Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

13
© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee 1 Governance for Balancing Decent Work with Competitiveness Prepared for the IIRA 6th Asian Regional Congress by LEE, Hyo-Soo Professor of Yeungnam University, Korea President of the Korean Industrial Relations Association April 20 2007 New Delhi, India
  • Upload

    -
  • Category

    Business

  • view

    272
  • download

    0

description

This paper provides the way of balancing decent work with competitiveness on the basis of the PDR systems theory and the RESAP model. In the macro level, the RESAP will provide an infrastructure for decent works with competitiveness. In the micro level, firms should develop PDR systems focusing on humanware for mutual gains to balance decent work with competitiveness. Decent work with competitiveness in a firm level refers to mutual gains. Mutual gains are achieved in the wll-developed and balanced PDR systems by a good humanware. For a good humanware, distribution and rule-making systems should be designed so as to maximize mind-set such learning, creative and cooperative minds. The software and hardware systems can be continuously improved and efficiently by creative human resources. This mechanism will create decent work with competitiveness and real flexibility. What can we expect from the RESAP? The RESAP model will provide new paradigm in strategic choices for knowledge economy. We can find the way to attain both economic competitiveness and social inclusion on the RESAP model. VADS(Vocational Ability Development System) and LJIC(Learing and Job Information Sysem) will create a 'dynamic and healthy labor market(DHLM)' that minimize job and skill mismatchs. More information of the PDR System Theory: * Lee, Hyo-Soo, "The Interaction of Production, Distribution, and Rule-Making Systems in Industrial Relations", Relat. ind. vol.51, no 2, 1996. * Lee, Hyo-Soo, "Paternalistic Human Resource Practices: Their Emergence and Characteritics", Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 35, No.4, 2001. More information of the RESAP model: Lee, Hyo-Soo, "Korea: Proposal for a New Type of Partnership", More than Just Jobs, OECD, 2008.

Transcript of Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

Page 1: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

1

Governance for Balancing Decent Work with Competitiveness

Prepared for the

IIRA 6th Asian Regional Congress

by

LEE, Hyo-Soo

Professor of Yeungnam University, Korea President of the Korean Industrial Relations Association

April 20 2007

New Delhi, India

Page 2: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

2

Contents

Introduction

Changes in Economic Environment and Decent Work

Policy Options for Decent Work with Competitiveness in Macro Level

Balancing Decent Work with Competitiveness in Micro Level

Conclusion

Page 3: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

3

Changes in Economic Environment and Decent Work Localized Market → Global Market

⇒ Global Competit ion, Speed, Flexibility Push downward pressures on wages and working conditions Flexible labor market

Industrial Society → Knowledge-based economy

⇒ Rapid changes of technology and knowledge Destruction of traditional jobs and creation of new jobs Lifelong learning system to renew vocational ability

Young Society → Aging Society

⇒ Increase of low wage jobs for the aged

In these changing environments, decent jobs are easily destructed in the middle of price and speed competition.

Balancing Decent work with competit iveness is a central issue

Page 4: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

4

What is policy options for decent work with competitiveness?

Policy options in Macro Level for Decent Work Flexible Labor Market focusing on Numerical Flexibility

⇒ Decent Job Destruction and Low Skill Equilibrium Dynamic and Healthy Labor Market focusing on Wage and

Functional Flexibility, Job Mismatch and Skill Mismatch 2 infrastructures : Vocational Ability Development System (VADS), Learning & Job Information Center (LJIC) RESAP Model

Strategic Choices in Micro Level for Decent Work Low Road Strategies for Flexibility and Price Competition

Destruction of Decent Work, Competitiveness in Short-run High Road Strategies for Decent Work with Competitiveness

Humanware revolution for mutual gains PDR Systems Theory

Page 5: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

5

RESAP Model : Vision & Directions of HRD Partnership

Economic and Social Advancement Economic and Social Advancement

DHLMMinimization of job & skill mismatch

DHLMMinimization of job & skill mismatch

Competitive advantageJob creation

Competitive advantageJob creation

LJICOvercome asymmetric

information

LJICOvercome asymmetric

information

Social inclusionWorkfare

Social inclusionWorkfare

VADS for innovation clusters

VADS for innovation clusters

VADS for the marginalized

VADS for the marginalized

Building RHRD clusterKnowledge workforce and vocational ability development per life cycle

Building RHRD clusterKnowledge workforce and vocational ability development per life cycle

VisionVision

MissionMission

Strategies

RESAPRegional Economic and Social Advancement Partnership

RESAPRegional Economic and Social Advancement Partnership

Page 6: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

6

What is basic Strategies for the RESAP?

