Background Report Reference - United States … per million British Thermal Units heat input pounds...

89
r Background Report Reference AP-42 Section Number: 10.6.1 Background Report Section: 4 Reference Number: 53 Title: Results Of The August 27 & 28,1996 Air Emission Engineering Determinations At The Louisiana Pacific Corporation Plant, In Newberry, Michigan Interpoll Laboratories, Inc. October 1996

Transcript of Background Report Reference - United States … per million British Thermal Units heat input pounds...

r

Background Report Reference

AP-42 Section Number: 10.6.1

Background Report Section: 4

Reference Number: 53

Title: Results Of The August 27 & 28,1996 Air Emission Engineering Determinations At The Louisiana Pacific Corporation Plant, In Newberry, Michigan

Interpoll Laboratories, Inc.

October 1996

EPA
Text Box
Note: This is a reference cited in AP 42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Volume I Stationary Point and Area Sources. AP42 is located on the EPA web site at www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ The file name refers to the reference number, the AP42 chapter and section. The file name "ref02_c01s02.pdf" would mean the reference is from AP42 chapter 1 section 2. The reference may be from a previous version of the section and no longer cited. The primary source should always be checked.

1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I

Report Number 6-8201E October 4, 1996 SUSll

Interpol1 Laboratories, Inc. 4500 Ball Road N.E.

Circle Pines, Minnesota 55014-1819

TEL: (612) 786-6020 FAX: (612) 786-7854

RESULTS OF THE AUGUST 27 & 28, 1996 AIR EMISSION ENGINEERING DETERMINATIONS

AT THE LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION PLANT IN NEWBERRY, MICHIGAN

Submitted to:

LOUISIANA PACIFIC CORPORATION Route 8, Box 8263

Hayward, Wisconsin 54843

Attention:

Sue Somers

Approved b y

a& Daniel espen Manager Stationary Source Testing Department

I ’ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

... ABBREVIATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111

1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

3.1 Results of Orsat & Moisture Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

3.2 Results of Phenol Determinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

3.3 Results of Cascade Impactor Determinations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

4 RESULTS OF ZINC ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

APPENDICES:

A - Volumetric Flow Rate Determinations

B - Field Data Sheets

C - Interpoll Laboratories Analytical Data

D - Sampling Train Calibration Data

0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

ACFM cc (mi) DSCFM DSML DEC-F ( O F )

DIA. FP FT/SEC g CPM CWACF CWDSCF g/dscm HP H RS IN. IN.HC. 1N.WC. LB LB/DSCF LB/HR LB/lO6BTU LBIMMBTU LTPD MW mg/Nm’ ug/Nm’ microns (urn) MIN. ng ohm-cm PM PPH PPM PPmC PPmA PPWW PPt PSI SQ.FT. TPD ug VIV

WIW

<

AB B REVIATI ONS

~

I Standard conditions are defined as 68°F (20°C) and 29.92 IN. of mercury pressure.

pkfack\wphscbbbrev hn I

actual cubic feet per minute cubic centimeter (milliliter) dry standard cubic foot of dry gas per minute dry standard milliliter degrees Fahrenheit diameter finished product for plant feet per second gram gallons per minute grains per actual cubic foot grains per dry standard cubic foot grams per dry standard cubic meter horsepower hours inches inches of mercury inches of water pound pounds per dry standard cubic foot pounds per hour pounds per million British Thermal Units heat input pounds per million British Thermal Units heat input long tons per day megawatt milligrams per dry standard cubic meter micrograms per dry standard cubic meter micrometer minutes nanograms ohm-centimeter particulate matter pounds per hour parts per million parts per million carbon parts per million, dry parts per million, wet parts per trillion pounds per square inch square feet tons per day micrograms percent by volume percent by weight 5 (when following a number)

.. 1 1 1 I

P I

I I I I I

1 INTRODUCTION

On August 27 & 28, 1996 Interpoll Laboratories Personnel conducted air emission

engineering determinations on the following sources at the Louisiana Pacific Plant in

Newberry, Michigan:

Dryer Primary Cyclone Exhaust

E-Tube Outlet Phenol

Dryer RTO Outlet Phenol

Press Vents Phenol

Phenol, Cascade Impactor

On-site testing was performed by Ed Juers, Scott Fjelsta, Ron Rosenthal, Jim Lorenz, Bob

Aschenbach, Steve Kelker, and Dan Hulleman. Coordination between testing activities and

plant operation was provided by Keith Seelig of Louisiana Pacific Corporation.

The important results of the test are summarized in Section 2. Detailed results are

presented in Section 3. Section 4 contains results of zinc analysis. Field data and all other

supporting information are presented in the appendices.

I I I

1

'1 'I 2 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

I 'I 'I 'I 'I 'I I 'I 'I I 'I [I I I I I

The results of the air emission determinations are summarized in Table 1. An overview of the results is Dresented in the table below:

PARAMETER MEASURED

PRIMARY CYCLONE EXHAUST

Phenol

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ppm,d) < 0.17

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (LB/HR) < 0.08

€3uwmnH Phenol

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ppm,d)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (LB/HR) - Phenol

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ppm,d)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (LB/HR)

< 0.17

< 0.09

< 0.17

< 0.09

M E S S VENTS Phenol

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . < 0.17

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (LB/HR) < 0.42 (ppm,d)

It should be noted that the samples could not be analyzed for methanol because the

samples were extracted for phenol analysis initially which made methanol analysis impossible

to perform. No other difficulties were encountered in the field or laboratory evaluation of

the samples. On the basis of these facts and a complete review of the data and results, it is

our opinion that the results reported herein are accurate and closely reflect the actual values

which existed at the time the test was performed.

2

P I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Table 1 . Summary of the Results of the August 27 & 28, 1996 Phenol Emission Engineer-

ing Tests at the Louisiana Pacific Plant in Newberry, Michigan.

Time Concentration Emission Rate

Date (HRS) (oorn.d) ( L B/H R)

Dryer Primary Cyclone Exhaust

8-28-96 0930-1 124 < 0.16 < 0.08

8-28-96 1215-1318 < 0.17 < 0.08

8-28-96 1500-1610 < 0.17 < 0.08

< 0.17 < 0.08

E-Tube Outlet

8-28-96 0930-1 i 15 < 0.17 < 0.10

8-28-96 121 5-1 31 5 < 0.17 < 0.09

8-28-96 1500-1 605 < 0.17 < 0.09 Avg < 0.17 < 0.09

Dryer RTO Stack

8-28-96 0930-1 1 18 < 0.17 < 0.09

8-28-96 1215-1327 < 0.17 < 0.09

8-28-96 1500-1 600 < 0.17 < 0.09 Avg <,0.17 < 0.09

Press Vents

8-27-96 1005-1 106 < 0.17 < 0.39

8-27-96 11 17-1220 < 0.17 < 0.44

8-27-96 1230-1405 < 0.17 < 0.44 Avg < 0.17 < 0.42

3

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

3 RESULTS

4

a I I t I I I I I I I I I I I I! I I I

3.1 Results of Orsat & Moisture Analvsis

5

I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I

I n t e r p o l 1 L a b s R e p o r t N o . 6-8201E L o u i s i a n a P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 4 D r y e r P r i m a r y C y c l o n e E x h a u s t

R e s u l t s o f O r s a t B M o i s t u r e A n a l y s e s - - - - - M e t h o d s 3 8 4 ( Z v / v )

D a t e o f r u n

D r y b a s i s ( o r s a t )

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 08-28-96 08-28-96 08-28-96

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.90

o x y g e n .................... 16.60

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79.50

Wet b a s i s ( o r s a t )

3.90 4.20

16.60 16.10

79.50 79.70

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 0 0 3.03

o x y g e n .................... 12.78 12.88

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61.20 61.68

w a t e r v a p o r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23.02 22.41

D r y m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 29.29 29.29

Wet m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 26.69 26.76

S p e c i f i c g r a v i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.922 0.924

F O

6

1.103 1.103

3.17

12.14

60.12

24.57

29.32

26.54

0.917

1.143

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l 1 L a b s R e p o r t No . 6-8201E L o u i s i ana P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 4 E-Tube O u t l e t

R e s u l t s o f O r s a t & M o i s t u r e A n a l y s e s - - - - - M e t h o d s 3 8 4 ( S v / v )

D a t e o f r u n

D r y b a s i s ( o r s a t )

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . o x y g e n .................... n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Wet b a s i s ( o r s a t )

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . o x y g e n .................... n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w a t e r v a p o r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

D r y mo

Wet mo

Spec1 f

F O

e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . c g r a v i t y . . . . . . . . . . . .

