. No
cultures are done. The surgeon diagnosis the patient
with “cellulitis” and prescribes Keflex for two weeks.
Does this meet criteria for SSI? No
The patient returns to the office in two days (Oct 17th)
with worsening redness, increasing pain and superficial
dehiscence of wound. No cultures are done. The
surgeon begins local wound care (betadine soaked
gauze BID) and documents “poor wound healing”. He
changes her antibiotic therapy to Bactrim.
Does this meet criteria
for SSI?
No
The patient returns in three weeks later (Nov 17th) with
fever 38.60C and purulence in her wound. The surgeon
explores the wound (in the OR) and takes “deep
wound” cultures which return positive for MRSA
Does this meet criteria
for SSI? Which category? Deep incisional
primary (DIP)
SSI Numerator Collection Forms
47 11/11/2013
SSI Collection Form Alternative (if not reporting in NHSN)
48 11/11/2013
Discuss the impact of SSIs on patient safety and the
cost of healthcare
Describe the CDC’s surveillance methodology for SSIs.
Apply the definitions of infection used for SSI
surveillance, including criteria for superficial, deep,
and organ/space infections
Use the surveillance data to generate infection rates
and reports that can be integrated into your ASC’s
QAPI program
SSI Learning Objectives
49 11/11/2013
Calculating Non-stratified SSI rates: #infections/#procedures performed X 100
50 11/11/2013
51 11/11/2013
Display of SSI organisms
52 11/11/2013
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
ASC IP notified of an “increase” in laminectomy
infections.
Timeline of Events: Craniotomy Surgical Site Infection Reduction Project
IP performed retrospective surveillance for lami infections and conducted observations in the operating room during lami procedures. At it’s height, lami
infections exceeded 4%.
Periop: promote pre-op showers, am pre-op CHG cloth wipe, eliminate multi-use patient items, reduce traffic in the OR, standardize skin prep and incision care orders and develop “lami checklist” for compliance auditing. .
Neurosurgeons were notified of intra-op non-compliance for follow-up.
Roll-out of checklist
Lami infection rates declined to <2% for two consecutive quarters. Peri-operative Services went live with a unified electronic charting system.
Checklist incorporated into electronic charting system.
Validated 100% compliance with key checklist elements. Infection rate <2%
for last 4 of 5 quarters. Wrap-up
of project; surveillance to
continue.
Timeline of Laminectomy SSI Improvement Project
54 11/11/2013
WHEW-dog tired?
55 11/11/2013
Questio
ns/
Discussi
on
Participation Code
• The 5 digit confirmation code for this webinar is: 67890
• You will be asked to enter this in the evaluation