What is basic Strategies for the RESAP?–What is the strategic goals for the RESAP? @ Simultaneous pursue of economic and social advancement

Why? Interdependence of Economic Competitiveness & Social Inclusion

–What is the policy instrument for the RESAP?@ VADS and LJIC based on partnership

–Who and How operate the RESAP? @ Regional Governance Initiatives, Partnership

Why Regional Governance Initiatives? –Why regional initiatives? @ Innovation Cluster and Social Inclusion

fully Effective on a Regional-level–Why Governance Initiatives? @ Partnership among companies,

Univ. and government for fostering and effective utilization of knowledge workforces

Page 7: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

7

How to make the Regional governance initiatives?RESAB : Governance of RESAP

Province or StateRESAB

Project & Policy Review

LJICOne stop

center

LCCPolicy Development

KCCPolicy

Development

ICCPolicy

Development

City or CountyRESAB

LJICOne stop

center

LCCKCC ICC

Project Application

Financial Support

Departments of the

governmentMOL

Page 8: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

8

What is the functions of the LJIC?

Information hub of the labor market

Provide information for learning and jobs

One-stop services for job seekers and companies

To make effective competition system and induce specialization of education and training institutes such as universities, colleges and training center

To reduce transition cost and transaction cost in the labor market.

Page 9: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

9

What is function of the KCC, ICC & LCC

KCC (Knowledge Competitiveness Council)

– To develop partnership and polices for life-long learning and Strategies for Fostering Knowledge Workforce

ICC (Innovation Cluster Council )

– To develop VADS for the Innovation Cluster for regional economic competitiveness

LCC (Learning Community Council)

– VADS for the Vulnerable for Social Inclusion

Page 10: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

10

PDR Systems Model for Employment Relations

Actors’ value &

Power Positions

PDR Systems & their Interaction

Production System

Humanware System Personnel System Mind-set Ability-Development System Software System Hardware System

Distribution System

Rule-Making System

Performance Levels Productivity

Workers’ Quality of life

Competitive Environment

Strategic Choice

General Environment

Source: Adapted from Hyo-Soo Lee [1996; 2001]

G

We should make mutual gains for decent work with competitiveness in a firm level. PDR System model will provide the mechanism for mutual gains

Page 11: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

11

Strategic Choices for Decent Work with Competitiveness in a Firm Level : PDR System Model

Mutual gains are achieved in the well-developed and balanced PDR Systems by a good humanware

For a good humanware, distribution and rule-making systems should be designed so as to maximize mind-set such as learning, creative and cooperative minds

The software and hardware systems can be continuously improved and used efficiently by creative human resources

This mechanism will create decent work with competitiveness and real flexibility

Page 12: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

12

Conclusion

In the macro level, the RESAP will provide an infrastructure for decent work with competitiveness

VADS and LJIC will create DHLM that minimize job and skill mismatches

Regional governance initiative will provide competitive human resources for decent work with competitiveness

In the micro level, firms should develop PDR systems focusing on humanware for mutual gains to balance decent work with competitiveness

In conclusion, humanware does matter for decent work for competitiveness

Page 13: Balancing Decent Work With Competitiveness

© Prof. Hyo-Soo Lee Yeungnam Univ.

13

Conclusion (continued)

What can we expect from the RESAP– Get new paradigm in strategic choices for knowledge economy

– Economic competitiveness and Social Inclusion

– Effective competition system for HRD

– Maximization of invisible resources by effective cultivation of knowledge workforces

– Efficient utilization of labor and reducing structural unemployment by the minimization of skill mismatch

– Optimum allocation of labor forces and reducing frictional unemployment of by minimization of job mismatch

– Minimization of transition cost and transaction cost