BASEL 111 AND

download BASEL 111 AND

of 46

Transcript of BASEL 111 AND

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    1/46

    BASEL III

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    2/46

    BASEL III Introduction

    BASEL 1BASEL 2

    BASEL 3

    Objectives

    Key Outcomes

    Building Blocks Of BASEL 3

    Impact of BASEL 3

    BASEL 3 ProposalsBCBS Awaiting Proposals

    Major Recommendations.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    3/46

    BASEL 1 Introduced in 1988

    Amendment in 1996.

    Incorporate capital charge for market risk via,(1) Standardized Measurement Method (SMM).(2) Internal Models Approach (IMA).

    Market risk capital framework includes,(1) Capital charge for general market risk.(2) Capital charge for credit risk.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    4/46

    The Basel 2 amendment on 2004.

    The main aim behind the proposal are as follows,

    (a) Enhanced risk coverage

    (1) Credit Risk(2) Market Risk(3) Operational Risk.

    (b) Standardized to model based with

    increasing complexity.

    (c)Three pillar approach.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    5/46

    The 3 Pillars of BASEL 3 are,

    (1) Minimum Capital Requirement

    (2) Supervisory review Process(3) Market Discipline

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    6/46

    The Basel 2 of 2004 copied and pasted the

    capital charge for market risk of Basel 1amendment of 1996 as a result,

    (1) Not keeping pace with newmarket developments and practices.

    (2) Capital charge for market risk much

    lower compared to banking bookpositions on the assumption thatmarkets are liquid and positions canbe hedged quickly.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    7/46

    Capital charge for credit risk in trading bookwas lower than capital charge for credit riskin banking book.

    Lower capital charge for trading book led toscope for capital arbitrage.

    Capital charge for counterparty credit risk forderivative positions covered the default riskand migration risk was not captured.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    8/46

    Global financial crisis happen in the areas of(1) Trading book(2) Off balance sheet derivatives(3) Market risk

    (4) Inadequate liquidity risk management.

    Banks suffered heavy losses in their tradingbook.

    Banks did not have adequate capital to coverthe losses.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    9/46

    Heavy reliance on short term wholesalefunding.

    Unsustainable maturity mismatch.

    Insufficient liquidity assets to raise financeduring stressed period.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    10/46

    Global regulatory standard on bank capital

    adequacy, stress testing and market liquidityrisk as per the Basel Committee on BankingSupervision in 2010-11.

    Strengthens bank capital requirements

    Introduces new regulatory requirements onbank liquidity and bank leverage.

    Banks hold 4.5% of common equity and 6% ofTier I capital of Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA).

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    11/46

    Basel III introduces additional capital buffers,

    (i) a mandatory capital conservation bufferof 2.5%.

    (ii) a discretionary countercyclical buffer,which allows national regulators to requireup to another 2.5% of capital duringperiods of high credit growth.

    Basel III introduces a minimum 3% leverageratio and two required liquidity ratios.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    12/46

    Fundamental restructuring approach to riskand regulation in the financial sector.

    Enhanced level of dynamism, complexity andinterdependency within the global regulatorylandscape.

    G20 Summit in Seoul on November 2010endorsed the BCBS agreements on capital

    and liquidity.

    Long transitional periods needed for theimplementation of the Basel 3 proposals.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    13/46

    Improving banking sectors ability to absorb

    shocks.

    Reducing risk spill over to the real economy.

    Fundamental reforms proposed in the areas of

    (1) Micro prudential regulation at individual

    bank level(2) Macro prudential regulation at system

    wide basis

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    14/46

    Increase in common equity tier1 ratio from 2% to7%.

    Less than policy makers hoped.

    For business the proposal is challenging.

    Many banks already have ratios above 7% basedon Basel 2.

    The changes add up and well capitalised banks in

    Europe and the US could find it demanding.

    The result was reduced credit availability orincreased cost of credit.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    15/46

    Introduces Additional Capital Buffers

    (*) Mandatory capital conservation bufferof 2.5%.

