AUDIENCE FEEDBACK

My first question got a very good response. Everyone who answered this question thought my magazine is conventional.

My second question also received a good response. I got given a lot of constructive criticisms of how I could improve, and also some positive feedback.

Everyone who answered this question believed that the layout of my magazine is conventional for a pop magazine. Which was excellent feedback!

All but one of the people that answered this question believe that the images In my magazine represent a typical pop magazine. This is good feedback, and shows that I have understood how to make images look effective and conventional.

People who answered this question thought my colour and images were most effective, closely followed by the layout. However the font didn’t get a very high rating. I now know what the font of my magazine is what I need to improve on the most.

I then asked a final question, ‘how could I improve?.’ The majority of people that answered this question believed that I could improve on the font, and perhaps add a consistent colour scheme throughout the entire magazine.