ars.els-cdn.com · Web view*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Z. Cai), Tel:...
Transcript of ars.els-cdn.com · Web view*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Z. Cai), Tel:...
Supplemental Material to Manuscript titled “Exposure to Bisphenols,
Benzophenones, Parabens and Triclosan among Pregnant Women in
different trimesters”
Hongzhi Zhao1#, Wenqian Huo2#, Jiufeng Li1, Xinli Ma 1, Wei Xia2, Zhengji Pang1,
Mingyi Xie1, Shunqing Xu2*, Zongwei Cai1*
1State Key Laboratory of Environmental and Biological Analysis, Department of
Chemistry, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
2Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education & Ministry of
Environmental Protection, and State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health, School
of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and
Technology, Wuhan, China
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] (Z. Cai), Tel: +852-34117070;
[email protected] (S. Xu), Tel: +86-27-83657705
S1
Table of Contents Page
Tables
Table S1 Gradient elution processes used in UHPLC S3
Table S2 Mass transitions for target analytes S4
Table S3Descriptive Statistics of total urinary concentrations (ng/mL) (free form plus conjugate species) of environmental pollutants detected in pregnant women (n = 209) of different trimesters
S5
Table S4 Correlations between SG-adjusted levels of each compound. S8
Table S5 Total variance explained of Principal Component Analysis S10
Table S6 The result of Mann-Whitney U test of different trimesters S11
Table S7 The ICC of different trimesters S11
Figures
Figure S1 The detection rate of each analyte in different trimesters S12
Figure S2 Metabolic pathways of BP-3 in the phase I reactions S13
Figure S3 Correlation analysis of target analyte (based on SG-adjusted urinary concentrations)
S13
Figure S4 Correlation analysis of SG-adjusted levels of different chemical classes
S14
S2
Table S1 Gradient elution processes used in UHPLC
Retention Flow %A (water) %B (acetonitrile)0 0.2 75 25
1.5 0.2 25 2510 0.2 20 80
10.2 0.2 0 10012 0.2 0 100
12.2 0.2 75 2515 0.2 75 25
S3
Table S2 Mass transitions for target analytes
Analyte Abbreviation Parent ion (m/z) Product Ion (m/z) CE (eV) Internal standard LOD (ng/mL)
2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone BP-1 213.0 91.1 30 13C6-BP-3 0.10
2,2’,4,4’- tetrahydroxy benzophenone
BP-2 245.1 135.0 20 13C6-BP-3 0.01
2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone
BP-3 227.1 211.1 25 13C6-BP-3 0.20
2,2’-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzo-bpenone
BP-8 243.1 123.1 20 13C6-BP-3 0.10
4-hydroxybenzophenone 4-OH-BP 197.1 92.1 34 13C6-BP-3 0.10/ 13C6-BP-3 233.1 217.1 25 13C6-BP-3 /
methylparaben MeP 151.0 92.1 30 13C6-MeP 0.05/ 13C6-MeP 157.0 98.1 30 / /
ethylparaben EtP 165.0 92.1 30 13C6-EtP 0.01/ 13C6-EtP 171.0 98.1 30 / /
propylparaben PrP 179.0 92.1 30 13C6-PrP 0.10/ 13C6-PrP 185 98.1 30 / /
butylparaben BuP 193 92.1 30 13C6-BuP 0.10/ 13C6-BuP 199 98.1 30 / /
benzylparaben BzP 227.1 92.1 25 13C6-BuP 0.10Triclosan TCS 287 35.2 15 13C12-TCS 0.20
/ 13C12-TCS 299 35.2 15 / /
S4
Abbreviations: CE, collision energy; LOD, limit of detection; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; RT, retention time.
