Asd March 2006 Organization Capability Baseline Summary Report HY1 2005-06 1 Organization Capability...

asd

March 2006 Organization Capability BaselineSummary Report HY1 2005-06 1

Organization Capability Baselines

Summary Report HY1 2005-06

March 2006

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4

asd


# of Projects Received for Baselining

53%

34%

13%

Development Maintenance Production Support

Data Received for Baselines – Distribution of Project Type

asd


Cumulative Baselines for all Development Projects

Metric Standard Deviation

MeanLower Bound

Upper Bound

Count

Effort Estimation Variance (%) 5.6 1.9 0.0 9.8 96

Schedule Estimation Variance (%) 3.1 0.6 0.0 6.1 110

Cumulative Defect Removal Efficiency (%) 2.3 99.0 98.0 100.0 55

Review Efficiency (%) 11.3 90.2 83.5 100.0 51

Delivered Defect Density (Defects/KLOC) 0.7 0.4 0.0 1.6 47

Cost of Quality (%) 14.3 25.4 11.1 43.3 77

Cost of Poor Quality (%) 3.4 2.3 0.1 8.3 76

Baseline Period Apr-05 to Sept-05

asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects – Effort Variance

-2.00

0.002.00

4.006.00

8.0010.00

Mean LB UB

Process Performance

Effort Variance

Jan03-Apr03 May03-August03 Sep03-Apr04 July04-Mar 05 Apr05-Sep05

0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.00

Standard deviation Mean

Process Perormance

Effort Variance

Jan03-Apr03 May03-August03 Sep03-Apr04 July 04 - Mar 05 Apr05-Sep05

Downward trend in both Standard Deviation and Mean

Mean: 1.0Lower Bound: 0.0Upper Bound: 9.8 Upward rise in UB

asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects – Schedule Variance

0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.008.00

Mean LB UB

Process Performance

Schedule Variance


0.002.004.006.008.00

10.00


Process Performance

Schedule Variance

Jan03-Apr03 May03-August03 Sep03-Apr04

July 04 - Mar 05 Apr05-Sep05

Downward trend in both Standard Deviation and Mean

Mean: 0.6Lower Bound: 0.0Upper Bound: 6.1 Downward shift in

UB

asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects – DDD

0.000.200.400.600.801.001.201.401.60

Mean LB UB

Process Performance

Delivered Defect Density (Defects / KLOC)

Jan03-Apr03

May03-August03

Sep03-Apr04

July 04 - Mar 05

Apr05-Sep05

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20


Process Performance

Delivered Defect Density

Jan03-Apr03

May03-August03

Sep03-Apr04

July 04 - Mar 05

Apr05-Sep05

Upward trend in Standard Deviation while Mean remains constant

Mean: 0.4Lower Bound: 0.0Upper Bound: 1.6 Upward rise in UB

asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects – CDRE

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00


Process Performance

Cuml. Defect Removal Efficiency


Downward trend in Standard Deviation while Upward trend in Mean

Mean: 99.0Lower Bound: 98.0

Upper Bound:100.0 Upward rise in LB

88.00

90.00

92.00

94.00

96.00

98.00

100.00

Mean LB UB

Cuml. defect removal Efficiency


asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects– RE

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

Mean LB UB

Review Efficiency (%)


0.00

50.00

100.00


Process Performance

Review Efficiency

Jan03-Apr03 May03-August03 Sep03-Apr04 July 04 - Mar 05

Apr05-Sep05 Jan03-Apr03 May03-August03 Sep03-Apr04

July 04 - Mar 05 Apr05-Sep05

Downward trend in Standard Deviation while Upward trend in Mean

Mean: 90.2Lower Bound: 83.5

Upper Bound:100.0 Upward rise in LB &

UB

asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects – COQ

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00

50.00

Mean LB UB

Process Performance

Cost of Quality (% of Total Effort)

May03-August03 Sep03-Apr04 July 04 - Mar 05 Apr05-Sep05

0.00

10.00

20.00

30.00

40.00


Process Performance

Cost of Quality


Upward trend in Standard Deviation while downward trend in Mean

Mean: 25.4Lower Bound: 11.1Upper Bound:43.3 Downward shift in

LB

asd


Capability Baseline for Development Projects – COPQ

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

Mean LB UB

Cost of Poor Quality (Rework Effort - %)


