ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT - Edl · ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ... – Base...

93
Educational Services ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT Educational Services Department September 2011 Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)

Transcript of ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT - Edl · ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ... – Base...

Educational Services

ASSESSMENT AND

ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

Educational Services Department

September 2011

Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR)

Educational Services

CONTENTS

• Academic Performance Index (API)

• Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

• California Standards Test (CST)

• California Modified Assessment (CMA)

• District/County/State Comparison

Educational Services

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Growth API Year-to-Year Comparison

Base API Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API)

• State Performance Indicator

– Single number score between 200 and 1000 (with 800 as the target API score)

– Measures the year-over-year growth in academic performance

• Growth API vs Base API – Growth API: Change in the API from year to year

– Base API: Baseline API for the current cycle to reflect changes in the testing variations

• Students Considered

– All Students

– Subgroups

– Numerically Significant Subgroups

– Economically Disadvantaged

– English Learners

– Students with Disabilities

• Assessments Considered

– CST Scores (with Writing Component)

– CMA

– CAPA

Educational Services

SUBGROUPS vs NUMERICALLY SIGNIFICANT SUBGROUP

• Subgroup – 100 or more students enrolled or 50 or more students enrolled

who make up at least 15 percent of the total enrollment

• Subgroup Categories – Ethnic/Racial Subgroups – Socioeconomically Disadvantaged – English Learners – Students with Disabilities

• Numerically Significant Subgroup – 100 or more students with valid scores or 50 or more students

with valid scores who make up at least 15 percent of the total valid scores

Educational Services

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eastside Union School District 686 673 687 699 710

Gifford C.Cole Middle School 574 668 683 693 689

Columbia Elementary School 695 668 671 708 723

Eastside Elementary School 666 687 685 690 705

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 711 674 696 715 752

686

673

687 699

710

574

668

683 693 689

695

668 671

708

723

666

687 685 690

705 711

674

696

715

752

550

600

650

700

750

800

Academic Performance Index (API) Growth API

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eastside Union School District 683 678 682 700

Gifford C.Cole Middle School 574 688 681 693

Columbia Elementary School 692 666 671 708

Eastside Elementary School 663 681 683 690

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 709 673 695 715

683 678 682

700

574

688 681

693 692

666 671

708

663

681 683 690

709

673

695

715

550

600

650

700

750

800

Academic Performance Index (API) Base API

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

District Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Columbia Elementary School

Eastside Elementary School

Tierra Bonita Elementary School

2008 622 633 609 618 624

2009 631 646 609 639

2010 655 640 676 672

2011 658 624 683 670 700

622 633

609 618 624

631 646

609

639 655

640

676 672 658

624

683 670

700

560

580

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

Academic Performance Index (Growth API)

Year-to-Year Comparison Numerically Significant Subgroup

Black Students

Educational Services

District Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Columbia Elementary School

Eastside Elementary School

Tierra Bonita Elementary School

2008 672 667 664 686 675

2009 688 694 672 676 706

2010 706 708 705 695 715

2011 715 699 732 701 756

672 667 664

686 675

688 694

672 676

706 706 708 705 695

715 715 699

732

701

756

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

780

Academic Performance Index (Growth API)

Year-to-Year Comparison Numerically Significant Subgroup

Hispanic Students

Educational Services

District Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Columbia Elementary School

Eastside Elementary School

Tierra Bonita Elementary School

2008 740 722 729

2009 752 746 728

2010 742 703

2011 749 751 740 732 801

740 722 729

752 746 728

742

703

749 751 740

732

801

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

780

800

820

Academic Performance Index (Growth API)

Year-to-Year Comparison Numerically Significant Subgroup

White Students

Educational Services

District Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Columbia Elementary School

Eastside Elementary School

Tierra Bonita Elementary School

2008 658 649 653 673 663

2009 676 684 653 677 685

2010 690 690 698 677 699

2011 704 683 720 697 747

658 649 653

673 663

676 684

653

677 685 690 690

698

677

699 704

683

720

697

747

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

Academic Performance Index (Growth API)

Year-to-Year Comparison Numerically Significant Subgroup

Socio-Economically Students

Educational Services

District Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Columbia Elementary School

Eastside Elementary School

Tierra Bonita Elementary School

2008 651 643 648 665 651

2009 665 665 653 662 679

2010 685 685 690 673 697

2011 698 677 722 684 746

651 643 648

665 651

665 665 653

662 679 685 685 690

673

697 698

677

722

684

746

580

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

Academic Performance Index (Growth API)

Year-to-Year Comparison Numerically Significant Subgroup

English Learners

Educational Services

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)

-FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)

Academic Performance Index (API)

Educational Services

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES

• AYP is a series of annual academic performance goals

• California’s Definition of AYP

• Under California’s criteria for ESEA, schools and LEAs are required to meet or exceed requirements within each of the following four areas in order to make AYP annually: – Requirement 1: Participation Rate

– Requirement 2: Percent Proficient—Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) – CST, CMA, CAPA

– Requirement 3: API as an Additional Indicator

– Requirement 4: Graduation Rate

Educational Services

SAFE HARBOR • Safe Harbor is an alternate method of making the AMOs

without meeting the established statewide targets (for AYP) if an LEA, school, or numerically significant subgroup shows significant growth over the prior year.

