Assessed Coursework

4
Problem: Mechanical deaeration equipment of seawater injection system will be out of operation for 3 months. Seawater injection system operating condition: Kinetic viscosity, = . Volume flow rate, = = . Diameter of pipe, = = . Pipe area, = = ( . ) = . Sherwood number, = . . . = Where, = = and = Corrosion implication of operating the system with mechanical deaeration and oxygen scavenger injection: Concentration of oxygen in seawater, C = 0.01ppm = 3.125 x 10 -4 molm -3 = . . . . = . = . = . = . . . =

description

assignment

Transcript of Assessed Coursework

  • Problem:

    Mechanical deaeration equipment of seawater injection system will be out of operation for 3

    months.

    Seawater injection system operating condition:

    Kinetic viscosity, = .

    Volume flow rate, = = .

    Diameter of pipe, = = .

    Pipe area, = = (.

    ) = .

    Sherwood number, = . .. =

    Where, = =

    and =

    Corrosion implication of operating the system with mechanical deaeration and oxygen

    scavenger injection:

    Concentration of oxygen in seawater, C = 0.01ppm = 3.125 x 10-4 molm-3

    = . .

    . . = .

    = .

    = .

    = . .. =

  • = . . (. ). .

    . = .

    =

    = . . = . = .

    Corrosion implication of operating the system without mechanical deaeration:

    Concentration of oxygen, C = 7ppm = 0.21875 molm-3

    Corrosion rate without mechanical deaeration is 27.5mmy-1 = 2.29mm/m

    Amount of corrosion without mechanical deaeration equipment for 3 months is 6.87mm.

    Corrosion control assessment:

    In order to reduce corrosion risk during repair of mechanical deaeration equipment, 2

    possible changes to mode of operation to reduce corrosion risk which are as following:

    1. Increase amount of sodium sulphide oxygen scavenger to seawater

    From inspection data indicates that acceptable corrosion rate is < 0.1mmy-1:

    . = . =

    Therefore, m

    Chemical reaction is as below:

    Na2SO3 + 0.5 O2 -> Na2SO4

    Theoretically, 8 ppm of sodium sulphide is needed to reduce 1 ppm of dissolved oxygen.

    Initial concentration of oxygen scavenger (Cos) reduce dissolved oxygen in seawater from 0.1

    ppm to 0.01 ppm:

    = .

    = .

    Table 1: Change of corrosion rate of system corresponding to the amount of oxygen

    scavenger added to seawater injection system.

    Concentration of oxygen

    scavenger, Cos (ppm)

    Oxygen concentration,

    Co2 (ppm)

    Corrosion rate,

    ilim (mmy-1)

    0.72 6.91 27.16

  • 4 6.5 25.40

    8 6 23.63

    12 5.5 21.62

    16 5 19.62

    20 4.5 17.72

    24 4 15.72

    28 3.5 13.76

    32 3 11.80

    36 2.5 9.81

    40 2 7.85

    44 1.5 5.89

    48 1 3.93

    52 0.5 1.96

    55.8 0.025 0.12

    Efficiency of sodium sulfite oxygen scavenger is higher when it injected with

    continuous batch at suitable point in the feed water system. However, oxygen corrosion

    cannot inhibited by oxygen scavenger completely and increasing amount of oxygen

    scavenger with continuous batch injection will increase cost. In additional, sodium sulfide

    oxygen scavenger can act as nutrient for SRB bacteria from seawater.

    From table 1, amount of oxygen scavenger required to reduce acceptable corrosion

    rate of 0.1 mmy-1 is 55.8 ppm. High concentration of sodium sulfite will increase pH of

    seawater but this also increase solid to the pipe leading erosion corrosion and possibility of

    pipe blockage. However, increasing amount of oxygen scavenger will not increase

    effectiveness of deoxygenate due to low reaction rate of oxygen scavenger with oxygen at

    room temperature. Catalyze is require to increase reaction rate of oxygen scavenger with

    oxygen.

    Amount oxygen scavengers increased will not effectively substitute the function of

    the deaerator. For example, if the oxygen content of the feedwater of boiler system is greater

    than 50ppb then oxygen corrosion will occur although oxygen scavenger added into

    feedwater. Sulfite does not passivate metal surface.

    2. Decrease flow rate of water

    Initial reynold number of seawater flow is 1.46 x 106 which indicate turbulent flow inside

    pipeline. Flow rate of water will cause change in reynold number.

    From =

    , Re directly proportional to u.

    Initial flow rate of water, = . = 0.184 m3s-1

    Velocity of seawater flow in pipe, = .

    ..= .

    Theoretically,

  • Critical velocity for erosion, =

    r

    Density of water r = 1030 kgm-3

    Empirical constant c is between 180 and 245 for continuous service or up to 300 for

    intermittent service. Therefore, Vc is ranging from 5.61 ms-1 to 9.35 ms-1.

    Table 2: Change of corrosion rate of system corresponding to flow rate of water and reynold

    number.

    Flow rate of water, u

    (m3s-1)

    Reynold number, Re Corrosion rate, ilim

    (mmy-1)

    0.184 1.46 x 106 27.16

    0.160 1.27 x 106 23.79

    0.140 1.11 x 106 21.46

    0.120 0.955 x 106 18.86

    0.100 0.796 x 106 16.15

    0.080 0.637 x 106 13.34

    0.060 0.477 x 106 10.35

    0.040 0.318 x 106 7.35

    0.020 0.159 x 106 4.06

    Initial velocity of seawater flow in pipe is 10.08 exceed critical velocity for

    erosion will cause erosion corrosion and enhance corrosion by mass transport controlled with

    increase oxygen delivery to pipe internal surface. From table 1, reducing flow rate of water

    from 0.184 m3s-1 to 0.020 m3s-1 will decrease the corrosion rate from 23.41 mmy-1 to 3.5

    mmy-1. This shown that decrease flow rate of water without change in initial amount of

    oxygen scavenger (0.72 ppm) is less effective to reduce corrosion rate compare to effect of

    increase amount of oxygen scavenger.

    In conclusion, amount of oxygen scavenger is the major factor to reduce corrosion

    risk in seawater injection system without mechanical deaeration equipment for 3 months. In

    order to achieve a cost effective plan, both amount of oxygen scavenger and flow rate of

    water operation condition can be changed to compensate loss of mechanical deaeration

    equipment.