Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

36
Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD

Transcript of Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Page 1: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Being with the Patient:

The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited

Gordon Harper MD

Page 2: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Presented at Meeting of American Society of

Adolescent Psychiatry (ASAP) and International Society of Adolescent Psychiatry and

Psychology (ISAPP)

New York City28 March 2015

Page 3: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

I have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Page 4: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Thanks to the Committee on Adolescenceand the Publications Board,

Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry

and to George Hein (Lesley College) and Mel Miller (Norwich University).

Page 5: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Some background:

5

Page 6: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.
Page 7: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Erikson:

“The Nature of Clinical Evidence”In Insight and Responsibility:

Scientists get at the nature of thingsby finding out what they can do to them.

Clinicians learn about the nature of man by trying to do something for and with him.

More broadly, “mutuality”!

7

Page 8: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

What’s become of this split?

8

Page 9: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Psychiatry, since the 1950s:

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”Standard dxsDSM III, IV, 5RCTsNeuroscienceMany medicationsEvidence-based Rx

9

Page 10: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Psychiatry, since the 1950s (2):

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”ACGME

standards NBPN“Disorders”Check-lists

relationship-based dxlongitudinal outcome data

10

Page 11: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Psychiatry, since the 1950s (2):

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”

Bleiberg, Treating Personality Disorders in Children and Adolescents: a Relational Approach

11

Page 12: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

And outside Psychiatry…

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”

Charon, “reciprocity of recognition”

12

Page 13: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

13

“The Reciprocity of Recognition — What Medicine Exposesabout Self and Other”

Rita CharonNew Engl J Med 2012

Page 14: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

More outside Psychiatry…

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”Epstein, relnship in 1ary care

Relnship in PsyRx and PsyAys Global Assmt of Relatl Functioning PsyDyn Diag Manual

Shared Decision-making

14

Page 15: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

More outside Psychiatry…

Surgeons’ tone of voice and malpractice history…

- Ambady et al, Surgery, 2002

The anterior cingulate and relationship:- Haroush et al, Cell, 2015

Page 16: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

More outside Psychiatry…

Anthropologist T M Luhrmann:

“Redefining Mental Illness” (NYTimes 1/17/15)

citingBritish Psychological Society,

“Understanding Psychosis and Schizophrenia”

Page 17: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Luhrmann:

• Psychosis and normal experience - overlap• Individual meaning and preference • NIH – Insel – RDCs vs DSM• Social experience and brain function

Page 18: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

From non-clinical fields:

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”Buber, I and ThouTwain, Huck Finn

18

Page 19: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

19

Change thru relationshipChange thru relationshipin literaturein literature

Huck Huck and and JimJim

Page 20: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Out of Africa...

Ubuntu (humanity)

“umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu” (a person is a person through (other)

persons)

Unhu (traditional African

jurisprudence)20

Page 21: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Desmond Tutu:

[Ubuntu] means my humanity is caught up, is inextricably bound up, in [yours]. We belong in a bundle of life. We say, “a person is a person through other people.” It is not “I think therefore I am.” It says rather: “I am human because I belong.” I participate, I share.

Page 22: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Closer to home:

A call for tolerance and understanding

Muslim students at Harvard: respond to Islamophobia with education paired with relationship building.

The Crimson, March 11, 2015

22

Page 23: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Going even further back…

“Data-in-relation” “Objective data”Ortega y Gassett: “Yo soy yo y mis circunstancias”

Troilus and Cressida

23

Page 24: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Knowing self only thru others…Knowing self only thru others…

ShakespearShakespear

e, e, Troilus Troilus and and

CressidaCressida

Page 25: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

ULYSSES A strange fellow here Writes me: 'That man, how dearly ever parted, How much in having, or without or in, Cannot make boast to have that which he hath, Nor feels not what he owes, but by reflection; As when his virtues shining upon others Heat them and they retort that heat again To the first giver.'

ACHILLES This is not strange, Ulysses. The beauty that is borne here in the face The bearer knows not, but commends itself To others' eyes; nor doth the eye itself, That most pure spirit of sense, behold itself, Not going from itself; but eye to eye opposed Salutes each other with each other's form; For speculation turns not to itself, Till it hath travell'd and is mirror'd there Where it may see itself. This is not strange at all.

Page 26: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

ULYSSES I do not strain at the position,-It is familiar,--but at the author's drift; Who, in his circumstance, expressly proves That no man is the lord of any thing, Though in and of him there be much consisting, Till he communicate his parts to others: Nor doth he of himself know them for aught Till he behold them form'd in the applause Where they're extended; who, like an arch, Reverberates the voice again, or, like a gate of steel Fronting the sun, receives and renders back His figure and his heat.

Page 27: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

And lately, in Psychiatry…

Dynamics of prescribing:• Mintz and Belnap, “What is psychodynamic

psychopharmacology? An approach to pharmacologic treatment resistance. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry, 2006.

• Mintz and Flynn, “How, not What, to Prescribe.” Psychiat Clin N Am, 2012.

27

Page 28: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

And lately, in Psychiatry…

Dynamics of prescribing:• Mintz and Belnap, “What is psychodynamic

psychopharmacology? An approach to pharmacologic treatment resistance. J Am Acad Psychoanal Dyn Psychiatry, 2006.

• Mintz and Flynn, “How, not What, to Prescribe.” Psychiat Clin N Am, 2012.

28

Page 29: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

More, in Psychiatry…

Context:• Bracken et al, “Psychiatry beyond

the current paradigm.” BJP 2012• Kirkmayer and Gold, “Re-socializing

Psychiatry: critical neuroscience and the limits of reductionism.” In Choudhury and Slaby, 2012.

29

Page 30: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

A clinical vignette…

– 19-year-old youth, “schizophrenic”

– Scattering ashes in office– MD angry -> disclosure of Fa’s

rages– Changes direction of treatment

30

Page 31: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Data-in-relationship less visible;Data-in-relationship less visible;

““Objective” data ascendant.Objective” data ascendant.

How do we see this?How do we see this?

• Scientific progress?Scientific progress?• Reductionistic care?Reductionistic care?

• Need for a new balance?Need for a new balance?

Page 32: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

How does it happen? How might it change?

Remember,

“Every system is perfectly designed to achieve the results it gets.” (IHI)

32

Page 33: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Relevant structures:Relevant structures:

•Administrative requirementsAdministrative requirements•ReimbursementReimbursement

•TrainingTraining•ResearchResearch

•Patient feedbackPatient feedback

Page 34: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Let’s hear from the audience…Let’s hear from the audience…

Page 35: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Thank you!Thank you!

Page 36: Being with the Patient: The “Nature of Clinical Evidence,” Revisited Gordon Harper MD.

Contact informationContact information

• Gordon Harper MD [email protected]