Bangalore, India,17-18 December 2012 Teaching standardization to Engineers - CMI experience Knud...
Transcript of Bangalore, India,17-18 December 2012 Teaching standardization to Engineers - CMI experience Knud...
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012
Teaching standardization to Engineers- CMI experience
Knud Erik Skouby,Professor, CMI/ Aalborg University
Joint ITU-GISFI Workshop on “Bridging the Standardization Gap: Workshop on
Sustainable Rural Communications”
(Bangalore, India, 17-18 December 2012)
Standardisation
Standards are specifications that determine the compatibility of different products
(also minimum quality and reference standards)
Standardisation is the process where standards are agreedWhat/ why do we teach to engineers?
Basics of the ‘Information Society’
The rapid technological change has highlighted the stronglink between technological standards, innovation, market performance and economic welfare
The ability to communicate electronically is the foundationStandards enable the electronic communication
All people will be served with wireless devicesAffordable to purchase and operateCalm computing: technology invisible to usersMachine to machine communications
• Sensors and tags: e.g. in transport and weather systems, infrastructure, to provide ambient intelligence and context sensitivity
All devices are part of the (mobile) internet
WWRF -2020 Vision: 7 trillion wireless devices
serving 7 billion people
6
7 Trillion Devices in a decade
Knowledge from Data – O2O
Tags
Personalized medicine
Smart meters
Objects Sensors
Aalborg, Denmark, 8-9 October 2012 7
Need for standardsTechnology: Interworking/interoperability/overall architecture is a mustSocio-economics:Prevention of Market failures
Information asymmetryExternalitiesDevelopment of ‘Natural’ monopolyIPR: Intellectual Property Right
PatentCopyrightDesign registration
Aalborg, Denmark, 8-9 October 2012 8
Students need to understand the elements – and the relations – in
standardization
InstitutionsDrivers/ barriersProcessesImpact
Aalborg, Denmark, 8-9 October 2012 9
Institutions
Old Regime: ITUNational sovereigntyJoint provisionInteroperability via
negotiated standards
Present regimeHyper fragmented -and
volatile- “standards market”Myriad of agents in the
standardization process (SDOs, forums, companies)
ICT standards specified in “islands”
End to end monolithic standards are “last millenium”
POLICY MARKET
TECHNOLOGY
Drivers/ Barriers in standards
Digitalization
Computerization
Packet based Switching
Mobile
Next Generation Networks (NGN)
Convergence & converged services
Ambient ICT
Techno-economic efficiency
Cost / prices
Tech development
New infrastructures and services
Enabling of changes
Competitive environment
Creation of adequate infrastructures and services
User empowerment
Applications
RegulationServices
Internet Protocol (IP)
Impact: Winner factors – ‘acceptable’? Be first Luck / coincidence Co-operation with complementary producers Might be the best product, but
Lock-in QWERTY as an example Path dependence / hysterisis
Market failure or ?
Impact Paradox?
FreedomCreativityDynamics
StabilityOrder
Routine
„In fact, fast-changing economies have a greater need for standards and norms.”
Evergrowing Spectrum Demand
Work starting to calculate demand in preparation for WRC 2015Not adequate VHF/ UHF bands availablePossible solutions
SharingSatellite occupies 3600 – 4200 MHzLower Broadcasting bandsOr Research new technology techniques
Key success factors
complexity/cost backhaul requirements
business models and usage scenariosspectrum and standardisation
Efficient signallingRealistic deployment scenarios and
performance evaluationSystem architecture aspects and backward
compatibilityCross layer optimisation
CMI course on standardization
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012 17
9 topics are examined in the course:
Economics of standardsTaxonomy of standardsStandardization organizations and processesStandards and innovationStandardization strategiesStandards and business modelsStandards and IPRStandardization and regulationEU approach to standardization and
certification
Economics and taxonomy
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012 18
The course combines a technology view on standards with an economics and policy approach with focus on economics. The economics of standards are examined with respect to how standards develop in the markets and what their implications are for market developments.At the taxonomy level, the issues of reference, minimum standards, and compatibility standards are dealt with. The course primarily focuses on compatibility standards clarifying also the difference between de facto and de jure standards.
Standardization organizations and processes & Standards and innovation
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012 19
Following the differentiation between de facto and de jure standards, the categories of standardization setting organization are studied: official standardization organizations; professional organizations; Internet organizations; standardization forums. Furthermore, the processes in the different types of organizations are presented.The mentioned ‘contradiction’ between innovation and the implementation of standards is discussed: standards can be seen as generic and necessary platforms for new innovations to occur.
Standardization strategies & business models
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012 20
Depending on their position in the markets, the different players may have different interests in promoting standards. Large companies will have an interest in promoting their own standards and may form alliances with other companies in order to further their interests. Examples of standards ‘wars’ are examined. The technology design is an important part of business models. There is, therefore, interdependence between the business models implemented and the technology standards applied. The extent to which specific standards determine the specific business models is discussed.
Standards, IPR & regulation
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012 21
Part of the standardization strategies relate to the establishment of intellectual property right, patents –and in the case of software, first and foremost copyright. The manner in which IPRs affect the standardization processes is dealt with.Most de jure standards are voluntary. But some standards also become mandatory regulations. In the course, the relationship between standards and regulations are examined.
EU approach to standardization and certification
Bangalore, India ,17-18 December 2012 22
In order to promote the Internal Market, the European Union has implemented procedures to secure a common approach to standardization and certification in general. The EU approach is examined in order to get a broader view on standardization than the issue of compatibility standards.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Standardization @ universities: an academic discipline
Theory MethodologyData/ factsUnderstand the process
ComplicatedNot ‘in it self’/ by natureIt is multidisciplinary
Research needed
Aalborg, Denmark, 8-9 October 2012 23