Bamberger Thesis Board

download Bamberger Thesis Board

of 1

Transcript of Bamberger Thesis Board

  • 8/3/2019 Bamberger Thesis Board

    1/1

    CORP

    WORKER

    CITY

    GOVT

    CITIZEN

    SOCIAL

    SECURITY

    REVENUE

    UPWARDM

    OBILITYLIFESTYLE

    WAGES

    BRANDINGPUBLICSPACE

    CULTURE / ARTS / ENTERTAINMENTSKILLED AND UNSKILLED LABOR

    SERVICES

    IDENTITY

    COLLABORATION

    PROXIMITYTOSERVICES

    LABORFORCE

    SOCIALSECURITY

    TAX INCENTIVES

    PUBLICFACILITIES

    PUBLIC / PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPSSUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

    CULTUR

    E/ART

    S/ENT

    ERTA

    INME

    NT

    LIFEST

    YLE(RES

    TAUR

    ANTS

    /BARS)

    PUBL

    ICAME

    NITIES

    LABOR

    THE CREATIVE CLASS COLLABORATION

    REVE

    NUE

    ANCILLARY BUSINESS

    INNOVATION

    LOYALTY

    DENS

    ITY

    SKILLE

    DLA

    BOR

    LIFESTYLE

    CIVIC/PUBLIC

    CREATIVE

    FINANCIAL

    CORP

    WORKER

    CITY

    GOVT

    CITIZEN

    STAKE HOLDERS

    CORP

    WORKER

    CITY

    GOVT

    CITIZEN

    SO

    CIAL

    SECURITY

    REVENUE

    UPWARDM

    OBILITYLIF

    ESTYLE

    WAGES

    BRANDINGPUBLICSPACE

    CORP

    WORKER

    CITY

    GOVT

    CITIZEN

    LABOR

    THE CREATIVE CLASS COLLABORATION

    REVE

    NUE

    ANCILLARY BUSINESS

    INNOVATION

    LOYALTY

    DENS

    ITY

    SKILLE

    DLA

    BOR

    CORP

    WORKER

    CITY

    GOVT

    CITIZEN

    S

    OCIALSECURITY

    TAX INCENTIVES

    P

    UBLICFACILITIES

    PUBLIC / PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPSSUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

    CULTUR

    E/A

    RTS/ENT

    ERTA

    INME

    NT

    LIFE

    STYL

    E(RES

    TAUR

    ANTS

    /BARS)

    PUBL

    ICAME

    NITIES

    REVENUE

    CULTURE / ARTS / ENTERTAINMENT

    SKILLED AND UNSKILLED LABORSERVICES

    IDENTITY

    COLLABORATION

    PROXIMITYTOSERVICES

    LABORFORCE

    CORP

    WORKER

    CITY

    GOVT

    CITIZEN

    CULTURAL / INSTITUTIONAL / EDUCATIONAL (CIE)PROXIMITY TO CREATIVE CAPITAL

    CIVIC

    PUBLIC OPEN SPACELEVERAGING EXISTING URBAN FABRIC

    LOCATING EXISTING POPULATIONDISPLACING THE FEWEST PEOPLE

    INVERTING PROPERTY VALUELOCATING CHEAP LAND

    IO

    MARINA

    MISSION BAY

    PACIFIC HEIGHTS

    SOUTH OF MARKET

    NOB HILL

    RUSSIAN HILL

    SOUTH

    BEACH

    HAYES VALLEY

    COW HOLLOW

    FINANCIAL DISTRICT

    SOUTH

    NORTH WATERFRONT

    WESTERN ADDITION

    DOWNTOWN /

    TENDERLOIN

    INNER MISSION

    NTAIN

    FINANCIAL DISTRICT

    NORTH

    GHT ASHBURY

    NORTH PANHANDLE

    VAN NESS /

    CIVIC CENTER

    LOWER PACFIC HEIGHTS

    EIGHTS

    TELEGRAPH

    HILL

    ANZA VISTA

    NORTH

    BEACH

    ALAMO

    SQUARE

    BUENA VISTA

    PARK DUBOCE

    TRIANGLE

    PARK /

    EIGHTS

    POTRERO HILL

    Oracle

    Facebook

    AMDGoogle

    Intel

    Apple Adobe

    IBM

    Submarket Vacancy (sf) Total (sf)

    Financial District North 3,778,134 29,144,206Financial District South 3,344,934 26,125,621South of Market 2,437,118 12,636,787Downtown / Tenderloin 479,262 5,789,610Van Ness / Civic Center 1,082,377 8,090,359

    South Beach 384,378 5,408,023Mission Bay 780,314 2,932,736Waterfront / North Beach 450,631 4,393,328

