ARIGU003 · 2021. 1. 19. · 3 federal on-scene coordinator's report for fifth street drum dump...

3

FEDERAL ON-SCENE COORDINATOR'S REPORT

FOR

FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA

MAY 10, 1988 TO JANUARY 11, 1989

EMERGENCY .RESPONSE•TEAM •

BENTON M. WILMOTHSENIOR ON-SCENE COORDINATOR

U.S. EPA REGION IIIWHEELING, NEST VIRGINIA

A R I G U 0 0 3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FACTS SHEET

FOREWORD

I. INTRODUCTIONA. Nature of the Site/Initial SituationB. Site Locationc. Efforts to Obtain Cleanup from Potential

Responsible Party

II. ROSTER OF AGENCIES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND INDIVIDUALSA. Names and AddressesB. Organization of the Response

III. NARRATIVE OF EVENTS

IV. RESOURCES COMMITTEDA. Initial Funding RequestB. Estimated Total cost Summary

V. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMOVALA. Activities of the Various Agencies

1. Potential Responsible Party2. Federal Agencies3. State Agencies4. Contractors

B. Disposal Methods and Quantities Removed

VI. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

VII. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND RECOMMENDATIONS

VIII. LEGAL ASPECTS

APPENDICES

A. Maps and SketchesB. Funding Requestc. Analytical ResultsD. Photographic DocumentationE. POLREPSF. ManifestsG. Incoming Spill ReportH. Site Safety PlanI. Glossary of Abbreviations

••-J

REGION III PROJECT J205CERCLA EMERGENCY ACTION FACTS SHEET

SITE: Fifth Street Drum Dump

SIZE: 20' X 20'

LOCATION: Huntington, Wayne County, West Virginia

PROJECT DATES: May 10, 1988 through January 11, 1989

DESCRIPTION: The Fifth Street Drum Dump was the site offive abandoned drums of waste solventslocated approximately 150 feet from theDaniel Greathouse, Jr. residence. Mr.Greathouse filed a complaint with WestVirginia Department of Natural Resources(WVDNR) when his daughter was injured bysticking her hand through a rusted openingin one of the drums. On May 10, 1988, theOSC, under Delegation of Authority 14-1-A,obtained S5Q,000 in CERCLA funds toimplement a removal action due to thedeteriorated condition of the drums anduncontrolled hazardous wastes.

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Waste solvents

QUANTITIES REMOVED: 10 drums - 5 overpacked, 3 of bulked wastesolvents, and 2 of contaminated soil/clothing

ON-SCENE COORDINATOR: Benton M. Wilmoth

REMOVAL CONTRACTOR: O.H. Materials, Inc., Findlay, OH

DISPOSAL LOCATION: ThermalKEM, Rock Hill, SC

PROJECT CEILING: ? 50,000

PROJECT COST: $ 18,636 (estimated)

COMMENTS: The close coordination of all partici-pants enabled the OSC to coordinate aneffective response to mitigate the threatto human health and the environment.posedby the abandoned drums at this site.

Benton M. Wilmoth, Senior OSCU.S. EPA Region IIIWheeling, West Virginia

INTRODUCTION

A, Nature of the Site/Initial Situation

The initial site investigation was performed by the WestVirginia Department of Natural Resources (WVDNR), Division ofWaste Management on April 21, 1988 in response to a complaint byDaniel Greathouse, Jr. concerning five drums that had beenabandoned approximately 150 feet from his house on the propertyof Jim Thompson. Mr. Greathouse stated that his daughter, whileplaying around the drums, had injured her hand by sticking itthrough the rusted top of one of them. According to WVDNR data,the drums were obtained from ACF Industries, Huntington, WestVirginia, by the former resident of the house, Daniel Greathouse,Sr., for the purpose of killing weeds near the house.

On May 2, 1988, Thomas Blake of WVDNR notified Sr. On-Scenecoordinator (OSC) Wilmoth of the presence of the drums andrequested EPA assistance. The OSC then tasked Roy F. Weston'sTechnical Assistance Team (TAT) to perform an emergencyassessment. On May 6, 1988, TAT performed air monitoring andobtained drum and soil samples at the site.

On May 10, 1988, Sr. OSC Wilmoth, under Delegation ofAuthority 14-1-A, obtained $50,000 in CERCLA funds and issued adelivery order to o.H. Materials, Inc. (OHM), prime contractorunder the Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERGS) mechanism.OHM was directed by the OSC to be on site May 12, 198B to over-pack the drums and perform site stabilization.

