Auckland Development Committee. Agenda Dec 2015

8/20/2019 Auckland Development Committee. Agenda Dec 2015

1/137

Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policyunless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contactthe relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson.

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Auckland Development Committee will be heldon:

Date:Time:Meeting Room:Venue:

Tuesday, 8 December 2015 9:30am Reception Lounge, Level 2Auckland Town Hall301-305 Queen StreetAuckland

Auckland Development Committee

OPEN AGENDA

MEMBERSHIP

Chairperson Deputy Mayor Penny Hulse Deputy Chairperson Cr Chris Darby Members Cr Anae Arthur Anae Cr Calum Penrose

Cr Cameron Brewer Cr Dick Quax Mayor Len Brown, JP Cr Sharon Stewart, QSM Cr Dr Cathy Casey Member David Taipari Cr Bill Cashmore Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBE Cr Ross Clow Cr Wayne Walker Cr Linda Cooper, JP Cr John Watson Cr Alf Filipaina Cr Penny Webster Cr Hon Christine Fletcher, QSO Cr George Wood, CNZM Cr Denise KrumCr Mike LeeMember Liane Ngamane

(Quorum 11 members)

Tam White, Democracy Advisor3 December 2015 Contact Telephone: (09) 890 8156Email : [email protected]: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

Please note: Any attachment s listed within this agenda as “Under Separate Cover” can be foundat the Auckland Council website http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/ .

http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/


2/137

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Responsibilities

This committee will lead the implementation of the Auckland Plan, including the integration ofeconomic, social, environmental and cultural objectives for Auckland for the next 30 years. It willguide the physical development and growth of Auckland through a focus on land use planning,housing and the appropriate provision of infrastructure and strategic projects associated with theseactivities. Key responsibilities include:

Unitary Plan

Plan changes to operative plans

Designation of Special Housing Areas

Housing policy and projects including Papakainga housing

Spatial Plans including Area Plans

City centre development (incl reporting of CBD advisory board) and city transformation projects

Tamaki regeneration projects

Built Heritage

Urban design

Powers

(i) Allpowers necessary to perform the committee’s responsibilities.

Except:

(a) powers that the Governing Body cannot delegate or has retained to itself (seeGoverning Body responsibilities)

(b) where the committee’s responsibility is explicitly limited to mak ing a recommendationonly

(ii) Approval of a submission to an external body

(iii) Powers belonging to another committee, where it is necessary to make a decision prior to thenext meeting of that other committee.

(iv) Power to establish subcommittees.


3/137

Exclusion of the public – who needs to leave the meeting

Members of the public

All members of the public must leave the meeting when the public are excluded unless a resolutionis passed permitting a person to remain because their knowledge will assist the meeting.

Those who are not members of the public

General principles

Access to confidential information is managed on a “need to know” basis where access to theinformation is required in order for a person to perform their role.

Those who are not members of the meeting (see list below) must leave unless it is necessaryfor them to remain and hear the debate in order to perform their role.

Those who need to be present for one confidential item can remain only for that item and mustleave the room for any other confidential items.

In any case of doubt, the ruling of the chairperson is final.

Members of the meeting

The members of the meeting remain (all Governing Body members if the meeting is aGoverning Body meeting; all members of the committee if the meeting is a committee meeting).

However, standing orders require that a councillor who has a pecuniary conflict of interest leavethe room.

All councillors have the right to attend any meeting of a committee and councillors who are notmembers of a committee may remain, subject to any limitations in standing orders.

Independent M āori Statutory Board

Members of the Independent M āori Statutory Board who are appointed members of thecommittee remain.

Independent M āori Statutory Board members and staff remain if this is necessary in order forthem to perform their role.

Staff

All staff supporting the meeting (administrative, senior management) remain. Other staff who need to because of their role may remain.

Local Board members

Local Board members who need to hear the matter being discussed in order to perform theirrole may remain. This will usually be if the matter affects, or is relevant to, a particular LocalBoard area.

Council Controlled Organisations

Representatives of a Council Controlled Organisation can remain only if required to fordiscussion of a matter relevant to the Council Controlled Organisation.


4/137


5/137

Auckland Development Committee 08 December 2015

Page 5

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

1 Apologies 7

2 Declaration of Interest 7

3 Confirmation of Minutes 7

4 Petitions 7

5 Public Input 7

5.1 Panuku Development Auckland's Transform class (formally knownas Type 1) urban renewal program - Ben Ross 7

6 Local Board Input 8

7 Extraordinary Business 8

8 Notices of Motion 8

9 Reports Pending Status Update 9

10 Summary of information memos and briefings - 8 December 2015 13

11 Auckland Development Committee Work Programme 2015/2016 -December Update 15

12 Priority Development Locations and Panuku Development Auckland WorkProgramme 27

13 Approach for making decisions on the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan 89

14 Heritage Advisory Panel Recommendation-Kings School 101

15 Unitary Plan Committee forward work programme 107

16 Consideration of Extraordinary Items

PUBLIC EXCLUDED17 Procedural Motion to Exclude the Public 111

C1 Confidential Reports Pending Status Update 111

C2 Pakuranga Town Centre Delegation of Authority Approval 112

C3 Special Housing Areas Tranche 9: Recommendations 112

C4 Special Housing Areas Tranche 9: Further Recommendations 112 3

The report was not available when the agenda to print and will be circulatedprior to the meeting.

C5 Housing for Older Persons: Procurement of a Preferred CommunityHousing Provider Partner 114

The report was not available when the agenda to print and will be circulatedprior to the meeting.


6/137


7/137


Page 7

1 Apologies

Apologies from Cr JG Walker and Cr WD Walker have been received.

2 Declaration of Interest

Members are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision makingwhen a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other externalinterest they might have.

3 Confirmation of Minutes

That the Auckland Development Committee:

a) confirm the ordinary minutes of its meeting, held on Thursday, 12 November 2015,including the confidential section, as a true and correct record.

4 Petitions

At the close of the agenda no requests to present petitions had been received.

5 Public Input

Standing Order 7.7 provides for Public Input. Applications to speak must be made to theDemocracy Advisor, in writing, no later than one (1) clear working day prior to themeeting and must include the subject matter. The meeting Chairperson has the discretionto decline any application that does not meet the requirements of Standing Orders. Amaximum of thirty (30) minutes is allocated to the period for public input with five (5) minutes speaking time for each speaker.

5.1 Panuku Development Auckland's Transform class (formally known as Type 1)urban renewal program - Ben Ross

Purpose1. To address the committee in relation to:

- Urban location analysis information and results

- Manukau City Centre (one of the short listed transform options)

Executive Summary2. Ben Ross has submitted further information in support of his address (Attachments A

& B).

Recommendation/sThat the Auckland Development Committee:

a) thank Ben Ross for his presentation.

