BEST PRACTICES WITH BING ADSMARCH 12, 2014

WHO ARE YOU?

ERIC COUCHSENIOR PPC ACCOUNT MANAGER,HEAD OF TRAINING@HANAPIN MARKETING.WRITER @ PPC HEROwww.ppchero.com

@ecouch11@ecouch11#SMX #23B

ME, MYSELF & BING

EARLY ADOPTER FREQUENT AUTHOR

SPENT $1.3M IN THE LAST YEAR ON BING

LEAD GENERATION+

ECOMMERCE@ecouch11#SMX #23B

OVERVIEW

BEST PRACTICESDYNAMIC AD PARAMETERSPOLICIESREPORTING

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BEST PRACTICES

HOW ARE THEY DIFFERENT FROM GOOGLE?

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

IS IT DIFFERENT?

ARE ACCOUNT STRUCTURE BEST PRACTICES DIFFERENT?

… NOT REALLY.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHY?

BECAUSE OF PORTABILITY.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

IS IT DIFFERENT?

ARE DEVICE TARGETING BEST PRACTICES DIFFERENT?

YUP.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHY?

BECAUSE OF ENHANCED CAMPAIGNS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHAT’S DIFFERENT?

DEVICE SEGMENTATION.

OR

DEVICE BID MODIFIERS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE CASE FOR SEGMENTATION

MOBILE CPA = 40% MOBILE SPEND = 80%TABLET CPA = 13%

TABLET IMPRESSIONS, CLICKS, & COST = DRASTICALLY.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE CASE FOR SEGMENTATION

BING STAYED ABOUT THE SAME.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

IS IT DIFFERENT?

ARE OPTIMIZATIONBEST PRACTICES DIFFERENT?

NO. AND YES.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WAIT, WHAT?

THE DAY-TO-DAY ROUTINE ISN’T DIFFERENT.

THE DETAILS SHOULD ABSOLUTELY BE DIFFERENT.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

DETAILS, DETAILS, DETAILS…

BIDSAD REVIEWSGEOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCENEGATIVE KEYWORDSETC.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

SERIOUSLY, BIDS?

I KNOW, I KNOW.

BUT IT HAPPENS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

MATCH TYPES

THE DANGERS OF BING BROAD MATCH.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BROAD MATCH VIGILANCE

BING BROAD MATCH ISN’T INHERENTLY MORE INEFFICIENT THAN ADWORDS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BROAD MATCH VIGILANCE

WE ACTUALLY SEE SUCCESS WITH IT MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, WHICH LEADS TO SOME INTERESTING ISSUES.

LIKE WITH BRANDED TERMS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

CASE STUDY!

CLIENT CAME TO US WITH CLIMBING CPA ON BRAND TERMS.

KEYWORD CPA WAS VOLATILE, SPIKING UP TO $356 – THE GOAL IS $44.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE PROBLEM

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE PROBLEM

THIS KEYWORD WAS A VICTIM OF ITS’ OWN SUCCESS.

HIGH QUALITY SCORE+HIGH BID+BROAD MATCH

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE PROBLEM

EQUALS…

50% IRRELEVANT CLICKS/IMPR.

80% IRRELEVANT QUERIES.

84% IRRELEVANT SPEND.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

APPLES TO APPLES

IS THAT APPRECIABLY DIFFERENT FROM GOOGLE?

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

APPLES TO APPLES

SAME KEYWORD.

SAME CAMPAIGN STRUCTURE.

SAME NEGATIVES.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

APPLES TO APPLES

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

APPLES TO APPLES

ENGINEUNIQUE QUERIES (TOTAL)

UNIQUE QUERIES (BROAD)

SPEND (BROAD)

BING 326 267 $3,300.96

GOOGLE 78 2 $14.90

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE TAKEAWAY

BING BROAD MATCH ISN’T INHERENTLY BAD – THE ACTUAL KEYWORD WAS AT A $49 CPA FOR THE MONTH.

IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL KEYWORD, UNTIL THE VOLATILITY HIT.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE TAKEAWAY

BUT IF YOU HAVE A KEYWORD WITH A SPECIFIC INTENT BEHIND IT, LIKE BRAND TERMS:

• USE MODIFIED BROAD INSTEAD.• SEGMENT OUT BROAD MATCH

CAMPAIGNS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE TAKEAWAY

AND USE MORENEGATIVE KEYWORDS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

IS IT DIFFERENT?

ARE AD COPY BEST PRACTICES DIFFERENT?

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

IF YOU’RE ASKING ME WHETHER OR NOT YOU CAN STOP USING A CALL TO ACTION, THEN NO.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

BING HAS A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE FROM ADWORDS – 71 TOTAL CHARACTERS IN THE AD TEXT.

NOT JUST 35 PER LINE.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

THEORETICALLY, THIS ALLOWS YOU TO MAKE USE OF A LARGER VOCABULARY.

IN PRACTICE, THIS ISN’T AN APPRECIABLE DIFFRENCE.

FOR EXAMPLE:@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BING RESULTS PAGE

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

GOOGLE RESULTS PAGE

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

THESE ARE PRETTY MINOR DIFFERENCES.

HOWEVER, YOU COULD TEST LONGER-FORM MESSAGING…

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

OR MAKE USE OF EXTREMELY LONG WORDS IN THE MIDDLE OF YOUR BING ADS WITHOUT FEAR.

FOR INSTANCE…

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

IF YOU’RE IN THE BUSINESS OF TREATING PNEUMONOULTRAMICROSCOPICSILICOVOLCANOCONIOSIS*

YOU CAN ONLY FIT THAT IN ON BING.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MORE EFFECTIVE BING AD

WHY IS IT DIFFERENT?

SIDEBAR ADS, MOSTLY.

THAT’S IT.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE QUESTION

SO WHAT CAN WE DO TO DIFFERENTIATE BING ADS FROM GOOGLE?

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE ANSWER

DYNAMIC AD PARAMETERS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHAT ARE THEY?

SNIPPETS OF PLACEHOLDER TEXT THAT

DYNAMICALLY UPDATE YOUR ADS WITH TEXT RELEVANT TO THE TRIGGRED KEYWORDS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

HOW DO THEY WORK?

YOU AFFILIATE PARAMETER VALUES WITH EACH KEYWORD.

YOU CAN THEN WRITE ONE AD, WHICH DYNAMICALLY UPDATES BASED ON THE PARAMETERS IN USE.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE OLD WAY OF AD WRITING

THREE PRODUCTS, THREE OFFERS.

THREE AD GROUPS, THREE ADS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE NEW WAY OF AD WRITING

THREE KEYWORDS.

TWO PARAMETERS.

ONE AD.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE NEW WAY OF AD WRITING

STILL THREE KEYWORDS.

STILL TWO PARAMETERS.

ONE AD, DYNAMICALLY ALTERED BY THE MATCHED KEYWORD.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

STREAMLINED AD WRITING

UPDATING OFFERS WOULD USUALLY TAKE A WHOLE NEW ROUND OF AD COPY.

HERE, WE JUST UPDATE THE PARAMETERS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

ADVERTISER BEWARE

THERE ARE A COUPLE OF CAVEATS.

• BEWARE OF CHARACTER LIMITS. USE DEFAULT TEXT PLACEHOLDERS.

• MUDDLES THE AD REVIEW PROCESS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHY GO DYNAMIC?

BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS.

I KNOW, I WAS SURPRISED TOO.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHY GO DYNAMIC?

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

SOURCE: CASSIE OUMEDIAN

PPC HERO - “DOES DKI REALLY WORK?”http://www.ppchero.com/does-dki-really-work-case-study/

THE TAKEAWAY

DON’T LET THE TECHNICAL HURDLES DISSUADE YOU FROM TRYING BING DYNAMIC TEXT PLACEHOLDERS.

THEY’RE NOT THAT COMPLICATED.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

POLICY

IT’S TIME FOR SOME ANECDOTES.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

POLICY FRUSTRATION

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

GOOGLE ME

POLICY COOPERATION

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BING ME

POLICY TAKEAWAYS

BING AND GOOGLE POLICY ARE DIFFERENT, AND YOU CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT.

