At the limits

28
DEBATE David Baker- For Heinz Weindl-Against The Key Pathogenic Cell in MS is a B cell and is Independent of Antigen- Presentation to T cells To B or Not T-B, that is the Question?

Transcript of At the limits

Page 1: At the limits

DEBATE

David Baker- For

Heinz Weindl-Against

The Key Pathogenic Cell in MS is a B cell

and is Independent of Antigen-Presentation to T cells

To B or Not T-B, that is the Question?

Page 2: At the limits

AT THE LIMITS-MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS 2017

B CELLS ARE AN ACCOMPLICE

T CELLS ARE FACILITATORS

THE IMPORTANT PATHOGENIC CELL IN MS

VICTIM: OLIGODENTROCYTE HAS BEEN MURDERED

B CELL

MEMORY B CELLS ARE GUILTY

T CELLS ARE GUILTY

Page 3: At the limits

INFLAMMATORY PENUMBRA IN MS

MYELIN = BROWN

DEMYELINATION

PERIVASCULAR

LESION

RELAPSING MS

BIOLOGY OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Myelin=brown stainOligodendrocytes do not express MHC class II in vivo

ANTIBODY

CYTOKINE

CELL

HYPOXIA

Page 4: At the limits

MS is a T cell-mediatedProblem!

MS is a B cell-mediatedProblem!

Animal Models

Myelin-ReactiveT cells in MS

Dogma

Biology &Available Data

Response to TherapyTreatments

EAE is T cell Mediated!but, Animals Don’t Get MS

Healthy People Respond to the Same Antigens.

Myelin-immunotherapy = FAILED

All active treatmentstarget B cells

Cir

cum

stan

tial

Evid

en

ce

AT THE LIMITS-MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS 2017

To B or Not T-B, that is the Question?

Page 5: At the limits

RESPONSE TO THERAPY

If MS is T Cell-Mediated, Why Does Ocrelizumab/Rituximab Work?

• Block B Cell Cytokines & Products

• Block Antigen-Presentation

Why evolve an extra APC Network?

• Block B Cell Follicles (& Pathogenic Antibodies)

Therapeutic Antibodies have very poor CNS penetration

Trophic Support-Cytotoxicity

DMT block peripheral Immune-Response to block Lesion formation

Minor 5-20% T cells Population Important

• Block Pathogenic CD20 T Cells

Is their critical B cell APC function In vivo?

CD4 T cell depletion = FAILEDMarked CD8 depletion (Dimethyl fumarate) = Modest

(DMF has modest depletion of B cells)

To B or Not T-B, that is the Question?

Inebilizumab (anti-CD19) inhibits MS lesionAgius et al. 2017 Mult Scler epub

Page 6: At the limits

T CELL SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY IN MS = FAILED

• CD4 T CELL (~70%) DEPLETION WITH cM-T412 MARGINAL EFFECT- PERCEPTION = FAILED

• Th1 (IL-12/IL-23) T CELL INHIBITION WITH USTEKINUMAB-PERCEPTION = FAILED

• Th17 (IL-17) T CELL INHIBITION WITH SECUKINUMAB MARGINAL EFFECT-PERCEPTION = FAILED

B CELL-DEPENDENT EAE = RUBBISH EAEIT IS SUBOPTIMIZED…TO MAKE ANTIGEN PRESENTATION IMPORTANT

B CELL-DEPENDENT EAE = SUBOPTIMIZED EAE

• Disease Resistant Strain used• Weak Immunogen for Strain• Processing requiring antigen• Low severityTO MAKE ANTIGEN PRESENTATION BY B CELLS APPEAR IMPORTANT

UCL-INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGYQueen SquareUCL-INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGYQueen SquareUCL-INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGYQueen Square

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: IS A CD4 Th17 T CELL-MEDIATED DISEASE?

RESPONSE TO THERAPY

B CELL SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY IN EAE = FAILED/MARGINAL

75% T cell Depletion

Sefia E et al. MSARDS 2017

B cell Knockout

wildtype

Kuerten S et al. J Neuroimmunol.

2006 177:99-111

B cell Depletion

Page 7: At the limits

T CELL SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY IN MS = FAILED

• CD4 T CELL (~70%) DEPLETION WITH cM-T412 MARGINAL EFFECT- PERCEPTION = FAILED

• Th1 (IL-12/IL-23) T CELL INHIBITION WITH USTEKINUMAB-PERCEPTION = FAILED

• Th17 (IL-17) T CELL INHIBITION WITH SECUKINUMAB MARGINAL EFFECT-PERCEPTION = FAILED

UCL-INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGYQueen SquareUCL-INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGYQueen SquareUCL-INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGYQueen Square

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: IS A CD4 Th17 T CELL-MEDIATED DISEASE?