Attachments A Urban Renewal Programe ........................................................................ 117B Manukau City Centre - transform project .................................................. 127


8/137


Page 8

6 Local Board Input

Standing Order 6.2 provides for Local Board Input. The Chairperson (or nominee of thatChairperson) is entitled to speak for up to five (5) minutes during this time. TheChairperson of the Local Board (or nominee of that Chairperson) shall wherever practical,give one (1) day ’s notice of their wish to speak. The meeting Chairperson has the

discretion to decline any application that does not meet the requirements of StandingOrders.

This right is in addition to the right under Standing Order 6.1 to speak to matters on theagenda.

At the close of the agenda no requests for local board input had been received.

7 Extraordinary Business

Section 46A(7) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (as

amended) states:

“An item that is not on the agenda for a meeting may be dealt with at that meeting if-

(a) The local authority by resolution so decides; and

(b) The presiding member explains at the meeting, at a time when it is open to thepublic,-

(i) The reason why the item is not on the agenda; and

(ii) The reason why the discussion of the item cannot be delayed until asubsequent meeting.”

Section 46A(7A) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (asamended) states:

“Where an item is not on the agenda for a meeting, -

(a) That item may be discussed at that meeting if-

(i) That item is a minor matter relating to the general business of the localauthority; and

(ii) the presiding member explains at the beginning of the meeting, at a timewhen it is open to the public, that the item will be discussed at the meeting;but

(b) no resolution, decision or recommendation may be made in respect of that itemexcept to refer that item to a subsequent meeting of the local authority for furtherdiscussion.”

8 Notices of Motion

At the close of the agenda no requests for notices of motion had been received.


9/137

I t e m

9


Reports Pending Status Update Page 9

Reports Pending Status Update

File No.: CP2015/26048

Purpose1. To update the committee on the status of Auckland Development Committee resolutions

from February 2015, requiring follow-up reports.

Executive Summary2. This report is a regular information-only report that provides committee members with

greater visibility of committee resolutions requiring follow-up reports (Attachment A). Itupdates the committee on the status of such resolutions. It covers committee resolutionsfrom February 2015 and will be updated for every regular meeting.

3. This report covers open resolutions only. A separate report has been placed in theconfidential agenda covering confidential resolutions requiring follow up reports.


a) receive the reports pending status update.

AttachmentsNo. Title Page

A Reports Pending Status Update 11

Signatories Author Tam White - Democracy Advisor Authoriser Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy


10/137


11/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

9


Reports Pending Status Update Page 11


12/137


13/137

I t e m

1 0


Summary of information memos and briefings - 8 December 2015 Page 13

Summary of information memos and briefings - 8 December 2015

File No.: CP2015/26145

Purpose1. To receive a summary and provide a public record of memos or briefing papers that may

have been distributed to committee members since 15 October 2015.

Executive Summary2. This is a regular information-only report which aims to provide greater visibility of information

circulated to committee members via memo or other means, where no decisions arerequired.

3. The following presentations/memos/reports were presented/circulated as follows:

3 November 2015 – Civic Administration Building – shortlisted parties (confidential)

10 November 2015 – Special Housing Areas (T9) (Confidential)

24 November 2015 – Joint CCO Governance & Monitoring and Auckland DevelopmentCommittee – Panuku Development Auckland overall development program(confidential)

1 December 2015:

a. Treaty of Waitangi obligations (confidential)

b. Housing for Older persons housing (confidential)

c. City Centre Integration update.

d. Downtown Public Spaces

e. Draft Aotea Quarter Frameworkf. Manukau Interchange update

g. Pakuranga Town Centre update (confidential)

h. Memo update on the route protection phase of the Additional Harbour Crossing(AWHC).

4. These and previous documents can be be found on the Auckland Council website, at thefollowing link:

http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/

o at the top of the page, select meeting “Auckland Development Committee” from the drop -down tab and click ‘View’;

o Under ‘Attachments’, select either HTML or PDF version of the document entitled ‘Extra Attachments’

5. Note that, unlike an agenda report, staff will not be present to answer questions aboutthese items referred to in this summary. Committee members should direct any questionsto the authors.


a) receive the summary of information memos and briefings – 12 November 2015.

http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/


14/137

Item 1

0


Summary of information memos and briefings - 8 December 2015 Page 14


A City Centre Integration update (Under Separate Cover) B Downtown Public Spaces (Under Separate Cover) C Towards the Aotea Quarter Framework feedback report (Under Separate

Cover) D Draft Aotea Quarter Framework (Under Separate Cover) E Manukau Interchange update (Under Separate Cover) F Memo update on future proofing on the route protection for the Additional

Waitemata Harbour Crossing (Under Separate Cover)

Signatories Author Tam White - Democracy Advisor

Authoriser Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy


15/137

I t e m

1 1


Auckland Development Committee Work Programme 2015/2016 - December Update Page 15

Auckland Development Committee Work Programme 2015/2016 -December Update

File No.: CP2015/25145

Purpose1. To report progress against the Auckland Development Committee (ADC) forward work

programme during the period July - December 2015, and outline the forward programme forthe period February - September 2016.

Executive Summary2. The Auckland Development Committee adopted a forward work programme in June 2015, to

assist the committee to deliver on its priorities and manage work flow. This report tracks theprogress against the work programme. It highlights the key decisions that the committee hasmade in the last six months, and provides an update of the programme extended toSeptember 2016.


a) note progress against the forward work programme from July – December 2015, andnote the updated programme to September 2016.

Comments3. The Auckland Development Committee adopted a forward work programme in June 2015, to

assist the committee to deliver on its priorities and manage work flow. All committees of thewhole and most reporting committees have now adopted forward work programmes. This isone of a range of initiatives that are part of the Council’s quality policy advice programme,and responds to elected member requests to improve the quality of advice provided.

4. The majority of the reports on ADC agendas since June 2015 have been directly related tothe work programme. As noted, when the programme was adopted, there will always beunanticipated reports but these have been the exception.

Key decisions July 2015 – December 2015

5. The committee has made a number of significant decisions since adopting the programme.These are recorded in attachment A and include:

a. approving 10 SHAs in tranche 8, with recommendations for tranche 9 on this agenda

b. adopting the Future Urban Land Supply Strategy to guide the timing and sequencing ofrelease of land zoned future urban

c. approving a land exchange at Three Kings to enable a significant brownfieldsdevelopment in a central isthmus location

d. approving a master plan for 20 hectares of council owned land at Hobsonville Pointwhich will include 14 hectares of housing and 6 hectares of commercial development

e. approving the commencement of stage two, the redevelopment stage, at Tamaki.

f. agreeing council positions on a number of matters that are the subject of ProposedUnitary Plan (PAUP) hearings

g. agreeing the Aotea Framework discussion document for public consultationh. agreeing a set of requirements to guide the redevelopment of the Civic Administration

Building, and approving an expression of interest process.


16/137

Item 1

1



6. This agenda also includes recommendations to:

a. enter into a contract with a community housing provider, to partner with council to deliverHousing for Older Persons services

b. endorse the proposed Panuku Development Auckland development programme.

Work programme to September 2016

7. The work programme has been updated and extended to September 2016 (Attachment B).Items that have been completed, or are no longer progressing, have been removed from theprogramme. There are two additions to the programme which are submissions to theforthcoming Local Government Act Amendment Bill (depending on scope), and to the newProductivity Commission Inquiry into urban planning matters.