S5
Table S3 Descriptive Statistics of total urinary concentrations (ng/mL) (free form plus conjugate species) of environmental pollutants detected in pregnant women (n = 209) of different trimesters
Analyte Trimester DF (%) / GM (95%CI)Median(50th)
Selected percentilesRange (ng/mL)
25th 75th 95th
BP-1
T1 79.9Unadjusted 0.17 (0.13, 0.21) 0.19 0.04 0.53 2.62 <LOD~28.24SG-adjusted 0.20 (0.16, 0.25) 0.21 0.08 0.61 2.39 <LOD~40.79
T2 78.0Unadjusted 0.10 (0.08, 0.13) 0.10 0.07 0.26 1.06 <LOD~125.56SG-adjusted 0.11 (0.09, 0.14) 0.14 0.08 0.28 0.92 <LOD~114.14
T3 75.1Unadjusted 0.11 (0.09, 0.14) 0.12 <LOD 0.30 1.35 <LOD~378.69SG-adjusted 0.12 (0.10, 0.15) 0.12 <LOD 0.32 1.42 <LOD~236.68
BP-3
T1 85.6Unadjusted 0.76 (0.59, 0.96) 0.95 0.32 2.26 14.83 <LOD~59.41SG-adjusted 0.90 (0.71, 1.14) 1.17 0.40 2.63 12.90 <LOD~117.32
T2 73.2Unadjusted 0.34 (0.27, 0.43) 0.50 <LOD 1.19 5.09 <LOD~448.22SG-adjusted 0.37 (0.28, 0.47) 0.55 <LOD 1.38 4.87 <LOD~407.47
T3 72.7Unadjusted 0.43 (0.32, 0.57) 0.64 <LOD 1.54 9.81 <LOD~1362.73SG-adjusted 0.46 (0.35, 0.60) 0.65 <LOD 1.48 8.38 <LOD~851.71
4-OH-BP
T1 95.2Unadjusted 0.17 (0.14, 0.20) 0.19 0.08 0.44 1.45 <LOD~7.08SG-adjusted 0.20 (0.16, 0.24) 0.22 0.08 0.57 1.75 <LOD~4.00
T2 94.3Unadjusted 0.17 (0.14, 0.21) 0.20 0.07 0.46 1.41 <LOD~3.33SG-adjusted 0.18 (0.15, 0.22) 0.20 0.09 0.47 1.58 <LOD~3.01
T3 91.9Unadjusted 0.19 (0.15, 0.23) 0.22 0.07 0.46 1.39 <LOD~6.68SG-adjusted 0.20 (0.16, 0.25) 0.25 0.08 0.46 1.63 <LOD~8.35
S6
∑benzophen
ones (μmol/L)
T1 /Unadjusted 0.008 (0.006, 0.009) 0.007 0.004 0.016 0.083 <LOD~0.373SG-adjusted 0.009 (0.008, 0.011) 0.009 0.005 0.017 0.075 <LOD~0.594
T2 /Unadjusted 0.005 (0.004, 0.005) 0.005 0.002 0.009 0.029 <LOD~2.551SG-adjusted 0.004 (0.004, 0.006) 0.005 0.003 0.011 0.027 <LOD~2.319
T3 /Unadjusted 0.005 (0.004, 0.007) 0.005 0.002 0.012 0.059 <LOD~7.747SG-adjusted 0.006 (0.005, 0.007) 0.006 0.003 0.012 0.048 <LOD~4.842
MeP
T1 100Unadjusted 19.45 (15.06, 25.11) 17.66 4.22 77.49 422.08 0.15~1178.98SG-adjusted 23.12 (18.08, 29.55) 22.96 4.96 102.97 432.13 0.15~1256.16
T2 100Unadjusted 17.52 (13.89, 22.10) 19.37 4.44 75.94 244.39 0.32~1223.93SG-adjusted 18.87 (15.06, 23.63) 21.88 4.08 77.68 227.93 0.14~679.96
T3 99.0Unadjusted 13.58 (10.63, 17.35) 13.36 3.83 49.78 234.00 <LOD~382.68SG-adjusted 14.59 (11.47, 18.58) 13.93 3.95 47.05 223.51 <LOD~541.34
EtP
T1 95.2Unadjusted 0.81 (0.59, 1.12) 0.56 0.29 1.83 113.49 <LOD~2929.44SG-adjusted 0.96 (0.71, 1.32) 0.69 0.35 2.24 70.58 <LOD~2994.38
T2 91.4Unadjusted 0.45 (0.33, 0.62) 0.51 0.23 1.34 23.05 <LOD~302.94SG-adjusted 0.48 (0.35, 0.67) 0.56 0.21 1.44 23.90 <LOD~319.09
