BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings...

13
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1146 [email protected] International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Volume 9, Issue 8, August 2018, pp. 11461158, Article ID: IJCIET_09_08_116 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=8 ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316 © IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE BUILDINGS DURING EARTHQUAKE AND AFTERSHOCKS BY ADJUST THE DTM AND MR WITH FREQUENCY Kadim Karim Mohsen Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering College, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq Satar Habib Mnaathr Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering College, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq Abdul Gaffar S.M Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering College, University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq ABSTRACT Seismic examination of Portable building (basic investigation) is the figuring of the reaction of the movable building structure to tremors. It is a piece of the procedure of basic outline, tremor designing or auxiliary appraisal the Portable building can possibly 'wave' forward and backward amid a quake (or even a serious breeze storm). This is known as the 'basic mode', and is the most minimal recurrence of movable building reaction. Most Portable building structures have higher methods of reaction, which are interestingly enacted amid tremors. For every mode, a reaction is perused from the outline range, in view of the modular recurrence and the modular mass, and they are then consolidated to give a gauge of the aggregate reaction of the structure. In this we need to compute the size of powers every which way and after that see the impacts on the building. This approach characterizes a progression of powers following up on a movable working to speak to the impact of quake ground movement, commonly characterized by a seismic plan reaction range. The relevance of this technique is stretched out in numerous Portable construction standards by applying elements to represent higher movable structures with some higher modes, and for low levels of bending. To represent impacts because of "yielding" of the structure, numerous codes apply adjustment factors that diminish the power situation, the results of this study point out the significance of vibrations caused by shaking in construction of engineering structures as well as the appropriate performance of a TMD and MR in reducing oscillations in Movable buildings.

Transcript of BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings...

Page 1: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1146 [email protected]

International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)

Volume 9, Issue 8, August 2018, pp. 1146–1158, Article ID: IJCIET_09_08_116

Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=8

ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316

© IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed

BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF

MOVABLE BUILDINGS DURING

EARTHQUAKE AND AFTERSHOCKS BY

ADJUST THE DTM AND MR WITH

FREQUENCY

Kadim Karim Mohsen

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Engineering College,

University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq

Satar Habib Mnaathr Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering College,

University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq

Abdul Gaffar S.M

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Engineering College,

University of Thi-Qar, Nasiriya, Iraq

ABSTRACT

Seismic examination of Portable building (basic investigation) is the figuring of

the reaction of the movable building structure to tremors. It is a piece of the procedure

of basic outline, tremor designing or auxiliary appraisal the Portable building can

possibly 'wave' forward and backward amid a quake (or even a serious breeze storm).

This is known as the 'basic mode', and is the most minimal recurrence of movable

building reaction. Most Portable building structures have higher methods of reaction,

which are interestingly enacted amid tremors. For every mode, a reaction is perused

from the outline range, in view of the modular recurrence and the modular mass, and

they are then consolidated to give a gauge of the aggregate reaction of the structure.

In this we need to compute the size of powers every which way and after that see the

impacts on the building. This approach characterizes a progression of powers

following up on a movable working to speak to the impact of quake ground movement,

commonly characterized by a seismic plan reaction range. The relevance of this

technique is stretched out in numerous Portable construction standards by applying

elements to represent higher movable structures with some higher modes, and for low

levels of bending. To represent impacts because of "yielding" of the structure,

numerous codes apply adjustment factors that diminish the power situation, the results

of this study point out the significance of vibrations caused by shaking in construction

of engineering structures as well as the appropriate performance of a TMD and MR in

reducing oscillations in Movable buildings.

Page 2: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the

DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1147 [email protected]

Key words: Seismic, Movable buildings, Structural analysis, MR, TMD.

Cite this Article: Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M,

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and

Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency. International Journal of

Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 2018, pp. 1146-1158.

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=8

NOMENCLATURE

x(t) Displacement vector m

M

Mass matrix

kg

C

Damping matrix N.s/m

K Stiffness matrix

N/m

1. INTRODUCTION

The examination of a structure and the reaction to the normal excitation , along these lines it

can be resolved whether a specific structure will satisfy its planned capacity and, likewise, the

aftereffects of the dynamic loadings following up on a structure can be anticipated, for

example, the dynamic anxieties, weakness life and commotion levels [1]. The specialized

reason for lessening the base outline base shear in damped structures by a most extreme of

25%, from that required for the relating undamped assembling is inferred in light of

practically identical levels of harm in both the damped and undamped [2]. The building

models are subjected to the even part of speeding up of the tremor, while the extension show

is subjected to the vertical increasing speed of the quake. On account of structures the impact

of vertical ground speeding up is disregarded, considering that the solidness of the working in

the vertical course is higher than that in the level [3].