B. Site Location

The Fifth Street Drum Dump site was located near Huntington,Wayne County, West Virginia, approximately two miles south of theFifth Street Exit of 1-64 off WV Route 52. The drums werelocated approximately 150 feet from the Daniel Greathouse, Jr.residence on the property of Jim Thompson.

C. Efforts to Obtaip Cleanup from Potential Responsible Party

The OSC, upon discovery of conditions at the site,determined that a removal action should be performed immediatelybecause the deteriorated solvent drums posed a significant riskof harm to the nearby residents. At that time, no partiesassociated with the presence of the drums were willing to acceptcleanup responsibility. Therefore, the OSC did not issue verbalor written notice and utilized his Delegation of Authority 14-1-Ato initiate emergency mitigative actions at the site.

ARI 00006

,->fqh1 ^Khrj r->»»rt ^IJlflO /-NgMHHW ~OHO S! ̂ 5 £ 0 SUBH- W C H' 0) 0 0 31 »(-•'• U C? (5 O IB 0 U O1 N (->• IP W [T O 3 3o 3 MI o 3 MI o o pi (B o 3 o w o ro H' w o «: o P o < m o ID w g .H'* it rt A rt it u 77 rt N o f t - - 4* ro it 01 31 .MI H H- 2! rt i* IB i) (1 fl (t— H-CT ~ H. 31 ~ ro B ~ H ~ H ro 3"i *•• H KIP) >- H 3! n IP i-t (Ba 3 « P P to s H. 3 h- • ro o H- rt 5 M UH-U1H W

I 3 I D I3(» I-

o p t - i a p r f i B i qrt ro

Mi0 Mif i o r o nI-IHQr t , 3H-ltPlt3 3*3 IIPIBftPH 0

•ge-ed; p.M'O Ito n ff

'̂00007

inn ui- N J H I B N V I hti/ioa w to ui o > MMP.. ra o\(0(trt'i) it C IB en C 3 »P 3top u H O>< PI tt M M I B M t t O H' W I/I ffi <•JH ID 3 O 3» O l l t O P OHIBP3H'UID i o wan w 11 s ro h up,a OHo o - c r o o H i B w n r t H'ltpxjo

!0 01 H - . H - H I B 3 9 3 H - P 3O 01 H H < ! i t P ( B i Q O P < BP H P < I B H - 4 3 3 I Bp. H- P in IB it 33 9 (-" B itiq 0 IB 0 P3 3 Mi M

It

q o sj s m qp3t) ^ ap. pi p. H' P 0 P P 31 IB0 3 H H t l O l H C 0 3

p. p H p i l B ' d H 9 It1-3 (B H- H- H-IJ P1 P 0g ' H r o p p p - M . w 3B O q qonft t o sw n . m p i p * Hrop3 rt ro P

"OUIPP1!) OPO 1/ll-fi]K P 3 0 1 K Miino c r o r o013• O I D P - < rtroft oiaroPrttnoiH- tf

o, , ̂±! >

fr >• LJ— ' „ (Ya > *•

I— LJ2 Z ID D h-^ ° hQ O £t- LJ _LJ 2 ZL.I >: o

i z zH- O

NARRATIVE OF EVENTS

The Fifth Street Drum Dump was the site of five abandoneddrums located on the property of Jim Thompson, near Huntington,West Virginia, approximately 150 feet from the Daniel Greathouse,Jr. residence. Mr. Greathouse, Jr. registered a complaint withthe West Virginia Department of Natural Resources (WVDNR) afterhis daughter was injured by sticking her hand through the lid ofone of the rusted drums. All the drums were highly deteriorated.

According to WVDNR data, the drums were originally acquiredby Daniel Greathouse, Sr., a former resident of the DanielGreathouse, Jr. residence, for the purpose of weed control.

WVDNR Division of Waste Management performed an initial siteinvestigation on April 22, 1988. site observations, air monitoringinstrument readings and historical data provided strong evidencethat the drums contained waste solvents. As a result, WVDNRbannerguarded the drums during their visit.

On May 2, 1988 the site was referred to Sr. osc BentonWilmoth for consideration as a possible EPA removal action.The OSC tasked Roy F. Weston's Technical Assistance Team (TAT)with performing an emergency assessment at the Fifth Street site,

on May 6, 1988, TAT, accompanied by WVDNR Inspector ThomasBlake, performed the emergency assessment. TAT documented asso-ciated threats, collected drum and soil samples and covered thedrums with plastic while at the site. By using air monitoringinstruments and direct observation, TAT supported WVDNR1scontention that the deteriorated drums contained waste solvents.