T3 92.3Unadjusted 0.54 (0.39, 0.76) 0.52 0.23 1.27 22.55 <LOD~2706.56SG-adjusted 0.58 (0.42, 0.80) 0.65 0.25 1.65 25.34 <LOD~1176.77
PrPT1 100
Unadjusted 3.16 (2.33, 4.29) 1.83 0.53 18.22 160.46 0.06~783.66SG-adjusted 3.75 (2.81, 5.02) 2.14 0.63 23.34 137.86 0.10~ 604.36
T2 99.5Unadjusted 2.85 (2.09, 3.89) 2.32 0.46 19.29 87.63 <LOD ~645.39SG-adjusted 3.07 (2.26, 4.17) 2.38 0.48 24.54 82.80 <LOD~430.26
T3 98.1 Unadjusted 2.35 (1.73, 3.19) 1.65 0.40 15.45 90.92 <LOD~757.48
S7
SG-adjusted 2.52 (1.87, 3.40) 1.99 0.45 17.07 79.11 <LOD~329.34
BuP
T1 69.4Unadjusted 0.05 (0.04, 0.07) 0.03 <LOD 0.27 2.27 <LOD~145.36SG-adjusted 0.06 (0.04, 0.08) 0.03 <LOD 0.24 3.32 <LOD~94.48
T2 66.5Unadjusted 0.04 (0.02, 0.03) 0.02 <LOD 0.22 0.75 <LOD~38.45
SG-adjusted 0.06 (0.05, 0.08) 0.02 <LOD 0.22 1.15 <LOD~17.48
T3 66.5Unadjusted 0.04 (0.03, 0.06) 0.02 <LOD 0.27 0.75 <LOD~24.77
SG-adjusted 0.05 (0.04, 0.06) 0.03 <LOD 0.24 0.99 <LOD~16.51
∑parabens (μmol/L)
T1 /Unadjusted 0.205 (0.192, 0.310) 0.218 0.041 0.770 4.335 <LOD~18.552SG-adjusted 0.244 (0.194, 0.313) 0.289 0.057 1.048 4.077 <LOD~20.098
T2 /Unadjusted 0.168 (0.170, 0.252) 0.212 0.042 0.698 2.038 <LOD~11.558SG-adjusted 0.181 (0.146, 0.228) 0.196 0.046 0.704 1.886 <LOD~6.421
T3 /Unadjusted 0.151 (0.109, 0.170) 0.178 0.042 0.681 2.810 <LOD~20.524SG-adjusted 0.162 (0.131, 0.204) 0.161 0.055 0.548 1.823 <LOD~8.923
TCS
T1 52.2Unadjusted 0.27 (0.19, 0.38) 0.16 <LOD 1.62 40.97 <LOD~179.47SG-adjusted 0.32 (0.23, 0.45) 0.18 <LOD 1.64 33.21 <LOD~234.22
T2 49.3Unadjusted / <LOD <LOD 1.22 13.72 <LOD~159.53SG-adjusted / <LOD <LOD 1.43 12.09 <LOD~106.36
T3 47.8Unadjusted / <LOD <LOD 1.23 12.40 <LOD~72.37SG-adjusted / <LOD <LOD 1.13 11.19 <LOD~723.65
Abbreviations: DF, Detection Frequency; GM, geometric mean; CI, confidence interval; SG, specific gravity; LOD, limit of detection; BP-1, 2,4-dihydroxybenzophenone; BP-3, 2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone; BP-8, 2,2’-dihydroxy-4-methoxybenzo-bpenone; 4-OH-BP, 4-hydroxybenzophenone; MeP, methylparaben; EtP, ethylparaben; PrP, propylparaben; BuP, butylparaben; BzP, benzylparaben; TCS, Triclosan.
S8
Data of other analytes were not reported due to the low frequency of detection in the samples (< 30 % in human urine samples). GM was reported only if the proportion of detectable more than 50 %.Undetectable concentration was accounted as a value equal to the LOD divided by the square root of 2. ∑benzophenones: the molar sum of concentrations of BP-1, BP-3, BP-2, BP-8, 4-OH-BP; ∑parabens: the molar sum of concentrations of MeP, EtP, PrP, BuP, BzP.
S9
Table S4 Correlations between SG-adjusted levels of each compound (n=209×3).