Run 1 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

4.00

1 6 . 7 0

7 9 . 3 0

3.02

1 2 . 5 9

5 9 . 7 8

2 4 . 6 2

2 9 . 3 1

2 6 . 5 2

0 . 9 1 6

1.050

Run 2 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

4 . 2 0

1 6 . 5 0

7 9 . 3 0

3 . 1 3

1 2 . 2 9

5 9 . 0 5

2 5 . 5 4

2 9 . 3 3

2 6 . 4 4

0 . 9 1 3

1.048

Run 3 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

4 . 4 0

1 6 . 3 0

7 9 . 3 0

3 . 0 7

1 1 . 3 9

5 5 . 4 0

3 0 . 1 4

2 9 . 3 6

2 5 . 9 3

0 . 8 9 6

1.0

7

I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l l Labs R e p o r t No. 6 - 8 2 0 1 E L o u i s i a n a P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t N o . 4 D r y e r R T O O u t l e t

R e s u l t s of O r s a t 8 M o i s t u r e A n a l y s e s - - - - - M e t h o d s 3 8 4 ( % v / v )

D a t e o f r u n

D r y b a s i s ( o r s a t )

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . ........... 3 . 5 0

o x y g e n .................... 1 6 . 7 0

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19.80

Wet b a s i s ( o r s a t )

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . 6 6

o x y g e n .................... 1 2 . 7 0

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 0 . 6 9

w a t e r v a p o r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3 . 9 5

D r y m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 2 9 . 2 3

Wet m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 2 6 . 5 4

S p e c i f i c g r a v i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 9 1 7

FO 1 . 2 0 0

3 . 8 0 4.00

1 6 . 5 0 1 6 . 2 0

7 9 . 1 0 7 9 . 8 0

2 . 8 1 2 . 9 4

1 2 . 2 0 1 1 . 9 1

5 8 . 9 5 5 8 . 6 7

2 6 . 0 4 2 6 . 4 8

2 9 . 2 7 2 9 . 2 9

2 6 . 3 3 2 6 . 3 0

0 . 9 1 0 0 . 9 0 8

5 8 1.175

a

I I 1 s 'I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l l Labs R e p o r t N o . 6-8201E L o u i s i ana P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y . M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 6 P r e s s V e n t s

R e s u l t s o f O r s a t B M o i s t u r e Ana lyses- - - - -Methods 3 B 4 ( t v / v )

D a t e o f r u n

D r y b a s i s ( o r s a t )

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 08-27-96 08-27-96 08-27-96

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.03

o x y g e n .................... 20.90

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79.07

Wet b a s i s ( o r s a t )

0.03

20.90

79.07

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.03 0.03

o x y g e n .................... 20.57 20.63

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77.84 78.06

w a t e r v a p o r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.56 1.28

D r y m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 28.84 28.84

Wet m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 28.67 28.70

S p e c i f i c g r a v i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.990 0.991

0.03

20.90

79.07

0.03

20.61

77.98

1.38

28.84

28.69

0.991

9

I I I I $1

I I I li I I I I I I I I I

i

I n t e r p o l l L a b s R e p o r t No. 6 -8201E L o u i s i a n a P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y . M i c h i g a n

T e s t N o . 10 (Cascade I m p a c t o r ) D r y e r P r i m a r y C y c l o n e E x h a u s t

R e s u l t s o f O r s a t S M o i s t u r e A n a l y s e s - - - - - M e t h o d s 3 & 4 ( t w / v )

D a t e o f r u n

D r y b a s i s ( o r s a t )

Run 1 Run 2 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . 3 0

o x y g e n .................... 1 7 . 3 0

c a r b o n m o n o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . 0.00

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 . 4 0

Wet b a s i s ( o r s a t )

c a r b o n d i o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.47

o x y g e n .................... 1 2 . 9 7

c a r b o n m o n o x i d e . . . . . . . . . . . 0.00

n i t r o g e n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 9 . 5 5

w a t e r v a p o r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 5 . 0 0

D r y m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 2 9 . 2 2

Wet m o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . . . 2 6 . 4 1

S p e c i f i c g r a v i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . 9 1 2

W a t e r mass f l o w . . . . . . ( L B / H R ) 2 9 3 2 2

2 . 9 0

1 7 . 5 0

0.00

7 9 . 6 0

2 . 1 9

1 3 . 2 3

0.00

6 0 . 1 7

2 4 . 4 1

2 9 . 1 6

2 6 . 4 4

0 . 9 1 3

2 8 5 5 4

FO

10

1 . 0 9 1 1 . 1 7 2

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 11

~

3.2 Results of Phenol Determinations

1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l ! Labs R e p o r t No. 6 - 8 2 0 1 E Lou1 s i ana P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i on

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 4 D r y e r P r i m a r y C y c l o n e E x h a u s t

R e s u l t s o f P h e n o l D e t e r m i n a t i o n s ...........................

Run 1

D a t e o f r u n 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

T i m e run s t a r t / e n d . . . . . ( H R S ) 0 9 3 0 - 1 1 2 4

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . ( I N . H G )

M e t e r t e m p e r a t u r e . . . . ( O E G - F )

M e t e r c o r r e c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t

Vo lume t h r o u g h gas m e t e r . . . . a t m e t e r c o n d i t i o n s . . . ( C F ) s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s ( D S C F )

T o t a l s a m p l i n g t i m e . . . . ( M I N )

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . ( % V / V )

V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e (DSCFM)

. . . . . . . P h e n o l i n samp le . ( u G )

P h e n o l c o n c e n t r a t i o n . . . . . . . . (GR/103DSCF) . ............. (uG/OSCM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( P P B - D R Y ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (PPB-WET) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

P h e n o l e m i s . r a t e ( l O - a L B / H R )

2 9 . 3 1

7 1 . 5 0

1 . 0 0 3 5

4 6 . 8 6 0 4 5 . 9 8 5

6 0 . 0

2 3 . 0 2

3 1 8 8 0

8 4 0 . 0 0 <

0 . 2 8 1 9 < 6 4 5 , 5 6 < 1 6 4 . 9 7 < 1 2 6 . 9 9 ~

7 7 . 0 1 6 ~

Run 2 Run 3

0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

1 2 1 5 - 1 3 1 8 1 5 0 0 - 1 6 1 0

2 9 . 3 1

8 3 . 2 0

1 . 0 0 3 5

4 7 . 3 8 0 4 5 . 4 9 3

6 0 . 0

2 2 . 4 1

3 1 3 8 1

8 4 0 . 0 0 <

0 . 2 8 4 9 < 6 5 2 . 5 3 < 1 6 6 . 7 5 < 1 2 9 . 3 8 <

7 6 . 6 2 9 <

A t r a i l i n g ' < ' symbo l i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e t r u e v a l u e i s l e s s t h a n o r e q u a l t o t h e r e p o r t e d v a l u e

A n a l y s i s p e r f o r m e d a c c o r d i n g t o N I O S H M e t h o d 3 5 0 2

2 9 . 3 1

8 9 . 3 0

1 . 0 0 3 5

4 6 . 7 5 0 4 4 . 3 9 0

60 .0

2 4 . 5 7

3 0 2 3 9

8 4 0 . 0 0 <

0 . 2 9 2 0 < 6 6 8 . 7 5 ~ 1 7 0 . 8 9 < 1 2 8 . 9 0 ~

7 5 . 6 7 6 ~

12

B I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I a

I n t e r p o l 1 Labs R e p o r t No. 6-8201E L o u i s i a n a P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 4 €-Tube O u t l e t

R e s u l t s of P h e n o l D e t e r m i n a t i o n s ...........................