    (*) Discretionary countercyclical buffer,

    which allows national regulators torequire up to another 2.5% of capitalduring periods of high credit growth.

    Introduces minimum 3% leverage ratio and

    2 required liquidity ratios.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    16/46

    Impact on profitability.

    Strengthens bank capital requirements

    Introduces new regulatory requirements onbank liquidity and bank leverage.

    Banks has to hold 4.5% of common equity

    and 6% of Tier I capital of RWA.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    17/46

    It is a risk based capital regime.

    Banks should keep in mind that regulatorswill continue to focus on risk managementand governance in underpinning a robust

    financial sector.

    Basel 3 is the solution for the outstanding

    issues left by Basel 1 and 2 .

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    18/46

    Raising quality level, consistency andtransparency of capital base.

    Improving/enhancing risk coverage on

    account of counterparty credit risk.

    Supplementing risk based capital requirementwith leverage ratio.

    Addressing systemic risk andinterconnectedness.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    19/46

    Reducing pro-cyclicality and introducingcountercyclical capital buffers.

    Minimum liquidity standards

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    20/46

    Impact on Individual BanksWeaker banks crowded out.

    Significant pressure on profitability andReturn On Equity.

    Change in demand from short term to

    long term funding.

    Legal entity reorganisation.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    21/46

    Impact on the Financial System Reduced risk of a systemic banking crisis.

    Reduced lending capacity.

    Reduced investor appetite for bank debt andequity.

    Inconsistent implementation of the Basel 3proposals leading to international arbitrage.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    22/46

    Impact on Economy IIF study loss of output of 3% in G3 on full

    implementation during 2011-15

    Impact of 0.2% on GDP for each year for 4 yearsfor 1% increase in TCE

    For 25% increase in liquid assets, half the impact

    of 1% increase in TCE

    Long term gains will be immense

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    23/46

    Global banks have a gap of liquid assets of

    1,730 billion to be met in 4 years.

    Global big banks have a capital shortfall of577 billion to meet 7% common equity normto be met in 8 years.

    Tier 1 capital ratio falls to 5.7% from 11.1%

    under the adjustment of capital and increasein risk coverage.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    24/46

    Impact on Indian Banks High capital ratios at 14.4% falls to 11.7%.

    Tier 1 capital fall from 10% to 9%

    Common equity from 8.5% to 7.4%

    Most of deductions are mandated by RBI.

    Most of our banks are not trading banks, sonot much increase in enhanced risk coveragefor counterparty credit risk

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    25/46

    Indian banks are not as highly leveraged as

    their global counterparts.

    The leverage ratio of Indian banks would becomfortable.

    Banks having a huge trading book and offbalance sheet derivative exposures

    Its impacted due to increased risk coverageon account of counterparty credit risk

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    26/46

    Banks having huge off balance sheetexposures, derivatives and others haveimpact on account of leverage ratio.

    Banks depending heavily on wholesale fundshave impact on the new liquidity standards.

    SIBs have implications for capital and liquidity

    surcharges and activity restrictions

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    27/46

    New capital requirements

    Effect of proposals on hybrid capital

    Capital conservation ratio

    Countercyclical buffer

    Leverage ratio

    Liquidity ratios

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    28/46

    Common equity to 4.5% of RWA phased in 2013 &

    2014.

    Tier 1 capital raised to 6% phased in 2013 & 2014.

    Minimum total capital requirement remains at 8%.

    New capital conservation buffer of 2.5% phased in2016, 2017 and 2018.

    New countercyclical buffer in the range of 0% to2.5%

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    29/46

    Tier 1 capital:

    (1) common equity

    (2) non-common equity instrumentsmeeting specific criteria

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    30/46

    Common Equity Tier 1

    Banks common shares meeting criteria

    Stock surplus/share premium on Common Equity

    Tier 1 instruments

    Retained earnings and other disclosed reserves

    Common shares issued by banks consolidatedsubsidiaries and held by third parties forinclusion in Common Equity Tier 1 afterregulatory adjustments .