Because no parties associated with the presence of the drumswere willing to assume cleanup responsibility, on May 10, 1988,the OSC utilized Delegation of Authority 14-1-A for 550,000 inCERCLA funds and issued a delivery order to the ERGS primecontractor, O.H. Materials, Inc. (OHM), to begin sitestabilization. Additionally, the OSC issued Special Bulletin Ato notify EPA Region III of the removal action.

On May 12, 1988, as directed by the OSC, OHM and TAT wereon site to initiate site stabilization activities. ERGS bulkedthe drum liquids into three drums. The emptied drums andresidual sludges were then placed in overpacks to stabilize them,Additionally, OHM scraped and placed into drums soil from thearea where the drums had been resting. TAT collected abackground soil sample and a quality assurance soil sample toensure complete and effective removal of contaminants.

Before leaving the site, OHM secured the 10 drums withplastic and placed bannerguard around them to await °inaldisposal arrangements. On November 11, 1988, after receipt ofdisposal approval, the ten drums were loaded onto a truck fortransport to ThermalKEM in Rock Hill, sc for final disposal.

RESOURCES COMMITTED

A. Initial Funding Request

Based on the report by the West Virginia Department ofNatural Resources (WVDNR) and the preliminary assessment byWeston's Technical Assistance Team (TAT), the On-SceneCoordinator (OSC) concluded an imminent and significant risk ofharm to human health and the environment was posed by theuncontrolled hazardous waste at the Fifth Street Drum Dump.

A copy of Special Bulletin A outlining the OSC's activationof Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation andLiability Act (CERCLA) funds is included as Appendix B of thisreport. The Delegation of Authority (14-1-A) authorizes the oscto approve CERCLA removals with a total cost of less than$50,000. on May 10, 1988, the osc issued Delivery Order #7445-03-049 to the ERGS prime contractor, O.K. Materials, Inc., in theamount of $19,000 to initiate a removal action.B. Estimated Total Cost Summary

ExtramuralA. ERCS

1. Personnel (incl. per diem) $ 2,573.682. Equipment • 806.363. Materials 814.834. Analytical 3,050.oo5. Transportation/Disposal 6,911.00ERCS Subtotal $ 14,155.87

B. TAT $ 2,094.15

EXTRAMURAL SUBTOTAL $ 16,250.02

Intramural

A. EPA Direct $ 930.00

B. EPA Indirect $ 1,456.00

INTRAMURAL SUBTOTAL $ 2,386.00

TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (Estimated) $ 18,636.02

PROJECT CEILING $ 50,000.00

10

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REMOVAL

A, Activities_of the Various Agencies

1. Potential Responsible Party

Three parties were associated with the presence of the drumsat the Fifth Street Drum Dump: Jim Thompson, owner of theproperty where the drums were located; Daniel Greathouse, Jr.,who reported the drums to WVDNR; and Daniel Greathouse, Sr., whoallegedly had acquired the drums from ACF Industries.

None of these parties was willing to assume responsibilityfor cleanup, therefore no activities were performed by potentialresponsible parties.

2. Federal Agencies

Benton M. Wilmoth, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Region III, Wheeling, West Virginia office served as the FederalOn-Scene coordinator (OSC) for this project and was responsiblefor coordination with the stato and direction of the contractorsto ultimately eliminate the threat.

3. State Agencies

Thomas Blake of the west Virginia Department of NaturalResources (WVDNR), Division of Waste Management was responsiblefor conducting the initial site investigation at the site and forreferring the site to EPA.

4. Contractors

Roy F. Weston's Technical Assistance Team (TAT) was taskedto perform an initial emergency site assessment. Duringsubsequent removal operations, TAT was responsible for providingthe OSC with technical and administrative support that includedcontractor monitoring, quality assurance sampling, airmonitoring, photographic and site activities documentation,drafting of funding documents and POLREPs, and the site safetyplan.

O.H. Materials, Inc. (OHM) of Findlay, Ohio was the primecontractor under the Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS)mechanism. OHM was responsible for performing the actual removalactivities and providing the necessary manpower, equipment andmaterials to safely remove the drums and stabilize the site. Inaddition, OHM arranged for laboratory analysis of all samplestaken and handled disposal arrangements,B. Disposal Methods and Quantities Removed

A total of ten drums (five overpacked, three of bulked wastesolvents, and two of contaminated soil/clothing) were transportedon 11/11/88 to ThermalKEM, Rock Hill, sc for final disposal.

