AVERTIN FOR TETANUS
Transcript of AVERTIN FOR TETANUS
295AVERTIN FOR TETANUS.-ANTENATAL CLINICS.
frequency during dark adaptation rises. In thefirst case the cones are functioning, in the second casethe rods. The brightness of the area surroundingthe test patch is the most important factor indetermining whether the critical frequency is of therod or cone type. The outcome of investigationspursued by this method is to confirm what is alreadyknown in connexion with the phenomena of flicker.The " duplicity theory " of a double mechanismdepending on the rods and cones respectively isassumed, and receives support from the resultsobtained. A novel suggestion based on the criticalfrequency of the retinal periphery in bright lightis that the peripheral cones are functionally notidentical with the foveal cones. If this is confirmedit will be in accordance with the known anatomicaldifferences of the cones in the two regions.
AVERTIN FOR TETANUS.
The first instance, so far as we are aware, of theemployment of avertin to control the spasms oftetanus, is related by Prof. Fritz Momburg and Dr. E.Rotthaus.1 The drug appears to have been of thegreatest possible service. The history of the case isbriefly as follows : On July 21st, 1928, a girl of 7fell down and got a small wound in the left patella.On July 28th, after an incubation period of onlyseven days, convulsions and stiffness of the limbsbegan. On the 29th severe trismus, opisthotonos,and rigidity of limbs supervened. Under avertinnarcosis (0-17 g. per kilo) the wound was excised.Tetanus antitoxin was given intramuscularly, intra-venously, and intrathecally to the extent of 20,000units. During the next six days another 30,000 unitswere injected. During the 12 days following theoperation the child was put under the influence ofavertin 20 times. On two of the days she was madenarcotic with avertin no less than three times. Thedosage ranged between 0.1 g. and 0-18 g. per kilo ofbody-weight, and altogether she received 63-8 g. Theworst days were the sixth to eighth, and the mostdistressing symptom was the terrible diaphragmatic"cramp. For control of this, chloroform and oxygenwere employed, and several times respiration ceasedentirely. From the fourteenth day onward therewere no convulsions, and the trismus diminished.On the forty-ninth day the child was discharged well.The authors are of opinion that the relief affordedby avertin during the acute stages of the illnesswas greater than any they had ever witnessed fromother sedatives in similar conditions.
ANTENATAL CLINICS.
AN official memorandum2 outlining the organisationof a modern antenatal clinic, and the minimum scope Iof its activities, is likely to be scrutinised with jealous I.care, for this welfare scheme has not been accepted socordially by doctors, midwives or, indeed, by patients,.as have the infant clinics. In fact, the exhaustivescheme accepted by the Representative Meeting ofthe British Medical Association last month mentionedthe existence of antenatal centres only to expressfirmly the opinion that the usual routine work donethere could be done quite as well at the consultingroom of the doctor or at the home of the patient.Since, however, a national scheme which mightrender antenatal centres superfluous is as yet only in’the stage of a resolution of the RepresentativeBody, the views of the Ministry of Health on
the organisation and duties of these centres arewelcome.No encroachment on professional interests is
threatened by the memorandum ; on the contrary,
1 Deutsch. Med. Woch., July 21st, 1929, p. 1164.2 Maternal Mortality in Childbirth. Antenatal Clinics : their
Conduct and Scope. Mem, 145/M.C.W. 1929, H.M. StationeryOffice.
emphasis is laid on the advisory nature of the clinics,and on the desirability of restricting their work rigidlyto the supervision of normal pregnancies. It isreasonable to demand that supervision must beadequate, since a false sense of security may do evenmore harm than neglect. A distinction made by theMinistry of Health between consulting clinics, staffedby expert obstetricians, for which no rules are laiddown, and examination clinics, such as those sub-sidised by voluntary organisations or municipalities.The medical officer of one of these examinationclinics, whether giving whole or part timeservice, should be trained and experienced bothin obstetrics and antenatal work, and shouldhave held a resident appointment in a maternityhospital or at least three months’ post-graduateinstruction at a recognised school. His first duty is toadvise patients coming independently or sent byhealth visitors to book their confinements withdoctor or midwife forthwith. When midwives sendcases they are to be encouraged themselves to attend,and to make the necessary examinations under super-vision, so as to avoid duplication, but every patientshould be examined by a doctor at least twice duringpregnancy. The suggestion is made that on bookinga case the midwife should ascertain the name of thedoctor the patient would wish to employ in case ofneed during labour, and should inform him of thispossibility, and of the antenatal condition. Doctorsmay not altogether welcome a form of contingentbooking which morally binds them to be available ifdifficulties occur, but on the other hand an unexpectedsummons to an unknown case may be even moreunsatisfactory. Whatever the outcome of the labour,the midwife is to be asked to report to the clinic on itscourse, the local authority being advised to offer a smallfee for a courtesy which is indispensable to the collec-tion of reliable statistics. When a doctor has beenbooked for the confinement, and his patient attendsthe clinic, no examination should be made without hisconsent; he also is to be asked to report to the medicalofficer on the labour, no fee being mentioned in this’connexion. Since, however, it is laid down that adoctor wishing to transfer the whole or part of theantenatal care of a patient to a clinic should be able todo so, he stands to gain so much from the facilitiesto be offered, which include reports on abnormal cases,that he is not likely to grudge information inreturn.The reservation of beds in hospitals for abnormal
maternity cases referred by clinics as well as by doctorsis recommended in the memorandum ; reciprocaladvantage is an arrangement for patients livingfar from the hospitals where they intend to be confinedto attend the nearest clinic during the whole or partof their pregnancy. One brief sentence implies thedesirabliity of the extension of the maternity servicethroughout the country on lines already followed bythe Hampstead local authority-the provision ofobstetric consultants. The minimum number ofroutine examinations, according to the schedule,works out to nine or ten in normal cases, between thefirst examination at the sixteenth week and theconfinement. This number may seem excessive, butmost of the examinations need involve no more than
measurement of uterine height and girth, auscul-tation of fcetal heart, tests of urine, and inquiries asto general health, and can be conducted by the mid-wife. At the thirty-second and thirty-sixth week themedical officer should endeavour to ascertain thepresentation of the foetus and the relation of head topelvis.The disadvantages of any system under which the
doctor who examines a woman during pregnancy doesnot conduct her labour are obvious. But antenatalcentres staffed by medical officers, to which practisingmidwives are welcomed with their patients, are a
compromise which succeeds in providing for medicalsupervision in cases deemed to be normal, and for thediagnosis of abnormal ones, who are referred to thedoctor concerned. In the present transitional stageof our maternity services it is not easy to suggest a