Run 1

D a t e of r u n 08-28-96

T ime run s t a r t / e n d . . . . . ( H R S ) 0930-1115

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . ( I N . H G )

M e t e r t e m p e r a t u r e . . . . ( D E G - F )

M e t e r c o r r e c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t

Volume t h r o u g h g a s m e t e r . . . . a t m e t e r c o n d i t i o n s . . . ( C F ) s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s (DSCF)

T o t a l s a m p l i n g t i m e . . . . ( M I N )

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . ( % V / V )

V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e (DSCFM)

P h e n o l i n samp le . . . . . . . . (uG)

P h e n o l c o n c e n t r a t i o n . . . . . . . . (GR/103DSCF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (uG/DSCM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( P P S - D R Y ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (PPS-WET) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

P h e n o l e m i s . r a t e ( l O - 3 L S / H R )

29.31

76.00

0.9947

45.480 43 .E47

60.0

24.62

38475

840. OOc

0.2956~ 677.03~ 173.01~ 130.41~

97.481<

Run 2 Run 3

08-28-96 08-28-96

L215-1315 1500-1605

29.31

83.00

0.9947

46.130 43.900

60.0

25.54

36529

8 4 0 . 0 0 ~

0 . 2 9 5 2 ~ 6 7 6 . 2 1 ~ 172.80~ 128.67~

9 2 . 4 3 8 ~

A t r a i l i n g 'e' symbo l i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e t r u e v a l u e i s l e s s t h a n o r e q u a l t o t h e r e p o r t e d v a l u e

A n a l y s i s p e r f o r m e d a c c o r d i n g t o N I O S H M e t h o d 3502

29.31

81.00

0.9947

45.700 43.652

60.0

30.14

35275

840. OOc

0 . 2 9 6 9 ~ 6 8 0 . 0 6 ~ 1 7 3 . 7 8 ~ 1 2 1 . 4 0 ~

89.773c

13

II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I

I n t e r p g l l Labs R e g r t No. 6 - 8 2 0 1 E Lou 1 s 1 ana ~ a c i @i c C o r p o r a t 1 on

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 4 D r y e r RTO O u t l e t

R e s u l t s o f P h e n o l D e t e r m i n a t i o n s ...........................

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

D a t e o f run 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

T ime run s t a r t / e n d . . . . . ( H R S ) 0 9 3 0 - 1 1 1 8 1 2 1 5 - 1 3 2 7 1 5 0 0 - 1 6 0 0

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . (1N.HG)

M e t e r t e m p e r a t u r e . . . . ( D E G - F )

M e t e r c o r r e c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t

Volume t h r o u g h g a s m e t e r . . . . s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s (DSCF)

T o t a l s a m p l i n g t i m e . . . . ( M I N )

a t m e t e r c o n d i t i o n s . . . ( C F )

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . ( % V / V )

V o l u m e t r i c F l o w r a t e (DSCFM)

P h e n o l i n samp le . . . . . . . . ( u G )

P h e n o l c o n c e n t r a t i o n . . . . . . . . (GR/103DSCF) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (uG/DSCM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( P P B - D R Y ) . . ............... (PPB-WET) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

P h e n o l e m i s . r a t e ( l 0 - J L B / H R )

2 9 . 3 1

7 3 . 4 6

1 . 0 0 3 4

4 5 . 1 5 0 4 4 . 1 2 4

6 0 . 0

2 3 . 9 5

3 5 2 3 2

8 4 0 . OOC

0 . 2 9 3 7 ~ 6 7 2 . 7 8 ~ 1 7 1 . 9 2 ~ 1 3 0 . 7 5 ~

8 8 . 7 0 3 <

2 9 . 3 1

8 8 . 2 9

1 . 0 0 3 4

4 5 . 8 6 0 4 3 . 6 0 5

6 0 . 0

2 6 . 0 4

3 7 1 3 1

8 4 0 . 0 0 ~

0 . 2 9 7 2 < 6 8 0 . 7 8 < 1 7 3 . 9 7 < 1 2 8 . 6 7 ~

9 4 . 5 9 6 <

A t r a i l i n g ’ < ’ symbo l i n d i c t e s t h a t t h e t r u e v l u e i s l e s s t h a n o r e q u a l t o t h e r e p o r t e d v a l u e

A n a l y s i s p e r f o r m e d a c c o r d i n g t o NIOSH M e t h o d 3 5 0 2

2 9 . 3 1

9 7 . 0 0

1 . 0 0 3 4

4 6 . 3 9 0 4 3 . 4 2 0

6 0 . 0

2 6 . 4 8

3 5 2 9 4

840.00-z

0 . 2 9 8 5 < 6 8 3 . 6 9 < 1 7 4 . 7 1 < 1 2 8 . 4 5 ~

9 0 . 3 0 1 <

14

4 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l l Labs R e p o r t N o . 6 - 8 2 0 1 E Lou i s i ana P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i on

N e w b e r r y . M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 6 P r e s s V e n t s

R e s u l t s o f P h e n o l D e t e r m i n a t i o n s ...........................

D a t e o f r u n

T ime r u n s t a r t / e n d . . . . . ( H R S )

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . ( I N . H G )

M e t e r t e m p e r a t u r e . . . . ( D E G - F )

M e t e r c o r r e c t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t

Volume t h r o u g h g a s m e t e r . . . . a t m e t e r c o n d i t i o n s . . . ( C F ) s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s (DSCF)

T o t a l s a m p l i n g t i m e . ... ( M I N )

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . ( Z V / V )

V o l u m e t r i c flow r a t e (DSCFM)

P h e n o l i n s a m p l e . .

P h e n o l c o n c e n t r a t (GR/ lOJDSCF) . . . ( u G / D S C M ) . . . . . . ( P P B - D R Y ) . . . . . . (PPB-WET) . . . . . .

P h e n o l e m i s . r a t e

. . . . . . ( u G )

on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 0 - JLB/HR)

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

0 8 - 2 7 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 7 - 9 6 0 8 - 2 7 - 9 6

1 0 0 5 - 1 1 0 6 1 1 1 7 - 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 0 - 1 4 0 5

2 9 . 2 6

7 2 . 3 8

0 . 9 9 4 5

4 5 . 8 7 0 4 4 . 4 3 9

6 0 . 0

1 . 5 6

1 5 5 6 2 2

8 4 0 . 0 0 ~

0 . 2 9 1 7 < 6 6 8 . 0 1 < 1 7 0 . 7 0 < 1 6 8 . 0 4 <

3 8 9 . 0 3 2 <

2 9 . 2 6

8 6 . 6 3

0 . 9 9 4 5

4 6 . 3 7 0 4 3 . 7 5 2

60.0

1 . 2 8

1 7 1 7 9 0

8 4 0 . 0 0 4

0 . 2 9 6 2 ~ 6 7 8 . 4 9 ~ 1 7 3 . 3 8 4 1 7 1 . 1 6 ~

4 3 6 . 1 9 0 d

A t r a i l i n g ' < ' symbo l i n d i c a t e s t h a t t h e t r u e v a l u e i s l e s s t h a n o r e q u a l t o t h e r e p o r t e d v a l u e

A n a l y s i s p e r f o r m e d a c c o r d i n g t o N I O S H M e t h o d 3 5 0 2

2 9 . 2 6

9 2 . 1 2

0 . 9 9 4 5

4 6 . 8 4 0 4 3 . 7 5 6

6 0 . 0

1 . 3 8

1 7 3 2 2 5

840.00-z

0 . 2 9 6 2 < 6 7 8 . 4 3 ~ 1 7 3 . 37< 1 7 0 . 9 7 <

4 3 9 . 7 9 3 <

15

I

I I I

I I I I I I I

I I

3.3 Results of Cascade ImDactor Determinations

16

c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I I I I I I I I I ~

I i ~

17

Interpoll Labs Report No. 6-8201E

Louisiana Pacific Corp

Newberry, Michigan

Test No. 10

Cascade Impactor Sampling

Results of Particle Size Distribution Determination

Sample Identification: Dryer Primary Cyclone Exhaust

Assigned Density: 1 .OO gkc

Part. %

Dia. mlm * (urn) >

Prei mpactor 9.4 12.1

5.7

3.65

2.30

19.9

22.9

25.5

4 1.48 27.0

5 0.90 29.3

6 0.53 32.3

7 0.32 48.4

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

T e s t No. 10 (Cascade Impactor) D r y e r P r i m a r y C y c l o n e E x h a u s t

R e s u l t s of P a r t i c u l a t e L o a d i n g D e t e r m i n a t i o n s - - - - - - - M e t h o d 5

D a t e o f r u n Run 1

0 8 - 2 8 - 9 6

T ime r u n s t a r t / e n d . . . . . ( H R S ) 1 7 0 9 / 1 7 2 2

S t a t i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . ( 1 N . W C ) - 1 1 . 6 0 C r o s s s e c t i o n a l a r e a (SQ.FT) 9 . 6 2 P i t o t t u b e c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . . 8 4 0

W a t e r i n samp le gas c o n d e n s e r . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( M L ) 0 .0 i m p i n g e r s . . . . . . . . . . ( G R A M S ) 5 7 . 0 d e s i c c a n t . . ........ (GRAMS) 2 . 0 t o t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( G R A M S ) 5 9 . 0

. . . . . . . . . . c o l l e c t e d ( g r a m s ) 0 . 0 5 1 3

Gas m e t e r c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . . 0 . 9 9 4 5 B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . ( 1 N . H G ) 2 9 . 3 1 Avg. o r i f . p r e s . d r o p . . ( I N . W C ) 1 .04 Avg . g a s m e t e r temp. . (DEF-F) 88.0

Volume t h r o u g h g a s m e t e r . . . .