Time Post-Induction (Days)

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Fre

que

ncy o

f D

ise

ase

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100Vehicle

CD4d mAb

CD8d mAb

CD20d mAb

Anti-CD20 in EAE does not work or has a marginal effect, unless it depletes CD4 T cells.

RESPONSE TO THERAPY

B CELL SPECIFIC IMMUNOTHERAPY IN EAE = FAILED/MARGINAL

75% T cell Depletion

Sefia E et al. MSARDS 2017

Sefia E et al. MSARDS 2017

B cell Depletion

Page 8: At the limits

Plasma cellCD19-, CD20-

CD27+,CD38+, CD138+

CD8 memory

CD19+ B CELLS ARE NOT A SINGLE SUBSET

CD4 naive CD4 memory

Th1/Th17

CD8 Naive

CD8 cytotoxicCD8 suppressor

CD4 T regulatory cell

Tr1 regulatory cell

CD19+B cell

T Cell Biologists World View of B Cell Biology

Page 9: At the limits

BLOOD

Memory Cell(Guilty in MS)

CD19+, CD27+Unswitched

IgD+

CD19+, CD27+Class switched

IgD-

PlasmablastCD19+, CD20-

CD27+,CD38+

ImmatureCD19+, CD20+

CD27-,CD38+, CD10+

Pre-B CellsCD19+, CD20+

Plasma cellCD19-, CD20-

CD27+,CD38+, CD138+

BONE MARROW

Germinal Centre CellCD19+, CD20+

CD27+, CD269+

LYMPHOIDTISSUE

Primary Follicle Cortex (B cell Area)Secondary

Follicle

T cell Area

FollicularDendritic

Cell

Pro-B CellsCD19-/+, CD20+, CD34+

Naïve/MatureCD19+, CD20+

CD27-,CD38+, CD10-

Regulatory CellCD19+, CD20+CD5+, CD24+

CD19+ B CELLS ARE NOT A SINGLE SUBSET

Page 10: At the limits

CD19+, CD27+Class-Switched

IgD-Germinal

Centre CellCD19+,CD20+

CD27+,CD269+

BLOOD

Memory Cell(Guilty in MS)

CD19+, CD27+Unswitched

IgD+

PlasmablastCD19+, CD20-

CD27+,CD38+

Naïve/MatureCD19+, CD20+

CD27-,CD38+, CD10-

ImmatureCD19+, CD20+

CD27-,CD38+, CD10+

Pre-B CellsCD19+, CD20+

BONE MARROW

CD34+ stem Cell

HUMAN B CELLS

Pro-B CellsCD19-/+, CD20-

CD34+

BLOOD

LYMPHOID TISSUE

Plasma cellCD19-, CD20-

CD27+,CD38+, CD138+

Page 11: At the limits

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Immatute B cellsCD19 B cells

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Mature

Naive B cells

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

Memory B cells

Alemtuzumab Targets memory B cells

overshoot

overshoot

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-THERAPY

Baker D et al. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:961.

Environment for Secondary B cell Autoimmunities (about 50% at 5 Years)

Page 12: At the limits

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Immatute B cellsCD19 B cells

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Mature

Naive B cells

Time Post-Administration (Months)

0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24

Mea

n P

erc

en

tag

e C

ha

ng

e f

rom

B

aselin

e

-100

-90

-80

-70

-60

-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

10

Memory B cells

Alemtuzumab Targets memory B cells

overshoot

overshoot

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-THERAPY

Baker D et al. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:961.

Alemtuzumab hCD52 Tgmice kills by ADCC-needs both antibody & natural killer cells/ PMN to kill. (Hu et al. 2009)

Bone marrowNot purged

Environment for Secondary B cell Autoimmunities (about 50% at 5 Years)

Page 13: At the limits

MS Treatment Memory B cells in the

Blood

Availability of B cells to

enter CNS

Relapse Rate/

MRI Lesions

Glatiramer acetate

Beta Interferon

Dimethyl fumarate

Mitoxantrone

Fingolimod

Natalizumab

Alemtuzumab

Daclizumab*

Rituximab

Atacicept*

Infliximab*

HSCT

Cladribine

Reduced

Reduced

Reduced

Reduced

Reduced

Increased

Reduced

Reduced*

Reduced

Increased*

Increased*

Reduced

Reduced

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased*

Decreased

Increased*

Increased*

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Decreased

Increased

Increased

Decreased

Decreased

* Non-MS data

Loss of B memory Cell function in Efficacious Treatments

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-THERAPY

Baker D et al. EBioMedicine 2017; 16:41.

