ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION ASSESSMENT …
Transcript of ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION ASSESSMENT …
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 1 of 7
F
Proposal: Construction of a swimming pool
Property: Lot 43 DP 271099, 31 Namatjira Street, Barden Ridge
Applicant: Renee Hinkelbein
File Number: DA20/1115
To be determined by: Team Leader (CG)
Report from: Holly Mayo
REASON FOR THE REPORT This application is referred to the Team Leader because as the proposal is outside of the assessment
officers authorised delegation.
ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION
1.0 THAT:
1.1 That Development Application No. DA20/1115 for construction of a swimming pool at Lot 43
DP 271099, 31 Namatjira Street, Barden Ridge be approved, subject to conditions.
ASSESSMENT OFFICER’S COMMENTARY
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSALAn application has been received for the construction of a swimming pool, ancillary to a partly constructed
dwelling house, approved under DA20/0784. The swimming pool is proposed in the rear yard, with a 1m
side setback and 1.8m rear setback.
A site plan is provided below.
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 2 of 7
Image A. Site Plan
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION AND LOCALITYThe site is located off the northern side of Namatjira Street, Barden Ridge. The lot is located in the
relatively new subdivision, known as ‘Ridgeway’. The site is rectangular in shape, with a width of 17.5m
and depth of 31.5m. The site area is 551.3m2. The site falls moderately to the rear, by approximately
1.2m. The site and surrounding area is occupied by a partially constructed dwelling.
A locality plan and an aerial photo are provided below.
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 3 of 7
Image B. Locality Plan
Image C. Aerial Photo
4.0 BACKGROUNDA history of the development proposal is as follows:
The application was submitted on 18 December 2020.
The application was placed on exhibition, with the last date for public submissions being 01
February 2021.
Council requested additional information on 2 February 2021.
Amended plans were lodged on 8 February 2021.
5.0 ADEQUACY OF APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONIn relation to the Statement of Environmental Effects, plans and other documentation submitted with the
application or after a request from Council, the applicant has provided adequate information to Council to
enable an assessment of this application.
6.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATIONThe application was advertised in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 42 of Sutherland Shire
Development Control Plan 2015 (SSDCP 2015). Council notified 5 adjoining or affected owners of the
proposal and no submissions were received.
Revised PlansThe applicant lodged revised plans on 8 February 2021. In accordance with the requirements of
SSDCP2015 these plans were not publicly exhibited as, in the opinion of Council, the changes being
sought did not intensify or change the external impact of the development to the extent that neighbours
ought to be given the opportunity to comment.
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 4 of 7
7.0 STATUTORY CONSIDERATIONSThe land is located within Zone E4 Environmental Living pursuant to the provisions of Sutherland Shire
Local Environmental Plan 2015. The proposed development, being a swimming pool ancillary to a
dwelling house, is a permissible land use within the zone with development consent from Council.
The following Environmental Planning Instruments, Development Control Plan), Codes or Policies are
relevant to this application:
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015 (SSLEP 2015).
Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges River Catchment.
Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015 (SSDCP 2015).
State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55).
8.0 COMPLIANCEState Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 (Remediation of Land) (SEPP 55)State Environmental Planning Policy No. 55 – Remediation of Land (SEPP 55) requires Council to
consider whether the land subject to the development proposal is contaminated; and if the site is
contaminated, Council must be satisfied that the site is suitable or can be made suitable (i.e. following
remediation) for the proposed land use.
A site inspection identified that the site is currently vacant. A review of Council’s GIS and historical aerial
photos has shown that the above was previously bushland.
A search of Council’s records, including historical files, has revealed that the site has had no previous
uses. A search of Council’s contaminated land register specifies that the site is not potentially
contaminated.
In conclusion, the site is suitable for the proposed residential use in accordance with requirements of
SEPP 55.
Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2- Georges River CatchmentGreater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 (GMREP2) includes a number of aims and
objectives for the environment and water quality within the catchment. Appropriate stormwater
management and water quality measures are proposed and there is likely to be minimal adverse impacts
on water quality. Council is of the view that with the implementation of the recommended conditions of
consent the proposal would be consistent with the aims and objectives of GMREP2.
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015The proposal has been assessed for compliance against Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan
2015. A compliance table with a summary of the applicable development standards is contained below:
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 5 of 7
Sutherland Shire Local Environmental Plan 2015
CLAUSE REQUIRED PROPOSAL COMPLIANCE NOTESClause 6.14 - Landscape Area
Minimum 40% 42% Yes
Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan 2015The proposal has been assessed for compliance with SSDCP 2015. A compliance table with a summary
of the applicable development controls is contained below.
