Art 39 Amor Art 42 Bailon Persons

8/19/2019 Art 39 Amor Art 42 Bailon Persons

1/56

Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT

Manila

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. !"#$ %eb&ua&' !( )##"

%E*ICIT+S +MOR,C+T+*+N( Petitione&(-s.COURT O% +PPE+*S( M+NI*+( OR*+NDO . C+T+*+Nan/ MEROPE E. R+G+N0+( Respon/ents.

D E C I S I O N

1N+RES,S+NTI+GO( 2.3

This petition fo& &e-ie4 assails the Decision of the Cou&t of +ppeals in C+,G.R. CV No. !$5"6 /ate/ +u7ust !( )##8( 4hich&e-e&se/ the Decision) of the Re7ional T&ial Cou&t 9RTC: of Da7upan Cit'( &anch 88( in Ci-il Case No. D,#!;!( /ecla&in7the


2/56

%u&nish copies of this Decision to +tt'. Napoleon . +&enas( 2&.an/ +tt'. Nolan E-an7elista.

SO ORDERED.#

Respon/ents appeale/ the /ecision to the Cou&t of +ppeals(4hich &e-e&se/ the /ecision of the RTC( thus3

@HERE%ORE( p&ee4ise DISMISS Ci-il Case No. D,#!;!( RTC( &anch 88( Da7upan Cit'. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

+fte& the


3/56

natu&ali=ation an/ /i-o&ce.

The Cou&t of +ppeals the&efo&e ha/ no basis 4hen it hel/3

In li7ht of the alle7ations of %elicitas co


4/56

pe&sonalit' to inAui&e into the


5/56

Republic of the Philippines

SUPREME COURTManila

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. 94053 March 17, 1993

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitione&(-s.GREGORIO NOLSCO, &espon/ent.

The Solicitor General for plaintiff-appellee.

@a&loo G. Ca&/enal fo& &espon/ent.

R E S O * U T I O N

FELICINO, J.:

On 6 +u7ust $55( &espon/ent G&e7o&io Nolasco file/ befo&e the

Re7ional T&ial Cou&t of +ntiAue( &anch #( a petition fo& the/ecla&ation of p&esue&( in-o>in7 +&ticle 8 of the %a


6/56

assist the Solicito&,Gene&al in the instant case. The Republica&7ue/( fi&st( that Nolasco /i/ not possess a F4ell,foun/e/ belief that the absent spouse 4as al&ea/' /ea/(F ! an/ secon/( Nolascos

atte


7/56

!( $5"( as ae& Nolasco( 4ithout p&e?u/ice to

he& &eappea&ance. 4

The Republic appeale/ to the Cou&t of +ppeals conten/in7 thatthe t&ial cou&t e&&e/ in /ecla&in7 2anet Monica Pa&>e& p&esu


8/56

absentee is still aliveB o& the absentee is generally considered tobe dead an/believed to be so by the spouse present ( o& is presumed dead un/e& +&ticle ;$# an/ ;$ of the Ci-il Co/e. 9

The %a


9/56

In the case at ba&( the Cou&t consi/e&s that the in-esti7ation

alle7e/l' con/ucte/ b' &espon/ent in his attee&s 4he&eabouts is too s>etch' to fo&< the basis of a &easonable o& 4ell,foun/e/ belief that she 4as al&ea/'/ea/. @hen he a&&i-e/ in San 2ose( +ntiAue afte& lea&nin7 of 2anet Monicas /epa&tu&e( instea/ of see>in7 the help of localautho&ities o& of the &itish Eno4 the 7eo7&aphical /iffe&ence bet4een *on/on an/*i-e&pool( fo& a hus( e-e&' ti


10/56

ci&cu


11/56

not sub'ect to stipulation( ecept that


12/56


Manila

%IRST DIVISION

G.R. No. *,8;$#6 Ma' ;#( $5;

SER+%I+ G. TO*ENTINO( petitione&(

-s.HON. EDG+RDO *. P+R+S( M+RI+ C*EMENTE an/ THE*OC+* CIVI* REGISTR+R O% P+OMONG( U*+C+N(&espon/ents.

+


13/56

Cou&t( upon +


14/56


15/56

Dapucanta( Dula' +ssociates fo& petitione&.

Si7uion Re'na( Montecillo an/ On7sia>o *a4 Office fo& p&i-ate

&espon/ent.

P+R+S( 2.3

In an action 9%ae/ fo& the/ecla&ation of Nullit' of his ati( Met&o Manila: 4ith he&ein petitione& *ilia Oli-a @ie7el

9*ilia( fo& sho&t( an/ /efen/ant the&ein: on the 7&oun/ of *ilias p&e-ious eistin7


16/56

as a of


17/56


Manila

EN +NC

G.R. No. *,6;!8) +p&il 6( $55

*EONI*O C. DON+TO( petitione&s(-s.HON. +RTEMON D. *UN+( PRESIDING 2UDGE( COURTO% %IRST INST+NCE O% M+NII+( R+NCH II HON.2OSE %*+MINI+NO( CIT1 %ISC+* O% M+NI*+B P+0 .

++1+N( &espon/ents.*eopol/o P. Dela Rosa fo& petitione&.

E


18/56

cha&acte&.

