Benhamou Hcv Hiv Du 2010
-
Upload
odeckmyn -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
1.174 -
download
1
Transcript of Benhamou Hcv Hiv Du 2010
Hépatites Virales C et B et Infection par le VIH
Causes de décès d’origine infectieusedans le monde (2000)
HIV – HBV – HCV : TOP 10
MaladiesMaladiesInfections Infections respiratoiresrespiratoiresVIHVIHDiarrhDiarrh ééesesTuberculoseTuberculoseMalaria Malaria RougeoleRougeoleHHéépatitepatite BBPertussisPertussisTTéétanostanos nnééonatalonatalHHéépatitepatite CC
DDééccèèss par anpar an~3,5 million~3,5 million~3,0 million~3,0 million~2,2 million~2,2 million~2,0 million~2,0 million~1~1--3 million3 million
~888,000~888,000~750,000~750,000~355,000~355,000~300,000~300,000~ 250,000~ 250,000
Source : CDC, WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDSSource : CDC, WHO, UNICEF, UNAIDS
Viral hepatitis in HIV-infectedpatients
HCV HBV
Prevalence 20%-35% 7%-10%
Mortality Major cause of death Higher compare to HBV mono-infected
Progression toCirrhosis
Accelerated ?
Hepatotoxicityof anti-retroviraltherapies
Controversies ?
Active consideration for treatment of hepatitis
Hépatite Chronique C Chez les Patients
Co-infectés par le VIH
Influence of HIV on HCVInfluence of HIV on HCV
• Major cause of mortality
• More severe liver lesions vs HCV mono -infected
• Higher HCV RNA
No influence of HCV/HBV on response to HAART : EuroSIDA cohort
Konopnicki D et al. AIDS. 2005;19:593-601.
HIV RNA <400 copies/ml 50% rise in CD4
10101010
30303030
50505050
70707070
0000 3333 6666 9999 12121212
10101010
30303030
50505050
70707070
HCV
Mortalité chez les patients VIH en FranceÉtude du groupe GERMIVIC
Influence du VIH sur le VHCMortalité liée à l’atteinte hépatique
Caboub et al, CID 2001; Rosenthal et al, AIDS 2003.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1995 1997 2001 2003
%
Mortalité Globale Mortalité liée au Sida Mortalité liée au foie CHC
8
91,6
1,56,9
2
84,5
6,6 8,8
1
48,7
14,3
36,7
1
47
12,6
40,4
Impact of HAART on liver related
mortality
Impact of HAART on liver related
mortality
Qurishi N et al, Lancet 2003
Days of observation
500040003000200010000
Surv
ival
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
p < 0,0001
HAART
ARV
Untreated
6000 6000500040003000200010000
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.3
p < 0,018
HAART
ARV
UntreatedSurv
ival
Global MortalityGlobal Mortality Liver MortalityLiver Mortality
Days of observation
Progression to cirrhosis
influence of alcohol and immune
status
Progression to cirrhosis
influence of alcohol and immune
status
0
1
2
3
4
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
CD4<200/µL
OH>50 g/j
CD4 <200/µLOH <50 g/j CD4 >200/µL
OH<50 g/j
HIV-
OH<50 g/j
Benhamou et al. Hepatology 1999;30:1054-1058
Estimated duration of HCV infection
Fibrosis(METAVIR)
Timing for Anti-HCV and ARV
initiation
Timing for Anti-HCV and ARV
initiation
HIV mono-infected HIV/HCV
< 200 CD4 cells/µL ARV recommended
- ARV recommended- ARV before anti-HCV
> 200 CD4 cells/µL and< 350 CD4 cells/µL
ARV possible :
- High HIV RNA and
- Rapid CD4 decline
> 350 CD4 cells/µL and< 500 CD4 cells/µL
Monitor - Monitor HIV- Anti-HCV recommended(if indicated)
Adapted from IAS–USA panel guidelines. Yeni P. at al. JAMA, 2004
CD4>350 :• Fibrosis progression rate is reduced• CD4 decline to « dangerous » level if anti-VHC is initiated
Alberti et al. 1st ECCC. J Hepatol. 2005
Treatment of chronic hepatitis C
Genotype 2/3 Genotype 1/4
< 800 000 UI/mL > 800 000 UI/ml
TREAT
Fibrosis: > 2
HCV RNA
Fibrosis: 0/1
TREATRx differed
Alberti et al. 1st ECCC. J Hepatol. 2005
PEG IFN/RBVVirological response
29%
38%
14%
29%
15%21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
ACTG APRICOT RIBAVIC
EOT SVR
GT 1GT 4
80%
64%68%
73%
53%
31%
62%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
ACTG APRICOT Laguno RIBAVIC
EOT SVR
GT 1/4 GT 2/3
RBV 800 mg 24 weeks
Torriani F et al. NEJM 2004. Carrat F et al. JAMA 2004. Laguno C ett al. AIDS 2004. Chung R. NEJM. 2004
GT2/3, R
x 48 w
APRICOT(overall SVR 40%)
PRESCO(overall SVR 50%)
Pat
ient
s (%
)
all 48 weeks therapy
HIV-pos; low RBV dose
0
10
30
40
Geno 1 Geno 3
29%
62%
50
20
n=176 n=95
Geno 1 Geno 3
36%
72%
n=191
24, 48 or 72 weeks therapy
HIV-pos; weight-based RBV
n=152
Ramos et al. J Viral Hepat (in press)
Impact of HCV RNA on
SVR
Impact of HCV RNA on
SVR
61 63
18
61
0
20
40
60
80
100
≤800,000n=46
>800,000n=130
≤800,000n=28
>800,000n=67
Pro
port
ion
of p
atie
nts
Torriani F et al. NEJM. 2004.