• An LEA, school, or numerically significant subgroup must show a decrease in the percentage of students below proficient by 10% over the prior year.

• Safe Harbor includes a confidence interval that is calculated and applied by CDE which is based on the number of valid scores.

• For safe harbor to be applied, the school, LEA, or subgroup must also meet the participation rate and the additional indicators (API and graduation rate).

Educational Services

SAFE HARBOR CALCULATIONS • Determine the percentage of students scoring below

proficient in Year 1 Step 1

• Calculate safe harbor goal by computing 10% of the prior year below proficient number Step 2

• Determine the percentage of students scoring proficient in Year 2 and add the results to the Step 2 number to find the safe harbor goal Step 3

• Compare the results of Step 3 to the current year test results to determine if that number is higher than the safe harbor goal Step 4

Educational Services

SAFE HARBOR EXAMPLE

Step 1: Previous Year Results Step 2: Current Year Safe Harbor

Goal

% Proficient: 40% 10% of 60%= 6%

Below Proficient: 60% 40% + 6.0%= 46%

Educational Services

ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP)

• Federal Performance Indicator

• Encompasses four areas (Annual Measurable Objectives): – Participation Rate

– Percent Proficient

– API - Additional Indicator for AYP

– Graduation Rate

• Student Groups Considered for AYP – All students

– Significant racial or ethnic groups

– Economically Disadvantaged (ED)

– Students with Disabilities (SWD)

– Limited English Proficient (LEP)

• Only students enrolled for a full academic year – Enrolled continuously from CBEDs date

Educational Services

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Eastside Union School District Made AYP No

Met 16 of 29 AMOs PI Status (Title I) 3+

Met 0 of 3 AMAOs PI Status (Title III) 4

Met API Growth Target Yes 710 Growth 10

Participation Rate Percent Proficient

ELA MATH ELA MATH

Districtwide Yes Yes No No

Black Students Yes Yes No No

Hispanic Students Yes Yes No No

White Students Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Socio-economically Disadvantaged Yes Yes No No

English Learners Yes Yes No No

Students with Disabilities Yes Yes No No

Educational Services

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Gifford C. Cole Middle School Made AYP No

Met 10 of 21 AMOs PI Status 5+

Met API Growth Target No 689 Growth -4

Participation Rate Percent Proficient

ELA MATH ELA MATH

Schoolwide Yes Yes No No

Black Students Yes Yes No No

Hispanic Students Yes Yes No No

White Students* Yes Yes No No

Socio-economically Disadvantaged Yes Yes No No

English Learners Yes Yes No No

Students with Disabilities Yes Yes No No

Educational Services

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Columbia Elementary School Made AYP No

Met 18 of 21 AMOs PI Status 5

Met API Growth Target Yes 723 Growth 15

Participation Rate Percent Proficient

ELA MATH ELA MATH

Schoolwide Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Black Students Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Hispanic Students Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

White Students* Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

Socio-economically Disadvantaged Yes Yes No Yes/SH

English Learners Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

Students with Disabilities* Yes Yes No No

Educational Services

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Eastside Elementary School Made AYP No

Met 20 of 25 AMOs PI Status 5+

Met API Growth Target Yes 705 Growth 15

Participation Rate Percent Proficient

ELA MATH ELA MATH

Schoolwide Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Black Students Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Hispanic Students Yes Yes No Yes/SH

White Students Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

Socio-economically Disadvantaged Yes Yes No Yes/SH

English Learners Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Students with Disabilities* Yes Yes No No

Educational Services

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Tierra Bonita Elementary School Made AYP No

Met 17 of 21 AMOs PI Status 3

Met API Growth Target Yes 752 Growth 37

Participation Rate Percent Proficient

ELA MATH ELA MATH

Schoolwide Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Black Students Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

Hispanic Students Yes Yes No Yes/SH

White Students* Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

Socio-economically Disadvantaged Yes Yes No Yes/SH

English Learners Yes Yes No Yes/SH

Students with Disabilities* Yes Yes Yes/SH Yes/SH

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TESTS (CST)

• Subjects

– English–Language Arts (Grades 2-8)

– Mathematics (Grades 2-8)

– Science (Grades 5 and 8)

– History–Social Science (Grade 8)

– Writing (Grades 4 and 7)

Educational Services

STUDENT PROFICIENCY RATINGS • CST results show the level of proficiency a

student demonstrates in each of the subject areas tested.

