Astigmatism After Corneal Thermal Injury
-
Upload
dr-jagannath-boramani -
Category
Healthcare
-
view
71 -
download
1
Transcript of Astigmatism After Corneal Thermal Injury
Astigmatism after corneal thermal injury
Dr. Priya Srinivas FRCS, Cornea Fellow, Sankara Nethralaya
Shree Eye care, Mumbai
Case Report
Purpose
To report a case of high astigmatism induced by a thermal burn to the cornea
and its regression over a period of 19 months
Methods
A 43 year gentleman presented with accidental thermal injury to the left eye with a burning agarbatti(incense stick) 15 days before presentation
He complained of blurred vision in the left eye He was prescribed topical steroids, antibiotics and lubricants
by the referring clinician for 2 weeks
Clinical PresentationEye UCVA BCVA
(pinhole)Near
visionRight eye (OD) 6/6 6/6 N6Left eye (OS) Finger
counting at 3m6/36 N36
Eye OD OSLids Normal Normal
Conjunctiva/fornices Normal NormalLimbus Normal Normal
Cornea Normal Abnormal distortion of temporal cornea, DM folds, scarring
AC Normal Normal
Iris / Pupil Normal NormalLens Normal Normal
Fundus Normal Normal
IOP ( GAT) 18mm Hg 30 mm Hg
Topography
K1- 53.48 D @160 K2 - 43.41 D @70 Diff =10.07 D
Cyl 10.07 D
Methods
No improvement with spectacle correction Anti-Glaucoma medication - Brimonidine plus timolol eyedrops
twice daily was prescribed Steroids eyedrops were tapered and stopped Option of Contact lenses(RGP) trial after stabilization of
topography was discussed
Results - 4 months follow up
Eye OD OSLids Normal NormalConjunctiva/fornices Normal Normal
Limbus Normal NormalCornea Normal DM folds, scarring,
distortion less obviousAC Normal NormalIris / Pupil Normal NormalLens Normal NormalFundus Normal NormalIOP ( GAT) 18mm Hg 08 mm Hg
Eye UCVA BCVA(pinhole)
Near vision
Right eye (OD) 6/6 6/6 N6
Left eye (OS) 6/18 6/9 N10
Cyl 7.22D
Results - 19 months follow upEye UCVA BCVA (pinhole) Near visionRight eye (OD) 6/6 6/6 N6
Left eye (OS) 6/6 6/6 N6
Eye OD OSLids Normal NormalConjunctiva/fornices
Normal Normal
Limbus Normal NormalCornea Normal CLEAR
AC Normal NormalIris / Pupil Normal NormalLens Normal NormalFundus Normal NormalIOP ( GAT) 18mm Hg 18 mm Hg
Cyl 0.81 D
Results (Follow up topography)Time K1 K2 Cylinder0 month 53.48 @160 43.41@70 10.07 D
4 months 49.53@156 42.31@66 7.22D
19 months 43.83@135 43.02@45 0.81D
Discussion -Literature search
Corneal thermal burns by boiling fluids1, firecrackers1 and electric curling irons3can affect the corneal epithelium (89%) , Superficial stroma (8%) and even cause perforation1 (3%)
A very high corneal astigmatism (6.86 D) was induced by a thermal burn during a cosmetic eyelid procedure which resolved partially and the residual astigmatism required an astigmatic keratotomy2
11 Vajpayee R B, Gupta NK, Angra SK, Chhabra VK, Sandramouli S, Kishore K. Contact thermal burns of the cornea. Can J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun;26(4):215-8. Vajpayee R B, Gupta NK, Angra SK, Chhabra VK, Sandramouli S, Kishore K. Contact thermal burns of the cornea. Can J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun;26(4):215-8.
22 Brian Chou, OD, Brian S. Boxer Wachler, MD .Astigmatism after corneal thermal injury. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:784–786 Brian Chou, OD, Brian S. Boxer Wachler, MD .Astigmatism after corneal thermal injury. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:784–786
3 3 Mannis MJ, Miller RB, Krachmer JH. Contact thermal burns of the cornea from electric curling irons. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep 15;98(3):336-9.Mannis MJ, Miller RB, Krachmer JH. Contact thermal burns of the cornea from electric curling irons. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Sep 15;98(3):336-9.
Discussion In our case, the blink reflex didn't help in avoiding / minimizing
the damage Localized thermal damage caused shrinkage of collagen fibres
(same principle as thermal keratoplasty) An irregular astigmatism (10D cylinder) was induced by the
thermal burn The astigmatism resolved with no refractive correction and so
did the visual acuity. We do not know the exact time required for regression of the astigmatism because there was a gap of 15 months after the 4 month follow up
Corneal thermal injury can induce a very high irregular astigmatism because of localized shrinkage of stromal collagen
While RGP CLs form the mainstay of visual rehabilitation, spontaneous regression of astigmatism over time is likely to occur
An adequate waiting period of at least one year is recommended before embarking on any refractive procedure.
Conclusion