8. The committee will continue to make important decisions in the first half of 2016. It will alsoadopt the Auckland Unitary Plan in August 2016, following receipt of recommendations fromthe Independent Hearings Panel in July 2016.

Consideration

Local Board views and implications9. Local board work programmes will be developed in early 2016. The work programmes of

Governing Body committees will help inform these.

Māori impact statement 10. The projects and processes reported to this committee have a range of implications for

Māori which are considered when the work is reported. Formal monitoring of progress onexpenditure and delivery of Māori transformational acti vity is undertaken through theFinance and Performance Committee.

Implementation11. Staff will continue to monitor reporting to the committee against the agreed workprogramme.


A Auckland Development Committee Forward Work Programme 2015-2016,six monthly review

17

B Auckland Development Committee Forward Work Programme 2015-2016,updated to September 2016

23

Signatories Author Catherine Syme - Chief Advisor Authorisers Dean Kimpton - Chief Operating Officer

Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy


17/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 1




18/137

A

m

A

m




19/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 1




20/137

A

m

A

m




21/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 1




22/137

A

m

A

m




23/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t B

I t e m

1 1




24/137

A

m

B

m




25/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t B

I t e m

1 1




26/137

A

m

B

m




27/137

I t e m

1 2


Priority Development Locations and Panuku Development Auckland Work Programme Page 27

Priority Development Locations and Panuku Development AucklandWork Programme

File No.: CP2015/25948

Purpose1. The purpose of this paper is to:

a. Report on the process and progress made by Panuku Development Auckland inconsidering the shortlisted Town Centre locations provided by Auckland Council on 15October 2015.

b. Provide a recommendation on the two locations that have been selected as“Transform” locations for approval by the Committee.

c. Provide updated thinking on the wider Panuku Development Work Programme,including the “Unlock” and “Support” locations.

Executive Summary2. On 15 October 2015, the Auckland Development Committee (ADC) formally endorsed the

shortlist of nine locations, established through the Location Analysis Process, to handover toPanuku Development Auckland for further investigation.

3. Panuku has drawn from the Council qualitative and quantitative material and undertaken anassessment focused on our understanding of the role of Panuku and the use of additionalinformation.

4. The main steps in the decision making process have been to:

a. Review the material (assessment criteria and nine locations) from the AucklandCouncil Location Analysis Project

b. Review Auckland Council Property Limited (ACPL) and Waterfront Auckland (WA)legacy development projects

c. Develop decision making criteria, specific to the role and function of Panuku

d. Pursue conversations with potential development partners

e. Consult within the Council family, including the DPO and Auckland Transport, withregard to timing and deliverability

f. Consider available Panuku resources.

5. In particular, Panuku has used the following points to reference discussion and analysis:

a. Critical mass of Council land holdings (scale) and the ability to stage quicker wins withlong term goals (impact). A key part of this is community readiness for change.

b. Partnership opportunities, particularly with the Crown, but also within the Councilfamily in agreeing joint objectives

c. Ability to leverage off previous public and private investment and consider futureinvestment

d. Commercial proposition of the development site, or sites, and the marketattractiveness

e. Location of areas that have excellent access to public transport.

f. A focus on do-ability


28/137

Item 1

2



6. From this work, development categorisations were formed, this is summarised in Figure One and further detailed in the main body of the report.

Figure One: Development Strategy

7. The involvement of Panuku in the three types of locations will be different from place toplace. Numerically there will be more Support Locations than there will be Unlock andTransform. All locations will play their part over time to the Panuku Development WorkProgramme. The Support and Unlock locations will be a dynamic category, as it isrecognised that the facts can change on the ground depending on new sites or developmentopportunities and partnerships that can become available.

8. Panuku has now identified 17 locations that will form part of the development workprogramme. Pertinent to this decision making paper is the recommendation that Panukuoperate in two additional ‘Transform’ locations:

a. Manukau Metropolitan Centre and surroundsb. Onehunga Town Centre and Port.

9. These two areas provide the greatest opportunity for Panuku to catalyse high quality urbanredevelopment at a scale, in conjunction with the Crown and the private sector, resulting in:

a. Creation of a well-designed safe and healthy built environment, with good qualitypublic realm

b. An increase in housing supply and residential choices (maintaining existing socialhousing capacity)

c. Economic development opportunities

d. Achievement of certain defined social/environmental/community/economicdevelopment goals.

10. The ADC is now asked to note the overall programme and approve the “Transform”locations.


29/137

I t e m

1 2




a) note the material provided on the Priority Development Location Selection processand the emerging Development Work Programme.

b) endorse the two “Transform” locations of Manukau (Town centre and surrounds) andOnehunga (Town centre and Port) as these locations best meet the criteria prioritisedby Panuku given its agreed purpose.

Comments11. On 15 October 2015 the Auckland Development Committee (ADC) formally endorsed the

shortlist of nine locations to handover to Panuku Development Auckland for furtherinvestigation. The shortlisted locations were, in no particular order:

a. Manukau

b. Northcotec. Otahuhu

d. Takapuna

e. Onehunga

f. Avondale

g. Henderson

h. Mt Eden Station

i. Newmarket

Panuku Decision Making Process

12. Since the formation of Panuku in September the Executive and the Board have consideredthe material from Council and formed a view on a future development work programme. Themain steps in our decision making process have been to:

a. Review the material (assessment criteria and nine locations) from the AucklandCouncil Location Analysis Project

b. Review ACPL and WA legacy development projects

c. Develop decision making criteria, specific to the role and function of Panuku

d. Pursue conversations with potential development partners – via Treasury, Ministry ofBusiness Innovation and Employment (MBIE) and Housing New Zealand Corporation(HNZC)

e. Consult within the Council family, including the DPO and Auckland Transport withregard to timing and deliverability

f. Consider available Panuku resources.


30/137

Item 1

2



Reviewing the Auckland Council Assessment Criteria

13. Panuku drew from the assessment objectives and supporting criteria that Council providedthrough the Location Analysis work. We assessed the AC assessment objectives andcriteria and reframed the criteria, largely informed a focus on the role and purpose ofPanuku.

Figure Two: Reviewing the Council Assessment Objectives and establishing Panuku Specific Criteria

Auckland CouncilAssessmentObjectives

Explanation Relevance to Panuku Role and Function?

1. MarketAttractiveness

The locations need to have a degree ofmarket appeal and potential forredevelopment. Given the nature of theredevelopment programmes envisagedconsumer demand for higher density housingis also important.

Yes relevant. Interrogation of specific sites needed toreview redevelopment potential and uncover barriers toredevelopment or sale.

Refer: Key Land Holdings Criteria/CommerciallyViable/Market Criteria.

2. Land andInfluence

The locations need to have council ownedopportunities present and also becomplemented with potential to partner withother land owners (in particular theGovernment and local iwi).

Yes relevant. Fundamental for achieving Panukuobjectives, particularly in areas where Councilownership is fragmented.