A R I O O O

CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS

April 22. 19BB

WVDNR conducted site inspection in response to complaintby Mr. Daniel Greathouse, Jr. concerning five drums located onthe Jim Thompson property adjacent (approx. 150 feet) to hisresidence. Mr. Greathouse, Jr. reported that his daughter wasinjured when she stuck her hand through the top of one of thedeteriorated drums. WVDNR site observations, air monitoringinstrument readings and historical data indicated that the drumscontained waste solvents. WVDNR bannerguarded the drums.

May 2, 1988

WVDNR Inspector Thomas Blake notified Sr. osc Wilmoth of thedrums and requested EPA assistance.

May 6. 1988

During an emergency site assessment, TAT and WVDNR Blakeperformed a level "B" entry and collected drum and soil samplesfor lab analysis. TAT air monitoring data and site observationssupported WVDNR1s contention that the drums contained wastesolvents. At OSC's direction, TAT covered the drums withplastic.May 10. 19BB

The OSC activated Delegation of Authority 14-1-A for 550,000in CERCLA funds and issued a delivery order to the ERCS primecontractor O.K. Materials, Inc. (OHM), to initiate sitestabilization activities. Additionally, the OSC issued SpecialBulletin A notifying EPA Region III of removal activities.

May 12. 1988

OHM and TAT arrived on site. OHM bulked liquids from thefive drums and overpacked emptied drums containing residualsludges. Additionally, OHM scraped and placed into drums soilfrom the area where the drums had been resting. TAT collected abackground soil sample and a QA soil sample. Ten drums werestaged at the site, covered with plastic and bannerguardedawaiting final disposal arrangements.November 11. 1988

The ten drums were loaded onto a truck for transportation tothe disposal facility at ThermalKEM, Rock Hill, SC. All drumswere properly labeled and manifested.

January 11. 1989

The signed manifest was returned this date and the OSCofficially closed the project,

f i f t l O Q O I 2

PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND RECOMMENDATIONS

There were no problems encountered throughout the durationof this project.

LEGAL ASPECTS

Neither verbal nor written notice was issued by Sr. OSCWilmoth to any parties that may have been associated with thissite. As a result, EPA Office of Regional Counsel did not becomeinvolved and, at the time of this writing, no future costrecovery action is anticipated.

flRIOOOU

TTD Number: 8810-87PCS Number: 2037

:C>IT;IJ» INTERVAL 20 Fit'

IFTH STREET DRU/rj flH'JNTIHGTON, WAYIIE COUIFIFTHSTRKTDRlgJBl?ftO/5

ORIGINALTDD Number; 8805-22PCS Number

SITE LOCATION MAPFIFTH STREET DRUM DUMP

HUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WHST VIRGINIA

AR! 000 I 6

TDD Number 3805-22PCS Number; ,/;,/,

WOODEDAREA

/

•—""l/tT1 INTERMITTENTDRUMS Oft STREAM

NOT TO SCALE

SITE SKETCH

FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WEST V I R G I N I A

SPECIAL BULLETIN AFifth Street Drum DumpHuntington, Wayne County, WVTO: Regional Response Center

U.S. EPA Region III

DATE: May 11, 1988

FROM: Benton M. Wilmoth, fir. OSCOn-Scene Coordinator (3HW22)

THRU: Stephen R. Wassersug, DirectorHazardous Waste Management Division (3HWOO)

THRU: Thomas Voltaggio, Chiefsuperfund Branch (3HW20)

THRU: Robert Caron, ChiefEmergency Response Section (3HW22)

I. INTRODUCTION

An inspection performed in accordance with the Nationalcontingency Plan has identified an immediate and significant riskof harm to human health and the environment posed by the presenceof five drums of uncontrolled waste solvents. The drums, whichare in a highly deteriorated condition, are located approximately100 feet from the Daniel Greathouse, Jr. residence off of US Rt.152 near Huntington, Wayne County, West Virginia. A childplaying near the drums, alledgedly stuck her hand through thecorroded tops of one of the drums. In addition, the drums arelocated 15 feet from an unnamed tributary of Hisey Fork Ck., atributary of the Ohio River, which would be affected should oneor more of the rusted drums be ruptured.

Section 104 of CERCLA calls for the initiation of immediateremoval where there Is a threat of a release of a hazardoussubstance which may present an imminent and substantial danger topublic health or welfare.