• Students will receive one of the following five ratings on the tests: – Advanced

– Proficient

– Basic

– Below basic

– Far below basic

Educational Services

Content Area

2010–11 API Test

Weights

K–5 6–8 K–8

CST/CMA/CAPA in ELA 56.5% 51.4% 54.2%

CST/CMA/CAPA in Mathematics 37.6% 34.3% 36.1%

CST/CMA/CAPA in Science, Grades 5 and 8 5.9% 7.1% 6.5%

CST in History–Social Science, Grade 8 N/A 7.1% 3.2%

Educational Services

CST PROFICIENCY BANDS Grade Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

2 150–261 262–299 300–349 350–401 402–600

3 150–258 259–299 300–349 350–401 402–600

4 150–268 269–299 300–349 350–392 393–600

5 150–270 271–299 300–349 350–394 395–600

6 150–267 268–299 300–349 350–393 394–600

7 150–262 263–299 300–349 350–400 401–600

8 150–265 266–299 300–349 350–394 395–600

Grade Far Below Basic Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced

2 150–235 236–299 300–349 350–413 414–600

3 150–235 236–299 300–349 350–413 414–600

4 150–244 245–299 300–349 350–400 401–600

5 150–247 248–299 300–349 350–429 430–600

6 150–252 253–299 300–349 350–414 415–600

7 150–256 257–299 300–349 350–413 414–600

8 150–256 257–299 300–349 350–413 414–600

Algebra I 150–252 253–299 300–349 350–427 428–600

English Language Arts

Mathematics

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Growth Trajectory (Federal)

Percent Proficient or Advanced (State)

Educational Services

13.6% 13.6%

24.4% 24.4% 24.4%

35.2%

46.0%

56.8%

67.6%

78.4%

89.2%

100.0%

21.4% 22.2%

26.9%

31.5% 31.0% 30.3%

34.7% 37.1% 37.9%

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

AYP Growth Target Trajectory CST-English Language Arts

Percent Proficient or Advanced

GOAL Eastside Union School District

Educational Services

16.0% 16.0%

26.5% 26.5% 26.5%

37.0%

47.5%

58.0%

68.5%

79.0%

89.5%

100.0%

20.1% 19.8%

26.0%

32.0%

37.4%

28.0%

33.2%

37.7% 40.8%

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

AYP Growth Target Trajectory CST-Mathematics

Percent Proficient or Advanced

GOAL EUSD

Educational Services

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

6 or more years

5 years 4 years 3 years 2 years 1 year

Advanced 14% 14% 12% 12% 14% 13%

Proficient 30% 20% 22% 26% 23% 26%

Basic 34% 31% 32% 30% 32% 30%

Below Basic 10% 24% 21% 19% 19% 18%

Far Below Basic 12% 11% 12% 13% 13% 13%

Pe

rce

nt

in E

ach

Cat

ego

ry

Performance on the CST By Years Enrolled in the District

Englis-Language Arts 2010-2011

Educational Services

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

6 or more years

5 years 4 years 3 years 2 years 1 year

Advanced 14% 20% 17% 23% 16% 12%

Proficient 23% 31% 29% 32% 26% 22%

Basic 31% 28% 24% 22% 28% 29%

Below Basic 21% 17% 24% 18% 22% 29%

Far Below Basic 11% 3% 6% 5% 8% 8%

Pe

rce

nt

in E

ach

Cat

ego

ry

Performance on the CST By Years Enrolled in the District

Mathematics 2010-2011

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

English-Language Arts

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 13.6% 13.6% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 35.2% 46.0% 56.8% 67.6% 78.4% 89.2% 100.0%

Eastside Union School District 21.4% 22.2% 26.9% 31.5% 31.0% 30.3% 34.7% 37.1% 37.8%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 19.7% 22.0% 26.5% 31.6% 0.0% 35.5% 38.7% 38.8% 38.3%

Columbia Elementary School 25.0% 22.4% 24.9% 26.9% 30.8% 25.8% 33.3% 35.2% 38.6%

Eastside Elementary School 24.1% 21.5% 21.2% 31.3% 29.0% 28.1% 32.0% 35.9% 34.8%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 18.5% 24.0% 40.7% 38.2% 35.1% 29.4% 33.3% 37.8% 40.8%

Eastside Academy

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eastside Union School District 0.8% 4.7% 4.6% -0.5% -0.7% 4.4% 2.4% 0.7%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 2.3% 4.5% 5.1% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 0.1% -0.5%

Columbia Elementary School -2.6% 2.5% 2.0% 3.9% -5.0% 7.5% 1.9% 3.4%

Eastside Elementary School -2.6% -0.3% 10.1% -2.3% -0.9% 3.9% 3.9% -1.1%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 5.5% 16.7% -2.5% -3.1% -5.7% 3.9% 4.5% 3.0%