GT 1 GT 2/3
N SVR
CD4< 200/µL 17 8 (47 %)
< 350 /µL 72 26 (36 %)
≥ 350 /µL 216 90 (47 %)
HIV RNA
< 50 cp/mL 173 72 (42 %)
50-5000 cp/mL 66 23 (35 %)
> 5000 cp/mL 49 21 (43 %)
Cooper D. et al, XV AIDS Conference
HCV RNA
Liver evaluation for
GT1, high HCV R
NA
APRICOTSVR according to Rx exposure
*Patients violated the rule if ≥1 of the three targets were not achieved Opravil M. et al. 45th ICAAC 2005; Abstract 2038
39%
SV
R r
ate
(%)
SV
R r
ate
(%)
≥80/80/80exposure
0
10
20
30
40
50
11%
<80/80/80exposure*
62
29%
Allpatients
n = 176 114
69%
SV
R r
ate
(%)
SV
R r
ate
(%)
≥70/70/70exposure
0
20
40
60
80
100
26%
<70/70/70exposure*
27
59%
Allpatients
n = 111 84
GT1 GT2/3
VR n (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
G1 G2/3 G1 G2/3 G1 G2/3
119 (68) 83 (87) 39 70 93 92
71 (40) 76 (80) 58 74 90 84
Week 4
≥1 log 10 drop
≥2 log 10 drop
HCV RNA -ve 22 (13) 35 (37) 82 94 79 57
148 (84) 89 (94) 34 66 96 100
110 (63) 84 (88) 45 70 98 100
60 (34) 68 (72) 70 82 92 89
log 10 drop
Week 12
≥1 log 10 drop
≥2
HCV RNA -ve
Torriani F, et al. 45th ICAAC 2005; Abstract 1024
APRICOT
PEG IFN2 (a:180 /b:1.5 µg) - RBV 1000 - 1200 mg
PEG IFN/RBV : Specific AE• Liver decompensation : 10% of cirrhotic pts
• Pl., Bilirubin, P alc, Hb and ddI• Compensated cirrhosis: No ddI, Monitoring +++
• Mitochondiral toxicity (1% -3%)• ddI (d4T) (RR x23)• No ddI – (d4T ?)• Monitor : Amylase, lipase, lactic acid
• Anemia : Hb <8 g/dL : 3.8%• AZT (RR x2)• Use EPO
• Neutropenia : Neutrophils <750: 2-11%• Use GCSF
Alberti A et al. 1st ECCC. J Hepatol. 2005 .Torriani F et al. NEJM 2004. Carrat F et al. JAMA 2004. Chung R et al. NEJM. 2004
CONCLUSION
• HCV coinfection: X30 in HIV vs general population
• HCV coinfection major cause of mortality and
morbidity in HIV population
• Less than 20% of the Patients have received anti-
HCV therapy in Europe
• Coinfected patients should be actively considered for
HCV therapy
Hépatite Chronique B Chez les Patients
Co-infectés par le VIH
Prevalence of HBsAg + in HIV InfectedPatients
• EuroSIDA Cohort (n= 9802) :
� Patients screened for HBsAg: 5883 (60%)
� HBsAg+: 530 (9%)
- South: 9.1%
- Central: 9.2%
- North: 9.7%
- East: 6%
Konopnicki D, et al. AIDS. 2005.