T o t a l p a r t i c u l a t e m a t e r i a l . .

a t m e t e r c o n d i t i o n s . . . ( C F ) 8 . 8 7 s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s . (DSCF) 8 .34

T o t a l s a m p l i n g t i m e . . . . ( M I N ) 1 6 . 0 0 N o z z l e d i a m e t e r . . . . . . . . . ( I N ) . 1 7 7 A v g s t a c k gas temp . . ( D E G - F ) 256

V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e . . . . . . . . a c t u a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ACFM) 59589 d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . . . (DSCFM) 3 1 3 5 5

I s o k i n e t i c v a r i a t i o n . . . . . ( % ) 9 3 . 7

P a r t i c u l a t e c o n c e n t r a t i o n . . . a c t u a l . . . . . . . . . . . . ( G R / A C F ) 0 . 0 4 9 9 0 d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . (GR/DSCF) 0 . 0 9 4 8 6

P a r t i c l e mass r a t e . . . (LB /HR) 2 5 . 4 9

18

0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I

Interpoll Labs Report No. 6-8201 E

Louisiana Pacific Corp

Newberry, Michigan

Test No. 10

Cascade Impactor Sampling

Results of Particle Size Distribution Determination

Sample Identification: Dryer Primary Cyclone Exhaust

Assigned Density: 1 .OO g/cc

Part.

Dia.

%

mlm

&%e klud > Preimpactor 9.0 11.5

1 5.6 18.6

2 3.60 20.3

3 2.25 22.6

4 1.36 23.9

5 0.88 39.5

6 0.55 51.3

7 0.3 1 56.9

19 I

I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l l L a b s R e p o r t No. 6-8201E L o u i i a a P a c i I C C o r a e w f i e r r y , 6 ; c h i gaB

T e s t No. lo'(Cascade Impac to r ) D r y e r P r i m a r y C y c l o n e E x h a u s t

R e s u l t s o f P a r t i c u l a t e Loading Determinations-------Method 5

D a t e o f r u n Run 2

08-28-96

Time r u n s t a r t / e n d . . . . . (HRS) 1805/1811

S t a t i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . ( 1 N . W C ) C r o s s s e c t i o n a l a r e a ( S Q . F T ) P i t o t t u b e c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . W a t e r i n samp le g a s

c o n d e n s e r . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( M L ) i m p i n g e r s . . . . . . . . . . (GRAMS) d e s i c c a n t . . . . . . . . . . (GRAMS) t o t a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (GRAMS)

T o t a l p a r t i c u l a t e m a t e r i a l . . . . . . . . . . . . c o l l e c t e d ( g r a m s )

Gas m e t e r c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . . B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . ( 1 N . H G ) Avg. o r i f . p r e s . d r o p . . (1N.WC) Avg. g a s m e t e r t e m p . . ( D E F - F )

Volume t h r o u g h gas m e t e r . . . . a t m e t e r c o n d i t i o n s . . . ( CF) s t a n d a r d c o n d i t i o n s . ( D S C F )

T o t a l s a m p l i n g t i m e . . . . ( M I N ) N o z z l e d i a m e t e r . . . . . . . . . ( I N ) A v g . s t a c k gas temp . . (DEG-F)

V o l u m e t r i c f 1 ow r a t e . . . . . . . . a c t u a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (ACFM) d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . . . (DSCFM)

I s o k i n e t i c v a r i a t i o n . . . . . ( % )

P a r t i c u l a t e c o n c e n t r a t i o n . . . a c t u a l . . . . . . . . . . . . ( G R / A C F ) d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . ( GR/DSCF)

P a r t i c l e mass r a t e . . . ( L B / H R )

-11.60 9.62 .840

0.0 21.0 2.0

23.0

0.0513

0.9945 29.31 1.03 82.0

3.53 3.36

6.00 .177 259

59697 31516

100.0

0.12441 0.23576

63.69

20

1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I

4 RESULTS OF ZINC ANALYSIS

21

~ ~

1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES INC. 61 2-786-6020

Zinc Results [Units: Total uq)

Client: Louisiana-Pacific, Newberry, MI Report No: 8201

ug =micrograms

Reviewed by:

David J. Schneider, Manager Chemistry Department

Page I of 2

22

8201-LP.XLS

1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES INC. 61 2-786-6020

Zinc Results /Units: Total uq)

Client: Louisiana-Pacific, Newberry, MI Report No: 8201

ug =micrograms

Reviewed by:

David J. Schneider. Manager Chemistry Department

Page 2 of 2

I 8201-LP.XLS

23

I I

I

'I

'I I

APPENDIX A

VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE DETERMINATIONS

'I

I I I I I I 1

I I CI I1 I 1 I: I I I I R

I n t e r p o l 1 L a b s R e p o r t No. 6 - 8 2 0 1 E L o u i s i a n a P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 6 P r e s s V e n t s

Resul ts o f Vo lumetr ic Flow Rate Determination-------Method 2

D a t e o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . T ime o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n . . . . . . . (HRS)

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . . ( 1 N . H G )

P i t o t t u b e c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . . . . . .

Number o f s a m p l i n g p o r t s . . . . . . . . . T o t a l number o f p o i n t s . . . . . . . . . . . Shape o f d u c t .................... D u c t w i d t h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N )

D u c t l e n g t h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N )

D u c t a r e a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( S Q . F T )

D i r e c t i o n o f f l o w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

0 8 - 2 7 - 9 6

1005

2 9 . 2 6

. 8 4

2

2 4

R e c t a n g u l a r

1 1 8

5 9

4 8 . 3 5

UP

S t a t i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N . W C ) - 2 . 2 5

Avg. gas temp . . . . . . . . . . . . . (DEG-F) 1 0 4

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . . . . . ( % V / V ) 1 . 5 6

Avg . l i n e a r v e l o c i t y . . . . . (FT /SEC)

Gas d e n s i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( L B / A C F )

M o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . (LB/LBMOLE)

Mass f l o w o f gas . . . . . . . . . . ( L B / H R )

V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . a c t u a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( A C F M ) d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . . . . . . . . ( D S C F M )

5 9 . 9

.06778

2 8 . 8 4

7 0 6 2 4 9

1 7 3 6 5 8 1 5 5 6 2 2

A- 1

I n t e r p o l 1 Labs R e p o r t No. 6-8201E L o u i s i a n a P a c i f i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y , M i c h i g a n

T e s t No. 6 P r e s s V e n t s

R e s u l t s o f V o l u m e t r i c F l o w R a t e D e t e r m i n a t i o n - - - - - - - M e t h o d 2

D a t e o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . T ime o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n . . . . . . . ( H R S )

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . . ( I N . H G )

P i t o t t u b e c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . . . . . .

Number o f sampl i n g p o r t s . . . . . . . . . T o t a l number o f p o i n t s . . . . . . . . . . . Shape o f d u c t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D u c t w i d t h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N )

D u c t l e n g t h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N )

D u c t a r e a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( S Q . F T )

D i r e c t i o n o f f l o w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

S t a t i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . . . . . . ( 1 N . W C )

Avg . g a s temp . . . . . . . . . . . . . (DEG-F)

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . . . . . ( t V / V )

Avg . l i n e a r v e l o c i t y . . . . . (FT /SEC)

Gas d e n s i t y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( L B / A C F )

M o l e c u l a r w e i g h t . . . . . . (LB/LBMOLE)

Mass f l o w o f gas . . . . . . . . . . ( L B / H R )

V o l u m e t r i c f l o w r a t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . a c t u a l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( A C F M ) d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . . . . . . . . (DSCFM)

08-27-96

1122

29.26

.84

2

24

R e c t a n g u l a r

118

59

48.35

UP

-2.3

103

1.28

65.8

.06797

28.84

778231

190841 171790

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

A-2

1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

I n t e r p o l 1 Labs R e p o r t No . 6 - 8 2 0 1 E L o u i s i ana P a c i P i c C o r p o r a t i o n

N e w b e r r y . M i c h i g a n

T e s t No . 6 P r e s s V e n t s

R e s u l t s o f V o l u m e t r i c F l o w R a t e Determination....... M e t h o d 2

D a t e o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n . . . . . . . . . . . . T ime o f D e t e r m i n a t i o n . . . . . . . (HRS)

B a r o m e t r i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . . ( 1 N . H G )

P i t o t t u b e c o e f f i c i e n t . . . . . . . . . . .

