Avetta Performance Report
Transcript of Avetta Performance Report
Table of Contents • Foreword • Key Survey Results • Recommendations
01
Section 1: Section 2: Opportunities for Growth
Program Results
02
The supplier prequalification process is an enormous administrative burden that can impact project timelines while increasing operational costs. Avetta partners with companies to enhance supply chain visibility, increase efficiency of supplier qualification process and eliminate manual effort involved in contractor management.
While we have proven results in reducing administrative burden by 75%, this is not just the only benefit that comes with leveraging Avetta’s contractor management solution. Less tangible, but very real are the benefits that come with compliant workplace, safer workers, zero penalties and a better reputation.
Avetta relieves its clients of significant administrative burden by collecting and verifying supplier responses on the basis of their unique compliance requirements – performing the work of 550+ full-time employees and saving them USD millions annually in operational costs.
By leveraging Avetta’s contractor management solution, companies can make great strides when it comes to improving safety metrics. With the ability to report on a contractor’s compliance status anytime, operators can make informed decisions to keep the workplace safer. What’s more, the longer suppliers stay within the Avetta network, the better they perform year-over-year.
For this survey report, Avetta delved into the supplier performance data for one of its key clients – GlobalCo, Inc., to understand global impact of its contractor management program on GlobalCo, Inc.’s business, the overall safety trends observed, top performing trades, program efficiency and so on.
ForewordTogether We Are Better
03
Key Survey ResultsFor the �������������������������� ��� on the Avetta platform, we analyzed 3-years of OSHA safety metrics before they joined Avetta platform. These results were compared to 2019 safety performance metrics (2020 performance metrics will be published in April 2021). We also compared 2019 performance metrics to industry average rates. The safety metrics used for benchmarking included:
Number of OSHA recordable incidents per 200,000 hours
Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate (TRIFR):
Number of accidents per 1,000,000 total hours
Number of fatalities, permanent and temporary disabilities per 1,000,000 total hours
Recordable injuries per 1,000,000 hour
Accident Frequency Rate (AFR):
Lost Time Frequency Rate (LTFR):
Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR):
05
1. GlobalCo, Inc. Successfully Improved its Global Supplier Safety Metrics After implementing Avetta’s solution, GlobalCo, Inc. witnessed a 39% drop in TRIF rates within its supplier base in Canada, 27% drop in supplier AFR rates across UK and 29% drop in TRIR within the US supplier market.
Canada (310)Total Recordable Injury Frequency (TRIF)
39%
UK (221)Accident Frequency Rate (AFR)
27%
US (3,708)Total Recordable Incidents rate (TRIR)
29%
GlobalCo, Inc. Improved Global Supplier Safety by 27% - 39% in 2019
Figure 1: Better Supplier Safety Outcomes
06
The Program Outperformed All US Companies Surveyed by BLS by an Average of 33% in 2019
BLSAverage
GlobalCo, Inc.0
1
2
TRIR
-34%
GlobalCo, Inc.0
1
DART
-26%
GlobalCo, Inc.0
0.5
LWCR
-39%
BLSAverage
BLSAverage
GlobalCo, Inc. US 2019
US Suppliers
0 11
1.5
2
TRIR
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 10.6
0.8
1
1.2
DART
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-7%Yearly Decline
-7%Yearly Decline
0 10.3
0.4
LWCR
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-8%Yearly Decline
0.5
0.6
0.7
Figure 2: Outperforming Industry Benchmarks
Number of Years in Avetta Number of Years in Avetta Number of Years in Avetta
Figure 2 is based on 54,000 suppliers within the Avetta network. It gives a potential look into a continued partnership with Avetta over the next 10 years.