Influence of HIV on CHBIn the Pre HAART era, HIV in HBsAg positive patients (compared toHBV mono-infected):
• Increased the risk of chronic infection after contamin ation
• Reduced the seroconversion rates to anti-HBe and anti- H Bs
• Increased HBV replication
• Frequent reactivation related to CD4 decline
• Accelerated fibrosis progression
• Increased risk of liver decompensation, HCC and liver death
Bodsworth, JID 1989 ; Hadler, JID 1991 ; Krogsgaard, Hepatology 1987 ; Bodsworth, JID 1989 ; Gilson, AIDS 1997. Piroth, J Hepatol 2002; Vogel Cancer Res 1991; Corallini Cncer Res 1993 ; Altavilla Am J Pathol 2000 ; Bodsworth, JID 1989 ; Mills,
Gastroenterol 1990 ; Goldin, J Clin Pathol 1990 ; Gilson, AIDS 1997 ; Thio, Lancet 2002 ; Di Martino, Gastroenterol 2002; Colin Hepatol 1999; Perillo, Ann Int Med 1986 ; McDonald, J Hepatol 1987
MortalityLiver-related mortality in 5293 patients (MACS), 1984 /1987–2000
Thio CL, et al. Lancet. 2002;360:1921-1926.
Viral status
N HIV HBsAgLiver-related mortality (n)
Liver death (1000 pers/yr) P
3093 – – 0 0.0
139 – + 1 0.8 0.04
2346 + – 35 1.7 <0.0001
213 + + 26 14.2 <0.0001
5293 62 1.1
Liver related mortalityX 19 HBV/HIV vs HBV ( RR:18; 73,1-766,1; P<0,001)
Impact of HIV Infection on Progression to HBV -Related Cirrhosis
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Follow-up (years)
% o
f cirr
hosi
s
HIV negative
HIV positive
p=0.005
Di Martino V et al. Gastroenterology. 2002.
Influence of HAART
• Increases duration of HBV by improving survival
• Increases the risk of ALT flares related to – Immune restoration– Hepatotoxicity– Reactivation
• ARV discontinuation• HBV resistance
• Inhibition of HBV replication(LAM – FTC – ADV)
– Histological improvement
?
Proia et al. Am J Med 2000. Wit et al. JID 2002. Benhamou et al. J Hepatol 2005. Bruno et al. Gastroenerol 2002. Bonacini et al. Gastroenterol 2002. Puoti et al. Antiviral Ther 2004. Gouskos AIDS 2004
Liver-related mortality (1995-2003 - GERMIVIC Cohort )
12.6
14.3
6.6
1.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1995 1997 2001 2003
ESLD related death % of total death
7
21
4238
0
5
1015
20
25
3035
40
45
1995 1997 2001 2003
ESLD related death: % of HBsAg+
Rosenthal E, et al. J Viral Hep. 2007.
HIV/HBV Co-infection Mortality
* Improvement defined as ≥1 point reduction** Worsening defined as ≥ 1 point increase
Median METAVIR F at Baseline = 2
Improved *
Worsened **N = 15 12
33%
50%
20%
8%
-30%
-10%
10%
30%
50%
70% Week 48 Week 192
Benhamou Y et al. J Hepatol 2005.
Impact of Anti-HBV Therapy on Liver Fibrosis
F0-F1 F2 F3-F4
F0-F1 (n=8)
8 0 0
F2(n=17)
7 6 4
F3-F4(n=13)
1 1 11
Median time F. up : 29.5 months
ADV TDF
Lacombe, et al. CROI 2009, Abstract 815.
Treatment of HBV in HIV Co -infected Patients
Licensed for
HIV HBV
Interferon (IFN) ���� ����
Lamivudine (LAM) ���� ����
Emtricitabine (FTC) ���� ����
Entecavir (ETV) ���� ����
Telbivudine (LDT) ���� ����
Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) ���� ����
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)
���� ����
Interferon
Pts αααα-IFNMonths of
therapy CD4HBV DNA
<6 logHBeAg
clearance
McDonald 87 14 2.5-10 6 – – 0
Marcellin 93 10 3-5 4-6 20-858 2 2
Wong 95 12 10 6 No AIDS 1 1
Zylberberg 96 25 6 6 480 ±±±± 234 9 2
Di Martino 02 26 5 6 331 ±±±± 207 7 3
Total 87 19 (26%) 8 (9%)
McDonald. Hepatology. 1987; Marcellin. Gut. 1993; Wong. Gastroenterology. 1995; Zylberberg. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1996;Di Martino. Gastroenterology. 2002.
HIV/HBeAg + LAM-RPEG-IFN αααα2a + ADV
0123456789
Baseline 12 24 48 72
Weeks
Ser
um H
BV
DN
A (
log
copi
es/m
L)
PEG-IFN2a + ADV
0
20
40
60
80
100
Basel ine 4 8 12 24 36 40 48 60 72
Weeks
Ser
um A
LT (
IU/L
)
PEG-IFN2a + ADV
HBV DNA ALT
Ingliz P. et al, Antiviral Therapy 2008
N=17
-2.7
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0Week 52
Med
ian
Cha
nge
in L
og H
BV
DN
A
Median change in serum HBV DNAHIV/HBeAg+ Naïve Pts
Dore GJ, et al. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:607-613.
