Being Kind in Close Relationships Reduces Depression

download Being Kind in Close Relationships Reduces Depression

of 1

Transcript of Being Kind in Close Relationships Reduces Depression

  • 7/29/2019 Being Kind in Close Relationships Reduces Depression

    1/1

    Being Kind in Close RelationshipsReduces Depression

    AbstractThere has been increasing interest in the benefits of

    being kind, which include improved self-esteem,

    happiness, and greater overall mental-health.

    Practicing kindness has also been shown to

    strengthen relationships and increase social

    support, both of which can inoculate individuals

    from emotional distress and depression. The

    current study examined the effects of a kindness

    exercise within close relationships. Participants

    were recruited online and were randomly assigned

    to one of two conditions. Participants in the

    kindness condition performed a kind, loving gesturetowards someone close, while participants in the

    control condition simply wrote about an interaction

    they had with someone close. Multilevel modeling

    revealed that the kindness intervention was

    associated with significant decreases in depressive

    symptoms when compared to the control condition,

    with gains that were maintained at the two month

    follow-up. These results suggest that practicing

    kindness within the context of a close relationship

    can lead to sustained improvements in depression.

    Introduction Kindness, described as the inclination to be kind

    and compassionate towards others, has been

    identified in the positive psychology literature as a

    globally-valued strength of character (Peterson &

    Seligman, 2004). Practicing kindness has been

    shown to improve self-esteem and increase positive

    moods (Krause & Shaw, 2000; Mongrain, Chin, &

    Shapira, 2010; Simmons, 1991).

    Performing kind acts has the potential to benefitdepression. Disruptions in ones interpersonal

    context are linked to the occurrence and

    maintenance of depression (Joiner, Coyne, &

    Blalock, 1999). Practicing compassion within

    relationships has been shown to produce supportive

    interpersonal environments and strengthen

    relationships (Crocker & Canevello, 2008), which

    could prevent or repair dysfunctional relationship

    dynamics.

    Conclusions Practicing kindness within close relationships can decrease

    depression, with gains up to two months following the

    intervention.

    Cultivating close relationships is important for depressed

    individuals, whose symptoms are often exacerbated or maintained

    by dysfunctional interpersonal contexts. This type of online intervention offers an effective, accessible, and

    convenient alternative to more traditional methods of delivery.

    Method

    Participants:Participants were recruited online worldwide (N= 364) and wererequired to be over the age of 18 and have daily access to the

    Internet. The mean age of participants was 32.34 (SD = 11.19)

    and 66% were female. Participants presented with a mean

    baseline score of 22.1 (SD = 13.15) on the Centre for

    Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff,

    1977), indicating symptoms of clinical significance.

    Procedure: Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions.

    Participants in the kindness condition (n= 172) performed a kindact for someone they were close with and described the

    interaction they had.

    Participants in the control condition (n= 192) described aninteraction they had with someone close that day.

    These exercises were repeated every second day for three weeks

    with participants completing their exercises online. Participants

    completed the CES-D immediately prior to the exercise period, at

    post-test three weeks later, and at one and two month follow-ups.

    Data analysis:Multilevel modeling (MLM) was used to assess the effect of the

    kindness condition on depression and to determine if changes in

    depression were sustained over time. MLM was chosen due to thehigh level of attrition and the nested structure of the data.

    Results

    HypothesisPracticing kindness within the context of close

    relationships should strengthen these

    relationships and enhance social support, as

    well as foster the character strength of

    kindness. Consequently, it is expected that

    participants in the kindness condition will see

    significant decreases in depressive symptoms

    in comparison to those in the control condition.

    Caroline Barnes, B.A.Myriam Mongrain, Ph.D.

    Ryan Barnhart, M.A.

    Participants in the kindness condition saw a

    significant decrease in depressive

    symptoms due to the kindness intervention

    when compared to the control condition

    (Estimate = -.33, SE= .10, z= -2.40,p= .02).

    These decreases in depressive symptoms

    were maintained over time up to the two

    month follow-up (Estimate = -.08, SE= .04,z= -2.00, p= .04).

    Crocker, J., & Canevello, A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555-575.

    Joiner, T., Coyne, J. C., & Blalock, J. (1999). In Joiner T., Coyne J. C. (Eds.), On the interpersonal nature of depression: Overview and synthesis. American

    Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Krause, N., & Shaw, B.A. (2000). Giving social support to others, socioeconomic status, and changes in self-esteem in late life. Journals of Gerontology:

    Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55B, S323-333.

    Mongrain, M., Chin, J. & Shapira, L. B. (2010). Practicing compassion increases happiness and self-esteem. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 963-981.

    Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. APAPress: Washington, DC.

    Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D Scale: Aself-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.