Arne Andersson Magnus Christensen - Department … Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011...

18
Arne Andersson Magnus Christensen DEER 2011 Conference Partially Premixed Combustion

Transcript of Arne Andersson Magnus Christensen - Department … Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011...

Arne Andersson

Magnus Christensen

DEER 2011 Conference

Partially Premixed Combustion

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

High Load Low Temperature Combustion - enabled by introduction of “new” fuels RCCI ´Reactivity Controlled CI´ very high ON +very high CN

i.e. neat ethanol + Diesel

IMEP 17 bar w/o EGR reported

PPC Partially Premixed Combustion

in-between ON/CN

i.e. Naphtha or gasoline/diesel

IMEP 26 bar achieved

Power density - a prerequisite for downsizing and transport efficiency

CETANE

OCTANE

High load

Low load

CETANE

OCTANE

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

PPC use a gasoline type fuel

• Low Cetane ignition delay reduce soot (more premix) increase efficiency (faster heat release) Low load problems (noise, HC+CO)

•High volatility No wall wetting; Inject anytime!

• Low viscosity A lubricity additive needed

330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Crank Angle Position [edeg]

aRoH

R [J

/CA

D]

& P

cyl [

bar]

Single injectionPrail = 2400bar Prail = 1500bar

BSNOx ~ 0.5g/

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

CR requirement for ignition HCCI test for PRF blends

ignition becomes demanding for ON > 80 CR>17 needed for cold start? Diesel is similar to PRF 30 Port injected PRF0 to PRF100

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Controlling CO and HC at low load

uncooled EGR setting: Inlet Manifold Temp raised from 38 to 70 C

We must do more at lower loads!

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Ways to improve temperature at TDC

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

-90 0 90

CAD

Pcyl

(bar

) ε = 15.8ε = 17.3VVA 50°trottlehot EGR

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

-90 0 90

CAD

Tcyl

(K)

Influence on in cylinder temperature at TDC by: increased compression ratio, Miller, intake throttling and hot EGR

Hot EGR still the best

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Exhaust re-breathing is another way to increase in cylinder temperature

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

-90 0 90

CAD

T(K) ref

rebreathing

Re-breathing

In Cylinder temp with and without re-breathing

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

PPC test results with single stage turbo boundary conditions

A load sweep from IMEP 8 to 21 bar

From premixed to diffusion combustion

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011 …COMPARED TO VSD10

1200rpm/IMEP8, soot free combustion at very low NOx

Soot free due to premixing Note that diesel is injected at 2400 bar

1200rpm / IMEP 8 NOx/Soot trade-off

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0BSNOx [g/kWh]

BSS

oot [

g/kW

h]

VSD Pinj: 2400barON87, build 1ON87, build 2ON87, build 3ON87, build 4

Gross Indicated Efficiency

40

45

50

55

60

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0BSNOx [g/kWh]

Effic

ienc

y [%

]

ON87, build 1

ON87, build 2

ON87, build 3

ON87, build 4

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

1200rpm/IMEP12, significant potential on soot and BSFC with gasoline type fuel

Observed BSFC

195200205210215220225

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5BSNOx [g/kWh]

BSFC

[g/k

Wh]

VSD102400bar

ON87 1500bar

1200rpm / IMEP12 NOx/Soot trade-off

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5BSNOx [g/kWh]

BSS

oot [

g/kW

h]

VSD10 2400barON87 1500barN 1

One reason for improved BSFC is shorter combustion duration

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

IMEP12 – Rate of Heat Release example

330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Crank Angle Position [edeg]

aRoH

R [J

/CA

D]

& P

cyl [

bar]

Single injectionPrail = 2400bar (VSD10)Prail = 1500bar (ON87)

BSNOx ~ 0.5g/kWh

VSD10 2400 bar

ON87 1500 bar RoHR tail is identical! The later part of the combustion is mixing controlled Global mixing is still a major design target!

Diesel 2º CAD ignition delay Gasoline 8º CAD ignition delay

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

1800rpm /IMEP21

C100 SST

1800rpm / 100% NOx/Soot trade-off

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5BSNOx [g/kWh]

BSS

oot [

g/kW

h]

VSD10 2000barON87 1700bar

Observed BSFC

195

200

205

210

215

220

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5BSNOx [g/kWh]

BSFC

[g/k

Wh]

VSD102000barON87 1700bar

EGR percentage

20

25

30

35

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5BSNOx [g/kWh]

EGR

[%]

VSD102000barON87 1700bar

Slightly improved BSFC

Still almost soot free at 2 g NOx!

Same EGR level

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Sum up of test results

With easy to achieve boundary conditions we can:

•Run almost soot free at all tested loads

•Get biggest BSFC benefits at road load

•Get very low NOx at road load

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Transport system implications from “new” fuels need to be investigated

•Well To Tank analysis, WTT

• Availability

• Bio content capability

•….

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Compression Ignition with Diesel/Gasoline Blends

Diesel 35% + Gasoline 65% = PRF 80 (ON)

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Well To Tank efficiency GM/Argonne report using GREET (2001, 2005)

79.9%

86.4%

Naphtha 8% more Efficient!

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Conclusions

• Potentially more than 10% lower CO2 foot print with PPC/Naphtha

• Significant soot, NOx and efficiency gains from using PPC

• Significant engine design changes needed to handle low load

Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by

– Department of Energy National Energy Technology Lab under Award Number DE-EE0004232

– Department of Energy National Energy Technology Lab under Award Number DE-FC26-07NT43222

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.