Benedict Tuffuor – TREND Regional LA, Ho – 24 th July, 2013
description
Transcript of Benedict Tuffuor – TREND Regional LA, Ho – 24 th July, 2013
Technology Applicability Framework (TAF) –a tool for assessing applicability and scalability of WASH Technologies for providing
sustainable service delivery
Benedict Tuffuor – TRENDRegional LA, Ho – 24th July, 2013
What is the TAF Rationale for the TAF Concept of the TAF Methodology to apply the TAF Rationale for the GTIP Concept of the GTIP Outlook
Table of Contents
July 2013
Technology Applicability Framework (TAF) The TAF is a decision support tool for assessing and
monitoring applicability and scalability of a specific WASH technology for provision of sustainable services in a specific context
Target users of the TAF include government (national, local), private sector, NGO, academia, development partners
The TAF is based on a stepwise and transparent process that provides concrete information to design mitigation measures for improving performance of the technology used and of the introduction process
It is an participatory, facilitating and easy to use tool that triggers sharing of lessons learned between all actors including local and national level
July 2013
Rationale: Technologies as basis for sustainable WASH service delivery
Usage Context- Need- Market- Policies- Capacities- Economy…
Context factors on Supply side
WASH Technology- Functions- Features- Requirements
Sustainable WASH Services
Physical Context
- Conditions- Applicability
Context factors on Demand side
Introduction process- Implementation- Supply Chain- Operation & Maintenance- Life Cycle Costs- Capacities- Follow up……
Monitoring
July 2013
Requirements for the tool “TAF”: Easy to use for all target users of TAF, applicable in different contexts, supporting inclusiveness, fostering accountability by involving all relevant actors during interpretation of results, linking to concrete actions
Strategic areasfor the design of the TAF
July 2013
Technology Introduction Process
Sustainable WASH Services
Governance and accountability
User needs, efficiency and user friendliness
Innovation in WASH Sector
Context
Technology
SCREENING
Need and
Applicability
Technical FunctionCharacteristicsPerformance
ASSESSMENT of technology applicabilityusing 18 indicators
Perspective of key actors
Use
r-B
uyer
Oth
er In
stitu
tions
Dim
ensi
ons
Soc
Econ
Env
Inst
Know
Tech
TAFTechnology Applicability Framework
Pro
duce
r-P
rovi
der
Cost model
Dimensions:Soc = Social Econ = Economical and Financial Env = EnvironmentalInst = Institutional, legal,
organisationalKnow = Knowhow and skills Tech = Technological
Technology Applicability Framework (TAF): the concept
July 2013
Technology Introduction Process defines tasks for actors involved in each phase of introduction process
TIP
- Generic concept- For water, sanitation and hygiene technologies- Applicable for different cost models, e.g. market-based approach
Uptake + O&MTIPPING POINT
INVENTIONHigh
Technology
Time
SuccessfulTechnologyIntroduction
UPTAKE & USE
Uptake [number of unitsinstalled providing services]
Actors
Inve
ntio
n
Tipp
ing
Poin
t
Upt
ake
+ U
se
Specific tasks per actor and phase
Technology Introduction Process
Actors Actors
Technology Introduction Process (TIP): the concept
July 2013
Low
Sustainability dimensions in TAF
Economic
Social
Environmental
OrganisationalInstitutional
Legal
Skills andKnowhow
Technological
July 2013
TAF components
TAF uses multiple entry points to address critical factors concerning applicability and scalability of the technology and of sustainability of services provided by a specific WASH technology
July 2013
Sustainability Dimensions- Social - Economic- Environmental- Organisational, legal, institutional- Skills and Knowhow- Technological
Use
r, B
uyer
Pro
duce
r, P
rovi
der
Reg
ulat
or,
Inve
stor
, Fa
cilit
ator
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
Perspectives of Key Actors in Introduction Process
= 18 TAF Indicators
The TAF Process
• TAF follows stepwise procedure in 4 steps
• TAF process is based on desk work, field visits & workshops
• All actors are involved in field visits, workshops and interpretation!
• TAF process supports sharing of experiences, accountability and governance.
• Structured TAF process is easy to use, involvement of all actors fosters transparency and inclusiveness.
July 2013
Interpretation of possible TAF results
Interpretation per dimension
per particular perspective
As entire profile
Sust
aina
bilit
y D
imen
sion
s
Technology
Skills &Know-how
Institutional & Legal
Environ-mental
Economic
Social(4) (5) (6)
(7) (8) (9)
(10) (11) (12)
(13) (14) (15)
(16) (17) (18)
(1) (2) (3)
? ?
?
?
User/Buyer
Producers/Providers
Regulators/ Investors/Facilitators
+ +
+
+
+
+
0
0 0
0
-
-
-
-
Key perspectives
July 2013
+
0
-
High value, neutral or positive, supportive characteristics
Potential impact, could become critical, needs follow up
Low value, negative, critical, hindering characteristics
? Unclear information, should be clarified?
+
0
-
or for specific topics such as O&M
What can the TAF be used for?- Assessing applicability and scalability of a specific WASH technology in a specific context
- monitoring and evaluate of the performance of an existing WASH technology and of the introduction process
- to define concrete mitigation measures to increase technology performance but also of the introduction process
- Building up basis for comparison of different WASH technologies for a specific need and region
July 2013
Rationale for GTIP
Technology introduction processes are very complex in terms of roles of actors, timing of activities, mobilisation of funding.
In many countries there are procedures, but mostly are informal and often not well documented.