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    31/46

    Claim in liquidation of the bank

    Claim on the residual assets that isproportional with its share of issued capital,

    after repaying all claims in liquidation

    Principal is perpetual and never repaidoutside of liquidation

    No circumstances under which thedistributions are obligatory

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    32/46

    Distributions paid after all legal/contractual

    obligations have been met.

    No preferential distribution.

    Paid in amount is recognised as equity capitalfor determining balance sheet insolvency andin Accounting Standards.

    Directly issued and paid in and the bank cannot directly or indirectly have funded thepurchase of the instrument

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    33/46

    Goodwill/other intangibles, except mortgageservicing rights

    Deferred tax assets whose realisation

    depends on the banks future profitability

    Treasury stock

    Certain specified portions of investments notconsolidated for regulatory purposes

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    34/46

    Cash flow hedge reserves relating to hedgingof items

    Any increase in equity capital resulting fromsecuritisation transactions

    Unrealised gains and losses resulting from

    changes in banks own credit risk on fairvalued liabilities

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    35/46

    Tier 1 capital

    Subordinated to all depositors creditors

    Not secured or guaranteed

    No incentives to redeem & no investor put option

    Fully discretionary non cumulative coupons

    Callable by bank only after 5 years

    Return of capital only with prior supervisoryauthorisation

    Principal loss absorption on a going concern basis

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    36/46

    Tier 2 capital criteria:

    (1) Elimination of distinction between upper andlower tier 2

    Minimum Tier 2 criteria:

    (1) Original maturity at least 5 years with noincentive to redeem

    (2) Callable only by the issuer

    (3) Dividends/coupons may not have a credit-sensitive dividend feature

    (4) subordinated to all non subordinated creditors

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    37/46

    To comprise common equity

    Restraints on dividends and discretionarybonuses if buffer falls below 2.5%

    Capital Conservation Ratio to commence in2016 at 0.625% and increase to 1.25% in2017, 1.875% in 2018 and 2.5% in 2019

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    38/46

    Protect banking sector from periods of excesscredit growth

    Aim is to build-up phase of economic cycle

    Each jurisdiction to be given discretion to setcountercyclical buffer:

    (1) Minimum buffer range underconservation buffer

    (2) Decisions should be preannounced by12 months

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    39/46

    Special rules for internationally active banks

    Banks should calculate the buffer with at leastthe same frequency as their minimum capitalrequirements

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    40/46

    Tier 1 leverage ratio at 3% during parallel run

    period between 2013 and 2017

    Bank level disclosure of leverage ratio andcomponents to start in January 2015

    Supervisory monitoring period to commenceon 1 January 2011

    Leverage ratio not to become binding untilearly 2018

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    41/46

    Current proposals is to base leverage ratio onbanks capital compared to their Exposure onnew definition of tier 1 capital.

    Exposure should follow accounting standards

    High quality liquid assets include cash and cash-like instruments in the measure of Exposure

    Securitisation exposures will be counted in amanner generally consistent with accountingtreatment

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    42/46

    Two proposed liquidity ratios:

    (1) Short term Liquidity Cover Ratio (LCR)(2) Long term Net Stable Funding Ratio

    (NSFR)

    Liquidity cover ratio:

    High quality liquid assets to cover net cashoutflows over 30 day period

    Builds on traditional internal methodologies usedby banks to assess exposure to contingentliability events

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    43/46

    Certain high quality liquid assets to be

    included on asset side on an unlimitedundiscounted basis

    Level 2 assets must comprise no more than

    40% of the overall stock and must have aminimum 15% haircut

    Observation period for liquidity cover ratiocommences in 2011 and ratio to beintroduced at start of 2015

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    44/46

    Going-concern proposals

    Systemically important banks

    Trading book review

    Credit ratings and securitisations

    Cross-border bank resolution

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    45/46

    Increased quality of capital.

    Increased quantity of capital.

    Reduced leverage through introduction ofbackstop leverage ratio.

    Increased short term liquidity coverage.

    Increased stable long term balance sheet funding.

    Strengthen risk capture notably counterparty risk.

  • 8/2/2019 BASEL 111 AND

    46/46