BEST: Bioenergy resources (CHP) providing energy system flexibility. Juha Haakana
-
Upload
clic-innovation-ltd -
Category
Environment
-
view
52 -
download
1
Transcript of BEST: Bioenergy resources (CHP) providing energy system flexibility. Juha Haakana
BIOENERGY RESOURCES (CHP)
PROVIDING ENERGY SYSTEM
FLEXIBILITY
BEST WP1 seminar
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Juha Haakana, Lappeenranta University of Technology
Electricity Market + CO2-price
Efficient operation of system Sustainability Security
Renewable based production
and subsidies
???
2
Renewables, security of supply and efficiency
Solar power prices have dropped fast
Prices in Germany
Source: Fraunhofer ISE ”Recent Facts about
Photovoltaics in Germany “
Source: Antti Kosonen
1.4 1.8 2.2 2.8 3.9 5.3 6.9 9.415.8
23.2
40.0
69.7
100.5
138.9
179.4
257.0
0.0
50.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
Glo
ba
l ca
pa
city o
f so
lar
po
we
r syste
ms [
GW
]
Source: cleantechnica .com
Global solar capacity [GW]
Electricity Market + CO2-price
Efficient operation of system Sustainability Security
Renewable based production
and subsidies
Shorter operation times,
different running ranking,
worse economics
More renewable based production,
improved sustainability
More uncontrollable renewable
based production having high
output variation,
new challenges in intermittency,
lack of controllable production,
lack of inertia
4
Renewables, security of supply and efficiency
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Jan
-04
Sep
-04
May
-05
Jan
-06
Sep
-06
May
-07
Jan
-08
Sep
-08
May
-09
Jan
-10
Sep
-10
May
-11
Jan
-12
Sep
-12
May
-13
Jan
-14
Sep
-14
May
-15
Jan
-16
Sep
-16
Fin
nis
h m
on
thly
ave
rage
Els
po
t p
rice
€
/Mw
h
Electricity pricing
System price €/MWh
CHP is often on the edge
Source:
Nord Pool
Electrical power system frequency
Frequency deviation has
increased considerably between
2008 and 2016
Fre
qu
en
cy
[Hz]
Deadband
Electricity Market + CO2-price
Efficient operation of system Sustainability Security of supply
Renewable based production
and subsidies
Storages Demand responseControllable
productionNew transmission lines
How to solve the problem
?
When ? How? Profitability? Acceptability?
XShorter operation times,
different running ranking,
worse economics
More uncontrollable renewable
based production having high
output variation, new challenges
in intermittency, lack of
controllable production, lack of
inertia
More renewable based
production, excellent
sustainability
Low price of
electricity –
incentives for
investments ?
Capacity Market?
Payments of readiness to produce electricity or reduce consumption
Role of CHP
Renewables, security of supply and efficiency
Heat market
Electricity markets
• Day-ahead market Elspot (13:00, 1 MW)
• Intraday market (one hour before delivery, 1 MW)
• Reserve markets
• FCR-N (Frequency containment reserve - normal),
(hourly market 18:00) up and down regulation (0.1 MW)
• FCR-D (Frequency containment reserve - disturbance),
(hourly market 18:00) up regulation (1 MW)
• FRR-A (Frequency restoration reserve - automatic),
(hourly market 17:00) up and down regulation (5 MW)
• FRR-M (Frequency restoration reserve - manual)
Traditional markets
New business: Reserve markets
Source: Fingrid
Participation in new energy market sectors
Electricity markets
Role of CHP in future power system
• CHP has capability to respond fast in power regulation
demand
• Electricity prices in spot markets are relatively low
profitability to operate is poor New business
• Finnish power production capacity 16.4 GW (2016)
• Now CHP 7 GW (bio CHP 2 GW)
Regulation of CHP plant output power
0 %
10 %
20 %
30 %
40 %
50 %
60 %
70 %
80 %
90 %
100 %
No turbinebypass,
no reserveparticipation
Partial turbinebypass,
no powerregulation
No turbinebypass,
electricity upregulation
Full turbinebypass,
electricity downregulation
Heat Heat deficit: Electricity up regulation
Electricity Heat surplus: Electricity down regulation
0 %
10 %
20 %
30 %
40 %
50 %
60 %
70 %
80 %
90 %
100 %
No turbinebypass,
no reserveparticipation
Partial turbinebypass,
no powerregulation
No turbinebypass,
electricity upregulation
Full turbinebypass,
electricity downregulation
Heat Heat deficit: Electricity up regulation
Electricity Heat surplus: Electricity down regulation
0 %
10 %
20 %
30 %
40 %
50 %
60 %
70 %
80 %
90 %
100 %
No turbinebypass,
no reserveparticipation
Partial turbinebypass,
no powerregulation
No turbinebypass,
electricity upregulation
Full turbinebypass,
electricity downregulation
Electricity
Heat deficit: Electricity upregulation
Heat surplus: Electricitydown regulation
Heat
Traditional, no
reserve markets
Reserve market participation
So
ldh
eat
ener
gu
y
So
ldh
eat
ener
gy
So
ldel
ectr
ica
l
ener
gy
Sold
electrical
energy
Hea
tE
lect
rica
lp
ow
er
Hea
t
Ele
ctri
city
pro
du
ctio
nca
paci
ty
So
ld
elec
tric
al
rese
rve
cap
aci
ty
Ou
tpu
t (h
eat
+ e
lect
rici
ty)
Heat market
Electricity markets
• Day-ahead market Elspot (13:00, 1 MW)
• Intraday market (one hour before delivery, 1 MW)
• Reserve markets
• FCR-N (Frequency containment reserve - normal),
(hourly market 18:00) up and down regulation (0.1 MW)
• FCR-D (Frequency containment reserve - disturbance),
(hourly market 18:00) up regulation (1 MW)
Studied markets Data of electricity markets
available 2009-2016
Source: Fingrid
Participation in new energy market sectors
Case study: simulation of actual CHP
power plant
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Hourl
y r
even
ues
€/h
Heat Elspot FCR-N FCR-D
Profitability of participation in reserve
markets: Case Järvenpää Fortum
2015:
+ 20% profit
Comparison of
two cases:
Flexibility markets
would have a
significant effect on
operational profit
Year 2015
Reserve market Without reserve market
Revenue total 15 802 000 € 14 877 000 €
Heat 12 162 000 € 12 162 000 €
Elspot 1 892 000 € 2 628 000 €
Elbas 120 000 € 87 000 €
FCR-N 645 000 € 0 €
FCR-D 983 000 € 0 €
Costs 7 990 000 € 8 366 000 €
Fuel consumption 7 990 000 € 8 366 000 €
Profit 7 812 000 € 6 511 000 €
Year 2014:
+ 15% profit
Conclusions
1. Energy system faces wide challenges in future
New ways to operate energy system
New business opportunities
2. CHP power plants are interesting player in energy system
• Technology is already there
3. Study indicates feasibility for CHP plant participation in
reserve markets
+ 15% - 20% annual profit