Number o f s a m p l i n g p o r t s . . . . . . . . . T o t a l number o f p o i n t s . . . . . . . . . . . Shape o f d u c t .................... D u c t w i d t h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N )

D u c t l e n g t h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( I N )

D u c t a r e a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( S Q . F T )

D i r e c t i o n o f f l o w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

S t a t i c p r e s s u r e . . . . . . . . . . . (1N.WC)

Avg . g a s temp . . . . . . . . . . . . . (DEG-F)

M o i s t u r e c o n t e n t . . . . . . . . . . ( S V / V )

A v g . l i n e a r v e l o c i t y . . . . . (FT/SEC)

Gas d e n s i t y . . M o l e c u l a r we

Mass f l o w o f

V o l u m e t r i c f a c t u a l . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . (LB /ACF)

g h t . . . . . . ( L E /

gas . . . . . . . . . .

ow r a t e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

d r y s t a n d a r d . . . . . . . . . . . .

B M O L E )

LB/HR)

. . . . . . ( A C F M )

(DSCFM)

A- 3

0 8 - 2 1 - 9 6

1 2 3 5

2 9 . 2 6

. a 4

2

2 4

R e c t a n g u l a r

1 1 8

5 9

4 8 . 3 5

UP

- 2 . 4

1 0 8

1 . 3 8

6 7 . 0

. 0 6 7 3 2

2 8 . 8 4

1 0 5 2 3 5

1 9 4 3 9 1 1 7 3 2 2 5

I I I

I P I I I I I

I I I I I I t

APPENDIX B

FIELD DATA SHEETS

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

EPA Method 4 and 6 Field Data Sheet 6 jU L.P uwh+ Operator(s) L T 3-L j rce D.-,,qr f~rb-by C p 6 d /e.rl.,,s+ Meter Box No. 7 Casmeter Coef. Loo 5 5

q'Lk-?l T e s i Z R u n ' f AH@ 1.9V in.WC Bar.Press 2 9. 5 j in.Hg Sample Train Leak Check

Preliminary Resuls of SO: Concenrrarion Determination -

- ~ 0 i ~ u i - e Gravimetric - 2 3.02- %ViV

Moisture Psychmmeuic - r$ %VI"

PPM

PPM

I' 091 29eC:\STACK\WP\FORMN287ALl

B - 1

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

- Preliminary Resulrr of SO,

Concenmcion DeterminHlQn

".d - If5.W DSCF I I I

M O ~ S U ~ travimevlc - $2 . y I %VI"

Moisture Psychrometric - %vlv

\SO,, DRY - PPM

5 WET- PPM

LB/&f" -

B- 2 I 091 294€i:\SIACK\WP\FORMN-Z87ALl

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (612) 786-6020 '

EPA Method 4 and 6 Field Data Sheet Operatorb) E r T L

Sample Train leak Check Pretest: < 0.02 cim at i n . w c K Post Tesr:fiZ cirri at &in.wc @

c, J*d& Lc-LI5 c Meter Box No. 5 Casmeter Coef. / - 3 AH@ 1 . 4 ~ f in.wC Bar.Press 2 '1. 5 / in.Hg

et Bulb

1 Condensate Data: J

Item Weight (g,

Final Tare Dikence

lmpingers A L I

I

Preliminary Resuls of SO, Concentmion Determination

Vrd - cfq .. 3 y DSCF

Moisture Gravimetric - ZY. 57 %"lV

Moisture Psychrometric - %v/v

SO,, DRY - PPM

I so,, WET - PPM I

091 29G:\STACI(\WP\FORMM5\S-ZBiALl

B- 3

Item Weight @

Final Tare Difference

Preliminary ResulB Of SO, Concentration Determination

v, - 4 3 - 8 3 DSCF

Moisture Cravimerric - a 4.6 ,& %V/v

Moisture P@rornetric - %V/"

SO,, DRY - PPM

so,, WET - PPM

LB/hiMBtu - I

I I I ';

I I

f'l

Item Weight @I

Final Tare Difference - Impingers UZ+ a75 l q 7 Condenser Si< 172- G 3

3'6Y %?9 \ \4

Prelirnirmy Reiuls of SO2 Concentration Determination

v,- ' IA 3.%0 DSCF

Moimre Giavimelric - . 2 7- C r ' %v!v

Moimre Psychromenic - %vlv

SO,, DRY - PPM

SO,, WET - PPM

LB/MMBtu -

091 294C:\STACK\WnFORMN-287ALI

8-5

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

EPA Method 4 and 6 Field Data Sheet L?/IdcLhd'-. Operatods) se/ ati

' z -TL.kQ .-+\-t Meter Box No. /,-I ' Gasrneter Coef. .99ffc1 Job Source %-,-

Wet Bulb Dry Bulb Pretest: < 0.02 cim at lj i n . w N

Date ?-I%-% T e s t x Run 3 AH@ in.WC Bar.Press 2 9 I 3 ( in.Hg Sample Train Leak Check:

Post Test:> cim at li)in.WC

Condensate Data:

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Concentration Determination

v, - 4 3 . 5 6 DSCF I - M O I S N ~ tnvimetric - 30. I 4 %VlV

I I I

Moisture Prychmmetric - %v/v

SO,, DRY - PPM

so, WET - PPM

LB/MMBtu-

B-6 __

I 091 294C:\SThCK\WP\FORMN-ZB7ALl

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (612) 786-6020

EPA Method 2 Field Data Sheet

Cross-section View

I I I

Elevation View

R 4 I

lob L P / Nfwi7Fe Source mfg? p7( 1 IACK Test Run-Date g-28-% Stack Dimen. d 4 IN. Dry Bulb "F Wet bulb "F Manometer 0 Reg. Barometric Pressure Static Pressure Operators AYH fAJJ?Ach; - W V & k& 1/32 Pitot No. C- r

OElec. IN.HC IN.WC

293?

.. . .

. ~ ,I ', 6

,' . j . . _

!

I . .,

03 2 5 94-C :\STACK\WP\FORMS\S-3 9 2.1

B-7

I I I I I

INTERPOLL WBOGTGRIES, I N C (61 21 786-6020

Interpol1 Laboratories EPA iMethod 5/17 Sample Log Sheet

l ob c+?/ f i e w b e i [ v Dateg7d6-9C Tex ‘/ Run / source Bu+/ m~ YPCIC No. of naverse poins Method ’ Filter holder: ,d Filrer -e:

Sample Train Leak Check: Preren: s 0.02 cim at 15 NHG (vac) jmc Posc res: 6.0 cim a~ /o IN. HG ( v a c ) s Parricuiare Card DaU: 30. of filters used: Recovery solvenr(s)

Weiat (g)

Find TXC I Difference

@acetone OOther(S)

~I

I 2?< ~y<*.,,.m.x- %yq .y .yA

I 775- I s-2 3 73

Condenser I I

I I I I I I I I I I I

5-8

1 Condensate Data:

Item Weight (9) 1 .~

Final Tare Diiference I I I

Preliminaty Results of SOz Concentration Determination

"Sm - 3"f. i2/ DSCF

Moinure Cravimemc - 23 9g%"l" Moisture Psyrhmrnetric - r v i v

SO.. DRY - PPM

I I so,, WET - PPM I

I I I I I

INTERPOLL UBOGTGRIES, INC (61 21 786-6020

Interpol1 Laboratories EPA Method 5/17 Sample Log Sheet

Job c$/ / V c w & i r < Dare Test :f Run 2 Source 3 I 4 P / pr 0 5% IC So. of uavme points, - ' 3 ?vierno@//' Filter holderr& Fi lm me: - Sample Train Leak C h k Preres;: < 0.02 cfin at 15 IN.HG ( v a c m post rex: &)- ciin a~ /O IN. HG (vat) 1

Particulate Catch Data: ?io. of filren used:

F Recovexy jolvent(s)

0 acemne c i o t h ~ s )

No. of probe wash bottles: L 4 I I I I I I

I I I I I I

Sample recovered by: 62 Condensate Daia:

Weight (g)

TXC I Difference

Impinge: No. 1

Impinger Xo. 1

Impinger No. 2

Condenser I I Desiccanr cr=73 /s- 7 I 36

Total

Fl-3 &ld J+ Box No. Bag No.-

cz'min at M.HC (TR.5) Time end: W W cz'min Opeator:

:-laver .Aluminird Tedlar Size: laL -

Integrated as barnpiing Data:

Bag Pump No. Bag Material: Pretest leak check: Time srm: Sampiin, rate:

Si1.I of 0. Analyzer used to moniror Eain outlec

0523?eC:\SThC:(\WP\FC)R~~~~6~R

B-10 I

. -

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

EPA Method 4 and 6 Field Data Sheet L3/ /o CUIk J /-c Operator(s1 5K

Source -Sv,+> ~hb s &[C Meter Box No. 7 Casrnerer Coei. 1. &3% e&&$+ T e s t S R u n > AH@ /.kn in.wC Bar.Press J ' i -3 / in.Hg Sample Train Leak Check:

. . . , "', ;.

v k. 19' . try L;,

,

~ !.