5 – Swimming Pools in the E3 and E4 zones
5.2 – Controls for LocationB.5.2.1. Pools shall be located and designed to:a) to minimise disturbance to the
natural landscape with existing significant, healthy trees and vegetation retained and enhanced
b) minimise any impact on native vegetation from excavation
c) minimise any alterations to the natural topography.
Achieved Yes
B.5.2.3. Pool to be sited and designed to retain natural land forms and protect the integrity and stability of geological elements in the vicinity.
Satisfactory Yes
B.5.2.4. Where a pool is located in close proximity to an existing tree, the pool surround/decking shall be of isolated pier and beam construction to prevent tree root damage.
Trees, as approved by DA, are appropriate distance from the proposed pool
Yes
B.5.2.5. Pool to be separated from ancillary development. Non-pool structures to be outside the pool area enclosure.
Compliant Yes
B.5.2.6. The enclosed pool area is to be located and designed so that access between the between the residence and the waterway, street or adjoining public open space is outside the pool enclosure and not through the pool area.
Achieved Yes
B.5.2.7. The pool and surrounds must be designed such that splash, drainage and spill water does not adversely affect waterways and other sensitive natural features, or adjoining properties.
Achieved Yes
B.5.2.8. Pool and associated structures to be located clear of drainage easement.
Achieved Yes
5.3 – Controls for SetbacksB.5.3.1. Outside of pool coping to Pool located in the rear yard Yes
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 6 of 7
primary street setback – 7.5m min.B.5.3.2. Side/rear setback from outside edge of pool coping/decking/paving where pool is not more than 500mm above ground:a) 1m – where no landscaping b) 1m – where landscaping is
non-climbablec) 1.8m where landscaping is
climbable
1m side setback, non-climbable landscaping
Yes
5.4 – Controls for HeightB.5.4.4. Top of pool to be as close as possible to existing ground.
Satisfactory Yes
5.5 – Controls for Swimming Pool Barrier FencesB.5.5.1. Swimming pool barrier fences are to meet minimum heights, as indicated in Figure 1 and Figure 2 – refer to DCP for figures.
Conditioned to comply with the swimming pools act and regulations.
Yes
B.5.5.2. Max. height for swimming pool barrier fence within side/rear yard – 1.8m.
Achieved Yes
B.5.5.3. Max. height for swimming pool barrier fence within front setback – 1.2m. Fence to be open form.
Achieved Yes
5.6 - Controls for Pool LandscapingB.5.6.2. Pool, surrounds and any decking must be screened by plants if the pool, its surrounds or decking stands more than 500mm above ground level.
Pool paving less than 500mm above ground
B.5.6.3. Screen planting of min. mature height of 1.8m to be provided to maintain a reasonable level of privacy.
No screen planting proposed
9.0 ASSESSMENTA detailed assessment of the application has been carried out having regard to the matters for
consideration under Section 4.15(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The
following matters are considered important to this application.
9.1 EarthworksThe proposal includes earthworks and Clause 6.2 of SSLEP 2015 requires certain matters to be
considered in deciding whether to grant consent. These matters include impacts on drainage; future
development; quality and source of fill; effect on adjoining properties; destination of excavated material;
likely disturbance of relics; impacts on waterways; catchments and sensitive areas and measures to
mitigate impacts. The relevant matters have been considered and the application is acceptable.
9.2 Stormwater Management
DAReportDelegated.dotx Page 7 of 7
Clause 6.4 of SSLEP 2015 requires Council to be satisfied of certain matters in relation to stormwater
management prior to development consent being granted. These matters include maximising permeable
surfaces; on-site stormwater retention minimising the impacts on stormwater runoff. These matters have
been addressed to Council’s satisfaction.
9.3 Archaeological SensitivityCouncil records indicate that the subject site is rated high in terms of Archaeological Sensitivity. A site
inspection did not reveal any evidence of shell material or significant sandstone features within the
development zone. The proposal does not warrant an Aboriginal Archaeological Study being undertaken.
10.0 DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONSThe proposed development has a value of less than $100,000 and therefore does not attract any Section
7.12 contributions.
11.0 DECLARATIONS OF AFFILIATION, GIFTS AND POLITICAL DONATIONSSection 10.4 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 requires the declaration of
donations/gifts in excess of $1000. In addition the development application form requires a general
declaration of affiliation. In relation to this application no declaration has been made.
12.0 CONCLUSIONThe application has been assessed having regard to the matters for consideration under Section 4.15 of
the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The application will not result in any significant
impact on the environment or the amenity of nearby residents. Following assessment, the application is
supported for the reasons outlined in this report.
The officer responsible for the preparation of this report is:
Author: Holly Mayo Date: 23 February 2021
Assessment Officer
Checked by: Chris Greig Date: 25 February 2021
Electronically Published by Administration Officer: PBS