The control of basic vibrations created by tremor or wind should be possible by different

means, for example, altering rigidities, masses, damping, or shape, and by giving latent or

dynamic counter powers [4]. Robert J. McNamara, contemplated the tuned mass damper

(TMD) as a vitality retaining framework to diminish wind-actuated basic reaction of

structures in the versatile scope of conduct A tuned fluid damper (TLD) is an exceptional

class of TMD where the mass is supplanted by fluid (normally water). Sloshing of the fluid

impersonates the movement of the TMD mass.

The movement of the fluid section in a U-tube to balance the powers following up on the

structure, with damping presented in the swaying fluid segment through an opening keeping

in mind the end goal to accomplish better insurance for the scaffold subjected to solid vertical

ground movement, helical springs are utilized as safeguards with liquid dampers as vitality

dissipaters [5]. Dynamic control techniques for basic frameworks have been created as one

means by which to limit the impacts of these natural loads, the quick ideal control calculations

for applications to tremor energized fabricating structures.

Page 3: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1148 [email protected]

Figure 1 Movable building architect [5]

The recurrence area ideal control procedures for dynamic control of structural designing

structures under seismic stacking. They announced that, as opposed to already revealed time

space based controllers; the numerical investigations demonstrate that these control systems

are equipped for diminishing the building's reaction in both the first and second mode reaction

utilizing a functioning mass damper [6]. composed a controller for the dynamic vibration

detachment framework (for a three story building) utilizing criticism signs of the principal

story speeding up failing to assess the base elements of the controlled structure by

combination with controlled factors of the increasing speed of the primary story and the

relative dislodging between the main story and the second story[7]. Vibration control of

scaffolds deck under vertical seismic tremor part utilizing distinctive control strategies.

An enhanced exchange network with control strategy was utilized to decide the worldly

unique reaction since dynamic control depends on outside power, which requires routine

support and consequently may turn out to be conceivably unsteady, semi-dynamic control

have been considered by numerous scientists. Semi-dynamic control gadgets don't add

mechanical vitality to the auxiliary framework (counting the structure and the control

actuators), and accordingly limited information limited yield is ensured. Semi-dynamic

control gadgets are regularly seen as controllable aloof gadgets [8] .Structures commonly

disperse vitality from extraordinary unique occasions by enabling harm to the structure. Semi-

dynamic control gives supplemental damping to all the more effectively disperse vitality

because of dynamic burdens safeguarding the essential structure Semi-dynamic control

frameworks include :(1) dynamic variable firmness, where the solidness of the structure is

acclimated to build up a non-thunderous condition between the structure and excitation; and

:(2) dynamic variable damper, where the damping coefficient of the gadget is differed to

accomplish the most decrease in the reaction [9] .The semi-dynamic control framework is

equipped for drawing closer, as well as outperforming, the execution of a functioning control

framework. Semi-dynamic control framework just requires a little division of the power that

is required by the dynamic controller analyzed the viability of variable dampers for seismic

applications (multi-level of-opportunity structures). They showed that, not at all like

uninvolved dampers (where for adaptable structures, an expansion in damping coefficient

diminishes relocation yet expands the increasing speed reaction). Variable dampers can be

successful in diminishing both the relocation and increasing speed reactions. They closed

Page 4: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the

DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1149 [email protected]

additionally, that variable dampers, in any case, are not viable for unbending structures when

contrasted with latent dampers a semi blast controller for a non-direct structure and showed its

viability in reenactment against suites of a few tremors of close and far field root and force

[10].

2. THEORETICAL TECHNIQUE

An exchange of the impacts of soil-structure communication on the dynamic reaction of

straight structures which react as single-level of-opportunity frameworks in their settled base

condition is introduced. The structures are dared to be upheld at the surface of a

homogeneous, versatile half space and to be energized at the base. The free-field ground

movements researched incorporate a consonant movement, a moderately basic heartbeat write

excitation and a real seismic tremor record. Exhaustive reaction spectra are exhibited for a

scope of the parameters characterizing the issue, and the outcomes are utilized to evaluate the

exactness of a basic, surmised strategy for investigation in which the framework is spoken to

by a viscously damped, straightforward oscillator.

