REFOCUSING INDONESIA SPORT DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVESPresented by Kharisma Putra Kartono / i7631146

PRIDE of a nation

UNITY spirit

WHY?

© Mice Carton. Timnas PSSI Kalah Lagi

Drop of performance in international eventsThe Inconvenient Truth

• Last time SEA Games champion was 2011. HOST COUNTRY EFFECT?

• Never achieved big 10 in Asian Games fixtures.

• Gold tradition in badminton branch discontinued in London 2012 Olympic.

0

4

8

12

16

20

24

1994 Hiroshima 1998 Bangkok 2002 Busan 2006 Qatar 2010 Guangzhou 2014 Incheon

Indonesia Asian Games Ranking 1994-2014

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

1997Indonesia

1999 BruneiDarussalam

2001Malaysia

2003Vietnam

2005Filipina

2007Thailand 2009 Laos

2011Indonesia

2013Myanmar

2015Singapore

Indonesia SEA GAMES Ranking 1997-2015

Figure 1 Indonesia ranking in various international sport events (KEMENPORA 2015)

Talent, system, infrastructures, or policy?The Identified Problems

Key problems of sport development in Indonesia1 Low attractiveness to view athlete as profession

2 Weak integration between sport and education system

3 Limited funds for development of sport

4 Low involvement from private sectors in development of sport

5 Inadequate sport infrastructures and equipment

6 Unclear government strategy, role and priorityFigure 2 Key problems of sport development in Indonesia (Herdiansyah et al., 2010)

what can as the highest authority of sport governance do?

Will we become a bystander or a contender?Asian Games 2018

EVENT Management

High Performance Sport

Pyramid Model of Sport DevelopmentUnderlying Theory

Figure 3 Pyramid Model of Sport Development (Green cited in Ha et al, 2015)

Bottom-up? Top-down?

Where should we put our resources in sport?

South Korea development to sporting nationExample 1:

4 decades on top-down approach to produce quality elite sport performance

• Taeneung Athletic Village, 1966• Athlietic Specialist Sytem, 1972• Military Exemption Law, 1973• Performance Enhancing Research Pension, 1988• Specialist sport schools, 1980-1993

REVERSE PYRAMIDSport participation in South Korea was low, only in Five Year National Sport Plan 2003-2008, increase number of mass sport participation is seriously developed.

Pyramid Model of Sport DevelopmentUnderlying Theory

1. Talent identification and

development

2. Advanced athlete preparation and support

3. Training centres and multi-facility activity hubs

4. Domestic and international competitions

5. Educational, scientific/medical, philosophical, promotional support

6. Partnership with supporting agencies

7. Balanced and integrated funding and structures of mass and elite sport

MICRO LEVEL

Operations, Processes, and Methodologies for Development of Individual Athletes

MESO LEVEL

Infrastructures, Personnel, and Services Enabling Sport Programs

MACRO LEVEL

Socio-Economic, Cultural Legislative, and Organisational

Figure 4 Ideal-Type Model of Integrated HP and Mass Sport Development (Carney et al. 2012)

Australian Institute of Sport integrative approachExample 2:

AIS provides quality in each factors that are related to product high performance sport through mass participation in sport.

Sport for sport’s sake or sport for development?Dilemma of Policy Maker

Is Indonesia ready to be a sporting powerhouse?

Development through Sport

Development of Sport

Sport for All

Elite Sport

Where should we aim to address the problem?Policy dimension in Sport

Development through Sport

Development of Sport

Sport for All

Elite Sport

?Unclear positioning

Too many mix in the programmeCurrent Status

Development through Sport

Development of Sport

Sport for All

Elite Sport

The end point

Start of journey

Sporting powerhouse nationThe Aim

POSITIONING of SPORT to PRIVATE SECTORS

SPORT EXPERIENCE QUALITY

Strategic Solution

1

2

Linkage between athletes, supports, and environment Sport Experience

22.60%

25.45%

23.23%21.76%

24.99%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

2000 2003 2006 2009 2012

Indonesia Sport Participation Rate, for Population Age over 10 y.o.

Figure 5 Indonesia Sport Participation Rate, for Population Age over 10 y.o. (Badan Pusat Statistik 2015)

How can we improve current mass participation?

Linkage between athletes, supports, and environment Sport Experience

The anxiety:

Recent scheme:

Extra mile:

Sustainability after retirement

Pension funds for medal winning athletes, 2016

Career coach since productive phase

SPORT as CAREER

Linkage between athletes, supports, and environment Sport Experience

The anxiety:

Recent scheme:

Extra mile:

Long time gap between each national games

Held every four years

Held every two years, co-hosting option

COMPETITION SETTING

Appeal of sport to private funding Sport Positioning

The anxiety:

Recent scheme:

Extra mile:

Limited government resources

UU Nomor 36 tahun 2008 (tax deduction)

Acknowledgeable investment list

SPORT ENABLER

1. Talent identification and

development

2. Advanced athlete preparation and support

3. Training centres and multi-facility activity hubs

4. Domestic and international competitions

5. Educational, scientific/medical, philosophical, promotional support

6. Partnership with supporting agencies

7. Balanced and integrated funding and structures of mass and elite sport

The way it works…

A long pursuit, for national representations…