Assessment at Southampton Presentation of Gradebook and E-assignment Liv Støbseth-Brown 03 August...
-
Upload
brenna-jayne -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
1
Transcript of Assessment at Southampton Presentation of Gradebook and E-assignment Liv Støbseth-Brown 03 August...
Assessment at SouthamptonPresentation of Gradebook and E-assignment
Liv Støbseth-Brown 03 August 2011
3
4
AAS - Governance
Assessment at Southampton Project
Ownership Board (POB)Chair: Rosalynd Jowett
iSolutions workstreamProject Manager - Beccy LewisBusiness Analyst – Will EagleTechnical Lead – Fiona Lewis
Southampton Learning Environment (SLE)
Chair: Debra Humphris
Student and Academic Administration Board
(SAAB)Chair: Debra Humphris
Student and Academic Administration Workstream
Senior User - Gillian Holf, Head of Student Information and Records
Project Team MembersJenny Atkins, Faculty Education Manager, FBL
Jayne Brown, Student Records Manager, SAA HubCatherine Hann, Faculty Education Manager, FEEJackie Lupton, Exams, Awards and Graduation
Manager, SAA HubLiv Støbseth-Brown, Business Change Manager, SAA
Hub
Assessment Review Group
Chair: Rosalynd Jowett
5
AAS : Faculty Representation on POB
• Business and Law - Jenny Atkins, Tim Metcalf, Gill Sivyour,
• Engineering & Environment - Catherine Hann, Ian Williams
• Health Sciences -Claire Atkins, Rosalynd Jowett
• Humanities - Lynn Godfrey
• Medicine - Susan Ponsford, Sally Skidmore, Sally Rushworth
• Natural and Environmental - Jeremy Hinks, Mandy Pervin
• Physical & Applied Science - Andy Gravell, Dain Mead
• Social & Human - Aiden Gregg, Peter Smith
7
E-assignment
8
Submits oneor more files
One or more assessors(e.g. double marking)
Confirmatione-mail
Moderator
External Examiner
Marks & Feedback
Academic IntegrityChecking
E-ASSIGNMENTSYSTEM
AssignmentCoordinator
Confirmatione-mail
Marks report, comments and feedback files
Marks Generation/Calculation
Student & Staff AdministrationSystem
Student & StaffDetails
One or more students
Assignment Configuration
Other InformationSystems
Proposed Institutional System
9
Features• Multiple documents can be submitted
• Documents types specified (Word, PDF, Excel, SPSS…….)
• Virus Checking
• Academic Integrity declaration and Checks (TurnitIn)
• Specify dates for:
– Start & End of submission period
– Extension
– Completion of Marking
– Release of Marks
10
Features continued• Percentages or Graded Criteria (converted to
percentages)
• Makers can upload documents for student
• Export of Marks and submitted work
• Roles: Administrator, Marker, Moderator,External Examiner
• Marking approaches: Single, Double, Blind, 1st marker then 2nd marker
• Notification of Penalties
11
Benefits• For Students
– access to all assignment criteria and marking descriptors
– consistency of submission, marking and feedback, 24/7
• For Markers
– access to assignments online (?no physical copies)
– very similar to peer reviewing
• For Quality Assurance
– transparency of assignment criteria and marking descriptors
– consistent process of marking & easy access for externals
12
Benefits• For the Institution
– Efficiency of administrative processes, faster turn rounds
– Harmonisation of assessment processes across the Institution
– Quality Enhancement
– Analysis of assessment at the criteria level
– Performance feedback to markers leading to improved marker commitment
13
Eassignment Links• Humanities Student example
• http://www.jisc-ea.soton.ac.uk/resources/studentsubmission/humanitiesexample/
http://www.jisc-ea.soton.ac.uk/resources/administration/initialassignmentcreation3/initialassignmentcreation3.htm