2.1. Dynamic Equation of Building

The equation of motion of an elastic n degree of freedom building structure subjected to

lateral force vector can be expressed as

Where x(t) = (n*1) displacement vector relative to the base M,C and K = (n*n) mass ,

damping and stiffness matrices, respectively , assuming zero initial conditions, the Laplace

transformation of equation (1)

In which s donate the Laplace domain parameter, the (n*n) transfer function matrix H(s)

transforms the input forcing function f(s) into the output vector x(s), i.e.:

A unique transfer function exist for the output (displacement) at the DOF due to the

input (force) at the DOF, which is represented by the component of . Using

equation 3, the dynamic response of a linear elastic structure can be derived using the inverse

Laplace transformation of

{ } { }

Since the displacement response of the floor is the supper position of the

response associated with inputs applied at each floor, displacement can be expressed by the

sum of the transfer function and inputs at each floor, representing the input by equivalent

lateral force vector , displacement response for the base and top excitation ,

respectively are given by :

Base excitation

Page 5: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1150 [email protected]

Top excitation

where and represent effective earthquake force and story mass at floor j, is

the Laplace transformation of the ground motion , and is the components of

influence vector for the special case of excitation applied only at the roof level

(i.e., j= n only) the last equation reduced to

where is function of transfer between the shaker input on the floor level n and the

displacement response of the i-th floor equating equations 5 and 7, the linear shaker input

motion that will reduce an floor response , , that will match from the base

excitation can be derived using a filter defined as

Finally, the shaker input motion is obtained using as

{ } { }

In this approach the shaker input movement is gotten through a channel

characterized as the proportion of two exchange capacities to such an extent that the reaction

of I-th floor because of the base excitation and best excitation will match. Not that T(s) relies

upon which viewpoint (DOF) of the reaction is being coordinated. This technique can be

stretched out to duplicate elective reaction amounts, for example, add up to base shear, story

toppling minute, or between story overturning moment. In any case, an inadequacy of this

approach is its powerlessness to coordinate all the while the reaction of different DOFs (or

numerous reaction amounts).

2.2. Earthquake Engineering

The principle targets of seismic tremor designing are: Predict the potential results of solid

quakes on urban zones and common foundation. Configuration, develop and keep up

structures to perform at tremor presentation up to the desires and in consistence with

construction standards.

2.3. Seismic Performance

Essential ideas of the seismic tremor designing, executed in the real construction regulations,

accept that a building ought to survive an uncommon, extremely serious quake by maintaining

huge harm yet without all-inclusive falling. Then again, it ought to stay operational for more

successive, yet less extreme seismic occasions.

Page 6: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the

DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1151 [email protected]

Figure 2 Model of the movable building [10]

Figure 3 Lumped mass model building [1]

Figure 4 Uncontrolled response for 3 store building [1]

Page 7: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1152 [email protected]

Figure 5 Controlled response for 3 store building [1]

Figure 6 N story general torsional coupled building [11]

3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The Dynamic zenith which will be worked in Dubai is planned by an Italian modeler, David

Fisher. It will have an aggregate number of 80 stories. Every one of the floors are pre-

assembled and can turn 360 degrees around a focal segment by methods for control produced

by the breeze turbine situated between each floor. The condos are relied upon to cost about

$3.7 million to $36 million. The development was relied upon to be finished by 2010. Yet, it

wasn't thinking about it is a senseless thought and it is additionally the year 2011. The

anticipated cost of the undertaking was 700 million dollars.

Page 8: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the

DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1153 [email protected]

Figure 7 Comparison between the Movable and normal buildings

Figure 8 Some dynamic tower details

Research on the "Shrewd Envelope" has been effectively tried on various undertakings, in

a joint effort with some significant organizations of the development materials part, and is

currently prepared to be taken off on a modern scale. The Dynamic Group has 10 years in

length involvement in the exploration of creative building parts, fit for communicating with

atmosphere conditions and managing vitality moves through the building surface. The

"canny" building is along these lines one whose outside segments progress toward becoming

components of warm self-control, guaranteeing indoor solace while decreasing vitality

utilization.