Refer: Scale and Impact/ Key LandHoldings/Partnership Criteria

3. Scale The locations need to have significantcapacity for increases in residential andbusiness activity. They must also be highlyaccessible to ensure access to and fromopportunities (particularly employment).

Yes relevant. Fundamental for achieving Panukuobjectives, particularly in areas where Councilownership is fragmented.

Refer: Scale and Impact /Proximity to PT Criteria

4. Timing andEnablement

The locations need to be enabled bynecessary bulk infrastructure and havesufficient planning undertaken to facilitateredevelopment aspirations to progress at

pace.

Yes relevant. Readiness will directly impact abilitiesaround timing for redevelopment.

Refer: Scale and Impact Criteria/Leverage offprevious investment

5. CommunityImpact

The locations need to have communitysupport for change and the necessarycommunity facilities to sustain growth. Theyshould also have opportunities to positivelyimpact on Maori wellbeing and to reducedeprivation.


Refer: Scale and Impact Criteria

6. CapitalComplexity

The locations need to be deliverable in the‘short term’ without the need for signific antunplanned investment, and be alreadyprioritised for public investment tosupport/stimulate redevelopment.


Refer: Scale and Impact Criteria/ Leverage offprevious investment

Figure Three: Panuku Decision Making Criteria

Panuku Refined Criteria

Scale & Impact Ability to achieve increased growth and density capacity as a result of redevelopment (includesunitary plan provisions, infrastructure readiness)

Ability to unlock previous challenges/road blocks within the Auckland Council Family

Lifting the game from the past

Making a material contribution to housing and town centre strategies. Making a difference overtime through results, including providing some quick wins (3 years)

Ability to influence new investment decisions (i.e. decisions pending on major infrastructureprojects to ensure a cohesive/co-ordinated approach)

Extent of Local Board and community planning and readiness for change


31/137

I t e m

1 2



Key LandHoldings

Land holdings currently being managed by Panuku – interrogating the complexities andopportunities of the sites

The number of sites that have development potential

Total hectares of Council family holding

Proximity of Government land holdings and timing for redevelopment

Proximity of Iwi land holdings

Commerciallyviable/marketattractive

Extent to which Panuku can create an environment for the private sector to invest withconfidence

Analysis of current market willingness to invest and attractiveness of the area

Partnershipopportunities

Working with agreed objectives/parameters within the Council family. Agreeing on a jointstrategy

Joint branding and redevelopment of Government land – HNZC, MOE, NZTA, KiwiRailWorking with Iwi

Not for Profit initiatives

Working with the Private sector

Leverage offpreviousinvestment

Ability and opportunity to build on Council or public investment in transport, waste waterinvestment, public space, community facilities

A record of what investment is planned for the short-long term that can also be leveraged off

Proximity toPublic Transport

Accessibility to the Rapid Transit Network (RTN) e.g., rail or dedicated busway (800m)

Accessibility to the Frequent Transport network (FTN) e.g. good local PT connections (400m)

Reviewing the Nine Council Shortlisted Locations

14. Once we agreed the criteria we assessed the nine council locations and the legacydevelopment projects. Using our professional judgement of each of the nine areas anassessment was been made of each location based on criteria. Importantly, we were able toidentify where some of the barriers to development/progress have been historically (physicalor organisational), and discuss “what would Panuku do?”

15. The Executive assessed whether the organisation could make a difference including throughquicker wins or early results (over the next two to three years) in context of the longer term.Some tests were also made of the Strategic Intelligence Group (SIG) analysis of marketattractiveness, based on experience of the development managers in these areas. We drewfrom experience and knowledge of the Local Boards and consultation with them aboutoutstanding issues and the community’s readiness for change.


32/137

Item 1

2



Reviewing ACPL and WA Legacy Development Projects

16. A full review of all of the development projects of the legacy organisations (ACPL and WA)was undertaken. For ACPL projects in particular there was an interrogation of each of theindividual sites and how these might morph into larger opportunities within a geographicarea. Insight into historic and current market interest and commercially viable opportunities

were also provided.Pursuing Partnership Opportunities with Potential Development Partners

17. The Panuku Executive has been actively discussing partnership opportunities with theCrown. The Executive is aware that there are a number of at scale opportunities in particularHNZC land provides a major opportunity.

Working with the Council Family

18. Another area where Panuku is focusing on is how this organisation will work with other partsof Auckland Council particularly Auckland Transport and the new Development ProjectOffice (DPO) which is responsible for consenting and infrastructure co-ordination and

upgrades.Prioritising and Allocating Panuku Resources

19. The work programme outlined in section 8 of this report, indicates that Panuku will beoperating in 17 locations across the Auckland region. Some will require a long termcustodial approach (10 years +) over a wider geographical area, others will be on a sitespecific basis and require a shorter term involvement. The spread of resources within theorganisation needs to be considered and prioritised.

20. It is assumed that current resource or ability to expand is based on accepted parameterse.g. the use of the Development Fund and the ability to capitalise against sale proceeds.There will need to be a business case for the resources required for Transform locations.

Rationale for the Panuku Work Programme

Testing the Nine Shortlisted Locations under Panuku Criteria

21. We considered nine locations provided by Auckland Council against our refined criteria (asoutlined in Figure Three). A summary of the analysis is provided in Figure Four. Areaprofiles are included in Attachment A.

Figure Four: Analysing the Nine Shortlisted locations

PanukuRefinedCriteria

Recommend

ManukauMetropolitanCentre andsurrounds

Significantopportunity inTC, which isamplified withinclusion ofHNZC land.Some sitesready to goafter Panukumaster plan.ZonedMetropolitancenter. Highcapacity forgrowth

AC landownership22.56 ha over30 site.

Panukualreadyinvolved infour key sites

Traditionallychallenging areato generatemarket interest – although recentsome apartmentinterest has beenstrong

HNZC landholdings close toTC and within a3-5km radius ofthe centre.Treasury has aninterest inmeeting housingsupply andsustainableemployment

opportunities

Governmentinvestment inMIT and AUT

High level oftransportinvestment

On RTN withgood local PTconnections

Transformlocation


33/137

I t e m

1 2




Recommend

OnehungaTownCentre andPort

Significantopportunity forscale andimpact withthe withimminentpurchase ofthe OnehungaPort and abilityto connect tothe ManukauHarbour andTown Centre

Several largeCouncil-owned sitesin this centre,including thePark andRide next totheOnehungaStation. Portland to beadded to theportfolio

Marketattractivenessrated as high.High appeal forresidential use

HNZC landholdings/ SHAin closeproximity

$29minvestment inthe Onehungaforeshoreproject. $1.2mfor upgrade toOnehunga Mall.Transportinvestment (PTand road)


TransformLocation

Takapuna Excellent

opportunity toinitiate actionon Councilsites

Some sitesready to goafter Panukumaster plan

Two high

profile sites. Anzac Streetcar park andGasometersites – formixed useddevelopment

Potential overmedium termto purchaseother sites orunlock othercouncil owedsites

Market attractive

area. High levelof amenity andgood connectvity

Auckland

Transport asowner of carpark sites. ATcar park studyindicates parkingon keydevelopmentsites still needed