    Total 12,737,148 94,520670

    Mid-Market Zone

    Total Office sf

    Vacant Office sf

    Enterprise Zone

    SAN FRANCISCO TAX INCENTIVES AND OFFICE VACANCY

    SANTA CLARA COUNTY

    aka SILICON VALLEY

    Oracle

    Facebook

    AMD

    Google

    Intel

    Apple

    Adobe

    IBM

    3.3M sf

    1.5M sf

    4.2M sf

    3M sf

    318,000 sf

    600,000 sf

    980,000 sf

    1M sf

    12,737,14

    8

    14,898,000

    URBAN BRIDGE BUILD OVER

    BUILD UNDER OCCUPY THE STREET

    URBAN BRIDGE BUILD OVER

    BUILD UNDER OCCUPY THE STREET

    CHEAP

    OPEN

    SPACE

    FLEX-

    IBLEHORIZ-ONTAL

    CHEAP

    OPENSPACE

    FLEX-

    IBLE

    HORIZ-

    ONTAL

    CHEAP

    OPEN

    SPACE

    FLEX-

    IBLE

    HORIZ-

    ONTAL

    CHEAP

    OPEN

    SPACE

    FLEX-

    IBLE

    HORIZ-

    ONTAL

    footprint 335,000sf

    h a rd sc ap e 2 ,2 5 6, 00 0 s f

    green 5,425,000s f

    water 254,000s f

    t ot al 8 ,2 7 0, 00 0 s f

    footprint 1,485,000sf

    h a rd sc ap e 5 ,1 7 5, 00 0 s f

    green 4,600,000s f

    water 1,716,000s f

    t ot al 1 2 ,9 7 6, 00 0 s f

    footprint 1,630,000sf

    h a rd sc ap e 3 ,3 0 0, 00 0 s f

    green 2,800,000s f

    t ot al 7 ,7 3 0, 00 0 s f

    footprint 456,000sf

    h ar ds ca pe 5 75 ,0 00 s f

    green 7,372,000s f

    water 1,410,000s f

    t ot al 9 ,8 1 3, 00 0 s f

    GENERALMOTORSTECHNICALCENTER(1948)

    Warren,

    Michigan

    BELLTELEPHO

    NELABORATORIES(1955)

    Holmdel,NewJersey

    IBMMANUFACTUR

    INGANDADMINISTRATION(1956)

    Rochester,Minnesota

    IBMWATSONR

    ESEARCHCENTER(1956)

    Yorktown,

    NewYork

    EEROSAARINEN

    EEROSAARINEN

    EEROSAARINEN

    EEROSAARINEN

    ATLA

    CHARLESTON

    FFU

    H

    AMPHITHEATRE

    NIU

    QAOJ

    PLYMOUTHUSHWY101

    ENI

    LEROHS

    VistaSlope

    etnen

    amre

    P

    Cree

    kTr a

    ilD

    LLAH

    YTIC

    ERAUQS

    NOINU

    TSKRUT

    TS

    HTR

    OW

    NE

    VAE

    L

    TSNOISSIM

    EV

    AS

    SE

    N

    EV

    AS

    SE

    NN

    AV

    TSTSOP

    TSTSOP

    TS

    HT70

    OH

    TS

    LL

    EW

    OP

    TSSILLE

    TSSILLE

    TS

    NO

    SA

    M

    TS

    ROL

    YAT

    ERRAFO

    RRAF

    O

    TSKRUT

    TS

    ED

    YH

    TS

    NIK

    RA

    L

    TS

    K

    TS

    KL

    OP

    TSHT

    60

    TSYDE

    EVAETAGNEDLOG

    TSYRAEG

    YRAEG

    TSRETSILLACM

    TS

    HT

    RO

    WN

    E

    TSSEYA

    TSNOTLUF

    TSEVORG

    TS

    SE

    NOJ

    footprint 135,000sf

    h ar ds ca pe 3 45 ,0 00 s f

    green 2,710,000s f

    t ot al 3 ,1 9 0, 00 0 s f

    footprint 370,000sf

    h ar ds ca pe 5 27 ,0 00 s f

    green 865,000s f

    t ot al 1 ,7 62 ,0 0 0 sf

    footprint 2,900,000sf

    h a rd sc ap e 2 ,2 1 5, 00 0 s f

    green 4,730,000s f

    t ot al 9 ,8 4 5, 00 0 s f

    IBMSANTAT

    ERESACAMPUS(1975)

    SanJose,

    California

    SGICAMPUS(1997)

    MountainView,

    California

    APPLEC

    OMPUTER(EST.2013)

    Cupertino,California

    ?

    MBTARCHITECTURE

    STUDIOSARCHITECTURE

    FOSTER+PARTNERS

    Brian Price, Latent Politics

    Jeremy BambergerSILICON and the CITY

    Corporate campuses do not exist in cities, and robust cities never materialize near corporate

    campuses. This thesis asks two questions: Why dont corporations take advantage of existingcity infrastructure? And why dont cities leverage incentives to better attract corporations?

    The following explores the reconciliation between these seemingly incompatible typologies.

    The Bay Area is synonymous with Silicon Valley. The Valley is the dominant wealth generator

    in the region, and yet the city stands idle while riches are bestowed on the suburbs. Whatsmore, corporations re-create isolated micro-urbanisms, complete with walkability, open

    plazas, and extensive amenities. This artificial urbanism stops, of course, at the security fence.

    The corporate campus has defined itself as a type characterized by horizontality, flexibility,

    isolation, and homogeneous program. Its evolution has incorporated a more complex

    programming, one which nears comparison to urbanism. Through the development of a newmethodology that integrates GIS data with parametricism, urban form may be analyzed and

    targeted for the ideal conditions to attract corporations.