Page 9: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1154 [email protected]

Figure 9 Dynamic tower Outline

The utilization of the "Keen Envelope" innovation is in this manner a key factor of the

Turning tower's enthusiastic independence, by essentially bringing down the building's

vitality necessities. These green structures will open the way to future urban areas that will be

green and ecological sound. The Dynamic group's dreams is that the city without bounds will

be provincial instead of urban, as in it will be of vertical structures submerged in the

farmland. No more autos at first glance and all transportation will be controlled by elective

fuel conveying us to a superior life. The Savvy Network emerges from genuine needs in the

utilization of the vitality. Throughout the following two decades our vitality foundation will

experience changes like those which undulated through the media and media transmission

businesses in the course of recent years. Much the same as the PDA upheaval of the mid

1990s, when the original remote broadcast communications immediately soaked the simple

system, so too will digitalization infest the buy, age, transportation and utilization of a wide

range of vitality.

The move towards the "Shrewd Network" includes a decentralization of intensity sources.

Focal power stations will offer approach to appropriated nearby efficient power vitality

generators with completely coordinated system administration. By delivering its own vitality

necessities, the Pivoting Tower speaks to a point of reference in the inescapable rollout of the

"Savvy Network".

3.1. Industrialization

The time has come for structures wind up industrialized, offering numerous favorable

circumstances. We trust that sooner rather than later most structures will have a mechanical

approach. They will be finished in sections, in a preassembly office and after that conveyed to

the site, prepared for conclusive gathering and utilize. The industrialization of the working

without bounds grew now for the Turning High rises, will before long be reached out to any

sort of building, likewise to low ascent and ease lodging. The world first processing plant of

living modules for tall structures crosses the new boondocks of industrialization. Our

progressive strategy utilizes the same mechanical designing and a similar front line

advancements as the main flight related and auto enterprises. The entry from semi-completed

segments to finish units ensures top quality machine for living.

Page 10: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the

DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1155 [email protected]

3.2. Ground Acceleration and Building Damage

Similarly, the supreme development of the ground and structures amid a tremor isn't in reality

all that expansive, notwithstanding amid a noteworthy quake. That is, they don't more often

than not experience removals that are huge in respect to the building's own measurements.

Along these lines, it isn't the separation that a building moves which alone causes harm. Or

maybe, it is on account of a building is all of a sudden compelled to move rapidly that it

endures harm amid a seismic tremor. As it were, the harm that a building endures principally

depends not upon its removal, but rather upon increasing speed. While relocation is the

genuine separation the ground and the building may move amid a quake, increasing speed is a

measure of how rapidly they change speed as they move. Amid a tremor, the speed at which

both the ground and building are movable will achieve some greatest. The all the more rapidly

they achieve this most extreme, the more prominent their accumulative speed.

3.3. Inertial Forces

To delineate the procedure of inactivity produced strains inside a structure, we can consider

the least difficult sort of structure possible - a straightforward, consummately unbending

square of stone Amid a seismic tremor, if this square is just sitting on the ground with no

connection to it, the square will move uninhibitedly toward a path inverse to that of the

ground movement, and with a power relative to the mass and increasing speed of the square.

On the off chance that a similar square, in any case, is emphatically established in the ground

and no longer ready to move openly, it should somehow ingest the inertial power inside. This

inside take-up of power is appeared to bring about breaking close to the base of the square.

Obviously, genuine structures don't react as essentially as depicted previously.

Figure 10 Acceleration, Inertia Forces [7]

3.4. Building Frequency and Period

In any case, as we talked about in the how tremors influence structures, the extent of the

building reaction that is, the increasing speeds which it experiences depends fundamentally

upon the frequencies of the information ground movement and the building's regular

recurrence. At the point when these are close or equivalent to each other, the building's

reaction achieves a pinnacle level. In a few conditions, this dynamic enhancement impact can

expand the building speeding up to an esteem two times or increasingly that of the ground

quickening at the base of the building. For the most part, structures with higher common

frequencies, and a short regular period, have a tendency to endure higher increasing speeds

yet littler uprooting. On account of structures with bring down characteristic frequencies, and

a long common period, this is turned around as the structures will encounter bring down

increasing speeds however bigger relocations.

Page 11: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1156 [email protected]

3.5. Building Stiffness

Inflexibility enormously influences the building's take-up of seismic tremor created drive.

Rethink our first case above, of the inflexible stone square profoundly established in the dirt.

The inflexible square of stone is solid; therefore it reacts in a basic, emotional way. Genuine

structures, obviously, are all the more naturally adaptable, being made out of a wide range of

parts. Moreover, not exclusively is the square hardened, it is weak; and along these lines, it

breaks amid the seismic tremor. This leads us to the following vital basic trademark

influencing a building's tremor reaction and execution.