0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00


Process Perormance

COPQ


Upward trend in Standard Deviation while downward trend in Mean

Mean: 2.3Lower Bound: 0.1Upper Bound:8.3

Downward shift in LBUpward shift in UB

asd


Cumulative Baselines for all Maintenance Projects


MetricStandard Deviation

MeanLower Bound

Upper Bound

Count

Effort Estimation Variance (%) 2.8 1.6 0.0 5.9 201





Pre Release Defect Density (Defects / KLOC) 4.2 4.4 0.6 7.4 42

Cost of Quality (%) 8.2 22.4 15.1 33.9 74


Productivity (LOC/PD)

Java / J2EE 13.2 86.9 73.1 99.4 7

AS400 (Lines changed / hr) 0.5 1.1 0.8 1.6 4

C 35.0 46.0 14.0 88.0 11

asd


Capability Baseline for Maintenance Projects

-5

0

5

10

15

20

Standarddeviation

Mean LB UB

Effort Variance

Jan03-Apr03 May03-August03 September03-April04 July04-March05 April05-Sept05

SEVMean: 0.02LB: 0.0UB: 1.9Variation in the process has come down compared to the previous baseline

EEVMean: 1.6LB: 0.0UB: 5.9Variation in the process has come down compared to the previous baseline

0

2

4

6

8

10

Standarddeviation

Mean LB UB

Schedule Variance


asd



0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

Standarddeviation

Mean LB UB

Pre Release Defect Density (Defects / KLOC)

May03-August03 September03-April04 July04-March05 April05-Sept05

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Standarddeviation

Mean LB UB

Delivered Defect Density (Defects / KLOC)


PRDDMean: 4.4LB: 0.6UB: 7.4An upward shift in the UB is observed. No major changes in Standard deviation & Mean

DDDMean: 0.2LB: 0.0UB: 1.0Variation in the process has reduced, an upward shift in UB is noticed

asd



0

20

40

60

80

100

Standarddeviation

Mean LB UB

Cuml. Defect Removal Efficiency (%)


0

20

40

60

80

100

Standarddeviation

Mean LB UB

Review Efficiency (%)


REMean: 94.7LB: 92.0UB: 100.0Process performance has significantly improved when compared to the previous period

CDREMean: 96.9LB: 92.0UB: 100.0Process performance remains at the same level compared to previous period

asd



0.0

10.020.030.040.0

50.0

Mean LB UB

Process Performance

Cost of Qualify

J uly04-March05 April05-Sept05

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

Mean LB UB

Process Performance

Cost of Poor Quality

July04-March05 April05-Sept05

COPQMean: 1.7LB: 0.0UB: 5.0Significant reduction in COPQ is observed

COQMean: 22.4LB: 15.1UB: 33.9Significant reduction in COQ is observed

asd


Cumulative Baselines for all Production Support Projects

MetricLower Bound

Upper Bound

Adherence to turnaround time (%) 95.00 98.00

Delivered Defects (% of Work Requests delivered with defects) 0.00 1.72


asd


Capability Baselines for Production Support Projects

0

20

40

60

80

100

Low er Bound Upper Bound

Process Performance

Adherence to Turnaround Time

Jan-03 May-03 Sep-03 Apr-04 Sep-05

0

2

4

6

8

Low er Bound Upper Bound

Process Performance

Delivered Defects

Jan-03 May-03 Sep-03 Apr-04 Sep-05

DDLB: 0.0UB: 1.72Upward trend in the UB when compared to the previous baseline period

ATTLB: 95.1UB: 98.0Significant improvement in ATT observed

asd


Capability Baselines – Enterprise Applications

MetricStandard Deviation

MeanLower Bound

Upper Bound Count

Effort Estimation Variance (%) 13.2 -0.8 0.0 5.8 238



Pre-release Defect Density (Defects/KLOC) 0.7 0.5 0.0 1.0 215



Cost of Quality (%) 5.9 11.5 9.2 16.4 4



asd


Interpretations based on the data received for baselines for HY1 2005-06

• Increase in range for the Effort Estimation Variance is observed with an upward shift in the upper bound indicating effort overruns in many projects.

• Schedule Estimation Variance has shown downward trend in the UB and reduced standard deviation indicating increased consistency in delivery of projects on-time.

• The mean Delivered Defect density remains the same but standard deviation shows an upward trend indicating that some projects could have abnormally high DDD.

• CDRE and RE have significantly improved when compared with the previous baselines.

• Significant improvements observed in COQ and COPQ in the maintenance projects.

• Data received did not contain adequate data points on Productivity, and hence productivity trend could not be derived.

asd

March 2006 Organization Capability BaselineSummary Report HY1 2005-06 20March 2006

Thank You

Asd March 2006 Organization Capability Baseline Summary Report HY1 2005-06 1 Organization Capability...

Documents

Transcript of Asd March 2006 Organization Capability Baseline Summary Report HY1 2005-06 1 Organization Capability...