2. Positive ROI from E�ciency Gain and Increased Savings The GlobalCo, Inc. Supply Chain Risk Management program is expected to help the company save USD 12 million annually through software development, better program management and savings arising from accident avoidance. Here are some of the findings that contributed to this figure:
GlobalCo, Inc. avoided internal software development cost of $100,000 in Y1 and $50,000 in annual roadmap & maintenance (conservative estimate)
GlobalCo, Inc.'s average incident reduction rate of 29% based on 2019 data
A Cost/Incident of $37,990 and Cost/Fatality of $1.3M based on National Safety Council (NSC) estimates
A supplier loss (discontinued, bankruptcy, legal issue) cost of $100,000/Event
A cost avoidance of 170,354 contractor hours at an hourly rate of $76 to manage supply chain risk, compliance and qualification for 4,483 suppliers
07
08
The GlobalCo, Inc.-Avetta Program Is Forecasted to Save $12 Million Annually in Software Development, Program Management and Accident-Avoidance Savings
Self Managed Cost Program Cost (At List)* Savings with Avetta
$15,538,221
$3,639,136
$11,899,085
$2,281,694 $1,303,825 $977,869Safety
$2,281,694 $1,303,825 $977,869Financial
$2,281,694 $1,303,825 $977,869Program Cost
Self Managed cost
Program Cost (At List)*
Savings with Avetta
Total Cost $15,538,221 $3,639,136 $11,899,085
*Program Cost (At List) represents the total cost of implementing Avetta within the entire supply chain. These costs are distributed across the hiring client, suppliers, and workers, and do not represent the total cost on the client. In addition, many suppliers receive discounts or special pricing, so real savings are even higher.
Figure 3: ROI
GlobalCo, Inc. + Supplier Costs
~$800/Supplier
~$800/Supplier
10
1. Analysis by Supplier Trade RevealsContinuous Growth while Uncovering Room for Improvement Avetta identified the top trades of GlobalCo, Inc. suppliers from the total pool of 4239 suppliers and then these top trades were benchmarked against the industry TRIR safety metric averages. Based on the analysis we identified the top trades in the GlobalCo, Inc. that were out-performing industry TRIR safety rates and the trades that were under-performing. According to our analysis, among top ten trades on the basis of supplier count, GlobalCo, Inc.’s suppliers under the Engineering Services trade were underperforming significantly when compared to the market. The suppliers mapped to the trade had 74% higher TRIR compared to the industry average.
In GlobalCo, Inc.’s top 10 trades by supplier count, “engineering services” suppliers are underperforming compared to the market
Top 10 Trades Supplier TRIR vs NAICS TRIR
RoofingContractors
All Other SpecialityTrade Contractors
Other BuildingEquipmentContractors
Electrical Contractorsand Other Wiring
Installation Contractors
Other Services(except Public
Administration)
Plumbing, Heatingand Air-Conditioning
Contractors
Commercial andIndustrial Machinery
and Equipment (exceptAutomotive and Electronic)
Repair and Maintenance
NonresidentialBuilding Contractors
Power and CommunicationLine and Related
Structures Contruction
EngineeringServices
0
2.5
5 4.8
3.5
2.52.34
2.26 2.12
3.1
1.42
2.5
1.551.90
1.68
2
1.43
2.5
0.53
2.20
0.78 0.6
2.3
NAICS TRIR Supplier TRIR
GlobalCo, Inc. Engineering Services suppliers have a 74% higher TRIR compared to the industry average
Figure 4: Room for Improvement
11
GlobalCo, Inc. Engineering services, fiber optic, and fuel dealer suppliers lead the list of underperforming suppliers
NAICS TRIR vs GlobalCo, Inc. TRIR and % Change
Figure 5: Underperforming supplier trades with the highest risk
EngineeringServices
Fuel Dealers Motor andGenerator
Manufacturing
Other NonhazardousWaste Treatment
and Disposal
Fabricated StructuralMetal Manufacturing
Air-Conditioningand Warm Air
Heating Equipmentand Commercial and
Industrial RefrigerationEquipment
Manufacturing
Fibre Optics CableManufacturing
Other BuildingFinishing Contractors
Other Commercialand Industrial
Machinery and Equipment Rental
and Leasing
Architectural Engineering and Related Services
Structural Steel andPrecast Concrete
Contractors
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
284.7%
2.31
0.6
NAICS TRIR Supplier TRIR % Change
Highest risk GlobalCo, Inc. Supplier trades that are underperforming the market
188.4%
4.04
1.4
170.6%
5.95
2.2
140%
5.76
2.4
109.7%
4.82
2.3
86.1%
4.09
2.2
57.8%
4.58
1.0651.1%
2.9
31.8%
5.14
3.9
25.4%
4.01
3.2
4.76
4.4
8.2%
0.7
Besides Engineering Services, GlobalCo, Inc.’s Fiber Optic and Fuel Dealer Suppliers also topped the list of underperforming suppliers.
