artivle 12

59
G.R. No. 39519 November 21, 1991 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner-appellee vs. DANIEL PINTO, JR. and NARCISO BUENAFLOR, JR., defendants-appellants. The Solicitor General for petitioner-appellee.K.V. Faylona & Associates for defendants-appellants. FERNAN, C.J.: p As an aftermath of the mission of the Legazpi City Police Department to serve on Christmas day in 1970 a search warrant on Francisco Bello who was allegedly training a private army, patrolmen Daniel Pinto, Jr. and Narciso Buenaflor, Jr. were found guilty beyond reasonable doubt by the then Circuit Criminal Court in said city, of killing not only Bello but also 9-year-old Richard Tiongson and Rosalio Andes and seriously wounding Maria Theresa Tiongson. The dispositive portion of the decision of June 13, 1974. 1 reads: WHEREFORE, the Court finds the accused Narciso Buenaflor, Jr. and Daniel Pinto, Jr. GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt of crime of: (a) MURDER in CCC-X-288-Albay, and hereby sentences each of them to suffer imprisonment for the rest of their lives ( Reclusion Perpetua ); to indemnify the heir of Rosalie Andes in the amount of Twenty-five Thousand (P25,000.00) Pesos, jointly and severally; and to pay the costs; (b) MURDER in CCC-X-289-Albay, and hereby sentences each of them to suffer imprisonment for the rest of their lives ( Reclusion Perpetua ); to indemnify the heirs of Francisco Bello in the amount of Twenty-five Thousand (P25,000.00) Pesos, jointly and severally; and to pay the costs; (c) MURDER in CCC-X-298-Legazpi City, and hereby sentences each of them to suffer imprisonment for the rest of their lives ( Reclusion Perpetua ); to indemnify the heirs of Richard Tiongson in the amount of Twenty-five Thousand (P25,000.00) Pesos, jointly and severally; and to pay the costs; (d) FRUSTRATED MURDER in CCC-X-299 Legazpi City, and hereby sentences each of them to imprisonment of from Six (6) Years and One (1) Day of Prision Mayor as Minimum, to Twelve (12) Years and One (1) Day of Reclusion Temporal as Maximum; to indemnify the victim, Maria Theresa Tiongson, in the amount of Eight Thousand (P8,000.00) Pesos, jointly and severally; and to pay the costs. In addition to the foregoing the accused are sentenced to suffer perpetual disqualification from public office. According to the prosecution, on December 25, 1970, the Legazpi City Police secured from the City Court of Legazpi a warrant for the search of the house and premises of Francisco Bello in Mariawa, Legazpi City on the ground that the police had probable cause to believe that Bello illegally possessed a garand rifle, a thompson submachinegun and two automatic pistols. 2 The police had earlier undertaken a surveillance of Bello on the basis of information it had received that he was conducting an "obstacle course" or training men for combat since October, 1970. 3

description

=)

