Balancing the Scales: Effective Strategies to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Juvenile...
-
Upload
noah-corwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Balancing the Scales: Effective Strategies to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Juvenile...
1
Balancing the Scales:
Effective Strategies to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Juvenile
Justice System
2
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Reduction
Tiana Davis, DMC Policy Director
Center for Children’s Law and Policy (CCLP) Public interest law and policy
organization Focus areas
Reduce unnecessary incarceration Improve conditions of confinement Reduce racial and ethnic disparities
3
Today’s Goals:
Background and overview
Build a conceptual framework for understanding racial and ethnic disparities and Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC) in the juvenile justice system
Review CCLP’s DMC Action Network approach for reducing racial and ethnic disparities
Explore successful strategies implemented by DMC Action Network sites and replication sites
Consider DMC implications for Juvenile Justice and Mental Health Collaborations
4
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Reduction: Background and Overview
Models for Change and the DMC Action Network
Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative
Connecticut DMC Reduction Initiative
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Reduction Project
5
Why is this important?
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
Fundamental values of fairness and equity
Focus on rehabilitation
Negative consequences of juvenile justice involvement
System efficiency and effectiveness
6
Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities: What Are Our Goals?
Reduce over-representation of youth of color at key decision points
Reduce the disparate treatment of youth of color at key decision points
Prevent youth of color from unnecessarily entering and moving through the juvenile justice system
7
Overrepresentation
1886%
314%
Youth Transferred
African American
Hispanic
39%
41%
17%
3%
Overall Youth Population
African Amer-icanHispanicWhiteAsian
Youth Residing in the City of Northeast* Transferred to Adult Court
8
2005 2006 2007 2008
White 15.22 13.82 12.66 13.76
Black 53.35 51.86 51.53 55.92
Latino 24.23 18.32 21.41 22.03
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
White Black Latino
Sedgwick County Arrest Rates for Property Offenses 2005 -2008
2005 2006 2007 2008
2005 2006 2007 2008
2005 2006 2007 2008
Disparity
9
Race/Ethnicity
Rate of arrestsfor a property offense
per thousand in 2008
Relative Rate Index(RRI)
White youth 13.76
African American youth 55.92 4.06
Hispanic/Latino youth 22.03 1.60
Disparity
Sedgwick County Arrest Rates and Relative Rate Indices for 2008
10
Unnecessary Entry and Penetration
3 DEGREE ASSAULT
TRUANCY THEFT 2 DEGREE BURGLARY
D AND N 1 DEGREE CRIMINAL TRESPASS
TRESPASS VIOLATION OF PROTECTION
ORDER
CRIMINAL MISCHIEF
MENACING05
101520253035404550
26
16
22
15
20
10
5
17
10
7
21
7
25 24
20
10
6 6 75
25
45
12
18
5
12 12
2
53
8
15
9 9
5
2 3 3 45
12 1
WHITE
BLACK
HISPANIC
MULTIRACIAL
NATIVE AMERICAN
ASIAN
OTHER
*Source: Place name changed . Offenses represent the most serious of all charges at the time of admission .
Drakewood County Secure Detention Admissions by Top 10 Offenses and Race/Ethnicity for FY 2012
11
What are the common causes of racial and ethnic disparities in juvenile justice?
Structural inequalities in our society Policies that are fair on their face but
have unintended negative consequences
Differential decision-making Differential access to prevention and
treatment Accumulated disadvantage Complex interactions with other child-
serving systems
12
An effective effort to reduce racial and ethnic disparities is not . . .
A research project An attempt to solve the problems of racism and poverty An exercise in blame – e.g., kids, parents, the community, music, television, the
media A game of “gotcha” – e.g., finger pointing at public officials A way to reinforce the “abuse excuse”– e.g., poor, single-parent home, bad
neighborhood, etc. An attempt to gain more lenient treatment for youth of color than other youth An invitation to level the playing field by arresting or detaining more white
youth A magic bullet – e.g., expecting to know how to solve the issue by sending
leaders and staff to cultural competence and diversity training
13
Data-driven Locally-driven with state level support Collaborative Intentional about changing the system’s
impact on youth and communities of color Focused on system response
Policy Practice Programs
Focused on measurable outcomes
Effective efforts for reducing disparities are:
14
Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities: Planning for Reform
Guiding Principles for DMC Reform: Use data to inform policy, practice and program development Divert youth from formal system involvement and unnecessary
system penetration when consistent with public safety. Serve youth in the community, or in the least restrictive
environment required to meet the youth’s supervision and service needs
Ensure that youth of color have comparable access to opportunities for diversion as white youth
Employ objective decision-making criteria and standardize case processing to increase fairness and equity
Improve accountability at all levels of the system
15
Arrest: Police
Schools Probati
on
Referral: Intake
staff
Detention:
Judge
Transfer to adult
court
Petition:
Prosecutor
Adjudication: Judge
Disposition :
Judge
DiversionCommunityservice
DiversionInformal process
Straight Release Alternativeto detention (least restrictive)
Diversion Dismissal
DismissalRelease
ProbationCommunity-based treatment Residential placement
Enhancing Diversion Opportunities for Youth of Color
16
Percentage of Minorities at Each Stage: Alachua County FY 2010-11
Transferred to Adult Court
Committed
Detained
Non-Judicially Disposed
Judicially Disposed
Referrals Received
At- Risk Population
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
16%
25%
20%
30%
25%
28%
54%
77%
70%
74%
65%
70%
67%
31%
6%
3%
4%
4%
3%
3%
8%
WhiteBlackHispanicOther
Source: Florida Department of Juvenile Justice FY 2010-11 DMC Benchmark Report
17
Model for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities
Engage Stakehold
ers in Governing
Body
Map Decision Points
Gather and
Analyze Data:
Quantitative &
Qualitative
Focus on Key
Decision Points where
Measurable
Change Can
Occur
Plan Strategic Interventi
ons
Implement
Change
Evaluate Whether
Goals are Met
18
Data Practices
• DMC Data Template• DMC Performance Measures• Race and Ethnicity Data Collection-Two-Question Format• Language Preference Data Collection
Culture and Community• Strategic Community Engagement• Cultural Responsiveness and Linguistic Competence• Form Translation
Arrests and Pre-Adjudication
• Arrest Diversion Protocols and Programs• School-Based Conflict Resolution and Discipline• Police and Youth Training Curriculum• Objective Detention Risk Screening• Alternatives to Secure Detention
Post-Adjudication • Graduated Responses Protocol and Matrix for Probation and
Community Supervision• Community-based Treatment Alternatives
Strategic Innovations for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities
19
What We Know: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Juvenile Justice and
Mental Health
Youth of color are one-third to one-half less likely to receive mental health care as white youth (Holm-Hansen, 2006).
