Assessment System and Unit Evaluation BOE 2005.

Assessment System and Unit Evaluation

BOE 2005

2007-2008

2008-2009

Number of programs receiving data 51 49

Completion rates of all unit surveys 37% 31%

Indicators Used to MonitorAssessment System

Survey Academic YearCompletion

RatesLesson Plan Assessment for

Teacher Candidates2008-2009 33%2009-2010 31%

Curriculum Unit Assessment for Teacher Candidates

2008-2009 20%2009-2010 17%

Instructor's Evaluation of Advanced Graduate Candidate's Application of Research to Practice

2008-2009 46%

2009-2010 25%

Clinical Practice/Student Teaching/Internship/ICE Evaluation by INSTRUCTOR

2008-2009 32%

2009-2010 35%

2008 – 2009 Assessment Activities 1. Continued to modify, improve and expand the assessment system.

2. Worked to assure completion rates were high by monitoring the use of the assessment system.

3. Enhanced the assessment process and communication pathways by including the Department Chairs on the Assessment Committee.

2009 – 2010 Assessment Activities

3. Shifted Major Responsibility of Assessment to Departments

4. Began process of changing the assessment system from a unit-only based system to one combining unit- and program- based instruments. Hybrid work began Summer 2010

5. Replace the Data Management System – QC: TEAMS to PROJECT EXCELLENCE

2008-2009

2009-2010

2010-2011

Number of programs receiving data 49 44 x

Number of programs providing input to Unit (PAR) 32 32 x

Number of programs reporting back to the Unit about changes based on data

x x x

Completion rates of all surveys 31% 29% 65%

Indicators Used to MonitorAssessment System

Survey Academic YearCompletion

RatesLesson Plan Assessment for

Teacher Candidates2008-2009 33%2009-2010 31%Fall 2010 77%

Curriculum Unit Assessment for Teacher Candidates

2008-2009 20%2009-2010 17%Fall 2010 49%

Instructor's Evaluation of Advanced Graduate Candidate's Application of Research to Practice

2008-2009 46%

2009-2010 25%Fall 2010 100%

Clinical Practice/Student Teaching/Internship/ICE Evaluation by INSTRUCTOR

2008-2009 32%

2009-2010 35%

Fall 2010 55%

Committee Members: J. Barnes, OCT, B. Breg, SA, A. Dellaratta, OCT V. Dell’Era, SA, J. Eddy, SEYS, C. Falcon, OCT D. Ferrara (new), ECP, S. A. Kim (new), ECP T. Ko, OCT, M. McAuliffe, IR, B. Murfin, SEYS M Toner, FNES, and new members from EECE

Look for an announcement shortly for a Webinar by Chalk & Wire to demonstrate the features of their system before the end of this semester

Unit Assessment SubcommitteeData Management Design Team

note: Equity 6 - Relate information/instruction/services to students’ out-of-school experiences

2008 – 2009

1 Strongly Disagree4 Strongly Agree

2008 – 2009

1 Strongly Disagree; 4 Strongly Agree

2008 – 2009

1 Strongly Disagree 4 Strongly Agree

Least

Most

Co – Chairs: A Bhattacharya, SEYS, M Toner, FNES

Committee Members: D. Akiba, EECE, E. Armour-Thomas, Chair, SEYS R. Asher, SEYS, M. Baghban, EECE, J. Barnes, OCT H. Bembenutty (former member), SEYS B. Breg, SA, M. Bushnell Greiner, Chair, EECE V. Dell’Era, SA, J. Eddy, SEYS, L. Howell, ECP S. A. Kim, ECP, A. Lipnevich, EECE, M. McAuliffe, IR C. Michaels, Chair, ECP, S. Shin, EECE J. Stengel-Mohr, LCD, N. Wamba, ECP

Unit Assessment Committee

Project Excellence• A System that captures, records, and organizes meaningful data to provide useful information to stakeholders

• A System that permits engagement among all stakeholders through a collaborative, data capturing network with user groups

• A System that displays to stakeholders and interested external agencies the quality of the candidates and graduates of teacher education and clinical programs of the Education Unit

Assessment System and Unit Evaluation BOE 2005.

Documents

Transcript of Assessment System and Unit Evaluation BOE 2005.