Artemis project proposal round 2013

Johan Lukkien, Peter van Otterloo

Monday, January 21, 2013

Agenda

• Brief introduction into Artemis JU• Procedure • Results of Match Making event

• Questions – continuously

Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking Artemis

• General goal• support R & D Activities … to attract the

best European research ideas and capacities in the field of Embedded Computing systems.

• Trends• increasingly large projects: >100py• implementation pilots (AIPP) + ASP• exploitation focus

• Consortium• Industry dominant, Industry lead• per country: KI at most 50%• ‘Tree-based’ consortia

• Proposal• Brokerage/matchmaking event• One phase: Full Project Proposal• business oriented, KI mainly for

knowledge

• Timeline• 3 years duration• Matchmaking: T0• FPP: T0+8• Start: T0+11 earliest

• Funding scheme• 50% of integral cost, including travel

and equipment− 66% national, 33% EU

• not enough to pay new AIOs!• national funding is limited

• Strategy• include staff in the budget to cover for

holes in the funding

2012 Call

• 24 eligible proposals submitted• 11 below threshold (= 40 / 60)• 7M available in NL (+ 3.5 in EU)• funding per country distributed over

projects in which that country is partaking until money runs out

• NL in: CRYSTAL (4.3M), HoliDes (1.3M), ARROWHEAD (0.3M), ACCUS (1.07M instead of 1.9M)

• TU/e in: CRYSTAL, ACCUS, COPCAMS, ???

• Negotiations ongoing, start April 1

Example funding scheme

• 3y postdoc: 380K @ 50% = 190K (ok)• 3y AIO: 336K @ 50% = 168K (not ok)• 0.7y staff (UD): 110K @ 50% = 55K (fills the gap)

• total funding: 413K, 275K from AgentschapNL, 138K from EU

• Note: • Effort, hence # TU/e partners / Artemis proposal is limited• Artemis is an industry motivated program

Project types

• Artemis Sub-Programmes:• ASP1: Methods and processes for safety-relevant embedded systems• ASP2: Embedded Systems for Healthcare and Wellbeing• ASP3: Embedded Systems in Smart environments• ASP4: Embedded Systems for manufacturing and process automation• ASP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems• ASP6: Embedded Systems for Security and Critical Infrastructures Protection• ASP8: Human-centred design of embedded systems

• Artemis Innovative Pilot Projects, open in 2013 call• AIPP2: Innovative Integrated Care Cycles• AIPP3: Seamless communication and interoperability - Smart environments: the

Neural System for society• AIPP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems

Selection criteria

• ASP: excellence of proposal• AIPP: efficiency in execution

• less research, more development, large budget, high impact• success rate until now: 100%

• Make a difference• ‘Think big’ (100’s of my)

• eHealth and Cyber Security relatively low in the current clusters• hence, favoured (?)

Brokerage Events

• JU ENIAC and Catrene (EUREKA)• brokerage event Aeneas (Aeneas (the Association of R&D actors,

i.e. the private part in the PPD ENIAC) Jan 23/24• fully booked

• Still to come:• ITEA brokerage event on March 19/20

Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking ENIAC

• General goal• enhance the further integration and

miniaturization of devices, and increase their functionalities while delivering new materials, equipment and processes, new architectures, innovative manufacturing processes, disruptive design methodologies, new packaging and ‘systemising’ methods.

• Trends• exploitation focus

• Consortium• Industry dominant, Industry lead• per country: KI at most 50%• Tree-based

• Proposal• Brokerage/matchmaking event• Two phases: Project Outline, Full

Project Proposal

• Timeline• 3 years duration• Matchmaking: T0• PO: FPP+4• FPP: T0+8• Start: T0+11 earliest

• Funding scheme• 50% of integral cost, including travel

and equipment− 66% national, 33% EU

• not enough to pay new AIOs!• national funding is limited

• Strategy• include staff in the budget to cover for

holes in the funding

EUREKA – ‘doing business through technology’

• EUREKA – from the site:• Raising the productivity and competitiveness of European business through

technology. • Boosting national economies on the international market• and strengthening the basis for sustainable prosperity an employment.

• EUREKA ‘Clusters’ – from the site:• long-term, strategically significant industrial initiatives. • usually have a large number of participants, • aim to develop generic technologies of key importance for European

competitiveness • mainly in ICT, energy and more recently in the biotechnology sector.

• Since 1985

EUREKA Clusters

• International consortium (at least 2 countries)

• Rules, per country:• SME, IND, KI• certain division• IND/SME lead

• International cluster label required for national funding

EUREKA ITEA2

• General goal• advanced pre-competitive R&D in

Software-intensive Systems and Services (SiSS)

• Trends• relatively large projects: 40-300py

• Consortium• Industry driven, Industry lead• per country: IND, SME, KI• Best: tree-mode construction, Core-

team writing• Proposal

• Brokerage/Matchmaking event• Three phases: Project Outline, Full

Project Proposal, National proposal• Technically innovative• business oriented

• Timeline• 3 years duration• Matchmaking: T0• PO: T0+4• FPP: T0+8• NF: T0+12 – T0+16• Start: T0+15 earliest

• Funding scheme• 50% of integral cost, including travel

and equipment• not enough to pay new AIOs!• national funding is limited

• Strategy• include staff in the budget to cover for

holes in the funding

EUREKA CATRENE

• General goal• Technological Leadership for a

competitive European ICT industry• …nano-/microelectronics solutions that

respond to the needs of society at large• Trends

• relatively large projects: 40-300py• Consortium

• Industry driven, Industry lead• per country: IND, SME, KI• Core-team for writing

• Proposal• Brokerage/matchmaking event• Three phases: Project Outline, Full

Project Proposal, National proposal• Technically innovative• business oriented

• Timeline• 3 years duration• Matchmaking: T0• PO: T0+3• FPP: T0+8• NF: T0+12 – T0+16• Start: T0+15 earliest

• Funding scheme• 50% of integral cost, including travel

and equipment• not enough to pay new AIOs!• national funding is limited

• Strategy• include staff in the budget to cover for

holes in the funding