Understanding on process and on requirements concerning successful technology introduction in the sector needs to be strengthened.
There is clear need for a guidance on technology introduction to support actors in WASH sector.
Objectives for GTIP Guidance for Technology Introduction Process: GTIP should be
a guidance document, providing generic information that can be adapted by countries according to their needs, however it is is not like a rule to be strictly followed.
The GTIP should improve understanding of complex interactions between actors in various phases of technology introduction.
GTIP provides a systematic description of key elements, tasks, interlinkages between actors and steps for technology introduction.
The GTIP can be used as a tool to adapt or further develop country specific guideline for technology introduction or for analysis and planning of a specific Technology Introduction Process for a specific technology.
GTIP is based on good practice, however there is no silver bullet solution for technology introduction!
Expected results from applying the GTIP
Improved understanding in sector on technology introduction In case here are already some procedures in place:
Improved general procedures Support in an introduction process for a specific
technology In case there are no procedures in place:
1st draft procedures for technology introduction Defined roles and requirements and procedures as basis for
sector including private sector to engage more in WASH technology introduction
Concept of key phases in GTP TIP process is described in 3 key
phases: Invention (as there is something
new in the context) Tipping Point (in terms of scaling
up much is on steep uptake) Uptake and Use (here focus is
more on experiences on O&M)
Uptake + O&MTIPPING POINT
INVENTION
Technology
Time
SuccessfulTechnologyIntroduction
UPTAKE & USE
Uptake [number of unitsinstalled providing services]
The invention is crucial for the uptake process. To capture important aspects such as feasibility, the invention phase is subdivided into two sup-stages:
Testing (of a totally new technology, or rather adaptation of a known technology to the context; here it is about piloting, feasibility assessment)
Launch (preparation of the launch, including production, supply chain, promotion, quality control, after sales services)
Impact on poverty alleviation
Sales curve
Supply chain
Profits and losses
Invention
Testing Launch
Tipping Point Uptake & Use
Impact on market and services-sales-profits-supply chain-sustainable services-poverty alleviation
«Valley of death»
+
-
Time, progress of process
Investments
Key phases of technology introduction
Weeks to months Months to years Several years
Different time span for 3
phases
«Valley of death» due to gap between expenditure for introduction and lack of
revenues
Concept of the GTIP
The GTIP provides a break down of tasks per phase and actors in a generic way to answer the core question:Who does what in each phase to support successful technology introduction?
Uptake + O&MTIPPING POINT
INVENTIONHigh
Technology
Time
SuccessfulTechnologyIntroduction
UPTAKE & USE
Uptake [number of unitsinstalled providing services]
Actors
Inve
ntio
n
Tipp
ing
Poin
t
Upt
ake
+ U
se
Specific tasks per actor and phase
Technology Introduction Process
Actors Actors
LevelPhase
Phase 1A: Initial Steps and Testing
Phase 1B: Preparing Launch
Phase 2: Tipping Point
Phase 3: Uptake & Use
Level A: Strategic Focus“Why this technology?”, What is the need?”, “Which is the market?”
Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks-xyz….
Tasks..
Level B: Supply Chain “How and where will this technology be delivered to the clients?”
Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks..
Level C: Technology Development“How does the technology look like exactly?”, “What are the product and services to be provided?”
Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks..
Level D: Innovation in the sector “How will the sector support uptake of this technology?”
Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks..
Level E: Introduction Process“ Who takes the lead in this introduction process?”
Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks.. Tasks..
How to read the draft generic TIP Matrix?
Selected Phase
Selected level
An Example: What kind of tasks are needed e.g in the phase 2 on e.g. the strategic level?
In this field the tasks are listed for phase 2 and
for that level
Embedding of GTIP
As for the TAF, also the GTIP needs a host that leads and follows up the application of the GTIP.
For the development of procedures or technology specific applications of the procedures a team (core group) should be established; Depending on type of technology the composition of the core team to follow up introduction might change (e.g. water supply, sanitation, health, agriculture); membership should including representatives from national Bureau of Standards
Application of GTIP should follow a stepwise approach using workshops
GTIP should be embedded in existing institutional and organisational structures
Link between GTIP and TAF
The TAF should be applied as an initial step of the TIP if there are no information on applicability of the technology in a context – or later for monitoring purposes.
In the Generic TIP Matrix there are clear links on how to included the results of the TAF in the design and follow up of the introduction process (bold figures in generic matrix in Annex 2 of Manual).
Outlook
• TAF was tested in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Uganda on 13 different WASH technologies
• In all three countries government institutions were appointed as hosts for the TAF
• TAF is now used to monitor emerging technologies• TAF and TIP will be used to develop/adapt guidelines
for validation and introduction in all three countries • TAF and TIP: available as open source by end 2013• End of 2013: web-based Resource Base available,
that allows accessing all relevant documents on TAF&TIP, exchanging and some Q/A – for free!
July 2013
Some Questions for Reflection
Do you really appreciate the relevance of the TAF and GTIP in the Ghanaian WASH sector?
How do the TAF and the GTIP fit your context. Will they in any way help improve WASH delivery in the region?
What role do you see yourself playing in the application of the TAF and GTIP?
How do you propose we fund the application of the GTIP.
Where to get further information?
For Information on WASHTech,washtechafrica.wordpress.comor email to: [email protected]
www.washghana.net
For details on TAF&TIP in Ghana: [email protected]
c/o TREND
July 2013
Thank you!
July 2013