Eastside Academy 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nta

ge P

oin

t G

row

th o

ver

Pre

vio

us

Ye

ar

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Growth

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eastside Union School District 7.8% 8.6% 2.5% 7.1% 6.6% -4.9% -11.3% -19.7% -29.8%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 6.1% 8.4% 2.1% 7.2% 0.3% -7.3% -18.0% -29.3%

Columbia Elementary School 11.4% 8.8% 0.5% 2.5% 6.4% -9.4% -12.7% -21.6% -29.0%

Eastside Elementary School 10.5% 7.9% -3.2% 6.9% 4.6% -7.1% -14.0% -20.9% -32.8%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 4.9% 10.4% 16.3% 13.8% 10.7% -5.8% -12.7% -19.0% -26.8%

-40.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ive

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 13.6% 13.6% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 35.2% 46.0% 56.8% 67.6% 78.4% 89.2% 100.0%

All Students 21% 22% 27% 32% 31% 30% 35% 37% 38%

Black Students 10% 16% 22% 26% 28% 23% 29% 32% 32%

Hispanic Students 18% 18% 24% 28% 29% 29% 33% 36% 36%

White Students 31% 33% 36% 42% 38% 47% 47% 48% 50%

SED 16% 17% 22% 27% 28% 27% 33% 35% 36%

EL 13% 14% 17% 22% 25% 24% 28% 31% 32%

SWD 4% 5% 8% 16% 10% 16% 24% 17% 16%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

All Students 1% 5% 5% 0% -1% 4% 2% 1%

Black Students 16% 22% 26% 28% 23% 29% 32% 32%

Hispanic Students -4% 2% 2% -2% -3% 3% 1% -1%

White Students 11% 14% 15% 7% 15% 17% 13% 13%

SED -5% 0% 0% -4% -4% 2% 0% -1%

EL -8% -5% -5% -7% -7% -3% -4% -6%

SWD -17% -15% -11% -21% -16% -7% -18% -21%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Pe

rce

nta

ge P

oin

t G

row

th o

ver

Pre

vio

us

Ye

ar

California Standards Test (CST)

Percentage Point Growth English Language Arts

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

All Students 8% 9% 3% 7% 7% -5% -11% -20% -30%

Black Students -3% 2% -2% 1% 4% -12% -18% -24% -35%

Hispanic Students 5% 4% -1% 4% 5% -7% -13% -21% -32%

White Students 17% 19% 12% 18% 14% 11% 1% -9% -18%

SED 2% 3% -3% 2% 4% -8% -13% -22% -32%

EL -1% 0% -8% -3% 0% -11% -18% -26% -36%

SWD -10% -9% -17% -9% -14% -20% -23% -40% -52%

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ieve

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST)

Percentage Point Achievement Gap English Language Arts

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

All Students Black Students Hispanic Students

White Students SED EL SWD

2010-2011 GOAL 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6%

EUSD 38% 32% 36% 50% 36% 32% 16%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 38% 31% 38% 51% 37% 33% 14%

Columbia Elementary School 39% 32% 38% 47% 37% 34% 5%

Eastside Elementary School 35% 33% 31% 48% 32% 26% 20%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 41% 37% 38% 57% 39% 35% 29%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

f A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English-Language Arts 2010-2011

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

Eastside Union School District -20% -43% -24% -32% -36% -26% -33%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School -68% -68% -68% -68% -39% -26% -32%

Columbia Elementary School -19% -37% -27% -33% -68% -68% -68%

Eastside Elementary School -26% -53% -20% -31% -38% -68% -68%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School -15% -38% -24% -33% -31% -68% -68%

Eastside Academy -18% -55% -68%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ieve

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

English Language Arts Grade Level Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 13.6% 13.6% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 35.2% 46.0% 56.8% 67.6% 78.4% 89.2% 100.0%

Grade 2 22% 24% 28% 38% 36% 28% 36% 40% 48%

Grade 3 19% 18% 19% 23% 30% 14% 23% 23% 25%

Grade 4 22% 24% 29% 31% 29% 36% 35% 44% 44%

Grade 5 25% 22% 31% 25% 20% 24% 35% 35% 36%

Grade 6 22% 21% 20% 29% 25% 25% 29% 39% 32%

Grade 7 17% 18% 31% 27% 28% 32% 42% 43% 42%

Grade 8 17% 25% 23% 34% 26% 38% 36% 37% 35%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 2 2% 4% 10% -2% -8% 8% 4% 8%

Grade 3 -4% -5% -5% -8% -22% -5% -13% -15%

Grade 4 2% 5% 3% -9% 0% 7% 8% 4%

Grade 5 0% 7% -3% -18% -12% 7% -1% -4%

Grade 6 -1% -4% 1% -13% -11% 1% 3% -8%

Grade 7 -4% 7% -1% -10% -4% 14% 7% 2%

Grade 8 3% -1% 6% -12% 2% 8% 1% -5%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Pe

rce

nta

ge P

oin

t G

row

th o

ver

Pre

vio

us

Ye

ar

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Growth

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 2 8% 10% 4% 14% 12% -7% -10% -17% -20%