Suppliers operating across GlobalCo, Inc.’s verticals like roofing, commercial equipment, construction, electrical and power were clearly the safest among the lot.
12
Power andCommunicationLine and Related
StructuresConstruction
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
78%
2.5
0.54
64%
2.2
0.78
Roofing, commercial equipment, construction, electrical and power/comm line suppliers are among GlobalCo, Inc.’s safest suppliers
% Change GlobalCo, Inc. Suppliers TRIR vs NAICS TRIR
Figure 6: The Safest Supplier Verticals
Contruction Roofing Contractors Nonresidential BuildingConstruction
Other Services (exceptPublic Administration)
Electrical Contractorsand Other Wiring
Installation Contractors
Commercial andIndustrial Machinery
and Equipment (exceptAutomotive and Electronic)
Repair and Maintenance
Other Building andEquipment Contractors
All other SpecialityTrade Contractors
Plumbing, heating andAir-Conditioning
Contractors
Supplier TRIR NAICS TRIR % Change
62%
2.8
1.06
54%
3.1
1.42
49%
4.8
2.45
38%
2.5
1.55
28%
22.5
1.43
1.9
1.68
12%2.5
2.26
10%
2.14
15%
13
2. Opportunities to Improve Program E�ciency Avetta benchmarked the time taken to establish each completed compliance connection among GlobalCo, Inc. US suppliers onboarding in 2020. Then GlobalCo, Inc.’s median onboarding time was compared to Avetta’s top 25 clients with a similar supply chain footprint.
GlobalCo, Inc.’s median for Annual Update (AU) was 25 days, less efficient than top
clients’ median
The following were the key findings:
GlobalCo, Inc.’s median time for Pre-Qualification Forms (PQF) was
14 days, less efficient than top clients’ median of 8 days. There is
efficiency opportunity here.
GlobalCo, Inc.’s median completion time was 45
days, close to top clients' median of 43 days.
Onboarding Tasks PQF + AU Less Efficient than Benchmark Average
14
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270
Completion time of top 20 Clients
We benchmarked the time each completed connection took among GlobalCo, Inc. US suppliers onboarding in 2020.
The median onboarding time were compared to our top 25 clients.
A box plot shows 25/50/75-percentiles.
GlobalCo, Inc. median 45 days, close to top
clients’ median 43
GlobalCo, Inc.
Figure 7: Onboarding Completion Time
Completion time of GlobalCo, Inc.
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210Days
Client-Specific Forms: GlobalCo, Inc.’s median is 2 days < 4 days in top clients
Insurance: GlobalCo, Inc.’s 11 < 20 days in top clients
Pre-Qualification Forms (PQF): GlobalCo, Inc.’s 14 > 8 days in top clients
Annual Update (AU): GlobalCo, Inc.’s 25 > 18 days in top clients
Manual Audit: GlobalCo, Inc.’s 45 close to 43 in top clients
Recommendations
Identify key reasons why specific GlobalCo, Inc. trade verticals where underperforming compared to others
Identify key solutions and/or improvement areas to bolster safety standards of GlobalCo, Inc.’s top ten trade verticals
Thoroughly assess onboarding process and identify areas of improvement to lower onboarding time
The following are the some of the key action points uncovered from the survey:
About AvettaAvetta connects global organizations with 100,000+ qualified suppliers, contractors, and vendors across 125+ countries. We support the continued growth of supply chains through trusted contractor prequalification, safety audits, monitoring, and more. With real results in reducing incidents, our highly configurable solutions elevate safety and sustainability inevery workplace.
© 2021 Avetta, LLC Let’s connect at �������