$5.6m

Taharoto/Wairau Roadupgrade.Bus frequencyupgrades.Improvementsin beach frontamenity

On RTN with

good local PTconnections

Unlock

location

Northcote Excellentopportunity,however verycomplexleaseholdstructure intown centre.Working withHNZC land toimprove andincreasehousing stock

Council hasthe majorityownership ofthe TC(leasehold).4.16 ha over84 sites

Market attractivearea. Wouldrequire Panukuattention tostimulate interestand activityaroundresidential

HNZC landholdings within a3-5km radius ofthe centre. Areais in a SHA.Large iwi landholdings to theeast of the TC

LTP $6m tocentre upgrade.Stormwaterupgradeplanned

On FTN withgood local PTconnections

Unlocklocation

Henderson Goodopportunitythrough rangeof Council landholdings.Capacity todevelop ishigh. TODdevelopmentaround railstation formixed usecould be anearly win

AC councilownership18.57 ha over30 sites

Waitakerecentral sitestrategicallylocated andlarge site

Marketattractiveness islow. Panukucould stimulateresidentialinterest in theEx-councilbuilding.Commercial andretail competitionfrom nearby NewLynn andWestgate.

AucklandTransport asowner of carpark sites. Areais in a SHA.Waitakerecentral site

Ex-WaitakereCity Councilbuilding. Railstation.


UnlockLocation


34/137

Item 1

2




Recommend

Otahuhu Alreadysubject toCouncil focusthrough SPA,limited scaleopportunitiesfor Panuku todeliver outsidewhat AC isalreadydelivering

ACownership3.52ha over21 sites.High sitefragmentation

Panukuinvolved intwo sites withcommunitytennants

Medium level ofmarketattractiveness.Moderate level ofvalue fromamenity andproximity toservices

Within AucklandCouncil family

Area is in aSHA.

Signficiantinvestmentbeing co-ordinated by

AucklandCouncil(streetscape,PT interchangeand recreationalcentre,stormwaterupgrade)


SupportLocation

Avondale Goodopportunity as

Panukualreadyoperating inthis area onindividual sites

ACownership

4.13ha over24 sites

Panukuinvolved inthree sites forresidentialdevelopment

Medium level ofmarket

attractiveness.Moderate level ofvalue fromamenity andproximity toservices

Potential forintegrated

developmentwith HNZ andSHA sites at 24and 26RacecourseParade and1909 GreatNorth.

AvondaleRacecoursefuture notdetermined

$5m to upgradethe TC and the

wider area willbenefit from the$66 millionupgrade toOakley Creekreleasinghousingcapacity

On RTN withgood local PT

connections

SupportLocation at

least until asignficiantpartnershipopportunitypresentsiteself

Mt Edenstation

Excellentopportunity

given AT landholdings andCRLinvestment.Project issome yearsaway beforeredevelopmentcan beactivated

ACownership at

least 1.56haover 12 sites.Further landacquitionshave beenmade by AT,informaton isconfidential

High level ofmarket interest

andattractiveness

AucklandTransport as

major owner ofthe site

CRL investment On RTN withgood local PT

connections

WatchingBrief.

Revisit in2-3 years

Newmarket Limitedopportunity.Few councilsites of scaleforredevelopment

ACownership1.5ha of 4sites. Noneof these sitesaredevelopmentsites

High level ofmarket interest.Market willgenerate positiveregeneration

Limited, unlessPanukupurchased sitesin the openmarket andworked withprivate sectordeveloper

CRL investment On RTN withgood local PTconnections

Do notprogressas aPanukuproject

Testing the Legacy Development Projects

22. The next task was to review all of the ACPL and WA development projects and consider thepotential around those areas against the revised Panuku criteria – refer Figure Four for thesummary analysis and Attachment A for the detailed profiles.

23. It should be noted that in the analysis Wynyard Quarter and Tamaki Transformation Projecthave not been included in the analysis. Wynyard Quarter is already a Transform location as

identified through the Panuku Business Plan. Panuku will continue to play an active role insupporting the Tamaki Regeneration project.


35/137

I t e m

1 2



24. The Housing for Older Persons Network of Villages is a regional wide project. Councilcurrently owns 1,412 Housing for Older People rental units located in 62 villages covering 26hectares. The properties are unevenly distributed across Auckland as follows: South (686),North (458) and West (268). Elements of the stock have significant redevelopment potential.

25. It is the intent of Panuku that this stock should at least double the provision of housing,including at least current social housing and additional affordable housing. This will offersignificant opportunities to deliver on Council ’s Housing Action Plan and the organisation’sobjectives around housing, affordability, intensification and town centre regeneration. Thereis also a new model to enable government subsidies.

Figure Four: Reviewing Legacy ACPL projects


Recommend

City Centre Strategic andhigh profilesites in theCity Centreforredevelopment andcontributionto qualitymixed usedevelopment

Civic Administration BuildingandDowntownCar park in

ACownership

High level ofmarketinterest. Highprofile sites.

Private sectorpartnership onCivic AdminBuilding.

Britomart and Aotea precinctimprovements,including futureCRL.

ON RTN,excellentlocalconnections

Unlocklocation

OldPapatoetoeTown Centre

Refurbishment of the mallwill providesignificantamenityupgrade tothe towncentre. StageOne housingdevelopmentcomplete,more stagesto go

Two sites toberedevelopedinto retailandcommercialuses.Furtherproperty tobedevelopedintoresidential

Moderatelevel ofmarketinterest.Panukuinvestmentwill berequired tostimulateinterest andactivity

AucklandCouncil family -

Adjoining landheld by councilcould offeropportunity tobroaden scopeand influence ofcurrent sites

Revitalisation ofold Papatoetoeby Council

On RTN withgood localPTconnections

Unlocklocation

HobsonvillePoint

Significantland holdingsto be

committed forresidentialdevelopmentand up andanemploymenthub

Panukuholds 20hectares

which willbecomemixed use,predominately residential

High level ofmarketinterest in this

developmentsite

Delivery byprivate sector

HobsonvillePoint is a majorpublic sector led

development.Some existinginvestment inmarine precinct.High amenitycoastal access

On RTN(Busway)

UnlockLocation

Ormiston TC& Flatbush

Panuku’sinvolvementat Ormistonis via a 20haTown Centredevelopment,subject to adevelopmentagreement

Development dealcompletedon OrmistonTC. Panukupreparing 5sites for saleat Flatbushschool road.