Grade 3 5% 4% -5% -1% 6% -21% -23% -34% -43%

Grade 4 8% 10% 5% 7% 5% 1% -11% -13% -24%

Grade 5 11% 8% 7% 1% -4% -11% -11% -22% -32%

Grade 6 8% 7% -4% 5% 1% -10% -17% -18% -36%

Grade 7 3% 4% 7% 3% 4% -3% -4% -14% -26%

Grade 8 3% 11% -1% 10% 2% 3% -10% -20% -33%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ive

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2010-2011 GOAL 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6%

Eastside Union School District 48% 25% 44% 36% 32% 42% 35%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 29% 42% 36%

Columbia Elementary School 49% 31% 41% 35%

Eastside Elementary School 42% 15% 48% 37% 30%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 53% 30% 44% 35% 37%

Eastside Academy 50% 13% 0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts 2010-2011

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

Eastside Union School District -20% -43% -24% -32% -36% -26% -33%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School -68% -68% -68% -68% -39% -26% -32%

Columbia Elementary School -19% -37% -27% -33% -68% -68% -68%

Eastside Elementary School -26% -53% -20% -31% -38% -68% -68%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School -15% -38% -24% -33% -31% -68% -68%

Eastside Academy -18% -55% -68%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ive

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

English Language Arts 2010-2011

Educational Services

Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2011 GOAL 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6%

All Students 48% 25% 44% 36% 32% 42% 35%

Intervention 25% 8% 15% 18% 21% 0% 0%

SES 0% 10% 37% 34% 11% 14% 0%

ASES 49% 20% 31% 17% 32% 38% 38%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English-Language Arts Academic Support Programs

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Mathematics

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

GOAL 16.0% 16.0% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 37.0% 47.5% 58.0% 68.5%

Eastisde Union School District 20.1% 19.8% 26.0% 32.0% 37.4% 28.0% 33.2% 37.7% 40.8%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 10.5% 11.0% 14.8% 22.3% 0.0% 23.2% 29.0% 30.6% 26.3%

Columbia Elementary School 39.2% 27.5% 33.5% 33.6% 40.5% 29.6% 33.9% 44.9% 51.0%

Eastside Elementary School 20.7% 25.2% 29.0% 40.3% 34.5% 32.9% 34.9% 38.9% 44.0%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 30.5% 29.9% 47.9% 45.2% 39.8% 29.2% 37.7% 40.0% 52.4%

Eastside Academy

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eastisde Union School District -0.3% 6.2% 6.0% 5.4% -9.4% 5.2% 4.5% 3.1%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 0.5% 3.8% 7.5% 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 1.6% -4.3%

Columbia Elementary School -11.7% 6.0% 0.1% 6.9% -10.9% 4.3% 11.0% 6.1%

Eastside Elementary School 4.5% 3.8% 11.3% -5.8% -1.6% 2.0% 4.0% 5.1%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School -0.6% 18.0% -2.7% -5.4% -10.6% 8.5% 2.3% 12.4%

Eastside Academy 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nta

ge P

oin

t G

row

th o

ver

Pre

vio

us

Ye

ar

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Growth

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Eastisde Union School District 4.1% 3.8% -0.5% 5.5% 10.9% -9.0% -14.3% -20.3% -27.7%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School -5.5% -5.0% -11.7% -4.2% -13.8% -18.5% -27.4% -42.2%

Columbia Elementary School 23.2% 11.5% 7.0% 7.1% 14.0% -7.4% -13.6% -13.1% -17.5%

Eastside Elementary School 4.7% 9.2% 2.5% 13.8% 8.0% -4.1% -12.6% -19.1% -24.5%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 14.5% 13.9% 21.4% 18.7% 13.3% -7.8% -9.8% -18.0% -16.1%

-60.0%

-40.0%

-20.0%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ive

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2011 2013 2014

GOAL 16.0% 16.0% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 37.0% 47.5% 58.0% 68.5% 79.0% 89.5% 100.0%

