ATS14 Parking, Parking Everywhere: What Better Management Could Mean For Active Transportation -...
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of ATS14 Parking, Parking Everywhere: What Better Management Could Mean For Active Transportation -...
- 1. Oregon Active Transportation Summit April 21, 2014 1 Parking, parking everywhere: What better management could mean for active transportation
2. Discussion Points Numbers on parking what is actually happening Factors that lead to overbuilding Implications of cost Potential solutions 2 3. What is happening. Upwards of 2 Billion No. of parking Spaces in US About 20% Urban land devoted to parking About 3 : 1 Common suburban ratio of parking SF to building SF 3 4. Why so much parking Overbuilding of parking High Vehicle Ownership Code requirements/Land Use Planning Single use parking facilities Market norms Lack of parking management/data Undersupply anxiety Alternative Modes Stigmatized 5. Parking is very expensive to build. Overbuilt parking increases development cost and negatively influences access to transit. An oversupply of parking encourages driving and congests our roadways. WHY IS RIGHT SIZED PARKING IMPORTANT? 6. 6 Average overbuild 25% - 40% (mostly surface parking) Adds unnecessary cost to project development Inefficient use of land Surface @ $8,000 per stall can add $1.96 - $2.18 per foot to leasing cost (annual). Garage @ $30,000 per stall can add $6.00 - $7.30 per foot to leasing cost (annual) Why we should get it right 7. 7 Why we should get it right 8. 8 1,400 commercial spaces 2,320 residential spaces 9. When these findings are applied to a typical suburban project with 150 units, roughly $800,000 would be spent on unused parking. On average, we found that multi- family parking is supplied at 1.4 spaces per dwelling unit but is only used at about 1 space per unit. Why we should get it right.. OLD MODEL 10. Code drives demand. No clear understanding of demand. Demand is stalls built rather than stalls actually used. Lack of localized true demand data left to use national models that are severely flawed. Self fulfilling prophecy (code and appraisal) Transitioning to more dense parking in suburban areas will require innovation and partnership. 10 What the experts say* * From 2012 King County Right Sizing Parking Interviews 11. Parking requirements Revisiting past practice Reliance on rule of thumb, national averages, rates of competing cities (except Portland Central City) Apparent precision with weak empirical basis Interplay of city requirements, developer expectations, community expectations Driven by lack of on-street parking management and pricing 12. Whats next. 12 Today Tomorrow Continued reliance on surface parking will not support suburban visions The market will not support structured parking development in suburban settings. Solution is in addressing myths, realities and initiating innovative planning 13. True demand occupancy by land use type and area Stop relying on ITE or other cities view of demand Develop local demand data base Reduce minimums Reduce land use categories Eliminate credits Simplify code parking requirements Suburban development cannot pencil garages Tie public investment with code minimums (fee-in- lieu) Invest in District Garages 13 Moving Forward Changing Status Quo Calibrate code to vision Visions dont just happen Create coalitions, partners and educate on realities and trade-offs of adopted visions 14. Thanks