Belong Together

download Belong Together

of 32

  • date post

  • Category


  • view

  • download


Embed Size (px)

Transcript of Belong Together

  • 7/28/2019 Belong Together


    We belongtogether:The case ora United KingdomAlistair Darling,Leader o theBetter Together campaign

    The University o Glasgow, July 2013

  • 7/28/2019 Belong Together


  • 7/28/2019 Belong Together


    We Belong Together: Thecase or a United Kingdom

    IntroductionIn just over a years time the Scottish people will make a

    momentous choice. Do we stay in the United Kingdom,

    and remain partners with the countries we have been joined

    with or centuries, or do we leave and become a separate,

    independent state?

    Just over a year ago I launched Better Together making a

    positive case while asking tough questions about independence.

    As I said at our launch there is much in Scotland and the

    UK today that needs to change. We need more growth, more

    jobs and a more prosperous Scotland. To argue, as I do, that

    Scotland is better within the UK is not to deny that change

    needs to happen. Rather, our argument is that we will have

    better choices open to us to make the changes we need as

    a strong part o the UK.

    In my view, the onus is on those who want to break up the

    union to explain why, and why goingitalone would be better

    or Scotland. But there is also an obligation on those o us

    who support the UK to explain the positive, principled case

    or staying together, because we want Scots to make a positive

    choice to remain part o the UK, and not merely to reject the

    risks and uncertainties o independence.

    It is that side o the debate I want to concentrate on today.

    So I will not speak today about the weaknesses o the

    nationalist argument.

    Instead Im going to make a case or a strong Scotland in

    the UK. It will irst be a hardheaded case. I you like, it will be

    a calculation o where Scotlands interests lie. Issues like jobsand security, economics and deence, or public services and

    pensions are critical to everyones uture. The arguments or

    staying in the United Kingdom to protect and secure these

    interests are compelling.

    But important though those practical economic arguments

    are, they do not make the whole case. A choice to remain part

    o the United Kingdom is also a choice about belonging, about

    what our values tell us is the right thing to do. Making a positive

    choice or the UK is as much a matter o the heart as well

    as the head. So I also want to talk about how Scots belong

    both in Scotland and in the UK. That sense o belonging has

    implications or how we live and work together in the UK,

    and indeed or our constitution.

    We want Scots

    to make apositive choice

    to remain part

    o the UK, and

    not merely

    to reject the

    risks anduncertainties o


    Alistair Darling, Leader o the Better Together campaign The University o Glasgow, July 2013

    We belong together: The case or a United Kingdom


  • 7/28/2019 Belong Together


    Union and


    within it



    interests andpreserve our


    We belong together: The case or a United Kingdom

    Alistair Darling, Leader o the Better Together campaign The University o Glasgow, July 2013

    Union and Devolution

    Let me start with a word about that constitution. In setting out

    arguments or the UK, by showing that we are indeed better

    together, do not all into the error o assuming that demands

    uniormity, or that union is opposed to strong and distinctive

    Scottish institutions. Quite the opposite. Just as we will see that

    Scottish identity is intimately linked with British identity, I want

    to make the point to you that union has always involved onevariety or another o Scottish devolution.

    That may not be an obvious proposition, especially to those

    who campaigned in recent decades or a Scottish Parliament.

    But take a longer historical perspective. Throughout the

    centuries o union between Scotland and England, there

    have always been important Scottish institutions relecting

    our distinctiveness, as well as what we share.

    First o all, remember what mattered most to Scots over three

    hundred years ago when the union was irst ormed and its

    terms were negotiated and set. Not the mediaeval Scottish

    Parliament, in which ew had a voice. In those days it was the

    Scottish church, in which many had a place. Ater protracted

    argument, Scotland and England concluded that neither could

    impose its state religion on the other. Instead the union as it

    was agreed involved two completely independent churches.

    Similarly, to assuage another powerul lobby the aculty o

    advocates the union required a separate Scottish legal system.

    The English and Scottish legal jurisdictions remained just aboutas distinct rom one another as beore the union. There is good

    reason, thereore, why 1707 is reerred to as the union o the


    But the world moves on. The role o the Church has changed.

    Similarly the elite rule exempliied by the 17th century

    powerbrokers around the Court o Session has no place

    in a modern democracy. It was replaced irst by dierent

    orms o public administration Scottish boards, commissions,

    government departments and the like. But prior to 1999 they

    were responsible only to the UK Parliament. The case or betterscrutiny o these distinctive institutions was a key plank o the

    argument or devolution.

    So it would be a proound mistake to think that it is only since

    devolution that the union has had a distinctive Scottish side.

    In our modern, democratic age that means a powerul Scottish

    Parliament and a devolved government that deals with most o

    Scotlands domestic aairs.

  • 7/28/2019 Belong Together

    5/32Alistair Darling, Leader o the Better Together campaign The University o Glasgow, July 2013

    We belong together: The case or a United Kingdom


    O course there is an alternative nationalist narrative to this

    a romantic able o how a small nation was irst absorbed by

    its larger neighbour, and struggled to regain its identity. But just

    as nationalist sentiment ignores the reality o how we as Scots

    belong to the UK, so this childish tale ignores the reality that, or

    Scotland, union has always meant the preservation o a distinct

    Scottish identity. Historical scholars have long understood that

    the union o 1707 was not to be contrasted with independence.Rather there were two extremes: independence, which was

    no longer sustainable in Scotlands interest, and assimilation,

    which would have destroyed Scotlands identity. This is as true

    today as it was then union, and devolution within it, saeguard

    Scotlands interests and preserve our identity.

    Im proud to have played a part in the creation o the Scottish

    Parliament, and in sustaining devolution during its ormative

    years. But we never thought that the 1998 Scotland Act

    made our constitutional settlement complete. Thats why

    as Chancellor I supported the Calman Commission, whoserecommendations are now the Scotland Act 2012. They

    represent a very signiicant change, insuficiently understood.

    Box 1: Delivering urther devolution

    Read more about urther devolution:

    Serving Scotland Better: Scotland and the UnitedKingdom in the 21st Century

    Final report o the Commission on Scottish Devolution,

    June 2009

    Scotland Act 2012
  • 7/28/2019 Belong Together


    We belong together: The case or a United Kingdom

    Alistair Darling, Leader o the Better Together campaign The University o Glasgow, July 2013

    But perhaps Calmans most signiicant contribution was to

    set out an analysis o the union, which I want to explore today.

    They saw it as a political, economic and social union. Inside

    such a union, they argued or decentralisation o taxation,

    to enhance the accountability o the Scottish Parliament.

    But they also argued strongly or the principle o sharing o

    resources across the whole UK, to allow or equity as well as

    accountability. That theme o sharing is one I want to exploreurther, as I explain the case or continuing the union.

    The economic case or union

    People are worried about economic security: their jobs, and

    the uture or their amilies and children, at a time o great

    economic uncertainty. So, lets begin with the issue thats been

    central to the debate: the economy. The essence o the case or

    economic union is that it brings certainty at a time o insecurity,

    and opportunity both or Scottish businesses and individual

    Scots. Being part o an integrated UK economy helps us deal

    with risks, and share opportunities in a home market inside oneo the worlds largest economies.

    Scotland has been part o a deep economic union or so long

    we take it or granted. Its hard to imagine a world without it.

    A world in which Scots cann