All Students 20% 20% 26% 32% 37% 28% 33% 38% 41%

Black Students 14% 14% 20% 23% 28% 19% 24% 30% 32%

Hispanic Students 17% 18% 23% 31% 37% 28% 34% 39% 42%

White Students 27% 25% 35% 40% 47% 40% 43% 42% 47%

SED 16% 16% 23% 29% 35% 26% 32% 36% 40%

EL 16% 16% 21% 28% 34% 23% 31% 37% 40%

SWD 7% 7% 9% 12% 12% 15% 19% 21% 23%

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

All Students 0% 6% 6% 5% -9% 5% 5% 3%

Black Students 14% 20% 23% 28% 19% 24% 30% 32%

Hispanic Students -1.7% 3.6% 5.3% 5.3% -9.8% 5.8% 5.5% 4.2%

White Students 5.0% 15.3% 14.2% 15.1% 2.8% 14.9% 9.1% 9.3%

SED -4.4% 3.3% 3.2% 2.6% -11.8% 3.6% 3.1% 2.2%

EL -4.3% 1.4% 2.2% 1.9% -14.2% 2.5% 3.6% 2.4%

SWD -12.9% -10.7% -13.7% -20.5% -22.9% -8.7% -12.0% -14.7%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

Pe

rce

nta

ge P

oin

t G

row

th o

ver

Pre

vio

us

Ye

ar

California Standards Test (CST)

Percentage Point Growth Mathematics

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

All Students 4% 4% -1% 6% 11% -9% -14% -20% -28%

Black Students -2% -2% -6% -3% 2% -18% -24% -28% -37%

Hispanic Students 1% 2% -3% 5% 11% -9% -14% -19% -27%

White Students 11% 9% 9% 14% 21% 3% -5% -16% -22%

SED 0% 0% -3% 3% 8% -11% -16% -22% -29%

EL 0% 0% -5% 2% 7% -14% -17% -21% -28%

SWD -9% -9% -17% -14% -15% -23% -28% -37% -46%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ieve

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST)

Percentage Point Achievement Gap Mathematics

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

All Students Black Students Hispanic Students

White Students SED EL SWD

2010-2011 GOAL 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5%

EUSD 41% 32% 42% 47% 40% 40% 23%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 26% 20% 27% 33% 25% 22% 19%

Columbia Elementary School 51% 40% 55% 54% 51% 55% 19%

Eastside Elementary School 44% 38% 44% 45% 43% 44% 22%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 52% 39% 54% 67% 52% 51% 42%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

f A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics 2010-2011

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Alg I

Eastside Union School District -7% -19% -9% -40% -40% -38% -61% -42%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School -45% -36% -61% -42%

Columbia Elementary School -5% -13% -17% -38%

Eastside Elementary School -10% -27% -4% -45% -39%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School -6% -16% -3% -34% -33%

Eastside Academy -19% -56% -69% -69%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ieve

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

Mathematics Grade Level Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 16.0% 16.0% 26.5% 26.5% 26.5% 37.0% 47.5% 58.0% 68.5% 79.0% 89.5% 100.0%

Grade 2 44% 41% 48% 53% 49% 41% 48% 53% 62%

Grade 3 27% 30% 32% 35% 42% 32% 34% 42% 50%

Grade 4 26% 23% 33% 32% 31% 37% 38% 49% 60%

Grade 5 11% 11% 30% 30% 21% 17% 28% 23% 29%

Grade 6 10% 11% 12% 25% 18% 13% 21% 34% 29%

Grade 7 11% 9% 19% 15% 16% 17% 22% 26% 31%

Grade 8 9% 10% 10% 27% 8% 27% 32% 30% 8%

Algebra I 9% 15% 12% 34% 52% 64% 53% 24% 27%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 2 -3% 7% 5% -4% -8% 7% 5% 9%

Grade 3 -14% -9% -13% -11% -17% -7% -6% -3%

Grade 4 -21% -8% -16% -22% -12% -3% 1% 7%

Grade 5 -33% -11% -18% -32% -32% -13% -25% -24%

Grade 6 -33% -29% -23% -35% -36% -20% -14% -24%

Grade 7 -35% -22% -33% -37% -32% -19% -22% -22%

Grade 8 -34% -31% -21% -45% -22% -9% -18% -45%

Algebra I -29% -29% -14% -1% 15% 12% -24% -26%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Pe

rce

nta

ge P

oin

t G

row

th o

ver

Pre

vio

us

Ye

ar

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Growth

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Grade 2 28% 25% 22% 27% 23% 4% 1% -5% -7%

Grade 3 11% 14% 6% 9% 16% -5% -14% -16% -19%

Grade 4 10% 7% 7% 6% 5% 0% -10% -9% -9%

Grade 5 -5% -5% 4% 4% -6% -20% -20% -35% -40%

Grade 6 -6% -5% -15% -2% -9% -24% -27% -24% -40%

Grade 7 -5% -7% -8% -12% -11% -20% -26% -32% -38%

Grade 8 -7% -6% -17% 1% -19% -10% -16% -28% -61%

Algebra I -7% -1% -15% 8% 26% 27% 6% -34% -42%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ive

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Alg I

2010-2011 GOAL 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5%

Eastside Union School District 62% 50% 60% 29% 29% 31% 8% 27%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 24% 33% 8% 27%

