Kjell Arne Johansson Department of global and public health University of Bergen
Arne Andersson Magnus Christensen - Department … Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011...
Transcript of Arne Andersson Magnus Christensen - Department … Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011...
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
High Load Low Temperature Combustion - enabled by introduction of “new” fuels RCCI ´Reactivity Controlled CI´ very high ON +very high CN
i.e. neat ethanol + Diesel
IMEP 17 bar w/o EGR reported
PPC Partially Premixed Combustion
in-between ON/CN
i.e. Naphtha or gasoline/diesel
IMEP 26 bar achieved
Power density - a prerequisite for downsizing and transport efficiency
CETANE
OCTANE
High load
Low load
CETANE
OCTANE
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
PPC use a gasoline type fuel
• Low Cetane ignition delay reduce soot (more premix) increase efficiency (faster heat release) Low load problems (noise, HC+CO)
•High volatility No wall wetting; Inject anytime!
• Low viscosity A lubricity additive needed
330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Crank Angle Position [edeg]
aRoH
R [J
/CA
D]
& P
cyl [
bar]
Single injectionPrail = 2400bar Prail = 1500bar
BSNOx ~ 0.5g/
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
CR requirement for ignition HCCI test for PRF blends
ignition becomes demanding for ON > 80 CR>17 needed for cold start? Diesel is similar to PRF 30 Port injected PRF0 to PRF100
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Controlling CO and HC at low load
uncooled EGR setting: Inlet Manifold Temp raised from 38 to 70 C
We must do more at lower loads!
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Ways to improve temperature at TDC
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
-90 0 90
CAD
Pcyl
(bar
) ε = 15.8ε = 17.3VVA 50°trottlehot EGR
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
-90 0 90
CAD
Tcyl
(K)
Influence on in cylinder temperature at TDC by: increased compression ratio, Miller, intake throttling and hot EGR
Hot EGR still the best
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Exhaust re-breathing is another way to increase in cylinder temperature
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
-90 0 90
CAD
T(K) ref
rebreathing
Re-breathing
In Cylinder temp with and without re-breathing
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
PPC test results with single stage turbo boundary conditions
A load sweep from IMEP 8 to 21 bar
From premixed to diffusion combustion
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011 …COMPARED TO VSD10
1200rpm/IMEP8, soot free combustion at very low NOx
Soot free due to premixing Note that diesel is injected at 2400 bar
1200rpm / IMEP 8 NOx/Soot trade-off
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0BSNOx [g/kWh]
BSS
oot [
g/kW
h]
VSD Pinj: 2400barON87, build 1ON87, build 2ON87, build 3ON87, build 4
Gross Indicated Efficiency
40
45
50
55
60
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0BSNOx [g/kWh]
Effic
ienc
y [%
]
ON87, build 1
ON87, build 2
ON87, build 3
ON87, build 4
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
1200rpm/IMEP12, significant potential on soot and BSFC with gasoline type fuel
Observed BSFC
195200205210215220225
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5BSNOx [g/kWh]
BSFC
[g/k
Wh]
VSD102400bar
ON87 1500bar
1200rpm / IMEP12 NOx/Soot trade-off
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5BSNOx [g/kWh]
BSS
oot [
g/kW
h]
VSD10 2400barON87 1500barN 1
One reason for improved BSFC is shorter combustion duration
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
IMEP12 – Rate of Heat Release example
330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Crank Angle Position [edeg]
aRoH
R [J
/CA
D]
& P
cyl [
bar]
Single injectionPrail = 2400bar (VSD10)Prail = 1500bar (ON87)
BSNOx ~ 0.5g/kWh
VSD10 2400 bar
ON87 1500 bar RoHR tail is identical! The later part of the combustion is mixing controlled Global mixing is still a major design target!
Diesel 2º CAD ignition delay Gasoline 8º CAD ignition delay
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
1800rpm /IMEP21
C100 SST
1800rpm / 100% NOx/Soot trade-off
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5BSNOx [g/kWh]
BSS
oot [
g/kW
h]
VSD10 2000barON87 1700bar
Observed BSFC
195
200
205
210
215
220
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5BSNOx [g/kWh]
BSFC
[g/k
Wh]
VSD102000barON87 1700bar
EGR percentage
20
25
30
35
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5BSNOx [g/kWh]
EGR
[%]
VSD102000barON87 1700bar
Slightly improved BSFC
Still almost soot free at 2 g NOx!
Same EGR level
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Sum up of test results
With easy to achieve boundary conditions we can:
•Run almost soot free at all tested loads
•Get biggest BSFC benefits at road load
•Get very low NOx at road load
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Transport system implications from “new” fuels need to be investigated
•Well To Tank analysis, WTT
• Availability
• Bio content capability
•….
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Compression Ignition with Diesel/Gasoline Blends
Diesel 35% + Gasoline 65% = PRF 80 (ON)
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Well To Tank efficiency GM/Argonne report using GREET (2001, 2005)
79.9%
86.4%
Naphtha 8% more Efficient!
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Conclusions
• Potentially more than 10% lower CO2 foot print with PPC/Naphtha
• Significant soot, NOx and efficiency gains from using PPC
• Significant engine design changes needed to handle low load
Volvo Technology Arne Andersson, DEER 2011
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by
– Department of Energy National Energy Technology Lab under Award Number DE-EE0004232
– Department of Energy National Energy Technology Lab under Award Number DE-FC26-07NT43222
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.