BPA BPS BPAF BP-1 BP-3 4-OH-BP MeP EtP PrP BuP TCS
BPA
correlation coefficient
1.00 -0.07 0.26 -0.16 0.02 0.13 0.05 0.08 0.03 -0.04 -0.03
p value(two tails)
/ 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.23 0.04 0.53 0.28 0.46
BPS
correlation coefficient
-0.07 1.00 -0.12 0.41 0.09 -0.16 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.28 0.14
p value(two tails)
0.09 / 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.12 0.06 0.45 0.00 0.00
BPAF
correlation coefficient
0.26 -0.12 1.00 -0.21 0.24 0.27 0.03 -0.06 0.06 -0.08 0.16
p value(two tails)
0.00 0.00 / 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.11 0.16 0.05 0.00
BP-1
correlation coefficient
-0.16 0.41 -0.21 1.00 0.57 0.00 0.04 0.05 0.00 0.14 0.29
p value(two tails)
0.00 0.00 0.00 / 0.00 0.93 0.30 0.19 0.96 0.00 0.00
BP-3
correlation coefficient
0.02 0.09 0.24 0.57 1.00 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.04 -0.05 0.30
p value(two tails)
0.68 0.03 0.00 0.00 / 0.03 0.30 0.50 0.33 0.23 0.00
4-OH-BP correlation 0.13 -0.16 0.27 0.00 0.08 1.00 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.19 -0.10
S10
coefficientp value
(two tails)0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.03 / 0.27 0.06 0.32 0.00 0.01
MeP
correlation coefficient
0.05 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.04 1.00 0.24 0.68 0.26 0.00
p value(two tails)
0.23 0.12 0.44 0.30 0.30 0.27 / 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99
EtP
correlation coefficient
0.08 0.07 -0.06 0.05 0.03 0.07 0.24 1.00 0.28 0.42 0.03
p value(two tails)
0.04 0.06 0.11 0.19 0.50 0.06 0.00 / 0.00 0.00 0.43
PrP
correlation coefficient
0.03 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.68 0.28 1.00 0.21 0.01
p value(two tails)
0.53 0.45 0.16 0.96 0.33 0.32 0.00 0.00 / 0.00 0.89
BuP
correlation coefficient
-0.04 0.28 -0.08 0.14 -0.05 0.19 0.26 0.42 0.21 1.00 -0.08
p value(two tails)
0.28 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 / 0.05
TCS
correlation coefficient
-0.03 0.14 0.16 0.29 0.30 -0.10 0.00 0.03 0.01 -0.08 1.00
p value(two tails)
0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.99 0.43 0.89 0.05 /
S11
S12
Table S5 Total variance explained of Principal Component Analysis
ComponentInitial Eigenvalue Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total Variance (%) Cumulative (%) Total Variance (%) Cumulative (%)1 2.05 25.69 25.69 2.05 25.69 25.692 1.86 23.19 48.88 1.86 23.19 48.883 1.02 12.74 61.61 1.02 12.74 61.614 1.00 12.48 74.105 0.97 12.18 86.286 0.74 9.19 95.477 0.34 4.23 99.708 0.02 0.30 100.00
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis (based on SG-adjusted concentration)
S13
Table S6 The result of Mann-Whitney U test of SG-adjusted concentrations in different trimesters (n = 209×3)
Name MeP EtP4-OH-
BPPrP BP1 BuP BPAF BP3 TCS
p (two tails)
UnadjustedT1VsT2 0.60 0.06 0.86 0.64 0.001* 0.20 0.58 <0.001* 0.31T1VsT3 0.08 0.19 0.37 0.23 0.004* 0.58 0.81 <0.001* 0.20T2VsT3 0.19 0.55 0.49 0.46 0.68 0.47 0.67 0.21 0.82
SG-adjustedT1VsT2 0.26 0.01 0.55 0.33 <0.001* 0.06 0.19 <0.001* 0.11T1VsT3 0.02 0.07 0.84 0.10 <0.001* 0.20 0.40 <0.001* 0.05T2VsT3 0.13 0.49 0.24 0.46 0.81 0.63 0.74 0.35 0.99
p < 0.05(*) represent significant differences
Table S7 The ICC of different trimesters (n = 209×3)
MeP EtP PrP 4-OH-BP BP-1 BuP BP-3 TCSUnadjusted 0.39 0.01 0.23 0.53 0.07 0.21 0.14 0.33SG-adjusted 0.44 0.03 0.42 0.63 0.20 0.17 0.33 0.11
ICC: intraclass correlation coefficients
S14
Figure S1 the detection rate of each analyte in different trimesters.
S15
Figure S2 Metabolic pathways of BP-3 in the phase I reactions
Figure S3 Correlation analysis of target analyte (based on SG-adjusted urinary concentrations). (a) Correlation between EtP and BuP (b) Correlation between EtP and PrP
S16
Figure S4 Correlation analysis of SG-adjusted levels of different chemical classes (∑benzophenones, ∑parabens and TCS)
S17