P&io& to the /ate set fo& the t&ial on the


19/56


20/56

Pu&suant to the /oct&ine /iscusse/ in *an/icho -s. Relo-a( petitione& Donato cannot appl' the &ule on p&e?u/icial Auestionssince a case fo& annul


21/56


Manila

EN +NC

+.M. No. );8$ 2ul' ;( $$)

DOROTH1 . TERRE( co


22/56

$5( co


23/56

co


24/56

9Ehibit DB tsn( 2ul' "( $5!( p. )8:B she li>e4ise file/ acase fo& bi7a


25/56

the co


26/56


Manila

%IRST DIVISION


27/56

G.R. No. #$868 2une 8( $$8

2OSE C. SERMONI+( petitione&(-s.HON. COURT O% +PPE+*S( Ele-enth Di-ision( HON.DEOGR+CI+S %E*I0+RDO( P&esi/in7 2u/7e( Re7ional T&ialCou&t of Pasi7( &. 6( an/ 2OSEPH SINS+1( &espon/ents.

uasha( +spe&illa( +ncheta( Pea an/ Nolasco fo& petitione&.

Ponciano *. Escua/&a fo& p&i-ate &espon/ent.

E**OSI**O( 2.3

i7a


28/56

cont&act 4as &e7iste&e/. %o& this &eason( the co&&espon/in7info&es issue 4ith the Falle7e/ conceal


29/56

const&ue/ libe&all' in fa-o& of the accuse/. To co


30/56

s to &e-e&se the/ecision /ate/ Octobe& )( $$$ of the Cou&t of +ppeals inC+,G.R. CR No. )#"##( 4hich affi&


31/56

The facts of this case( as foun/ b' the cou&t a Auo( a&e asfollo4s3

+ppellant *ucio Mo&i7o an/ *ucia a&&ete 4e&e boa&/


32/56

9": Months of P&ision Co&&eccional as


33/56

Petitione&


34/56


35/56

The fi&st ele


36/56

SO ORDERED.

Puno( 9Chai&ete/ asCi-il Case No. #,)#8. On 2ul' 5( )##;( the RTC of

Muntinlupa( &anch )6!( &en/e&e/ an +


37/56

That on o& about 2anua&' )8( $5;( in the Municipalit' of SanPe/&o( P&o-ince of *a7una( Philippines( an/ 4ithin the ?u&is/iction of this Hono&able Cou&t( the sai/ accuse/ /i/ thenan/ the&e 4illfull'( unla4full' an/ feloniousl' cont&act a secon/

o& subseAuent


38/56

@he&efo&e( the O&/e& of +u7ust ;( )##" is &econsi/e&e/ an/ setasi/e. *et a ne4 one be ente&e/ Auashin7 the info&


39/56

bein7 its statuto&' counsel in all appeale/ c&i


40/56

initio on 8 +p&il )##; b' &anch )6! of the Re7ional T&ialCou&t of Muntinlupa Cit'. The sai/ /ecision 4as ne-e& appeale/( an/ beca of. In othe& 4o&/s( the&e 4as onl' one


41/56


42/56

In Ma&bella,obis -. obis( the Cou&t pointe/ out the /an7e& of not enfo&cin7 the p&o-isions of +&ticle 8# of the %ae an/ eat it too. Othe&4ise( all that ana/-entu&ous bi7a


43/56


Manila

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. ;!8!" +p&il !( )###

+NTONI+ +RM+S 1 C+*ISTERIO( petitione&(-s.M+RIETT+ C+*ISTERIO( &espon/ent.

VITUG( 2.3

On )8 +p&il $$)( Teo/o&ico Caliste&io /ie/ intestate( lea-in7se-e&al pa&cels of lan/ 4ith an esti


44/56

sole hei& of the estate of Teo/o&ico Caliste&io ' Cacabelos.

Respon/ent Ma&ietta appeale/ the /ecision of the t&ial cou&t tothe Cou&t of +ppeals( fo&


45/56

+ppeals &e-e&sin7 an/ settin7 asi/e the /ecision of the t&ialcou&t is not in acco&/ 4ith the la4 o& 4ith the applicable/ecisions of this Hono&able Cou&t. 8

It is e-i/ent that the basic issue focuses on the -ali/it' of thees of the natu&e of f&au/( a b&each of a>no4n /ut' th&ou7h so


46/56

spouse of the cont&actin7 pa&t'


47/56


Manila

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. !6686 Ma&ch )8( )##!

SOCI+* SECURIT1 S1STEM( Petitione&(-s.TERESIT+ 2+RUE VD+. DE +I*ON( Respon/ent.

D E C I S I O N

C+RPIO MOR+*ES(2.3

The Cou&t of +ppeals Decision /ate/ 2une );( )##8) an/Resolution /ate/ Septe


48/56

' O&/e& of Dece


49/56

acco&/in7 to the o&/e& of p&efe&ence p&o-i/e/ un/e& the la4(afte& the a


50/56

Respon/ent thus file/ a petition)" a7ainst the SSS befo&e theSSC fo& the &esto&ation to he& of he& entitle


51/56

/ecease/


52/56

basis alone of its o4n in-esti7ation an/ /ecla&e that the /ecisionof the RTC /ecla&in7 one to be p&esu


53/56

The SSS sub


54/56

he& p&esu


55/56


56/56

Art 39 Amor Art 42 Bailon Persons

Documents

Transcript of Art 39 Amor Art 42 Bailon Persons