Columbia Elementary School 63% 55% 51% 31%

Eastside Elementary School 59% 42% 65% 24% 30%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 63% 53% 66% 35% 36%

Eastside Academy 50% 13% 0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics 2010-2011

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Alg I

Eastside Union School District -7% -19% -9% -40% -40% -38% -61% -42%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School -45% -36% -61% -42%

Columbia Elementary School -5% -13% -17% -38%

Eastside Elementary School -10% -27% -4% -45% -39%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School -6% -16% -3% -34% -33%

Eastside Academy -19% -56% -69% -69%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Gap

Be

twe

en

Ach

ive

me

nt

and

Go

al

California Standards Test (CST) Percentage Point Achievement Gap

Mathematics 2010-2011

Educational Services

Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

2011 GOAL 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5%

All Students 62% 50% 60% 29% 29% 31% 8%

Intervention 49% 29% 45% 13% 18% 0% 0%

SES 67% 20% 53% 16% 16% 7% 0%

ASES 61% 51% 49% 28% 30% 38% 20%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics Academic Support Programs

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Cohort Growth Summary

English-Language Arts

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 13% 47% 40%

Grade 3/4 63% 32% 5%

Grade 4/5 17% 51% 32%

Grade5/6 26% 57% 17%

Grade 6/7 22% 52% 26%

Grade 7/8 18% 54% 28%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

English-Language Arts Eastside Union School District

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3

Grade 3/4

Grade 4/5

Grade5/6

Grade 6/7 23% 52% 25%

Grade 7/8 23% 55% 22%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

English-Language Arts Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 21% 45% 34%

Grade 3/4 56% 35% 9%

Grade 4/5 22% 47% 31%

Grade5/6

Grade 6/7

Grade 7/8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

English-Language Arts Columbia Elementary School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 2% 56% 42%

Grade 3/4 68% 32% 0%

Grade 4/5 12% 52% 36%

Grade5/6 38% 51% 11%

Grade 6/7

Grade 7/8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

English-Language Arts Eastside Elementary School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 13% 38% 49%

Grade 3/4 66% 30% 4%

Grade 4/5 19% 53% 28%

Grade5/6 24% 57% 19%

Grade 6/7

Grade 7/8

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ateg

ory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

English-Language Arts Tierra Bonita Elementary School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3

Grade 3/4

Grade 4/5

Grade5/6

Grade 6/7 0% 50% 50%

Grade 7/8 0% 40% 60%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

English-Language Arts Eastside Academy

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Cohort Growth Summary

Mathematics

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 25% 42% 33%

Grade 3/4 48% 37% 15%

Grade 4/5 9% 43% 48%

Grade5/6 38% 46% 16%

Grade 6/7 24% 56% 20%

Grade 7/8 41% 47% 12%

Grade 7/Alg I 7% 39% 54%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

Mathematics Eastside Union School District

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3

Grade 3/4

Grade 4/5

Grade5/6

Grade 6/7 24% 56% 20%

Grade 7/8 40% 47% 13%

Grade 7/Alg I 8% 38% 54%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

Mathematics Gifford C. Cole Middle School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 40% 34% 26%

Grade 3/4 16% 54% 30%

Grade 4/5 13% 40% 47%

Grade5/6

Grade 6/7

Grade 7/8

Grade 7/Alg I

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

Mathematics Columbia Elementary School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 11% 47% 42%

Grade 3/4 63% 32% 5%

Grade 4/5 5% 37% 58%

Grade5/6 58% 36% 6%

Grade 6/7

Grade 7/8

Grade 7/Alg I

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

Mathematics Eastside Elementary School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3 18% 49% 33%

Grade 3/4 69% 23% 8%

Grade 4/5 8% 55% 37%

Grade5/6 36% 48% 16%

Grade 6/7

Grade 7/8

Grade 7/Alg I

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ateg

ory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

Mathematics Tierra Bonita Elementary School

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

Increased Remained Decreased

Grade 2/3

Grade 3/4

Grade 4/5

Grade5/6

Grade 6/7 50% 0% 50%

Grade 7/8 0% 100% 0%

Grade 7/Alg I 50% 0% 50%

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Pe

rce

nt

Pe

r C

ate

gory

California Standards Test (CST) Growth Summary

Mathematics Eastside Academy

Cohort: 2010 to 2011

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Cluster Analysis

English-Language Arts

Educational Services

Word Analysis and Vocabulary

Development

Reading Comprehension

Literary Response and Analysis

Written Convention Writing Strategies Writing Applications

Grade 2 66.6% 61.4% 70.3% 63.8% 53.5%

Grade 3 63.0% 54.8% 67.6% 55.4% 48.6%

Grade 4 65.2% 52.4% 56.9% 59.5% 46.9% 56.0%

Grade 5 62.2% 56.2% 59.2% 60.0% 52.6%

Grade 6 60.9% 51.7% 55.8% 59.7% 50.9%

Grade 7 63.4% 60.5% 59.9% 59.1% 52.5% 76.7%

Grade 8 57.0% 59.7% 52.6% 56.3% 54.5%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

