Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse...
-
date post
18-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
2
Transcript of Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics Nancy S. Brickhouse...
Astrophysical Priorities for Accurate X-ray Spectroscopic Diagnostics
Nancy S. Brickhouse
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
In Collaboration with Randall K. Smith
Acknowledgments to Guo-Xin Chen, Svetlana Kotochigova and Kate Kirby
ITAMP WorkshopHigh Accuracy Atomic Physics in Astronomy
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics8 Aug 2006
• Introduction
• Case Studies from X-ray Spectroscopy– Fe XVII 3C/3D– Ne IX density and temperature diagnostics– Fe XVIII and XIX temperature diagnostics
• Conclusions
Outline
Overview: X-Ray Spectroscopy
• High Resolution – λ/Δλ ~ 1000 from gratings, compared with
CCD λ/Δλ ~ 10 - 50– Strong lines of H- and He-like ions and Fe L-shell– Most line profiles unresolved
• Spectral models– Collisionally ionized plasmas: stellar
coronae, SNR, galaxies, clusters of galaxies– Photoionized plasmas: X-ray binaries, AGN, planetary nebulae
Benchmarking the ATOMDB• ATOMDB (http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb) - Astrophysical Plasma Emission Database
(APED) input atomic data - Output collisional ionization models from the
Astrophysical Plasma Emission Code (APEC) http://cxc.harvard.edu/atomdb/WebGUIDE (Smith et al. 2001)
• Emission Line Project Goal to use the Chandra calibration data to
benchmark the collisional models
• What accuracy do we need and why?
Physical Conditions Determined from X-ray Spectroscopy
• Electron Temperature and Temperature Distribution• Electron Density• Elemental Abundances - Relative - Absolute (lines/continuum)• Opacity• Charge State in Time-Dependent (Non- Equilibrium Ionization) Plasma
Yohkoh
We really want to understand physical processes: e.g. coronal heating, shocks, accretion, winds
Fe XVII “3C/3D”
• In general, neon-like Fe XVII is formed over a very broad temperature range.
• We observe Fe XVII lines in most stellar coronal spectra. • In solar active regions, it is formed near the peak temperature and thus produces
very strong emission lines. • The solar 3C line has long been thought to
be “resonance scattered” (gf =2.7) in the solar corona.
3C 2s2 2p6 1S0 - 2s2 2p5 3d(2P) 1P1 λ15.014
3D 2s2 2p6 1S0 - 2s2 2p5 3d(2P) 3D1 λ15.261
TRACE Image in Fe IX
Solution[s] to the Long-Standing Fe XVII 3C/3D Problem
Fe XVII 3C --
-- Fe XVII 3D--
Fe
XV
I
-- O
VII
I L
y γ
•Anomalously low 3C/3D line ratios in solar active regions from resonance
scattering? (Rugge & McKenzie 1985)
• τ ~ 2.0 (Schmelz et al. 1997)
Sample Data from Solar Maximum Mission FCS
Brickhouse & Schmelz 2006
Recent Results• 3D is blended w/ inner shell Fe XVI Brown et al. 2001
• Experiment: Laming et al. 2001; Brown et al. 1998
Theory: Chen & Pradhan 2002; Doron & Behar 2002;
Loch et al. 2006; Gu 2003 → still ~15% higher than lab
Chen 2006 → 5-10% (also Chen et al. 2006, PRA on Ni XIX)
• For same observed ratio, optical depth depends on predicted value:
3C/3D = 4.20 → τ = 0.42 3C/3D = 3.30 → τ = 0.17 3C/3D = 2.85 → τ = 0.032• The 3C line is optically thin in solar active regions! Brickhouse & Schmelz 2006
Therefore, the TRACE Fe XV line is not optically thick either!
Fe IX Fe XII Fe XV
Active Region
Prominence
Brickhouse & Schmelz 2006
Ne IX “R-ratio” and “G-ratio”
• Classic He-like diagnostics• “R-ratio” = f/i is density-sensitive.• “G-ratio” = (f + i)/r is temperature-
sensitive.
f = forbidden 1s2 1S0 - 1s2s 3S1
i = intercombination 1s2 1S0 - 1s2p 3P2
1s2 1S0 - 1s2p 3P1
r = resonance 1s2 1S0 - 1s2p 1P1
Capella Ne IX Spectral Region
•Temperature from Ne IX G-ratio is too low Ness et al. 2003
•Mg XI and O VII also give temperatures too low in other stars Testa et al. 2004
Blending with Fe XIX in the Ne IX Spectral Region
Model Fe XIX wavelengths from HULLAC (1% accuracy)
With EBIT λ measurements
(Brown et al. 2002, 5-10 mÅ)
Fe XIX Model Wavelengths from Dirac-Fock-Sturm Method
Kotochigova, in progress
With this Fe XIX model we can match the positions of all features in the spectrum.
Recent Results
Derived T from Capella in better agreement
G-ratio agrees with LLNL EBITmeasurements of Wargelin
(PhD Thesis 1993)
New Ne IX G-ratio calculations (Chen et al. 2006, PRA)
Fe XVIII and XIX Line Ratios
LETG 355 ks
HETG/HEG 300 ks
HETG/MEG 300 ks
LETG 355 ks
-- Fe XVIII
-- Fe XVIII
IEUV ΩEUV [Te]—— = ———— exp (-ΔE/kTe)IX-ray ΩX-ray[Te]
Observed/Predicted Line Ratios
Desai et al. 2005
All X-ray/EUV line ratios are larger than predicted (by all codes).
For the strongest lines, the codes agree: discrepancies are 30% for Fe XVIII and a factor of 2 for Fe XIX.
Predictions are based on the EMD with its peak at 6 MK.
X-ray
Fe XVIII
Fe XIX
EUV
FUV
Te-Dependence of Fe XVIII and XIX Line Ratios
6 MK EMD peak
•Discrepancies not from: –excitation rate uncertainties –calibration uncertainties –absorption –time variability
•Simple Te diagnostics not consistent with the ionization state of the plasma
•Motivated consideration of time-dependent NEI effects in impulsively heated loops.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization ?• EMD models assume collisional ionization equilibrium:
Flux ~ ε(Te) ∫Ne2 dV
• In an NEI plasma, the charge state lags the instantaneous temperature Te
• NeΔt determines the charge state
• For a given Ne and Te , ionization is very fast compared with recombination
• Mass conservation (Ne dV = const) implies that a coronal loop, impulsively heated and then cooled by radiation and conduction, will emit primarily during recombination.
Ionization Balance?
• Recombination rate coefficients accurate to ~30%• Ionization rate coefficients?
Decreased ionization rate x 2
Conclusions
• Accurate atomic data are a big investment: priorities should be based on astrophysical importance and needs
• For most important diagnostics, line ratios accurate to 10% or better are possible
• Interesting astrophysical processes can be explored (e.g. non-equilibrium ionization) with accurate diagnostics
• Wavelengths need to be accurate to 1 mÅ• 3-way collaboration among astrophysics,
experiment and theory is needed• Experiments can’t substitute for theory