. . . , .

..*., "

1 Condensate Data:

Item II Weight (9, I II I

lmpingen

Condenser I I

Preliminary Results oi SO, Concentration Determination

Moisture Gravimetric - $.oy %Vh,

Moisture Psychrometric - %VlV

SO2, DRY - so,, WET - LB/MMBfu-

091 29G:WACK\WRFORMS*287ALl

8-11 -

-

INTERPOLL LUOfGTGRIES, INC (6121 786-6020

Interpoll Laboratories EPA Method 5/17 Sample Log Sheet

Job c?/ / bcw L+c D a r e G J e T b Test Run) Source pu+/ / L r o 5 & c NO. of naverse points 3 blerhod Filter holder Filter type: Sample Train Leak C h d Prerest: s 0.02 cfm at 15 IN.HG (Vacj-jL

Particulate Catch Dam: No. of filters used:

Post tes: e c h a /a IN. HG (vac&-

Recovery solvent(s)

I I I I

I I

Fial T m 1 Difference I I

No. of probe wash bodes: Sample recovered by: Condensate Data:

Weight &)

775-

Impinger No. 5 3 I '173 I

Desiccant

I I I I I

Total

Box No. Bag No.-

cdrnin ar N.HG $laver .Aluminized Tedlar S k . - U L

(MU) Time end: WW cz'min Operaroc

Bag Pump No. Bag Material: Preresr leak check l ime stm: Sam p I in, 0 rate:

SIN of O1 Analyzer used to monitor m i n ourler:

-.

05'30eC.\STAC:(\WP\F,~R~~~~6~R

B- 12 \

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

€PA Method 4 and 6 Field Data Sheet Operator(s) A4 5 t Meter Box No. 7 Casrneter Coei. O O 3 v

Sample Train Leak Check: 1- in.wc Bar.Press a5 '~~ / in.Hg

Item Weight (g, I Prelirninacy Resulb of SO, I Concentration Defermimuon

DSCF Tale Difference Final

"Id - lrnpingers

I I I I

I

1. Moisture Gravimetric - gb. I/ 8 % V h

Moisture Pqchrometric - 7NIV

SO,, DRY - PPM

I so,, WET - PPM I I I

091 294C:iSTACI(\WP\FORMN-ZBiAL 1

6-13

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

€PA Method 2 Field Data Sheet

r z O F

Job Source Test Stack Dirnen. Dry Bulb O F Wet bulb Manometer jBReg. OExp OElec. Barometric Pressure 24.2b IN.HC Static Pressure -a 25 IN.WC Operators t. Tk3 S, Lon,,? Pitot No. 2 w- 5 c; .<YV

Drawing I

View

Test Site

I I I I I I I I I I I I I

03 2 5 9CC:\STACK\WP\FO RMS\S-3 92.1

8-14 I

Condensate Data:

I Weight (9, I It I

I I I

Desiccant

I

Preliminary Results oi SO, Concentration Determination

"* - ywz DSCF

%VlV Moisture Cravimevic - LSk M O I S R I ~ ~ Psychrometric - %V/V

SO,, DRY - PPM

so,, WET - PPM

LBIMMBtu-

091 294C:WACK\WP\FORM287ALl

6-15

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (6 12) 786-6020

EPA Method 2 Field Data Sheet Drawing of Test Site

PIT55 \kyI Cross-section Elevation Source tS ' Job L.4, kL.JLd

Test 6 RunLDate e-27-qL Stack Dirnen. 59 x 5% P- ''*,Y- IN. Dry Bulb "F Wet bulb O F

Manometer Ef Reg. OExp OElec. Barometric Pressure 2 9,t-d IN.HC Static Pressure -2.T IN.WC Operators .E. SJPCS ' x.Lcr\nz Pitot No. 2-q v- f C . % Y O

I' I

03 25 94-C:'5TACK\W P\FO RhIS\S-3 92.1

6-16

I I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I

"3 I

Condensate Data: Preliminary Resula of SO2

Concentration Deemination

V, - 43 .73 DSCF

I I I I 1

Moiwre Grav~rnemc - I. 2% %VI%

Moisture Psychrornemc - %"/V

SO,, DRY - PPM

sq, w€i - PDM

LWMMBtu-

091 294-CC.\STACK\WPIF0RM287AL 1

8-17

Job Cross-section

View

INTERPOLL IABORATORIES, INC. (61 2 ) 786-6020

EPA Method 2 Field Data Sheet

Elevation View

Source Y l l K Test 6 Run&Date 6-27-96 Stack Dimen. <4*54.b"-!%&k& IN. Dry Bulb - O F Wet bulb "F

z t 2 IN.HC Manometer FReg. Barometric Pressure Static Pressure -2.q IN.WC

Pitot No. Z Y V - 6 c- . By0

OElec.

Operators € .sJ-r5 5. LOCPv77

Temp. of Gas

5.5 IN. Time Start: I 2 3 5 H RS

Traverse Distance

Wall (IN.) Point From Stack Distance

From End of Port (IN.)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Port Length: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~. . . . ~ . ~ . . .

R f II I I I I

03 25 94-C :\STACK\WP\FO RtvIS\S-3 92.1

6-18

I

I I

Item Weight @I I Preliminary Resultr oi SO, I Concentration Determlnanon

v, - Y5.75 DSCF Final Tare Difference

~

lmpingen A 2-70 2 7 7 I

I I I

Moisnue Gravimetric - 1. 36 %viv

Moisture Psychrometric - %VI"

SO, DRY - PPM

so, WET - PPM

LBIMMBtu -

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

EPA Method 2 Field Data Sheet

Traverse Distance Point From Stack

Wall (IN.)

lob 1 .0 L J L e rrV Source O c v r Pr7-0-m LxJonc f L L 5 j - Test 1 0 ' RunQDate ' -Z&-qi,

Dry Bulb " F Wet bulb O F

Operators f.T&Jecs ,3 ~ O ~ ~ Z , #?.U,tL\ Pitot No. 274-5 C. .e /o .

Stack Dimen. Y Z IN.

Manometer F e g . OEx CiElec. Barometric Pressure 29% IN.HG Static Pressure -[l .6 IN.WC

Distance From End of Port (IN.)

Drawing of Test Site

Temp. Meas. Device & S/N:

Cross-section View

Time End: 16 35 HRS

Elevation View

6- 20

032594-C:\STACK\WP\FORMS\S-392.1

-

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

D1 t l l

II 1 I! I I t t I I I I I I I t II

INTERPOLL LABORiTGRIES, INC (612) 7 a ~ 0 2 0

Interpoll Laboratories EPA Method 5/17 Sample Log Sheet f loo L P NQUJLQd Dare4-Z8-%Tesi [o Run

sourcz D c v r ~ k L/ do& t&++ NO. o i a a v m e pomu z I Mernod Filter holaer: Filrer w e :

Sample T a n L d Check ?rere=: S 0.02 c h at 15 IN-IG (vac) ?os; rex: a 6 1 1 15 IN. HG (vac) E Parncnlare Car& D3fa: ?io. of filrers used: Rcovery solvent(s)

8-21

6-22

.-

I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I

INTERPOLL UBORATCRIES, I N C (6121 786-6020

Interpoll Laboratories EPA Method 5/17 Sample Log Sheet

Job L O . F34Jlnrd Darc $-%* ien 1 0 Run 2 sourcz Merhod Filter holdcr: Filter y e :

Sample Train Le& C h e k Preresz s 0.02 ch ax 15 m.3G (vac) i% Post rex: z k i m ar /'I IN. HG (vac) ly Pardcnlare Catch Data: No. of filrers used:

j)CW r Pm-.dv ' ( 9 ~ o l . p 6 M t N o . oi m v m e points z I I '

Recovery jolvenr(s)

No. of probe wash bodes: Sample recovered by:

. . .