Figure 11 Seismic response of four floors with time under external regular force

Figure 12 Seismic response of four floors over time without external force

Page 12: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the

DTM and MR with Frequency

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1157 [email protected]

Figure 13 Seismic response of four floors under random external force

4. CONCLUSIONS

There’s still no way to ward off earthquakes. But it’s clear that we can do more to protect

buildings from shifting of tectonic plates beneath the Earth’s curs, thus It is desirable over

build a structure with bring down normal frequencies which is far from the recurrence of

excitation. Anyway as the recurrence of excitation turn out to be nearer to the lower

frequencies of the structure the control calculation turns out to be exceptionally compelling.

MR dampers can diminish the reactions of structures, when suspended between the lower

floors, for low ascent structures. MR dampers can decrease the most extreme uprooting of the

stories .For base segregated structures, the expansion of MR dampers between the base and

the ground brings about an increment in the greatest outright quickening of the base. For

elevated structures, MR dampers can be utilized between every two contiguous floors, or if

there is a two adjoining structures they can be coupled by a coupling join, comprises of a

gooey damper or by MR dampers.

TMD when suspended at the highest point of the building it is equipped for giving a

suitable decrease in the reactions.

For movable building, the TMD can lessen the greatest removal of the midpoint of the

bar, the most extreme outright increasing speed, When MR dampers are utilized at the

backings in parallel with helical springs, it give a high diminishment in the greatest relocation

A few control calculations might be utilized with the MR damper. The cut ideal control

calculation gives the best diminishment in the reactions when contrasted and different

calculations.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the Department of Mechanical, and Electrical & Electronic

Engineering, at Engineering College, University of Thi-Qar for its support.

Page 13: BEHAVIOR AND SEISMIC RESPONSE OF MOVABLE ......Behavior and Seismic Response of Movable Buildings during Earthquake and Aftershocks by Adjust the DTM and MR with Frequency

Kadim Karim Mohsen, Satar Habib Mnaathr and Abdul Gaffar S.M

http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 1158 [email protected]

REFERENCES

[1] Benaroya, H., Nagurka, M. and Han, S., 2017. Mechanical vibration: analysis,

uncertainties, and control. CRC Press.

[2] Chopra, A.K., 2017. Dynamics of Structures. Theory and Applications to. Earthquake

Engineering.

[3] Jabary, R.N. and Madabhushi, G.S., 2018. Tuned mass damper positioning effects on the

seismic response of a soil-MDOF-structure system. Journal of Earthquake

Engineering, 22(2), pp.281-302.

[4] Yang, D.H., Shin, J.H., Lee, H., Kim, S.K. and Kwak, M.K., 2017. Active vibration

control of structure by active mass damper and multi-modal negative acceleration

feedback control algorithm. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 392, pp.18-30.

[5] Al-Sallal, K.A., 2004, October. Tower buildings in Dubai–are they sustainable. In CTBUH

conference, Seoul (Vol. 2004).

[6] Venanzi, I., Ierimonti, L. and Ubertini, F., 2017. Effects of control-structure interaction in

active mass driver systems with electric torsional servomotor for seismic

applications. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 15(4), pp.1543-1557.

[7] Dyke, S. J., Spencer, Jr., B. F., Sain, M. K., and Carlson, J. D. "Experimental Verification

of Semi-Active Structural Control Strategies Using Acceleration Feedback," Proceedings

of the Third International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Vol. III, pp. 291-

296, 1996.

[8] Bhaiya, V., Bharti, S.D., Shrimali, M.K. and Datta, T.K., 2019. Performance of Semi-

actively Controlled Building Frame Using MR Damper for Near-Field Earthquakes.

In Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 2 (pp. 397-407). Springer,

Singapore.

[9] Oscar M. Ramirez,, Michael C. Constantine, M.EERI, Elastic and Inelastic Seismic

Response of Buildings with Damping Systems, Earthquake Spectra, Volume 18, No. 3,

pages 531–547, August 2002.

[10] Hancock, P., 2017. Transports of Delight: How Technology Materializes Human

Imagination. Springer.

[11] Chi-Chang Lin, Jin-Min Ueng , Teng-ChingHuang ,Seismic response reduction of

irregular buildings using passive tuned mass dampers, Department of Civil Engineering,

National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, 1998.

[12] Lu, Z., Huang, B., Zhang, Q. and Lu, X., 2018. Experimental and analytical study on

vibration control effects of eddy-current tuned mass dampers under seismic

excitations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 421, pp.153-165.