Among youth of color in contact with the juvenile justice system, nearly two thirds of males and nearly three-quarters of females meet diagnostic criteria for one or more disorders (Teplin, Abram, McClelland, Dulcan, & Mericle, 2002).
A Tennessee survey of 600 minority youth in custody revealed that 52 percent met diagnostic criteria for at least one disorder; but only 14 percent were referred to a mental health professional (Tennessee Commission on Children and Youth, Study of DMC, 2012).
20
Arrest: Police
Schools Probati
on
Referral: Intake
staff
Detention:
Judge
Transfer to adult
court
Petition:
Prosecutor
Adjudication: Judge
Disposition :
Judge
DiversionCommunityServiceMH/SA TX
DiversionInformal processMH/SA TX
Straight Release Detention AlternativeMH/SA TX
Diversion DismissalMH/SA TX
DismissalReleaseMH/SA TX
ProbationCommunity-based MH/SA TX Residential MH/SA TX
Enhancing Diversion Opportunities for Youth
of Color:Key Points for Mental Health Intervention
21
Mental Health and Juvenile Justice:Considerations for Reducing Racial and Ethnic
Disparities
Cornerstone 1: Collaboration* Multisystem Traditional and non-traditional
stakeholder involvement Planning body reflects population
served Collaboration required at all levels
of planning and implementation
Cler
gy
Serv
ice
Prov
ide
rs
Advoca
tes
Defense
Attorneys
Youth
Judges
Prob
atio
n
Parents
Police
ProsecutorsSchool
Systems
Adapted from Blueprint for Change: A Comprehensive Model for the Identification and Treatment of Youth with Mental Health Needs in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System- NCMHJJ, 2007
22
Mental Health and Juvenile Justice:Considerations for Reducing Racial and Ethnic
DisparitiesCornerstone 2: Identification
Evaluate system data to identify need by:
Race, ethnicity, gender, age, geography Type and level of behavioral health need Data improvements may be necessary
Adopt: Race neutral behavioral health screening and
assessment tools Race neutral risk screening and
assessment tools Clear and objective policy and practice
guidance that separates behavioral health needs from risk
Adapted from Blueprint for Change: A Comprehensive Model for the Identification and Treatment of Youth with Mental Health Needs in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System- NCMHJJ, 2007
23
Mental Health and Juvenile Justice:Considerations for Reducing Racial and Ethnic
Disparities
Cornerstone 3: Diversion
Objective criteria for diversion to behavioral health services
Equal consideration for diversion opportunities
Objective requirements for youth participation in programs
Supervisory review and accountability for diversion decisions
Adapted from Blueprint for Change: A Comprehensive Model for the Identification and Treatment of Youth with Mental Health Needs in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System- NCMHJJ, 2007
24
Mental Health and Juvenile Justice:Considerations for Reducing Racial and Ethnic
Disparities
Cornerstone 4: Treatment Equal access to diversion treatment services Cultural responsiveness and language accessibility of treatment models and
treatment staff Effectiveness of treatment services for youth of color Developmentally and culturally appropriate incentives to motivate youth Culturally responsive supports to facilitate family involvement Sensitivity and responsiveness to trauma histories common among system-
involved youth Clearly defined and equally applied consequences for failure to comply with
program requirements Clear and objective guidelines for treatment providers Objective program completion and exit criteria Monitor and address issues related to arrests of youth in residential treatment
Adapted from Blueprint for Change: A Comprehensive Model for the Identification and Treatment of Youth with Mental Health Needs in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System- NCMHJJ, 2007
25
Mental Health Innovations from the DMC Action Network: Pierce County, Washington’s Specialized Functional Family
Therapy Caseload
Pierce County had an array of evidence-based practices available for youth, but less than half of African-American youth who were referred to FFT successfully engaged with the program
The County identified a therapist who would focus on the cultural responsiveness of the program and who would work with a specialized caseload of twelve youth and families with the highest needs
Engagement rates almost doubled (45% to 83%) within the first few months of implementation
26
Final Thoughts
We encourage Mental Health/Juvenile Justice collaboration teams to: Adopt an intentional focus on how your collaboration can have
an impact on racial and ethnic disparities. Apply the lens of race and ethnicity to your planning efforts to
maximize impact.
Questions