Audience Engagement 2.0

37
Audience Engagement 2.0 Daniel Maxson

description

Audience Engagement 2.0. Daniel Maxson. What Is The Project?. Drive news based behavior Encourage volunteerism against hunger in the Champaign-Urbana metro area. Who is the Client?. WILL Mission WILL enriches people’s lives through programs that educate, entertain, inspire, and empower - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Audience Engagement 2.0

Page 1: Audience Engagement 2.0

Audience Engagement 2.0

Daniel Maxson

Page 2: Audience Engagement 2.0

What Is The Project?

• Drive news based behavior• Encourage volunteerism against hunger in the

Champaign-Urbana metro area

Page 3: Audience Engagement 2.0

Who is the Client?

• WILL– Mission• WILL enriches people’s lives through programs that

educate, entertain, inspire, and empower– Vision• WILL will be the model for public media, engaging our

communities and audiences in media, programs and services that support a healthy democracy and culture.

Page 4: Audience Engagement 2.0

Show Me Results!

• TV Storyboard execution• Radio execution• Online execution

Page 5: Audience Engagement 2.0

Big Idea

• We can fit volunteering into any schedule or budget.

Page 6: Audience Engagement 2.0

TV Execution

Page 7: Audience Engagement 2.0

TV Execution

Page 8: Audience Engagement 2.0

Online Execution

Page 9: Audience Engagement 2.0

Radio Execution

• 00:15• Wish you could volunteer but you never have

time? <name> can help. Visit our website at <url> and find opportunities that fit in your schedule and budget. There is no commitment required and we have tasks that fit in even the most hectic schedule. Visit <url> today to learn how to volunteer on your terms.

Page 10: Audience Engagement 2.0

Radio Execution

• 00:15• Think you don’t have time to volunteer? Think

again. At <name> we find volunteer tasks that can fit into any schedule and budget. There is no commitment required. Visit <url> today to learn how you can fit volunteering into your life.

Page 11: Audience Engagement 2.0

Radio Execution

• 00:15• Who has time to volunteer between working

two jobs? Everyone. At <name> we find quick, easy volunteer tasks so you can help feed the community while still having time for yourself. There is no commitment involved, so visit <url> to learn what you can do to help fight hunger.

Page 12: Audience Engagement 2.0

Tell Me Why

• Research• Strategy

Page 13: Audience Engagement 2.0

Research

• Secondary– Two distinct motivations for volunteering• Personal• Altruistic

– Long-term volunteers want more feedback– Provided framework for thinking about volunteers

among our audience

Page 14: Audience Engagement 2.0

Research

• Primary– Conducted seven interviews– Target was “long-term” volunteers– Some were leaders, others were followers– Some found by referral, others by CUVolunteer

Page 15: Audience Engagement 2.0

Research

• Primary – Insights– Volunteering is a “personal commitment”• Motivation is internal

– Diverse reasons for volunteering– Reasons for not volunteering• Not enough time• Fear of obligation

Page 16: Audience Engagement 2.0

Strategy

• SWOT• Positioning• Unique Selling Point

Page 17: Audience Engagement 2.0

SWOT

• Broken down by stakeholder– GroundCntrl– Illinois Public Media– The project itself

Page 18: Audience Engagement 2.0

GroundCntrl

• Strengths– Strongest metric tracking available on the market

for web-based activity organization– “Mission” completion requires tangible evidence – Users can upload content

Page 19: Audience Engagement 2.0

GroundCntrl

• Weaknesses– Still in beta stage– Recently rebranded from “Common Deeds”– Heavily marketed to project managers as opposed

to project participants

Page 20: Audience Engagement 2.0

GroundCntrl

• Opportunities– New niche– Interest in location-based badges demonstrated

by predecessors like Foursquare

Page 21: Audience Engagement 2.0

GroundCntrl

• Threats– Success highly dependent on user buy-in and

sustained interest

Page 22: Audience Engagement 2.0

WILL – Illinois Public Media

• Strengths– Well-established in local community– History of driving audience engagement– Recognized and trusted

Page 23: Audience Engagement 2.0

WILL – Illinois Public Media

• Weaknesses– Poor web presence– Conflicted on target audience– Poor social media focus

Page 24: Audience Engagement 2.0

WILL – Illinois Public Media

• Opportunities– Audience uses radio as a significant source of

news– Loyal audience

Page 25: Audience Engagement 2.0

WILL – Illinois Public Media

• Threats– Political backlash if controversial subjects are

brought up

Page 26: Audience Engagement 2.0

The Project

• Strengths– It serves a need identified by last semester’s

student researchers– GroundCtrl provides the means to track success– WILL is already a respected part of its community

Page 27: Audience Engagement 2.0

The Project

• Weaknesses– Diverse stakeholders– No monetization strategy– Key visionary players

Page 28: Audience Engagement 2.0

The Project

• Opportunities– Receptive audience

Page 29: Audience Engagement 2.0

The Project

• Threats– Interface design may discourage use

Page 30: Audience Engagement 2.0

Strategy

• Objective– Our objective for this campaign will be shaped by

the needs of our partner organizations. Abstractly, we want people to use our service as a way to fit volunteering into their lives in spite of any obstacles to regular volunteering.

Page 31: Audience Engagement 2.0

Positioning Statement

For people inclined to volunteer in Champaign-Urbana, this product will provide a centralized platform to discover timely opportunities to serve their community’s needs. Users will be able to track their activity, and reap rewards for achieving pre-set milestones. The system will be available online and via a mobile app.

Page 32: Audience Engagement 2.0

Target Audience

• Casual volunteers• Home-owner• College-educated• Employed• Married with children

Page 33: Audience Engagement 2.0

Competition

• CUVolunteer– Already serves as a virtually comprehensive source

of volunteer opportunities in the Champaign-Urbana area

– Planning to cooperate with them

Page 34: Audience Engagement 2.0

Competition

• Groundcrew– Already offers mobile location-based tasks– Does not provide automated feedback– Is not tied into reporting

Page 35: Audience Engagement 2.0

Points of Differentiation

• Automated feedback process for volunteer• Mobile application• “Social network”

Page 36: Audience Engagement 2.0

But Is It Sustainable?

• Conditionally, yes– Cost-benefit– Not all-purpose– Visionaries– Buy-in

Page 37: Audience Engagement 2.0

Questions?

?