High level ofmarketinterestexpected onthesedevelopmentsites

Delivery byprivate sector – Todd propertyGroup. Thisshould yield inexcess of 450dwellings.Nearby site willalso generateresidential

Proposed salesleverage offexisting andplanneddevelopments inarea

Regular FTNconnectionsplanned

UnlockLocation


36/137

Item 1

2




Recommend

Mt Eden (Cnrof DominionRd and ValleyRoad)

High profilesite.Increasedquality mixedusedevelopment- 91apartmentsand groundfloor retail.Potential forexemplarproject

214-222DominionRoad and113-115Valley Road- contiguousblock of 7adjoining lotspositioned atthe northeasterncorner ofDominionRoad andValley Road

High level ofmarketinterestexpected onthisdevelopmentsite

Delivery byprivate sector

High level ofmasterplanningcompleted onthis site

On FTN SupportLocation

Whangaparaoa – LinkCres

Developmentsite providingin the orderof 50 newhomes with apublicreserveincorporatinga wetlandandplayground.Expected tobe anexemplar of ahigh quality

mediumdensitydevelopment

20 LinkCrescent is a2ha site

High level ofmarketinterestexpected onthisdevelopmentsite valuedfor its coastallifestyle andstrongcommunityconnection

McConnellPropertypreferreddevelopmentpartner and aconditionaldevelopmentagreement hasbeen signed

Consultation forthe future use ofthe site datesback to 2001.High level ofmasterplanningnow completedfor this site

Goodconnectionsto FTN

SupportLocation

Pukekohe Opportunityforredevelopment of strategicsite next torail line.Individual ACowned sitescould beplannedtogether forbest impact

Panukumanagingsixproperties,one adjacentto rail line,five in towncentre.

Moderatelevel ofmarketinterest.WouldrequirePanukuinvestementto stimulateinterest andactivityaroundresidential

KiwiRail, AucklandTransport.Private sector.Opportunity forland swap withSt Johns on onesite.

Some TCupgrades beingled by CityTransformationin Council

On RTN, butnot part ofelectrifiedsystem yet

SupportLocation

Stonefields Developmentsites withpotential forresidential

84 - 100Morrin Rd

78 MertonRoad

120 AbbottsWay

Difficult sitesdue tohistoriccontamination. However inmarketattractivearea aroundStonefieldsdevelopment

Private Sector Private sectorresidentialdevelopment

Connectionsto FTN

SupportLocation


37/137

I t e m

1 2




Recommend

Howick Mixed usedevelopmenton small site,potentiallywith adjoiningcar park land

16 FencibleDrive


Local Board Drawing onrecentlycompletedHowick VillagePlace study

Connectionsto FTN

SupportLocation

New Lynn This is a highprofile sitethat frontstwo importantstreets interms ofurban fabric

– Totara Avenue andMcRay Way

10 – 22Totara

Avenue944m2

Good level ofmarketinterestexpected onthisdevelopmentsite

Private sector Significantlegacyinvestment inNew Lynn – mixed use andtransport

On RTN andgoodconnectionsto FTN

SupportLocation

Pakuranga(Mall)

Opportunityto developMall site.

AT ownedcarparksadjoiningMall.


With privatesector.

AucklandCouncil, throughCityTransformationis leading thenegotiations.

Major roadingupgradeplanned.

Lowconnectivitycurrently.

Previouslyreported asa supportlocation.

Not to beprogressedas limitedPanuku role

Emerging Work Programme Categorisations

26. Considering all of the criteria, Panuku has developed a work programme. The workprogramme is based on three categories.

Figure Six: Categorising Activities

Proposed Category Description and Thresholds

• Purpose: Custodianship of major change over a long term

• Over multiple, complex, large scale sites

• Will require masterplanning , fully engaging stakeholdersand developing long term relationships with stakeholders

• A high degree of control needed to facilitate publicoutcomes and private investment. Direct interventionneeded outside the business-as-usual mechanisms.

• Place making and management an ongoing resource

• Will require reallocation of funds, value capture, capitalrecycling to fund the project over the long term


38/137

Item 1

2



• Purpose: Overcoming barriers to redevelopment of largesites

• More than one site (2-4)

• Will require some masterplanning – an opportunity to viewsites holistically, rather than as single sites.

• Panuku role to facilitate private investment to unlock the

development potential of surrounding land and otherqualitative factors, some place making initiatives andmanagement will be required

• Requires broader stakeholder relationships andengagement with stakeholders

• A dynamic category – because the facts can change on theground depending on new sites or opportunities that canbecome available

• Purpose: Infill development - mixed-use and housing ondiscrete sites to increase levels of development andcontribute to disposals targets

• An individual site, commercial in nature

• Limited masterplanning• One development partner only

• Contained stakeholders

• A dynamic category – contributes to asset sale targets forPanuku

• Note: Every time a new site becomes available a judgementwill need to be made on whether it is for disposal orredevelopment. If it is a redevelopment opportunity, then itwill fall into the Support Category

27. The full programme outlined in Figure Seven and supporting map provided as Attachment B.

28. An important point to note is that over time:a. As opportunities arise (particularly access to new properties), some of these areas

may change categorisation and require a different level of focus. This will apply to the“Support” and “Unlock” categories

b. As Panuku involvement comes to completion, new projects will be added to the list,mostly as Support locations are key to asset sale and SOI targets as well asdevelopment outcomes.

Figure Seven: Development Programme

Proposed Category Locations

• Wynyard Quarter

• Manukau Metropolitan Centre and surrounds

• Onehunga Town centre and Port

• Tamaki Regeneration (in partnership)


39/137

I t e m

1 2



• Takapuna Town Centre

• Northcote Town Centre and surrounds (including HNZblock)

• City Centre

• Old Papatoetoe Town Centre

• Henderson Town Centre

• Hobsonville

• Ormiston Town Centre and nearby sites in Flatbush

• Housing for Older Persons Network of Villages

• Mt Eden (Dominion Rd & Valley Rd)

• Whangaparoa (Link Road)

• New Lynn

• Avondale

• Pukekohe

• Stonefields (Morrin Rd, Merton Road, Donnelly Road)

• Howick (Fencible Drive)

• Otahuhu

Recommendation for Transform Locations

29. Based on the analysis and judgement against the Panuku criteria, it is the Panuku Executiverecommends that the Board endorse the locations of:

a. Manukau Metropolitan Centre and surrounds

b. Onehunga Town Centre and Port.

Manukau Metropolitan Centre and Surrounds

30. Based on the Panuku criteria, Manukau Metropolitan Centre and surrounds delivers on:

a. Scale and impact : The Metropolitan centre itself has the capacity to receivesignificant growth and height. Auckland Council owned land holdings and possibleHNZC partner opportunities will provide scale and joint brand potential. Some

Auckland Council owned sites are ready to go after Panuku masterplan process. TheLocal Board is supportive of growth and change in this area.

b. Key land holdings: Auckland Council owns a number of sites in the centre ofManukau which it can use, in partnership with private developers, to increase thehousing supply in the area in the form of mixed-use housing and commercial buildings,retail shops, and to improve connections around the area between homes, publicspaces, public transport and the town centre.

c. Ability to leverage off previous investment : Government investment in socialinfrastructure. Recent investment from Auckland Transport in public transportinfrastructure.

d. Market/commercial viability : Traditionally a challenging area to generate marketinterest; however some apartments in the area have been well received.