Page 14: At the limits

Mitoxantrone

FingolimodBeta Interferon Hierarchy of Responsiveness

Loss of B memory Cell function in Efficacious Treatments

Dooley J et al. Neurology N2 2016 3 (e240).Baker D et al. EBioMedicine 2017; 16:41.

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-THERAPY

Page 15: At the limits

NatalizumabLoss of B memory Cell function in Efficacious Treatments

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-THERAPY

CD19+, CD27+ B Memory

Anti-CD20

Ocrelizumab Phase II extension (Baker et al EbioMedicine 2017; 16:41)

Palanichamy A et al. J Immunol. 2014; 193:580

6 months

1 year

Page 16: At the limits

Loss of B memory Cell function in Efficacious Treatments

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-THERAPY

Anti-CD20

Ocrelizumab Phase II extension (Baker et al EbioMedicine 2017; 16:41)

Palanichamy A et al. J Immunol. 2014; 193:580

6 months

1 year

Induction therapy potential

Page 17: At the limits

Developmental Repopulation of B cells is Slow

in Western Europe

Cla

ss s

wit

ched

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-AETIOLOGY

Duchamap et al. Immun Inflamm 2014:2:131

Absolute NumbersPercentages

Induction therapy using CD20-B cell depletion in non-MS autoimmune

________________________________________________________________________________Total Memory B cells Class switched memory B cells

________________________________________________________________________________Healthy Control 30.5 ± 6.9%; P = 0.001 18.3 ± 5.8% P = 0.001Responder 6.3 ± 0.9% 3.6 ± 0.5% (5 year)Non-Responder 51.1 ± 23.2% P = 0.009 42.8 ± 18.1% P = 0.036; (3-5 year)________________________________________________________________________________Amolik JH et al. Athritis rheum 2007; 56:3044Myasthenia gravis (Lebrun et al. 2016), NMO (Kim et al. 2015), Lupus (Vital et al. 2011), Arthritis (Trouvin et al. 2015)

Audia S et al. Blood. 2011; 118:4394

Page 18: At the limits

Childhood(1-13year)

Perc

enta

ge o

f M

em

ory

B c

ells

+ S

D

0

10

20

30

40

50

60Healthy

multiple sclerosis

Adolescent(14-17year)

Adult(25-55 year)

AdultOnset

Paediatric Onset

Memory B cells appear in paediatric MS more rapidly than during aging

Schwartz A et al. 2017. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 4:e309

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-PATHOLOGY

Page 19: At the limits

________________________________________CD19+, CD27+ Memory B cells

Blood CSF MS Type Remission Relapse Remission________________________________________Paediatric MS 30.1% 20.9% 66.4%

Adult MS 32.2% 26.7% 75.9%________________________________________

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-PATHOLOGY

Schwartz A et al. 2017. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 4:e309

Memory B cells drop in Blood during relapse and accumulate in CNS

Page 20: At the limits

T CELLS OUTNUMBER MEMORY B CELLS

MYELIN = BROWN

DEMYELINATION

PERIVASCULAR

LESION

RELAPSING MS

BIOLOGY OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

DISPRUPTIVE INFLUENCE

ANMS LESION

T CELLS = 7-24% OF LEUCOCYTES MEMORY B CELLS = 0.2-1.7% OF LEUCOCYTES

Page 21: At the limits

Genetic Association with B Cell Activating Factor (BAFF) in Sardinian MSCD24+, CD27+ = Unswitched and Class-Switched memory B cells are increased

Northern European MS may use a different Genetic Pathway

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-AETIOLOGY

HLA-DRB1*1501: Expressed by B cellsIL2RA (CD25) Expressed by memory B IL7RA (CD127) Expressed by pre-B cells

Many MS Susceptibility Genes withpresumed T cell function are present in oracts of B cell lineagesHLA-DRB1*1501: Expressed by B cellsIL2RA (CD25) Expressed by memory B IL7RA (CD127) Expressed by pre-B cellsTNFRSF1A Expressed by pre B cellsSTAT4 Expressed by pre B cellsIL12A Expressed by Immature B cellsBCL10 Expressed by Immature B cellsCXCR5 Expressed by Memory B cells

Page 22: At the limits

HSCT

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-AETIOLOGY

Antibody Secretion

Cytokine Secretion

APCFunction

B cell

CD22M

HC

Y

EBV

Burns DM et al.Blood. 2015;126:

Memory

MEMORY B CELLS HAVE KILLING POTENTIALTHEY MAY BE T CELL CO-STIMULATION INDEPENDENT

Page 23: At the limits

EBV Drives Memory B Cell FormationEBV PROMOTES HUMAN IMMUNITY

van den Heuvel D et al.

