Barrel Module Database - Status
description
Transcript of Barrel Module Database - Status
Barrel Module Database - Status
• Status of upload utilities
• Review of uploading SCTDAQ info
• Flagging Hybrid re-work
• Module Quality uploads
• Module Signoff Uploads
• Comparison Utility for MacroAssembly Sites
Dave RobinsonSCT Week December 2003
Database Actions byeach Cluster
Sensor-BaseboardAssembly
ReceiveSensors
ReceivebmBB
Hybrid Assembly
ReceiveHybrid
ReceiveASICs
Module Assembly
Send bmSB
Datasheet
Assembly
DatasheetAssemblySCTDAQ
Datasheet
Assembly
SCTDAQ
XY Metrology
Z Metrology
QA InstituteSCTDAQ
Macro Assembly
SCTDAQ
Send bmHASIC
Receive bmHASIC
Receive bmSB
Send bmMODULE
Send bmMODULE
Receive bmMODULE
Receive bmMODULE
Assembly
Baseboard QC
Sensor QCDatasheet
Sensor Data
ASIC QC
Hybrid QC
Send bmBB
Send Sensors
Receive Sensors
UploadsShipments
Quality
Quality
Summary of Upload Utilities
Action Status
Item Registration Available
Shipments Available
Assembly Uploads Available
SCTDAQ Uploads Available
Metrology Uploads Available
Datasheet Uploads Available
Module Quality Data Available
Module Signoff Data Available
Profiles Not yet started
SCTDAQ Uploader:http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~silicon/jSCTDAQ.html
All other uploads:http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~silicon/jBarrels.html
Uploading SCTDAQ data
Four methods, ordered by increasing convenience:
1. Directly using java applicationjava DBUpload/uploadSCTDAQ “D:\\sctvar\\results\\” “D:\\sctvar\\uploads\\” “X:\\archivedData\\” “202201702000.*”
2. From within SCTDAQ (Rint).x DBUpload.cpp(“202201702000.*”);
3. Via a perl script (wrapper to java application)perl uploadSCTDAQ.pl “202201702000.*”
4. Add new script to Dave C’s suite of perl scripts:perl StoreTestResults.pl 20220170200022 Module_Reception <runno> <scanno>
perl uploadSCTDB.pl 20220170200022 Module_Reception
Special Options:
• Serial numbers as regular expressions“202201702000.*” implies 20220170200001 to 20220170200099
• ‘-noupload’ option (upload files processed/created – then your responsibility to upload)
• ‘-nogui’ option (generates upload files without being promped by the spreadsheet gui.
How to flag rework in the SCT database
Eg chip replacement:
• dis-assembly / re-assemble of hybrid/chip using Geneva web interface
• Put replaced chip in third column of datasheet
• Re-upload datasheet (if original uploaded)
perl StoreTestResults.pl 20220330200287 Module_Reception <runno>
perl MakeWebIndex.pl 20220330200287 Module_Reception
perl uploadSCTDB.pl 20220330200287 Module_Reception
New Barrel Database Interface
http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~silicon/jBarrels.html
• New tabs ‘Quality Summary’ and ‘Module Signoff’
• Invoke by ‘java Barrels/gui’
Module Signoff Uploads
Uploaded when all QC work is completed, and when the module is ready for assembly on to a barrel.
Uploaded once by a senior physicist, after reviewing all data (sctdaq, metrology, etc ) and any other sources of information.
Category Good, Pass or FAIL
Barrel Assignment ‘Any’ or B5/6
Overall Comment General comments
Reason for FAIL (if category is FAIL)
Sensors DamagedBaseboard DamagedGross mechanical errorAbnormal leakageToo many bad channelsASICs non-replaceableOthers...
Reason for B5/6 assignment (if B5/6)
Preseries SensorsMicrodischarge>350VPoor current behaviourBad visual featuresHybrid Tdiff>2CFacing angle b>3mradOthers...
Module Quality Uploads
Comments and flags uploaded by the QC institute afterall SCTDAQ tests have been performed by that institute.
Module quality information is essential for the physicist who signs off the module (who may not have been involved with the SCTDAQ testing), because SCTDAQ data alone is not enough to be able to make a judgement on the module’s electrical quality.
IV Performance Good or FAIL
IV Comments Comments on IVs and long term current stability
Electrical Performance Good or FAIL
Electrical Comments Comments on warm and cold characterisations and LTT.
S Curves Category GoodWiggles at –ve thresholdWiggles at +ve thresholdWiggles above 0.5fC
S Curves Comment Comment on S curves
One set of quality data uploaded per QC insitute (but an institute can upload/edit previously uploaded information).
UK-B Module Quality and Signoff
• Universities performing QC (QMUL, Cambridge, Birmingham) upload their quality information to the RAL database via web interface on RAL server
• All module data, including quality information, available on a module summary webpage
• Signoff info entered into RAL database via web interface on RAL server. Script then generates SCT database upload files for signoff and all quality information (from all universities) and uploads them.
Non UK-B clusters
• Quality information uploaded directly to SCT database viabarrels java application
• For module signoff, physicist reviews java module summaryreport (via barrels application)
• Signoff info then uploaded directly to SCT database
UK-B Quality and SignoffHandled by web interfaces to RAL local database.
UK-B module Summary page
Uploading/editing Module Quality Info
Uploading Signoff Information
Top of module summary report
Report behaves like a web browser:
• clickable links
• forward/back buttons
Example of Sensor Test Report
Module Summary Report .. continued
Example of SCTDAQ Characterisation Report
Comparisons Utility for MacroAssembly Sites
• Compares reception tests at macroAssembly site withpreviously uploaded data
• Easy to use interface for non-experts
• Compares: - Noise (enc) from Response Curve Tests - Gain from Response Curve Tests - Noise (enc) from Noise Tests - Occupancy from Noise Tests - Currents at 150V, 350V and 500V - Defect count
• Significant deviations highlighted in RED
• Agreement highlighted in GREEN
http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/~silicon/software/jComparisons.html
Eg Cambridge as ‘macroAssembly Site’
Old pre-series Electrical module at Oxford