40/137

Item 1

2



e. Partnership potential : Housing New Zealand currently owns a large amount of landwithin eight to 10 kilometres of the centre. There is a significant opportunity forPanuku to work with government organisations, in partnership with developers, tocreate large-scale change in a much wider area by unlocking the current HNZ sites inconjunction with the upgrade of the town centre. At the least Panuku will focus on themetropolitan centre itself with a roughly three kilometre radius around it. This is the

basis of current recommendations.f. Proximity to PT : Connected to rail and bus with frequency improvements still to be

made.

Onehunga Town Centre and Port

31. Based on the Panuku criteria, Onehunga Town Centre and Port delivers on:

a. Scale and impact: Changing the Port of Onehunga to a more mixed use precinct isseen as the key to the regeneration opportunity in Onehunga. This sale had beenprogressed by ACPL, it is not yet fully completed, but expected to be soon. This is fourhectares of property (wharf and waterspace) that Panuku will have sole influence over.Being able to link the Port to the Town Centre and to Māungakiekie -One Tree Hillthrough quality networks presents a scale and impact opportunity that has not beenable to be considered to date. The Local Board is supportive of growth and change inthis area.

b. Key land holdings: Panuku could use Council land holdings in the town centre andthe Onehunga Port in the future, to enable the development of high quality, mixedstyles of housing close to the town centre, public transport and the water’s edge. ThePort land offers opportunities to offer access to, and better use of, the waterspace onthe Manukau Harbour which has traditionally not received as much attention as theWaitemata.

c. Ability to leverage off previous investment : There has been a significant amount ofpublic investment in Onehunga to improve connections to public transport including anew rail station, and around $29m of council and NZTA funding to open up theManukau Harbour edge. Future investment includes the east-west link (NZTA) whichis proposed to improve freight efficiency, however the current designation will sterilisethe port site and waterfront to the east. This will be an area for Panuku to influence.

d. Market/Commercial viability : This area has not yet reached its market potential, andit would be the role of Panuku to stimulate interest and activity.

e. Partnership potential : There is HNZC land in close proximity of the Town Centre anda potential opportunity for Panuku to work with government organisations in thislocation.

f. Proximity to PT: Connected to rail and bus networks, with frequency improvementsstill to be made.

Consideration

Local Board views and implications32. Panuku has undertaken early and transparent local board engagement to enable

stakeholder feed back to help inform the Panuku Board’s thinking on the work programmeand ultimately its recommendation to Council.

33. Throughout October and November, information has been openly shared with local boardsthrough group workshops and individual meetings. An invitation to provide written feedbackwas also extended. Overwhelmingly the engagement has been well received both from asubstantive and a process perspective.


41/137

I t e m

1 2



34. The feedback on location selection has also been supportive of the Panuku Board’srecommendations regarding the categorisation of the locations.

35. A comment from the Henderson-Massey Local Board captures the overall tone of thefeedback “we would like to express our sincere gratitude at the process PanukuDevelopment Auckland has laid down for development decisions. The ease of access toimportant information, and in a timely manner has been exceptional and been of greatassistance to this Board”.

36. Emergent themes from our stakeholder network include:

a. Genuine excitement for Panuku to drive revitalisation at a local level

b. Support in principal for a transformational shift in the way that Council delivers itsurban development activities

c. Optimism to develop strategic partnerships that will unlock Auckland’s potential

d. Advocacy at the local level for particular locations to be included in our workprogramme.

37. The inclusive approach to engagement has also enabled some peripheral issues to beraised and dealt with in an effective and timely manner. The most recurrent of these issuesbeing the general expectation that we have access to extensive resources, time, people, andmoney to deliver projects.

38. The open process has given us an opportunity to consistently explain our financial modeland set expectations to a reasonable level in terms of what, when and how we will deliver.Consistency of messaging is key to mitigating the risk of this expectation growing. Theprocess has also provided us an early platform from which we have been able to reiterateour vision, purpose and mandate through the statement of intent.

Local Board Engagement Timeline:

a. 12 October Local Board and Local Board Services Briefing

b. 15 October Info pack (location profiles, ADC report, memo) to Local Boards

c. 23 Oct Local Board Services Workshop

d. 28 October Phone calls Local Board Chairs advising of emerging work programme

e. 29 October Local Board Members workshop on emerging work programme

f. 29 October Local Board Memo, advising of emerging work programme and next steps.

Local Board Feedback

39. Twelve of the 21 Local Boards submitted written feedback. All of the feedback we receivedwas supportive.

Local Board Feedback

Howick Fully supportive of the proposed work programme

The Board also advocates Ormiston and sites at Flat Bush be included in the Unlockcategory and that Pakuranga, Howick as a Support category which is in line with thePanuku proposals

Kaipatiki Pleased to see Northcote included in list and is supportive of it being in the Unlockcategory

Manurewa Supports the framework Panuku is using to identify priorities

Would like Panuku to consider adding Manurewa Town Centre to the mix (which it isnot at this stage) if Manukau becomes a Transform.


42/137

Item 1

2



Henderson-Massey Very supportive of the process to date

Advocates for Panuku to unlock the major potential of Henderson town centre which iswhat is proposed by Panuku.

Mangere-Otahuhu Welcomes the formation of Panuku and looks forward to strategic partnerships. TheBoard stated it was supportive of the process to date. The Board advocates for higherintensity development in the Otahuhu SHA and provides Otahuhu specific information;this aligns with our current thinking.

Maungakiekie – Tamaki

Very supportive of Onehunga being included as an area for significant redevelopmentwhich aligns with the current proposals.

Puketapapa The Board supports our thinking for Housing Villages for older people be included asan Unlock

This Board also proposes a number of new suggestions, specifically the Board

o supports Three Kings Town Centre as a Transform and Support area

o advocates Stoddard Road as a key area for inclusion in Support or Unlock

o advocates for Mt Roskill shopping centre on Dominion Road as a Supportcandidate.

Devonport-Takapuna The Board strongly supports Takapuna being a priority location for redevelopmentwhich is in line with the proposed work programme.

Waitakere Ranges This Board acknowledged the level of research and sharing of information in theprocess.

This Board advocates for Council to adequately resource Panuku in future years

This Board requests that Glen Eden Town Centre to be included as a priority area forus, which it is not currently.

Albert-Eden This Board has provided feedback in response to the draft work programme, byproposing potential sites requiring further investigation in addition to the urbanlocations already identified by Panuku for development - specifically, Pt Chevalier,

Waterview and Dominion Rd/New North Rd.

Franklin Supportive of Man ukau as a Transform location and of Onehunga’s Unlockpotential which is reflective of our initial thinking

The Board also advocates that Papakura should be included in the Unlockcategory which is a new suggestion

Finally the Board supports the inclusion of Pukekohe as a Support area

Māori impact statement

40. Through its development work programme Panuku will have a clear role in giving effect tooutcomes directed by the council’s Māori Responsiveness Framework. Through theprinciples of Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the importance of land to Māori we acknowledge thatour particular relationship with Tāmaki Makaurau mana whenua is one of partnership inmanagement and development of this essential element.