% C

orr

ect

California Standards Test (CST) Cluster Analysis

English Language Arts By Grade Level

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA STANDARDS TEST (CST)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Cluster Analysis

Mathematics

Educational Services

Number Sense Algebra and

Functions Measurement and Geometry

Statistics, Data Analysis, and Probability

Number Properties,

Operations, and Linear Equations

Graphing and Systems of

Linear Equations

Quadratics and Polynomials

Functions and Rational

Expressions

Grade 2 73.5% 69.8% 77.9% 71.2%

Grade 3 69.7% 72.5% 71.5% 75.3%

Grade 4 75.7% 77.0% 65.8% 70.0%

Grade 5 51.2% 58.2% 49.7% 65.5%

Grade 6 55.3% 57.4% 46.7% 51.5%

Grade 7 50.8% 55.2% 51.4% 60.3%

Grade 8 38.6% 50.9% 36.0% 51.8%

Algebra I 56.7% 41.8% 47.7% 42.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

% C

orr

ect

California Standards Test (CST) Cluster Analysis

Mathematics By Grade Level

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA MODIFIED ASSESSMENT (CMA)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

English Language Arts

Educational Services

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 46.0% 56.8% 67.6% 78.4% 89.2% 100.0%

Grade 2

Grade 3 6% 9% 0%

Grade 4 0% 17% 14%

Grade 5 14% 11% 14%

Grade 6 19% 10%

Grade 7 6% 6%

Grade 8 0% 0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Modified Assessment (CMA) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

2010-2011 GOAL 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6%

Eastside Union School District 0% 14% 32% 10% 6% 0%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 0% 6% 0%

Columbia Elementary School 0%

Eastside Elementary School 0% 20% 8% 33%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 0% 13% 28% 40%

Eastside Academy

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Modified Assessment (CMA) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts 2010-2011

Educational Services

CALIFORNIA MODIFIED ASSESSMENT (CMA)

-STATE ACCOUNTABILITY-

2010-2011

Mathematics

Educational Services

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 47.5% 58.0% 68.5% 79.0% 89.5% 100.0%

Grade 2

Grade 3 6%

Grade 4 13% 28% 0%

Grade 5 6% 8% 19%

Grade 6 20% 20%

Grade 7 19% 11%

Grade 8

#REF! 1

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Modified Assessment (CMA) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Alg I

2010-2011 GOAL 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5%

Eastside Union School District 10% 19% 20% 11%

Gifford C. Cole Middle School 10% 11%

Columbia Elementary School 0% 51% 50%

Eastside Elementary School 0% 0% 0% 25%

Tierra Bonita Elementary School 0% 14% 50% 60%

Eastside Academy

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Modified Assessment (CMA) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics 2010-2011

Educational Services

DISTRICT, COUNTY, STATE COMPARISON

2010-2011

Academic Performance Index (API)

California Standards Test (CST)

Educational Services

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

GOAL 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800

EUSD 668 686 673 687 699 710

County 703 704 721 733 747

State 720 728 742 755 767 778

600

650

700

750

800

850

AP

I

Academic Performance Index (Growth) District, County, State Comparison

Year-to-Year Comparison

Educational Services

All Students 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade

GOAL 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6% 67.6%

EUSD 38% 48% 25% 44% 36% 32% 42% 35%

County 51% 56% 45% 62% 57% 51% 53% 52%

State 54% 56% 46% 64% 59% 55% 57% 57%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English Language Arts District, County, State Comparison

2010-2011

Educational Services

GOAL All Students Black Students Hispanic Students White Students SED EL SWD

EUSD 67.6% 37.8% 32% 36% 50% 36% 32% 16%

County 67.6%

State 67.6% 56.2% 43% 45% 72% 44% 39% 34%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

English-Language Arts District, County, State Comparison

2010-2011

Educational Services

All Students 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade Alg I

GOAL 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5% 68.5%

EUSD 38% 62% 50% 60% 29% 29% 31% 8% 34%

County 41% 65% 69% 71% 62% 48% 46% 32% 42%

State 40% 66% 68% 71% 63% 53% 50% 32% 47%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics District, County, State Comparison

2010-2011

Educational Services

GOAL All Students Black Students Hispanic Students White Students SED EL SWD

EUSD 68.5% 40.8% 32% 42% 47% 40% 40% 23%

County 68.5%

State 68.5% 58.4% 41% 50% 70% 49% 49% 36%

Pe

rce

nt

Pro

fici

en

t o

r A

dva

nce

d

California Standards Test (CST) Proficiency Rate

Mathematics District, County, State Comparison

2010-2011