B-23

B-24

I I

APPENDIX C

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES ANALYTICAL DATA

I I

I I I

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC (61 2) 786-6020

EPA Method 3 Data Reporting Sheet - Orsat Analysis

lob 0- N O r q O n y Source .

Dare Submined Team Leader . E T

F, Within €PA i 3 Guidelines ior iuel rype.

where Fo - 20.9-0, co,

F - Flask (250 cc all glasr)

- Tedlar Bag 15 layer)

.. Coal:

Anthm*tdLinnite Bimrninour

Oil: Dinillare Residual

Narunl Propane Butane

cas:

W o o d M l d Bak

c- 1

FO Range

1.01 61,130 1.083-1.230

1.260-1.413 1.21C-1370

l.€QC-1.836

1.405-1553 1.0001.130

1.434-i.sa6

INTER~E4BORATORIES, INC (612) 786-6020

~~~~ -

i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

EPA Method 3 Data Reporting Sheet - Orsat Analysis

Team Leader Date Submined

I ' I I I I

1 0 x 1 1 Analyzer Synem Leak Check M Ranee ..

@= F, Within EPA Mi3 Guidelines Coal: for fuel type. AmhraciWLignite

. . Bituminous Where Fo - Oil:

co2 Dinillate Residual

N-I

Bufane

car- F - Flask (250 cc all glas) Ropane

B - Tedlar Bag (5 layer1 WoodlWood Bark

1.016.1.130 1.083-1.UO

1.260-1.413 1.210-1.370

l.M10-1.836 1.434-1 586 1.405-1553 7.000-1.130

, - I 1 1

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC (6 12) 7866020

' ' EPA Method 3 Data Reporting Sheet - Orsat Analysis

, . . . . . . . . AnthradteRignife 1.016-1.130 '. . . Bituminous 1.083-1230

Distillate 1.2€4-1.413 Residual 1 1 1 0.1.370

NOURl 1.600.1.836 F - Flask 1250 cc ail glass1 Ropane 1.434-1.586

B m e 1.405-1.553 B - Tedlar Bag I5 layer) Wmdlwood Bark 1.OW-1.130

Oil: . .

Where Fo - co,

CaE ..

. .

111595C:\STAU(\WP\FO~569 c- 3

I I I

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

EPA Method 3 Data Reporting Sheet - Orsat Analysis . '. . ~

Test NO. No. of Runs Corn

Fa Within €PA M-3 Guidelines coal: /

for fuel type. AnthracitdLignire 1 .oi a1.i 30 Bituminous 1.083-1.230

Distillate 1.260-1.413 Residual 1.21C-1.370 I

I

Where Fo - 20.9<), Oil:

L. CO,

Gas: Nafural 1.6oo-i.a36 ~ , I

Propane Butane 1.405-1.553

Wood/wmd Bark 1.000-1.130

* . ; 1.434-1.586 ,- F - Flask (250 cc all glass)

E - Tedlar Bag (5 layer)

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Results of Solvent Rinse g

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (612) 786-6020

Solvent Rinse Data Reporting Sheet 45-m rFrp-acr0.c

&€PA Method 5 Probe Wash 0 €PA Method 29 Probe Wash UEPA Method 202 Cup & Tube Wash

Sourmisite D F * + ~ ~4 Ci / LrC..M i

Test No. /o lob d, fzn,

Transport Leakage0 N o n e F ml Solvent f i - - V - d . d

Date Submitted r - 21-4L l7

Date of Analysis 5--L3 - f o Technician E 7

- RUN RUN RUN RUN

^ . .

11

y b

.a.

0

d'

, , *.

..* .( .2

i Lr

;y

'Solvent Residue EPA-M5 Acetone Residue Blank Spec. 5 7.8 ugh1

u g h 1 -[(Sample w t . 2 (1O6)]Nol. of Sol. - rnl

P 1 I I I (I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

Cascade Impactor Laboratory Data Sheet

Job LP1dr4bW.N Date of Test % / z S / S L

Source ~ P S , < P ? ~ - ~ . P \ I 2 , d o - c E*kdc Test 10 Run I Analyst 5. x~,;-.~;I\e Impactor No. - I Substrate Used do mc-.

vstd

t 5

e

Sampling rate data: = g. 34 DSCF = 256 O F - Id Min.

P b =, 29.31 in.Hg P I. oq in.WC

zc, 00 % vlv MC = p,

5.67 x (a) x (a+ 460) =O.?bO a& *' = (-I-&-) x ( U c -13.6) x (100 - z)

11 01 95C:\STACK\WRFORMS\S-386

. .

, C-6

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

Cascade Impactor Laboratory Data Sheet

Sampling rate data: v, - - 3 . 3 6 DSCF t* e = 6 Min.

2 53 O F - - MC = % vlv

= / . 0 2 8 aqin 5.67 x (3.) x (=+ 460) ) x I-’+ -/13.6) x (100 - ‘a) ‘0 = (A

1 101 95-C:ETACK\Wp\FORMSl.S-386

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

c-7

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES INC.

I I I

Phenol Results By €PA Method 8270 For Dept. 201 Louisiana-Pacific, Newbeny, MI

Collected 8/27 and 8/29/96

=Total mass of the specified compound in the sample in ug. = Percent recovery of the field surrogate. (60120 ug 2-Fluorophenol and 5006 ug Phenol-D6 was added to the impinger solution before sampling.) - = Percent recovery of the lab surrogates.

Reviewed by:

David J. Schneider, Manager Chemistry Department

82OlPHEN.LPH

I C-8

Interpoll Laboratories, Inc.

(6 12)786-6020

Nature of

Spiking Material 950 ?d -L6 -4

a-b Pketnc I

2- F l u o r o p h e * . s i cl Sa 7 8-zt-6

I I

I I 1

Spike Spike Total Mass

Concentration Volume of Spike

5.006 m3 / m L / , O W L ZdOS my

50. IO h j I r L I > Z r n L &. 1 La m$

Imoinser Catch PreDaration Work

Order Form

I

Project Name: L? /A/< &be p r y Order Date: ti" -/d '46 I Date Required: p L 3 9 4 Delivery Date: 6- 2 3 9 . 5 I

I

'I

SPECIAL REOUIREMENTS

I I

I

**Please return this form with the samples.

c-9

I LOA-34

P I

r.J I op ".1

I 1 1

'I

h

c-10

I

\-

2

%I

Y C .- - w

r

I

I c-11

lr

c-12 I'

I

C-13

.

I I I I

c

2 pc

” 1: I I I I I I I

-

i 0

C-14

3

I

I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I

APPENDIX D

SAMPLING TRAIN CALIBRATION DATA

B I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I

Time ( m i d

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (612) 786-6020

EPA Method 5 Gas Metering System Quality Control Check Data Sheet

Volume Meter Temp (" FI

Inlet Outlet (CR

Job L. P. AJ CLJ berry Date 8-2g -4r: Operator L F Module No. 3

Instructions: Operate the control module at a flow rate equal to AH@ for 10 minutes before attaching the umbilical.

Record the following data:

Calculate Y, as foollows:

If Y,, is not within the range of 0.97 to 1.03, "the volume metering system should be investigated before beginning."

CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A, Method 5, Section 4.4.1

01 1995C:'.STACK\WP\FORMSG432

0- 1

INTERPOLL UBORXTORIES, INC. (6 121 786-6020

EPA IMethod 5 Cas Metering System Quality Control Check Data Sheet

Operator -5, RPrJr+'WYL(,LIJ ,b\oduie Yo. / 7

1 nstructions: Operate the control module at a flow rate equal to AH@ for 10 minures before attaching the umbilical.

Record the following data:

Bar press 2 7 - 3 in.Hg 5- -??q7 AH@ I .7( in.WC.

Time (mid

Volume (Meter Temp can Inlet Outlet

(CR

Calculate Y, as follows: v = L 1 786 r " (r go),,

if Y , 15 nor within the range of 0.97 to 1.03, "the volume merenng jysrern Should be investigated before beginning."

CFR Title 40, Parr 60, Appendix A, tblethod 5, Seaon A . 4 . l

D- 2

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I

I I I

I I

u? +- 3 m

W M

LZ

a 3 U C m c 0 ._ 1

2 -cr - 3

: X 0

W

m L

1

a m m 7

d

m

0 Z

m :: L W - 3

0 N

0-3

n 0

5 - E ” a : o c > -

0 Z 1 g ’ W w

..,.

.

.. . 7 . .__ ....

D- 4

I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I

I I

\o m m

P.

7

I I I

. .

0 N

2 3 L 0 al I

2

0- 5 . .

r

h J D

0-6 I

I I I

I I I I

c

U I f

D- 7

v)

C 0

% :- I- .-

D- 8

