Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that...

28
1 Steve Downs Chief Technology and Information Officer Claire Gibbons Senior Program Officer May 17, 2012 Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Welcome 2 Keith Green Director, Membership Council on Foundations

Transcript of Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that...

Page 1: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

1

Steve DownsChief Technology and Information Officer

Claire GibbonsSenior Program Officer

May 17, 2012

Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Welcome

2

Keith Green

Director, Membership

Council on Foundations

Page 2: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

2

Agenda

Introductions Web 2.0 at RWJF Evaluation at RWJF Q&A

3

WebEx Tips To expand or collapse a panel, toggle the arrow () or

().

All phone lines are on mute.

Questions? On the Q&A Panel, type your question,

select “All Panelists,” click “Send.”

This webinar is being recorded for self paced learning.

4

Page 3: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

3

Moderator

Debra Joy PérezAssistant Vice President, Research and Evaluation

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

5

Speakers

6

Steve DownsChief Technology and

Information OfficerRobert Wood Johnson

Foundation

Claire GibbonsSenior Program OfficerRobert Wood Johnson

Foundation

Page 4: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

4

Web 2.0 at RWJF

7

Steve DownsChief Technology and

Information Officer

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Poll 1

8

What’s your current use of social media?

a) Official presence and staff presenceb) Official presence onlyc) Staff presence onlyd) No presence yet but working on a plane) Not actively pursuing this right now

Use the “Polling” panel on the right navigation bar to respond to the poll. Select your answer and hit the “submit” button.

Page 5: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

5

Origins

9

a) Strategic Planning

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

What is Web 2.0?

10

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 6: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

6

Origins

11

a) Strategic Planningb) Emergence of social media

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Origins

12

a) Strategic Planningb) Emergence of social mediac) Establishment of staff working group

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 7: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

7

Values, not just tools

13

“As the group developed an understanding of Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools of Web 2.0 and an organization that embraces the underlying qualities of Web 2.0 and weaves those qualities into its work.”

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Values

14

- Openness- Participation- Decentralization

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 8: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

8

Openness

15

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Participation

16

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 9: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

9

Decentralization

17

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

18

- We’re in the know

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 10: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

10

19

- We seed and engage in important conversations

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

20

- We seek feedback more openly

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 11: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

11

21

- We cultivate and deploy networks across all dimensions of our work

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

22

- We make it easy for people to work with us

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 12: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

12

23

- We leverage our users’ contributions

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

24

- We adapt, based on the feedback we receive

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 13: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

13

25

How are we doing?

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

26

Web 2.0 Programming

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 14: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

14

27

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

28

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 15: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

15

Resources

29

Blogs:

- Beth’s Blog: http://www.bethkanter.org/- Working Wikily: http://workingwikily.com/

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Resources

30

Report:

• Catalyzing Networks for Social Change: A Funder’s Guide

http://www.monitorinstitute.com/downloads/Catalyzing_Networks_for_Social_Change.pdf

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 16: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

16

Resources

31

Books:

• Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations

• Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Resources

32

Books cont.:

• The Networked Nonprofit: Connecting with Social Media to Drive Change

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 17: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

17

Mid-way Q&A Check-inUse the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your

question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

33

Evaluation at RWJF

34

Claire GibbonsSenior Program Officer

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 18: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

18

Evaluation at RWJF

35

It’s in our DNA

Learning, not grading

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Context

36

Growing social media activity

Assumption: • More social media activity is better

What do we expect social media will achieve for us?

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 19: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

19

Poll 2

37

Have you used a logic model before?

a) Yesb) No

Use the “Polling” panel on the right navigation bar to respond to the poll. Select your answer and hit the “submit” button.

38

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Milstein, Bobby and Chapel, Tom. “Developing a Logic Model or Theory of Change.” The Community ToolBox. Ed: Val Renault and Steve Fawcett. 2012. University of Kansas. <http://ctb.ku.edu/>   

Page 20: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

20

Social Media Logic Model

39

Victoria Dougherty, Project Director

• Document review

• Interviews

• In-person meeting

• MeasurementFeel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Findings

40

More than just using social media

RWJF will become a different organization

Some goals are institution-wide, others are program specific

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 21: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

21

Intermediate (2‐3 yrs)Intermediate (2‐3 yrs) Long Term (>5 yrs)Long Term (>5 yrs)

RWJF is an Agent of Change

RWJF More Open, Engaging, Nimble, Perceived so Externally 

RWJF Positioned to be Web 2.0 Organization

Knowledge is Gained and Shared

Short Term (1 yr)Short Term (1 yr)

RWJF is an Open Organization Spurring Broad Participation

RWJF is Connector, Facilitator

Intermediate (2‐3 yrs)Intermediate (2‐3 yrs) Long Term (>5 yrs)Long Term (>5 yrs)

RWJF is an Agent of Change

RWJF “Touches, Moves and Inspires” 

