Aspects of multi-functional linkages in rural areas Michael Gregory European Network for Rural...
-
Upload
myles-owen -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Aspects of multi-functional linkages in rural areas Michael Gregory European Network for Rural...
Aspects of multi-functional linkages in rural areas
Investing in Young Farmers: Opportunities in Multifunctional Agriculture
15 December, Brussels
Michael Gregory
European Network for Rural Development
2
Objective of this presentation
To describe the strength of economic linkages between agriculture and the rest of the rural economy in selected NUTS 3
regions throughout the EU
…and illustrate that the provision of ‘public goods’ can be a significant part of the ‘multifunctionality’ mix of farms and rural enterprises.
© E
NR
D C
on
tact
Poin
t
3
Basis of the analysis presented
• The EN RD Thematic Working Group No.2 studying ‘Linkages between agriculture and the wider rural economy’
• Quantitative and qualitative analysis was conducted in 18 NUTS 3 rural areas throughout the EU and followed-up by further study in selected regions and a wide-ranging exercise to identify and assess specific project interventions.
4
Choice of NUTS3 Regions:
5
Clustering of regions:
• Non-dynamic areas: ▲
• Agriculturally-dependent dynamic areas: ▲
• Diversified dynamic areas: ▲
6
Backward Linkage 1.273
Indirect effects 0.242
Most Important Backward Relation
Trade (0.064)
Backward Dispersion
0.667
Backward Interconnectedness
2.583
Output Elasticity 0.092
Income Elasticity 0.111
Low backward linkages:
Major Products
Wheat
Cotton
Milk
Meat
Pine Wood
Fish Farming
Major imported Inputs
Locally Produced Inputs
Seed
Fertilizer
Plant Protection
Machinery
Irrigation
Feedstuff
7
Total forward: 2.589
Indirect effects1.533
Forward Food Industry
0.272
Forward Trade 0.201
Forward Hotels & Catering
0.118
Forward Dispersion
1.247
Flour Mills Bakeries PastaTrade
Ginners Textiles Trade
Milk and Dairy
Milk CheeseTourism Trade
Meat and Meat Products
WoodWood IndustryConstructionFurniture Trade
Food IndustryTourism Trade
Direct links Indirect linksHigh forward linkages:
8
Initial Input/Output Analysis results:Comparative analysis between clusters reveals:
• Backward linkages are generally quite low in all 3 clusters
• Forward linkages are generally strong in all 3 clusters
• Trade, Hotels & Catering appear to have high backward & forward links with the rest of the economy, in all 3 clusters
• Diversification appears to be higher in Diversified Dynamic areas than other clusters
• Accessibility + competitive agri-food chain critical factors underpinning agricultural links with the rural economy
9
Diversification trends:
• Tends to occur/have greater chances in areas where there are ‘real’ alternatives
• Where diversification policies have been aggressively promoted they have tended to result in shorter term, less sustainable outcomes
• Where agriculture is a significant sector, it tends to offer the best opportunities for specialisation and investment
10
Project level characteristics - general
• Evidence in all the selected regions of a wide range of EAFRD supported projects which demonstrate multifunctionality (both on and off farm income generation)
• Local people / entrepreneurial spirit are key main drivers in building linkages
• High impact of local institutional arrangements
11
In the EAFRD supported projects identified, analysed and found to be generating positive outcomes:
• Over 20% generate additional environmental and/or social public goods
• These public goods benefits are often identified a priori – but may be more substantial than expected.
• Additional non-planned environmental and/or social benefits may also be generated.
• These extra benefits would not have been materialized without policy intervention.
