Assessment of Natural Attenuation of an Unlined Area using FEFLOW … · 2019. 10. 3. · FEFLOW...
Transcript of Assessment of Natural Attenuation of an Unlined Area using FEFLOW … · 2019. 10. 3. · FEFLOW...
-
Philip Kelsey – Earthtech Consulting Limited
Assessment of Natural Attenuation of an Unlined Area
using FEFLOW Groundwater Modelling
for Consenting of the Bonny Glen Regional Landfill Site, Manawatu
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Rob Burden (Geochemistry), Alan Pattle (Peer Reviewer) and Midwest Disposals Limited
-
Project Background
• Refuse landfill extension, 13 44.6 hectares facility.
• 0.3 hectare unlined area in Stage 1 from previous owner.
• Propose:o Piggy-back liner over Stage 1 refuse.
o Attenuation assessment of leakage in underlying geology.
-
Groundwater Characterisation
Hydraulic Conductivities
• Aquifers, kaquifer = 1.9 x 10-5m/s (geometric mean of 19 tests).
• Aquitards, kaquitard = 2.8 x 10-9m/s (average triaxial data k, Fetter calcs).
• Shakespeare anisotropy 𝑘𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟
𝑘𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑= 6,785 strong preferential flow along bedding direction.
Water Quality
• No evidence existing landfill leakage.
• Match water quality signatures and sand aquifer layers.
• Groundwater dating (150 years) to pass through unsaturated zone.
Batch Testing
• Aquifer sorption.
-
Groundwater Flow Modelling
Central model area under existing landfill.
drainage
recharge
-
Attenuation Assessment – Mass Transport Modelling
Landfill Leakage
Existing Landfill Plus Extension
• Liner Leakage = 2.08m³/do 98% leakage from existing 0.32ha Stage 1 unlined plus 0.80ha Stage 1 to 3C clay liner areas.
o 2% leakage from HDPE/GCL design in existing Stages 3C to 7 and proposed extensions extending over 42.5ha.
• Leachate Source Concentrations:o Reducing leachate strength with time.
o Stage 1 piggy-back liner – construction prior to 2020.
-
Attenuation Assessment – Mass Transport Modelling
Groundwater Compliance Criteria
• Criteria adopted at western site boundary.
o Boron = 1.3g/m³ – ANZECC (80%) freshwater guideline.
o Ammonium-N = 2.3g/m³ – ANZECC (80%) freshwater guideline.
o Arsenic = 0.01g/m³ – DWS for health.
Decreasing mobility
Solutes Modelled
• Solutes most mobile in groundwater.
o Boron (critical case)
o Ammonium-N
o Arsenic
Distribution Coefficients (Kd’s) Determined
for Landfill Leachate Constituents (ml/g)
Am
mo
niu
m-N
Ars
en
ic
Bo
ron
Ch
rom
ium
Co
pp
er
Le
ad
Zin
c
Liner Loess Material 30 700 1.0 1,500 600 7,700 100
Shakespeare Gp.
Siltstone 8 70 0.7 1,500 4,000 7,700 2,300
-
Leachate Source Concentrations – Boron
Boron Groundwater
Compliance at Site
Boundary = 1.3g/m³
15.9 1.3g/m³
-
Attenuation Assessment – Mass Transport Modelling
Boron Modelling
• Peak boron at Western Boundary, t = 400 years.
• Predicted peak boron concentrations
-
Summary of Environmental Effects on Groundwater
• Effects on:
o Groundwater quality.
o Existing bore users.
o Surface water and springs.
Either negligible or less than minor.
o Consent Hearing – February 2015.
o Consents Issued – May 2015.
o No unexpected groundwater quality issues to 2019.
-
Summary
FEFLOW
• Readily incorporatedo Leachate source concentration variability (including piggy-back liner).
o Liner leakage rates for different designs.
o Attenuation settings.
o Multiple layered aquifer system.
• Model graphics and videoo Powerful visualisation tool for checking conceptual model and presenting results.