Lamivudine
(LAM 150 mg bid)
0.25
0.50
0.75
1
0 350 700 1050 1400
Days oflamivudine therapy
Pro
port
ion
of p
atie
nts
LAM
-R
N= 57
Number of patients 57 32 13 6 3under observation
Benhamou Y, et al. Hepatology 1999; 30:1302-06
HBV resistance to LAM
Entecavir
• 17 HIV/HBV Pts who received ETV for HBV
- Significant reduction in HIV RNA in the majority of pts
Selection of M184V (HIV RT) following ETV treatment
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
ART naïveART experienced
Total
Median time M184V 148 days 98 days
% w
ith M
184V
3/7
3/5
6/12
• Switch from a TDF to ETV for HBV suppression
- 6 pts switched to ETV because of TDF renal tox
- HBeAg+ and HBV DNA <LOD: 6
- L180M and M204V: 5
• Outcome results:
- HBV rebound on ETV: 6
- Median time to rebound: 3 months
- All pts maintained HIV suppression
Hull M, et al. 9th Intl. Congress on Drug Therapy in HIV Infection. Glasgow 2008.Audsley J, et al. 15th CROI, Boston 2008, #63.
ETV 1mg qd 48w = 4.3 log DNA decline in HIV/HBeAg+ LA M-R patients Pessoa et al. AIDS 2008
HIV IsolateNNRTI Multi drug resistant
HIV IsolateSubtype A
Drug ETV LdT
11.67 >600IC50 µMFold change 0.93 >Max
Drug ETV LdT
>600>Max
IC50 µMFold change
13.211.05
Telbivudine
Avila et al. CROI 2009, Abstract 1002.
• One doubtful case of LdT anti-HIV activity ?
Low et al., CROI 2009. Abstract 813a
• No in vitro anti HIV activity of LdT
ETV LdT
TDF vs. TDF+LAM (48 weeks)
3/ 50
12/ 50
29/ 50
42/ 50
1/ 25
9/ 25
14/ 25
19/ 25
0
20
40
60
80
100
DNA<3log
AST<45U/L
HBeAgloss
HBsAgloss
Pat
ient
s (%
)
TDF TDF+LAM
Schmutz G, et al. AIDS. 2006.
LAM Naive(n=9)
LAM Experienced(n=47)
HBV DNA <15 UI/mL
9 41
Mean time to DNA < LOD (weeks)
49 67
Tuma R, et al. AASLD 2008, Abstract 967.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
TDF + LAM (48 weeks)
Matthews G et al. Hepatology 2008
W48 outcomesLAMN=12
TDFN=12
TDF+LAMN=12
p
Median DNA Reduction 4.07 4.57 4.73 .7
DNA <3 log 46% 92% 91% .01
HBeAg loss 3 1 3
Anti-HBe Seroconversion 1 1 3
HBsAg loss 1 1 1
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
TDF- vs LAM- containing HAART in ARV-naïve HIV/HBeAg+ Co-infected Patients (TICO Study):
Randomized Thai trial (1:1:1) of LAM vs TDF vs LAM/TDF within an EFV-based HAART regimen
Treatment Algorithm Patients with Compensated Liver Disease and
No Indication for HIV Therapy (CD4 count >350/µL)
• No treatment
• Monitor every 6–12 months
HBV DNA≥≥≥≥2000 IU/mL
HBV DNA
HBV DNA<2000 IU/mL
ALT ElevatedALT Normal
• Monitor ALT every 3-12 months
• Consider biopsyand treat if disease
present
• PEG IFN• LdT (if HBV DNA>LOD at w24 add ADV)• ADV+LdT• Early HAART initiation –TDF+LAM/FTC
ECC Statement. J Hepatol. 2005.Rockstroh et al. HIV Medicine 2008.
Treatment Algorithm Patients with Compensated Liver Disease and Indication for HIV Therapy (CD4 count <350/µL)
HBV DNA≥2000 IU/ml
HBV DNA<2000 IU/ml
HAART includingTDF+3T/FTC
Substitute one NRTI byTDF or add TDF*
Patients without HBV-associated LAM resistance
Patients with cirrhosis
ECC Statement. J Hepatol. 2005.Rockstroh et al. HIV Medicine 2008.
Patients with HBV-associated LAM resistance HAART regimen
of choice
HAART includingTDF+LAM/FTC
*If feasible and appropriate from the perspective
of maintaining HIV suppression.
Refer patient for liver transplantation
evaluation if decompensation
HBV DNA