41. Through deepening Panuku relationships with mana whenua and extending this intocommitted collaborative engagement and relationships with mataawaka and urban Māori,the broader Māori population, we have the potential to materially uplift Māori contribution tothe social, cultural, economic and environmental successes of Auckland. This in turn raisesour capability in shaping the fabric and nature of Auckland’s urban environment.

42. Setting our core development programme is a key step in progressing this work. Panuku hasaccordingly engaged with Tāmak i Makaurau mana whenua throughout our decision-makingprocess in a robust and inclusive manner that has been reviewed and supported by TeWaka Angamua and the Independent Māori Statutory Board.


43/137

I t e m

1 2



Maori Engagement Timeline

a. 18 August: Monthly mana whenua engagement forum briefing (combined ACPL andWA pre-transition)

b. September: Individual meetings with mana whenua hapū offered and undertakenwhere requested

c. 15 October: Info pack (location profiles, ADC report, memo) to IMSB and manawhenua iwi and h apū – written feedback invited by 13 November

d. 20 October: Monthly Panuku mana whenua engagement forum discussion

e. 3 November: Follow up email to IMSB

f. 17 November: Monthly Panuku mana whenua engagement forum, final feedbackopportunity.

Mana whenua Feedback

43. No written feedback was received from mana whenua. Verbal feedback gathered issummarised below. Noting that we are now establishing contact with Urban Māori Authorities, marae and community based groups and Māori organisations in our propose dareas of work so that we can also work with them as we begin master planning in the NewYear.

a. No mana whenua iwi or hapū expressed a desire for one particular overall location tobe selected over the others; or not selected

b. Their response in respect of interests was consistent with their approach to treatysettlements, being a strong assertion by most of the ‘layers of interests’ approach

c. Several iwi signalled a desire to be involved and informed on all Transform, Unlockand Support locations and seek active engagement with Panuku

d. The Forum expressed concern over Panuku alignment of work in areas wheresignificant planning is already in place – for example in Manukau broader area thePuhinui masterplan, Southern Initiative and Unitary Plan

e. General agreement from the Forum that the early phase of Masterplanning in 2016should include review of current plans, including mana whenua feedback into plans

f. Best practice in environmental management was discussed as imperative, with astrong appetite for improving infrastructure wherever possible. Several groupsindicated that the Transform locations presented a strong opportunity for improvementand that they would take every chance to advocate for this

g. There is a strong desire for proactive commercial engagement through individualrelationships and clearly defined process. Most iwi are interested in commercialopportunities wherever they may exist across the city, but particularly in their areas ofstrongest interest

h. Some mana whenua hapū exp ressed they are in the development stageorganisationally and may be less able to take advantage of commercial opportunities,particularly while settlements are finalised

i. There was general agreement that mana whenua should be involved in an embeddedmanner throughout planning activities, with an emphasis on early and collaborativeengagement. Kaitiaki officers reinforced this as essential in enabling them to fulfilltheir responsibilities


44/137

Item 1

2



j. There was a level of comfort around how future engagement would look if the currentPanuku engagement approach at the Waterfront applied to future planning activitiesregion-wide provided Panuku took the opportunity for proactive early engagementpresented by our regular forum. However this level of engagement would also poseresourcing issues that would need to be assessed early

k. One mana whenua hapū suggested that sites chosen for intensive work could possiblybenefit from completion of Cultural Values Assessments. It was acknowledged that notall mana whenua iwi and hapū would think it a useful process. It was also notsuggested that it fully replace Te Aranga Design analysis on a case by case basis, butto provide Panuku and developers from which to initiate a Te Aranga process, and toavoid iwi having to regularly repeat information.

44. Panuku will continue with our collaborative engagement Māori in the New Year to make themost of the commercial and non-commercial opportunities presented by the emerging workprogramme.

IMSB Feedback

45. The engagement process undertaken by Panuku is fully supported by the IMSB Board and itsupports Panuku, in consultation with Maori, developing an engagement process involvingboth mana whenua and mataawaka.

46. In relation to the priority locations, the Board supports the preferred locations and itrecognises that the locations offer a wide range of opportunities for Maori to both input intoand benefit from. The IMSB has asked for regular update outlining progress on the workprogramme, views and input from Maori, responses to this input, and identification ofpossible opportunities and partnerships.

Implementation47. Should the ADC agree on the two “Transform” Locations then Panuku will begin the process

of developing High Level Project Plans (HLPP) for these areas. The HLPP process isexpected to uncover more detail and report on an overall strategy and vision for each area,the scope of the projects and the anticipated or necessary Panuku mandate to enable us toachieve that vision.

48. In April 2016 Panuku will present two HLPP to ADC for approval. This work is also likely toflag the additional resources, over and above the current available.

49. It is important that the organisation can demonstrate quicker wins (2-3 years). It isanticipated that the following locations can contribute to the objectives of Panuku in the shortterm:

a. Link Crescent, Whangaparoa: A conditional Development Agreement has beenentered into with McConnell properties for the development of 59 house lots.

b. Hobsonville: Development Agreement to be finalised for Stage One which will deliver80-85 house lots. SHA application for a further the balance of the site to be granted.

c. Takapuna: Two potential development sites to be marketed, subject to AucklandTransport parking requirements.

d. Dominion Road and Valley Road, Mt Eden: A mixed use development for whichPanukau will seek a Resource Consent prior to marketing the opportunity.

e. Old Papatoetoe Town Centre: Complete the sale of the Supermarket and associatedretail refurbishment and car park works.

f. City Centre: Civic Administration building development agreement finalised.

50. Avondale Development Agreement with Ockham Properties for the development of 70apartments, 24-26 Racecourse Parade properties and the completion of 1 Trent Street byNZ Housing Foundation which will provide 34 homes.


45/137

I t e m

1 2




A Area Profiles 47 B Proposed Range of Transform, Unlock and Support Locations 85 C Reporting Stages 87

Signatories Author Fiona Knox – Strategic Projects Manager – Panuku Development Auckland Authorisers David Rankin – Director Strategy & Engagement – Panuku Development Auckland

Jim Quinn - Chief of Strategy


46/137


47/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




48/137

A

m

A

m




49/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




50/137

A

m

A

m




51/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




52/137

A

m

A

m




53/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




54/137

A

m

A

m




55/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




56/137

A

m

A

m




57/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




58/137

A

m

A

m




59/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




60/137

A

m

A

m




61/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




62/137

A

m

A

m




63/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




64/137

A

m

A

m




65/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




66/137

A

m

A

m




67/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




68/137

A

m

A

m




69/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




70/137

A

m

A

m




71/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




72/137

A

m

A

m




73/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




74/137

A

m

A

m




75/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




76/137

A

m

A

m




77/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




78/137

A

m

A

m




79/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




80/137

A

m

A

m




81/137

A t t a c

h m e n

t A

I t e m

1 2




82/137

A

m

A

Auckland Development Committee. Agenda Dec 2015

Documents

Transcript of Auckland Development Committee. Agenda Dec 2015