Transcript of artivle 12

G.R. No. 39519 November 21, 1991PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner-appellee vs.DANIEL PINTO, JR. an NAR!ISO "#ENAFLOR, JR., defendants-appellants.The Solicitor General for petitioner-appellee.K.V. Faylona & Associates for defendants-appellants.FERNAN, C.J.:pAs an aftermath of the mission of the Legazpi City Police Department to serve on Christmas day in 1970 a search arrant on !rancisco "ello ho as allegedly training a private army# patrolmen Daniel Pinto# $r. and %arciso "&ena'or# $r. ere fo&nd g&ilty (eyond reasona(le do&(t (y the then Circ&it Criminal Co&rt in said city# of )illing not only "ello (&t also 9-year-old *ichard +iongson and *osalio Andes and serio&sly o&nding ,aria +heresa +iongson. +he dispositive portion of the decision of $&ne 1-# 197.. 1 reads/012*2!3*2# the Co&rt 4nds the acc&sed %arciso "&ena'or# $r. and Daniel Pinto# $r. 567L+8 (eyond reasona(le do&(t of crime of/9a: ,6*D2* in CCC-;-er imprisonment for the rest of their lives 9Reclusion Perpetua:? to indemnify the heir of *osalie Andes in the amo&nt of +enty-4ve +ho&sand 9Pee hen she heard a s&ccessive (&rst of g&n4re. "ello# ho as the (alcony facing the copra )iln 9GagonanG: ith his (ac) toards the pili tree# grad&ally fell to the 'oor ith his hands a(ove his head. +hen there as another (&rst of g&n4re. !rom the )itchen# 7nocencia r&shed to the door from here she sa a man holding a long 4rearm# hom she later identi4ed as Pinto# near the pili tree hich as aro&nd eight meters from here "ello as# and another man# also holding a g&n# cro&ching near the stairs. 517nocencia# ith her to-year-old child in her arms# 52 as a(o&t to r&sh to "ello hen her h&s(and p&lled her. $&st then a man# hom 7nocencia identi4ed as "&ena'or# came &p the ho&se# pointed a g&n at 7nocencia and her h&s(and and told them to lay 'at on the 'oor. +he man as)ed them here the g&n as. 7nocencia told him that there as no g&n in the ho&se (&t then# hen she loo)ed aro&nd# she sa a long 4rearm ith its m&zzle pointed &pard leaning against the all near the door aro&nd to meters from here "ello laid 'at on his (ac). "ello himself had a g&n (&t it as in its holster t&c)ed on his aist. 53 7t as "&ena'or ho too) (oth the long 4rearm and the g&n in "elloHs holster.5$0hen !rancisco Andes ent &p the ho&se# he told 7nocencia that *osalio as dead. 55 7nocencia ent near the pili tree here *osalioHs (ody as# )nelt don and as)ed the man ith a long 4rearm hy he )illed *osalio. +he man ansered that *osalio fo&ght (ac). 1oever# 7nocencia did not notice any eapon near *osalioHs (ody. 5%"elloHs hands and feet ere tied together and a (am(oo pole as inserted (eteen them so that to men# one of them (eing !rancisco Andes# co&ld carry the cadaver. 5& "ello died (eca&se of Gshoc) secondary to massive hemorrhage d&e to m&ltiple g&nshot o&ndsG. 5' A former pilot and ect the arrest of "ello even if no complaint had (een lodged against him. &% According to Pinto# of the 4fteen (&llets in the magazine of his car(ine# only to remained. 1e 4red GmostG of the thirteen shots d&ring the G"ello incidentG. &&Pinto shot the man later identi4ed as *osalio Andes hen he as at a distance of aro&nd three meters. *osalio as Gface to faceG ith him hen Pinto shot him. As *osalio did not fall from the 4rst shot# Pinto contin&ed shooting him. &' 0hen he ent &p the porch he sa the garand Glying on the 'oorG (&t the g&n t&c)ed on "elloHs aist as still in its holster. &93n the +iongson incident# Pinto asserted that he did not 4re his car(ine. '( 0hen he sa the headlight of the +iongsonsH Aeep# he also sa a 'ashlight (eing aved. A little later# he heard a sho&t ordering the Aeep to stop. +hen he heard one shot and immediately after# the volley of 4re as the Aeep as going toards his direction. As it passed (y him# he heard the AeepHs passengers shrie). '1!or his part# "&ena'or declared that d&ring the mission to serve the search arrant on "ello# he carried the G.-= cali(er revolver +el.G 9sic: hich had (een iss&ed to him (y the Legazpi City Police Department. 1e did not 4re his g&n at the +iongsons and# Gas a matter of fact#G he s&rrendered his 4rearm for (allisticeCamination. '2 7n the afternoon of Decem(er ort to '&sh o&t "ello ho# &n)non to the police# had earlier left the vicinity. 7t as hen the police 4red at the said (odega that "otin m&st have (een accidentally shot. 1(5 +his story as &ncorro(orated (&t if tr&e# o&ld sho the policeHs dangero&s propensity for &sing otherise oFcial operations in an &nlaf&l manner.A propensity for rash A&dgment as li)eise amply shon at the incident involving the +iongson children. Bince the Aeep coming toards them as oned (y the And&izas# the appellants acted o(vio&sly in the (elief that "ello as its passenger and posthaste they 4red &pon it even itho&t any inE&iry as to the identity of its passengers.1(% 5ranting that the police indeed 4red a arning shot# so&nd discretion and restraint dictated that# there (eing no responding shots from its passengers after the alleged arning shot and considering the condition of the road hich as not only m&ddy (&t &phill# instead of directing aimless g&n(&rst at the Aeep# the most that they co&ld have done as to render the Aeep immo(ile (y shooting its tires. +hat ay# they co&ld have veri4ed the identity of the passengers. As it ere# they riddled the Aeep ith (&llets inA&ring in the process innocent passengers ho ere completely &naare of hat they ere &p against.AppellantsH star) denial of 4ring their g&ns &pon the +iongson family falls 'at in the face of vario&s circ&mstantial evidence hich point to their c&lpa(ility. +here is the &n'inching testimony of Bgt. *omero that he sa G'ashes of 4reG from the direction of "&ena'or as the Aeep (earing the +iongsons passed (y. Baid testimony as corro(orated (y that of *afael $aco(# the PC mem(er of team