. .

INTERPOLL MBORATORIES, INC. (612) 786-6020

I, s'il

I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I

Temperature Measurement Device Calibration Sheet Unit Under Ten:

Model Range 'F Thermocouple Type

Method of Calibration: POT NO. c

p'

Vendor D , w q c.4- - rtAC31 Serial Number 7 r r x / 5 & 0 ' .- . _

Dare of Calibration 7 - i l - X Technician 1;. 141..-/le-*\ccK.

Y S Comparison againn ASTM merculy in'glass thermometer using a thermonaned and insulated aluminum block design4 io provide uniform remperature. The temperature is adjusted by adjusting the voltage on the block heater mridge. Omega Model CL-300 Type K Thermocouple Simulator which provides 22 Precise remperature equivalent millivolt signals. The CL-300 i s cold junnion compensated. Calibration accuracy is 2 0.1% of span (2100"F1 + 1 degree (for negative remperatures add = 2 deorees). The CL-300 simulates exaaly the millivoltage of a Type K thermocouple at the indicated temperature.

OF - off scale response by unit under rest ("FI 9: d w - 100 4 4 6 0 - t l

OUnir was nor in tolerance: iecalibrated - See new calibration sheet. g u n i t in ioierance 01 1995-G:\STACK\WP\FORMN433

- 0-10

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (61 2) 786-6020

Temperature Measurement Device Calibration Sheet I Unit Under Teh. ..

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I

Vendor Oh,- 4 uu4f Serial Number Q- ZlUU -

Date ai Calibmion 5 /ZZ/TL Tec'rnician

*Method of Calibration: POT NO. 37 Comparison againx ASTM mercurf in'glass thermometer using a thermonaned and insulated aluminum blo& designed io provide uniform tempemure. The temperaNre is adjusted by adjuning the voltage on the block hearer cutridge. Omega Model CL-300 Type KThermocouple Simulator which provides 22 precise temperature equivalent millivolt signals. The CL-300 i s cold junction compensared. Calibration accuracy is + 0.1% of span (21OOV 2 1 degee (for negative temperatures add 2 degrees). The CL-300 simulates exady the millivoltage of a Type K thermocouple af the indicated temwrarure.

I I I I

- i:

Response of Unit Under

so0

. -

OUnit was not in tolerance: -librated -See new calibration sheet. 01 1995C;\STACklWlVORM3%33

0-11

Desired Temp Temperature of Response of Unit Under Deviation (OF) Nominal Standard or Simulated Test 1°F)

Temp I'V A t (70) 7

48 2 0.36 I I I I

1700

1800

1900

2000

2100

1200

1300

1400

I I

-

Averages: 0.- -

11 1600 I

I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I D-12

B I I 1 I I I I I E I I I I I I I I I

Interpoll Laboratories, Inc. (612) 7 a ~ i - m ~

S-TvDe Pitot Tube lnsoection Sheet

frobeo; Pitot Tube NO.-

Pitot tube dimensions:

-. 3 / 2 IN.

. qL.7 5 IN.

1. External tubing diameter (DJ

2. Base to Side A opening plane (p,)

'.! S / 5 IN. 3. Base to Side B opening plane (Pel

AliEnment:

Distance from Pitot to Probe ComDonenQ:

9 " 10. Pitot to 0.500 IN. nozzle 4 1 I . Pitot to probe sheath 9 %tu

/ I 12. Pitot to thermocouple (parallel to p o k ) 3'' 2, 956

13. Pitot to thermocouple (perpendicular to probe' UP,

M e e n all €PA design criteria thus C, - 0.84 Does not meet €PA design criteria - thus calibrate in wind tunnel. 0 c,-

Date of inspection: Inspected by:

CFR Tide 40 Pan 60 Appenidix A Method 2 5-348

0-13

Interpol1 Laboratories, Inc. (612) 786-6020

S-Tvoe Pitot Tube lnsoection Sheet

Pitot Tube N o d q-5-

1. External tubing diameter 0,) 31' IN.

2. Base to Side A opening plane (PA)

3. Base to Side B opening plane (Pa

qh8 IN.

' qb8 IN.

Alianment:

5. 0, < 100

Distance from Pitot to Probe Comoonents:

10. Pitot to 0.500 IN. nozzle ' 760 IN.

1 1. Pitot to probe sheath z' IN.

12. Pitot to thermocouple (parallel to probe) 31 0 IN.

13. Pitot to thermocouple (perpendicular to probe) I 7 c O IN.

X M e e t s al l EPA design criteria thus C, - 0.84 0 Does not meet EPA design criteria - thus calibrate in wind tunnel.

CP -

Date of Inspection: Inspected by:

CFR Title 40 Parr 60 Appenidix A Merhod 2 5-348

~

I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I

I I

Actual Mercury Ambient Temperature Adjusted Mercury Initial Aneroid Difference Barometer Read Temp. Correction Barometer Read Barometer Read (P, - Pbm)

Factor -

I I I

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (6 12) 786-6020

Stack Sampling Department - QA Aneroid Barometer Calibration Sheet

Date L-tU-7L Technician Go4 A. Mercury Column Barometer No. c A X (

/tI> > ? 02-7 Aneroid Barometer No.

II Has this barometer shown any consistent problems with calibration! YedNo. If yes, explain.

Has problem been alleviated? YedNo. How?

Note: Aneroid barometers will be calibrated periodically against a mercury column barometer. The aneroid barometer to be calibrated should be placed in close proximiw to the mercury barometer and left to equilibrate for 20 - 30 minutes before calibrating. Aneroid barometer will be calibrated to the adjusted mercury barometer readings.

01 1794-C:\STACK\WP\FORMN-312

D-15

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC. (6 1 2) 786-6020

Stack Sampling Department - QA Aneroid Barometer Calibration Sheet

- Actual Mercury Ambient Temperature Adjusted Mercury Initial Aneroid Barometer Read Temp. Correction Barometer Read Barometer Read

Factor

as. ZL 7% 8 1 3 1 2 7.13 2 9.2/

Date X-12-76 Technician SF

Aneroid Barometer No. Z:o?p ,o/n Mercury Column Barometer No. x.*- 1u-

1

I I

Has this barometer shown any consistent problems with calibration? Yes/No. If yes, explain. I

I I Has problem been alleviated! YedNo. How?

Note: Aneroid barometers will be calibrated periodically against a mercury column barometer. The aneroid I I

barometer to be calibrated should be placed in close proximity to the mercury barometer and left to equili,brate for 20 - 30 minutes before calibrating. Aneroid barometer will be calibrated to the adjusted mercury barometer readings.

I 01 1794-G:KTAC~WP\FORM5\5-312

0-16

I' I I I I I' I I i I I. I I I I

I I I

i

Actual Mercury Barometer Read

INTERPOLL LABORATORIES, INC.

Stack Sampling Department - QA Aneroid Barometer Calibration Sheet

(61 2) 786-6020

Ambient Temperature Adjusted Mercury Initial Aneroid Difference Temp. Correction Barometer Read Barometer Read (P, - Pbm)

Factor

Date 7-s-9 6 Technician 06 Zt-Yt~J Mercury Column Barometer No. t Aneroid Barometer No. / 07 = y o e y

Has this barometer shown any consistent problems.with calibration? Yes/No. If yes, explain.

Has problem been alleviated? Yes/No. How?

Note: Aneroid barometers will be calibrated periodically against a mercury column barometer. The aneroid barometer to be calibrated should be placed in close proximity to the mercury barometer and left to equilibrate for 20 - 30 minutes before calibrating. Aneroid barometer will be calibrated to the adjusted mercury barometer readings.

01 17946:KTACK\WP\FORMSU-3 12

D-17