EXAMPLE: A CLIENT WENT SO FAR AS TO CREATE SEPARATE GOOGLE AND BING SITES.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

POLICY TAKEAWAYS

THE POLICY SPECIFICS VARY HEAVILY BY INDUSTRY, AND SHOULD BE TAKEN ON A CASE-BY-CASE BASIS.

THEY’RE ALSO ABOUT AS ENTERTAINING AS A PHONE BOOK.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

POLICY TAKEAWAYS

PLUS, TRYING TO QUOTE THEM IN JOHN’S PRESENCE IS LIKE TRYING TO DUNK ON MICHAEL JORDAN.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

AIR GAGNON

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

REPORTING

THE BING REPORT CENTER MAKES UP FOR 99% OF THE SHORTFALLS FOUND IN THE BING INTERFACE.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE REPORT CENTER

IF YOU SEE THIS ON A CONSISTENT BASIS:

THEN USE THE REPORT CENTER.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE REPORT CENTER

THE REPORT CENTER CAN ASSIST WITH:

KEYWORDS & BIDSSEARCH QUERY REPORTSGEOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCEAD REVIEWSETC.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THE REPORT CENTER

IT CAN ALSO HELP WITH:

SEARCH PARTNER QUALITY

IMPRESSION SHARE

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BING SEARCH PARTNERS

UNLIKE GOOGLE, BING HAS MORE TRANSPARENCY WITH THEIR SEARCH PARTNERS.

SO WHEN A CLIENT TELLS YOU THESE LEADS ARE BAD:

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

BING SEARCH PARTNERS

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

Source First Referring Site

PPC - Bing Content Network http://questhere.com/search?q=**********

PPC - Bing Content Network http://locateshow.com/search?q=********

PPC - Bing Content Network http://looknearly.com/search?q=********

PPC - Bing Content Network http://seeknearfind.com/search?q=********

WE CAN QUICKLY DIAGNOSE THAT THEY CAME FROM THE BING SEARCH PARTNER NETWORK THANKS TO THE WEBSITE URL (PUBLISHER) REPORT.

BING SEARCH PARTNERS

BUT IF YOU’RE LEAD GENERATION, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY OPT OUT OF THEM ANYWAY.

SERIOUSLY.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

IMPRESSION SHARE

WHAT ABOUT IMPRESSION SHARE REPORTING?

USE THESHARE OF VOICE REPORT.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

ONE OF MY FAVORITE TRICKS

DOWNLOAD A SHARE OF VOICE REPORT FROM BING, AND AN IMPRESSION SHARE REPORT FROM ADWORDS.

WHAT NEXT?

EXCEL SOLVER.@ecouch11#SMX #23B

EXCEL SOLVED BUDGETS

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

A MIX OF BING AND GOOGLE

CAMPAIGNS

AVERAGE DAILY SPEND ACROSS ALL

CAMPAIGNS

OPTIMAL BUDGET AS FOUND BY EXCEL SOLVER

SOURCE: SAM OWENPPC HERO – “HOW TO USE EXCEL SOLVER TO OPTIMIZE YOUR CAMPAIGN BUDGETS”http://www.ppchero.com/how-to-use-excel-solver-to-optimize-your-campaign-budgets/

EXCEL SOLVED BUDGETS

DID THIS ACTUALLYWORK?

YES.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

EXCEL SOLVED BUDGETS

YEAR-OVER-YEAR STATS, SAME CLIENT:

DECEMBER 2012: 172 LEADS, GOOGLE ONLY.

DECEMBER 2013: 614 LEADS, GOOGLE + BING.

BING ALONE?

207 LEADS.

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WRAP UP

BEST PRACTICESDYNAMIC AD PARAMETERSPOLICIESREPORTING

@ecouch11#SMX #23B

WHO ARE YOU?

ERIC COUCHSENIOR PPC ACCOUNT MANAGER,HEAD OF TRAINING@HANAPIN MARKETINGWRITER @ PPC HEROwww.ppchero.com

@ecouch11@ecouch11#SMX #23B

THANK YOU!

@ecouch11#SMX #23B