Project level characteristics – investments which additionally generate ‘public goods’
12
• Investments (supported by RD funds) propensity to create successful - economically positive - linkages would be higher with a more cross-cutting and integrated programming approach
• For the current programming period – possibility for improved selection criteria and technical and marketing support at the project level
• For the future – [more] explicit recognition of the multiplier effect of agriculture - ‘embedding’ linkages between agriculture and other sectors of the economy in the programming framework – more focussed territorial targeting
Possible RD policy implications to consider include:
13
For more information please visit EN RD website:
• TWG1: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/thematic-initiatives/twg1/en/twg1_home_en.cfm
• TWG2: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/thematic-initiatives/twg2/en/twg2_home_en.cfm
• TWG3: http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/thematic-initiatives/twg3/en/twg3_home_en.cfm
14
Selected case study examples –
illustrating the provision ‘public goods’ (both environmental and
social) as part of the multifunctionality mix
15
Adding value to agricultural and forestry products
Environmental sustainability is a major focus of the operation of the farm and is significantly “valued in the market” (photovoltaic panels, homeopathy products used to treat animals, no-tillage farming
techniques)
“La ferme du Hourcot”, Ornezan, Gers (FR) Establishment of cheese
factory within a farm
producing cereals, milk and
cheese.
Main goal : to produce high-
quality cheese and take
control of the whole
production chain, including
direct sales to local
consumers.
© E
NR
D
Con
tact
Poi
nt
16
Air quality, animal welfare, soil functionality, biodiversity.
“La ferme du Hourcot”, Ornezan, Gers (FR)
Public Goods provided
Rural vitality: new jobs (plus farm succession)
© E
NR
D
Con
tact
Poi
nt
© E
NR
D
Con
tact
Poi
nt
© E
NR
D
Con
tact
Poi
nt
17
Adding value to agricultural and forestry products
“Dairy plant Ema Mejeri”, Kalmar Ian (SE)• Establishment of a local dairy plant and production and
distribution of milk and dairy products to a local market
• Main goal was to offer owners (two farmers implementing the project) an alternative market, through the control of the whole production chain and the sales of high quality dairy products to local consumers.
• Environmental sustainability is promoted through a reduction of transportation effort
• Rural vitality: very significant impacts; creation of 20 new jobs; additional farmers provide milk to the firm (spillover); higher local incomes; rural economic diversification; mobilization of local actors.
18
Diversification into non-agricultural activities
• Establishment of a garlic museum; tourist facility attracting customers (direct sales).
• Main goal was to create event and tourism activities out of their farm product and increase their income.
“Maison de l’ail”, Saint Clar, Gers (FR)
© E
NR
D C
on
tact
Poin
t
19
“Maison de l’ail”, Saint Clar, Gers (FR)
Rural vitality: maintenance of jobs; higher income; rural identity (spillover to other local farms and sectors - synergy)
© E
NR
D C
on
tact
Poin
t © E
NR
D C
on
tact
Poin
t
© E
NR
D C
on
tact
Poin
t
Public Goods provided
Environmental sustainability: farmland is kept as a natural prairie; very low use of pesticides.
20
Support for business creation and development
• Establishment of a network which aims at the strengthening of cooperation between potato producers, restaurants and accommodation firms.
• Main goals were to: develop high-quality organic products and utilize modern marketing strategies in order to link the local area image with these products.
“Sales promotion and awareness of potatoes”, Waldviertel (AT)
© E
rdäp
felre
gion
Lai
nsitz
tal
21
“Sales promotion and awareness of potatoes”, Waldviertel (AT)
• Rural vitality: creation of new jobs in several sectors (agriculture, food processing, catering, etc.); higher incomes; rural identity (spillover to local sectors).
© E
rdäp
felre
gion
Lai
nsitz
tal
• Environmental sustainability: the project involves organic farms.
Public Goods provided
22
Diversification (Leader approach)
Establishment of a medium-sized rural accommodation unit in an area characterized by its high natural and aesthetic value.
“Mantania Tower Traditional Hotel”, Trikala (GR)
The aim was to establish an accommodation which respects local architecture and offers a wide range of services specific to the area (restaurant serving traditional local food; small shop selling local products; organization of “truffle days” and mushroom collection).
23
“Mantania Tower Traditional Hotel”, Trikala (GR)
Environmental sustainability: compliance
with local traditional architecture;
commodification of natural and aesthetic
value of the area.
Rural vitality: creation of a significant number of
new jobs; higher incomes; rural identity (spillover
to local sectors).
Public Goods provided