RWJF More Open, Engaging, Nimble, Perceived so Externally 

Greater Intelligence Gathering & Participation Strengthens  Work

RWJF Positioned to be Web 2.0 Organization

Knowledge is Gained and Shared

Short Term (1 yr)Short Term (1 yr)

RWJF is an Open Organization Spurring Broad Participation

RWJF is Connector, Facilitator

Page 22: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

22

Intermediate (2‐3 yrs)Intermediate (2‐3 yrs) Long Term (>5 yrs)Long Term (>5 yrs)

Greater Impact

Policy Goals Reached Quicker

Norms Change, Individuals, Businesses, Providers, Institutions Engage in Healthier Practices, Behaviors 

RWJF is an Agent of Change

RWJF is an Open Organization Spurring Broad Participation

RWJF is Connector, Facilitator

Programming Improves

RWJF “Touches, Moves and Inspires” 

RWJF More Open, Engaging, Nimble, Perceived so Externally 

Greater Intelligence Gathering & Participation Strengthens  Work

RWJF Positioned to be Web 2.0 Organization

Knowledge is Gained and Shared

Short Term (1 yr)Short Term (1 yr)

Results Spread

Intermediate (2‐3 yrs)Intermediate (2‐3 yrs) Long Term (>5 yrs)Long Term (>5 yrs)

Greater Impact

Policy Goals Reached Quicker

Norms Change, Individuals, Businesses, Providers, Institutions Engage in Healthier Practices, Behaviors 

RWJF is an Agent of Change

RWJF is an Open Organization Spurring Broad Participation

RWJF is Connector, Facilitator

Programming Improves

RWJF “Touches, Moves and Inspires” 

RWJF More Open, Engaging, Nimble, Perceived so Externally 

Greater Intelligence Gathering & Participation Strengthens  Work

RWJF Positioned to be Web 2.0 Organization

Knowledge is Gained and Shared

Short Term (1 yr)Short Term (1 yr)

Results Spread

Page 23: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

23

RWJF Positioned to be Web 2.0 Organization

Knowledge is Gained and Shared

Short Term (1 yr)Short Term (1 yr)

Intermediate (2‐3 yrs)Intermediate (2‐3 yrs)

RWJF “Touches, Moves and Inspires” 

RWJF More Open, Engaging, Nimble, Perceived so Externally 

Greater Intelligence Gathering & Participation Strengthens  Work

Page 24: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

24

Long Term (>5 yrs)Long Term (>5 yrs)

Greater Impact

Policy Goals Reached Quicker

Norms Change, Individuals, Businesses, Providers, Institutions Engage in Healthier Practices, Behaviors 

RWJF is an Agent of Change

RWJF is an Open Organization Spurring Broad Participation

RWJF is Connector, Facilitator

Programming Improves

Results Spread

To Do: Measurement

48

Some outcomes are vague (e.g., RWJF is an agent of change)

Learn more about what measures are available

Data collection process

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 25: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

25

Chat Your Response

49

What social media measurements are you using?

Use the “Chat” panel on the right navigation bar to respond to the question. Look for the “Send to” box in the chat panel. Write your message and select “All Participants”. Hit send.

Your response will be viewed by participants, speakers and recorded for those who may replay this message for self paced learning.

Next Steps

50

Communicating

Convening

Coordinating

Measure development

Feel free to submit a question at any time. Use the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

Page 26: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

26

Q&AUse the “Q&A” panel on the right navigation bar. Type your

question, select “All Panelists” and click “Send.”

51

Speaker Information

52

Claire GibbonsSenior Program Officer

[email protected]

Steve DownsChief Technology and

Information Officer

[email protected]

Debra Joy PérezAssistant Vice President Research and Evaluation

[email protected]

Page 27: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

27

53

@StephenJDowns

#RWJFweb20

Save the date—August 16: Exiting Responsibly: Best Donor Practices in Ending Field Support

Visit the webinar archive at www.cof.org/education to play back other recordings from this series

• Improving Effectiveness in an Age of UncertaintyJanuary 17, 2012

• Improving Internal Practices in PhilanthropyFebruary 21, 2012

Organizational Effectiveness for Foundations – A Webinar Series

54

Page 28: Becoming a Web 2.0 Philanthropy at Robert Wood Johnson ......Web 2.0, we quickly concluded that there is an important distinction between an organization that simply adopts the tools

28

What’s Next?Give feedbackFill out evaluation now or by email

Join us on Twitter now!Follow the chat, using #RWJFweb20 and by following @StephenJDowns

Review and shareToday’s webinar recording will be e-mailed to you

Sign-up for future webinarsSupporting Nonprofit Capacity Building: Considering Multiple Strategies to Further MissionWednesday, May 30, 2–3:30 p.m. ET

Executive Talent Management Increasing Philanthropy’s Bench StrengthThursday, June 7, 2–3:30 p.m. ET

Register for the2012 Fall Conference for CommunityFoundationsSeptember 10-12 ~ New Orleans, LA

55

Visit www.cof.org/education to learn more.

Thank You

56