Benzinga US Oil Tranporation Market Update - July 2015

download Benzinga US Oil Tranporation Market Update - July 2015

of 8

description

Benzinga US Oil Tranporation Market Update - July 2015

Transcript of Benzinga US Oil Tranporation Market Update - July 2015

  • BENZINGA PRO U.S. OIL REPORT

    JULY 2015

  • The Libya Government will seize any tanker that attempts to enter its Ras Lanuf port according

    to Reuters. Battling parties for government power in Libya had been responsible for the closure

    of the port. Marine Traffic shows some fishing, tanker, and livestock vessels in ports in Libya

    but most, including large tankers, are avoiding the area (Image).

    The Libyan Petroleum Facilities Guard has orders to "intercept any tankers trying to approach

    the oilfields for security and technical reasons" according to Reuters citing NOC Chairman

    Yousef Bu Saifi. The Libyan refusal to let most ships enter its ports suspected of bringing aid

    to enemy combatants is just another annoyance the industry has to deal with. One month ago

    almost to the day Benzinga reported on the Singapore pirates attacking ships and stealing

    cargo, even going as far as to repaint one.

    A review of the US crude import and transportation data is prudent as the oil industry prepares

    to move stored oil and as the idled tanker ships storing oil come to center stage slow, with

    Irans storage release impact already being discussed.

    Since 2010 Non-OPEC countries Landed Costs of Imported Crude have run below those of

    OPEC and Persian countries according to the EIA.

    The Landed Crude Oil Cost refers to the price of crude at the port from which it departs. This

    cost does include purchasing, transporting, and insuring the cargo but does not include things

    like tariffs and import fees incurred at the arrival port. Breaking down the chart below it is

    evident the US's cheapest import cost comes from Canada ($45.69/brl), then Mexico

    ($51.60/brl), followed by Venezuela ($52.51/brl), Colombia ($56.70/brl), and Saudi Arabia

    ($58.80/brl) as of April 2015 according to EIA data.

  • The United States pipeline infrastructure is roughly 2.6 million miles in length and operated by

    nearly 3,000 companies according to the US DOT. These pipes run throughout the US and

    connect the five Petroleum Administration For Defense Districts or PADD for short, along with

    various logistics lines including rail.

    Fridays rig count report shows a second

    week of increasing rigs, generating

    excitement for bulls that the decline may be

    over. Julys investor letter from Andrew Hall

    of Astenbeck recognizes improving

    fundamentals for oil going forward: Despite

    the lackluster price action, underlying

    fundamentals for oil continue to improve. It

    is becoming increasingly clear that the huge

    oil surplus that most analysts predicted for

    the first 6 months of 2015 failed to

    materialize. Refiner acquisition costs which include transportation and other refiner fees have

    collapsed recently, driven primarily by the spot price decrease, making refiner margins all the

    more appealing for the bulls.

    The US has brought new projects on-line in the past couple years allowing more oil to flow into

    & out of Cushing, enabling large capacity for pumping to the Gulf Coast for export. The

    transportation out of the Gulf and up to the Northeastern US tacks an extra $5-$6 onto each

    barrel due to Jones Act shipping regulations which essentially covers the liability of workers

    recouping wages from employees if injured. The US DOT lists the vessels the Jones Act applies

    to and Chevron (NYSE: CVX) owns 4 of these militarily useful vessels:

  • Two recent outbound projects have boosted the movement of product through Cushing: (1)

    TransCanada Gulf Coast Project officially came online to pipe product January 22, 2014 and

    (2) Enbridges Seaway pipeline twinning (doubling up) came alive in December 2014. The

    other major region in the US, Bakken in North Dakota, is increasing its pipeline capacity and

    rail capital investments to increase rail capacity for transport.

    According to Brown Brothers Harriman & Co Bakken should be able to move nearly 90 percent

    of its production by the end of 2016. CSX (NYSE: CSX), third largest operator in the US by

    market-cap lacks any access to this rail game in PADD 2 according to images on the companys website. Burlington

    Northern Santa Fe, the rail

    line purchased by Warren

    Buffett in 2009, is the only

    major rail operator

    connected in the Bakken

    region. Publicly traded

    Canadian Pacific company

    (NYSE: CP) does have a

    line running through the

    state into Canada that

    allows a stop off at Dakota

    Plains refinery and may

    offer some exposure to

    the regions need to move its supply.

    Choosing what method to

    transport depends on how

    you view the impacts of oil

    spills. Do you consider damage to the environment or perhaps the size of the spill or maybe

    the number of deaths as the most important factor?

    If human deaths were the main indictor, it would follow that Trucks are worse than Pipes are

    worse than Boats according to a Forbes 2014 article. When measuring size of spillage Trucks

    are worse than Pipes are worse than Rails are worse than Boats. When measuring

    environment, Boats are worse than Pipes are worse than Trucks are worse than Rails. So

  • there are many ways to skin this cat. Rail is not the worst way to transport oil but recent

    problems with derailing and explosions have not helped eased any public concern regarding

    the transportation of oil. According to EIA data Tanker Car usage is growing as Tanker ship

    use declines. Barges and Trucks are also seeing an increase in use as are pipelines.

    A 2014 Kansas City FED report lays out a comparison of pipelines, rails, barges, and trucks in

    terms of Capital Cost, Operating Cost, Coverage, and Shipment Size. A recent decline in the

    materials required for pipeline

    construction has helped to boost

    spending. For pipe diameters of

    8-inch, 12-inch, 16-inch, and

    20-inch construction has

    exploded according to data from

    the Federal Energy Regulatory

    Committee Form 6. Form 6 complies operational and financial information of oil pipeline

    companies with jurisdictional operating revenues in excess of $500,000. From 2013 to 2014,

    Labors portion of estimated costs for land

    pipeline rose from 38.84 percent to 42.36

    percent. Materials over the same period fell

    from 23.2 percent in 2013 to 13.6 percent in

    2014. Materials as a percent of land

    construction costs have been on a decline in

    2009 (see image on next page). New pipelines

    have been built and they are going to be used.

  • While these pipelines were being built rails became the chosen mode for transportation. The

    Kansas City notes in that same 2014 report The fastest-growing alternate mode of oil

    transportation has been railroads. Rail transportation is somewhat more expensive than

    barges, and not quite as flexible as trucks. But overall, as an option during pipeline construction

    and periods of high oil-price differential, rail may have the best combination of attributes of

    the alternative modes. The use of rail grew much faster than either barges or trucks in 2012

    and that strong growth continued in 2013, according to industry data. And as other shale plays

    emerge, especially if they are far from the coasts, rail may become even more important to

    the oil transportation network.

    The oil market is still looking for its equilibrium and with it being on nearly every financial

    market participants radar, the opinions of the market are far and wide making for volatile

    price swings. For the short-term, the consensus from analysts on Wall Street points to a focus

    on refiner crack margins and capital expenditures. Over the longer-term the focus shifts to

    M&A and its potential impact on transportation and transportation costs.