J Leukoc Biol. 2017; 101:

949-956

Evolutionary Advantage• Life-long B cell Immunity to help prevent infections

EBV drives proliferation & differentiation of memory B cells and blocks plasma cell differentiation.

Latent EBV virus reservoir in circulating memory B cells

Viral reactivation & shedding in saliva for transmissionImmune mechanisms can limit viral activity

Evolutionary Price

• B cell Lymphomas (Burkitts & Hodgkins) Lymphoma• Glandular Fever (B cell proliferation & CD8 T cell killing)• Autoimmunity (Historically post-reproductive age)

MEMORY B CELLS IN MS-BIOLOGY

Page 24: At the limits

CONCLUSIONS

B Cells appear to be the Major Target for Activity in MS

• Limited evidence that T cells control MS (Trial failures).

(CD4 depletion, Th1, Th17 cytokine therapy)

• Efficacy across with a range of different agents via a common B cell mechanism

Treatment Hierachy based on Memory B Cell Depletion Potential

• Memory B cell depletion is a major, common, mediator for relapse control in MS

• Memory B cell function, cytokine activity and EBV activity are interlinked

• There is pathogenic autoantibody in MS (May be secondary to damage)

Unifying mechanism consistent with (a) Aetiology (b) Pathology (c) Therapy

Page 25: At the limits

VAGAL NERVE STIMULATION?

MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES

SMALL MOLECULE INJECTABLES

REMOVAL OF SURVIVAL FACTORS

MOLECULESVIA THE MOUTH

GUILTY-VERDICT

GIVE THE MEMORY B CELL

THE “DEATH PENALTY”

Page 26: At the limits

SUMATION

B IS FOR BIOLOGY = RESPONSE TO THERAPY

Unifying mechanism incorporating: (a) Aetiology (b) Pathology (c) Therapy

• Rodents have complicated B cell biology/ do not get infected with EBV

Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis is Not MS

• Treatment Hierachy based on: Memory B Cell Depletion Potential

Memory T cell Depletion Potential

• Response to Therapy. Fingolimod enhances CCR7-, CD45RO+ cells

(This would contain the pathogenic population…. if MS was T cell-mediated)

Song ZY et al. PoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124923.

CD45RO’sIncrease

CD45RO’s increase in the CNS of MS

• Prevention of Rebound after Natalizumab withdrawal = CD20 B cell depletion

Page 27: At the limits

WEINDL ARGUMENTS

NO COMPELLING EVIDENCE PRESENTEDTO CAST DOUBT ON THE CENTRAL ROLE OFMEMORY B CELLS IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

THERE IS REASONABLE DOUBTAGAINTS IT BEING THE T CELL

(Response to therapy)

JUST BECAUSE A CELL IS PRESENT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS IMPORTANT (GUILTY)

MOST IMMUNE CELLS IN LESIONS ARE IRRELEVANT THEY ACCUMULATE BECAUSE OF INFLAMMATORY SIGNALS

The Chewbacca defence: the aim to deliberately confuse the jury rather

than to factually refute the case of the other side.

The concept of disguising a flaw in one's argument by presenting large amounts of irrelevant information

T Cells Control MS….It does not make Sense! Vote for the B’s…B cells = Biology of MS

Page 28: At the limits

THANKS FOR LISTENING WITH AN OPEN MIND

Do not acquit the B cell

The Memory B cell is GuiltyGive the T cell a suspended sentence for facilitation

GIVE THE MEMORY B CELL

THE “DEATH PENALTY”

Injectable Oral Antibody

magic bullet

The Chewbacca defence: the aim to deliberately confuse the jury rather

than to factually refute the case of the other side.

The concept of disguising a flaw in one's argument by presenting large amounts of irrelevant information

T Cells Control MS….It does not make Sense! Vote for the B’s…B cells = Biology of MS