The Delegation of Authority 14-1-A (4/8/86) authorizes theosc to approve CERCLA removals with a total cost of less than$50,000, The osc, therefore, approved the use of CERCLA funds atthis site to mitigate the threat to human health and theenvironment by securing and removing the drums of waste solventsand any contaminated soil.

f l R I O O Q i e

II. BACKGROUND

The initial site investigation was performed by the WestVirginia Department of Natural Resources, Division of WasteManagement on 4/21/88 in response to a complaint by Mr. DanielGreathouse, Jr. concerning the solvent drums. Mr. Greathousestated that his daughter, while playing around the drums, hadstuck her hand through the rusted top of one of the drums. Inaddition, Mr. Greathouse was concerned that, should one or moreof the drums rupture that the material would spill into thesmall stream downgradient from them.

During the WVDNR inspection, the drums were found to be in ahighly deteriorated condition and located approximately 100 feetfrom the Greathouse residence. All of the drums had spilledpaint on them and one was labeled "Flammable liquid - laquerthinning compound". The drums are located on an adjacentproperty owned by Mr. Jim Thompson. The drums were obtained3 to 5 years ago by the former resident of the Greathouseresidence, a Mr.Greathouse, Sr., who has since moved away, Thesolvents were used for weed control near the house. The WVDNRinspectors bannerguarded the drums and advised the Greathousefamily to avoid the drum area,

on May 2, 1988 the WVDNR (Blake) notified osc BentonWilmoth, US EPA Region III, Wheeling, WV of the presence of thefive drums near the Greathouse residence, on May 6, 1988, at therequest of OSC Wilraoth, Roy F. Weston's Technical Assistance Teamwas on site to perform an emergency assessment to determine thethreat posed by the drums. TAT performed air monitoring andsampled the drums and soil at the site. At osc direction, TATcovered the drums with plastic and advised the residents toavoid the drum area.

III. THREAT

Air monitoring data collected by TAT from the drumsindicated that the contents of the drums were very high involatile organics. TAT obtained maximum readings on both the HnuPhotoionizing Detector and the Organic Vapor Analyzer, TheCombustible Gas Indicator register readings up to 40% of thelower explosive limit. One drum is labeled "Flammable liquid -laquer thinning compound" and all drums have paint spilled ontheir sides. In addition, supporting historical data furtherindicated that the drums do contain waste solvents.

There are holes and rusted openings in the top of all thedrums, which are located approximately 100 feet from the DanielGreathouse, Jr. residence. Mr. Greathouse stated that hisdaughter stuck her hand through the rusted top of one of thedrums. The solvent drums pose a potential environmental threatas the drums are resting 15 feet from an unnamed tributaryof Hisey Fork Creek, a tributary of the Ohio River, and wouldhave an adverse effect on the waterway should one or more of

2 /-I Ff 100019

the drums rupture.

IV. SCOPE OP WORK

The scope of work proposed for implementation with theemergency $50,000.00 appropriation includes the following: l)overpacking of the solvent drums (drums to remain on site pendingfinal disposal approval); 2) Lab analysis of disposalanalysis samples and QA soil samples; 3) Removal of overpackeddrums and drums of contaminated, soil and clothing from site tofinal disposal.

The authorized budget for this $50K removal is:

EPA $ 5,000EPA HQ (15%) 7,500TAT 7,500ERCS 30,000

TOTAL $ 50,000

V. OSC ACTION

On May 6, 1988, at the direction of osc Wilmoth and inresponse to a request from the WVDNR, Roy F. Weston's TechnicalAssistance Team was on site to perform an emergency assessment onfive drums of waste solvents located near the Daniel Greathouse,Jr, residence.

On May 10, 1988, after considering TAT and WVDNR site data,the OSC made the determination that an imminent and substancialthreat was posed by the uncontrolled, deteriorated drums of wastesolvents near the Daniel Greathouse, Jr. residence, and issuedDelivery order 17445-03-049 to ERCS in the amount of $19,000.00to initiate removal actions aimed at mitigating the threat tohuman health and the environment.

At this time, no Potential Responsible Parties (PRP) havebeen identified. As a result, the OSC has initiated this CERCLAremoval action.

Because the conditions of the Fifth street Drum Dump meetthe conditions of Section 300.65 of the National Contingency Planfor an immediate removal, the OSC has approved this immediateremoval action.

Benton M. Wilmoth, Sr. OSCUS EPA - Region IIIWheeling, WV

ANALYTICAL REPORT16406 U.S. Route 224 EM

P,0, Box 1404FindUjr, Ohio 45839-1404

ETC • FINDLAY LABORATORY

WENT: USEPA Region IIIHunclngCon, HV

ATTN: J. LeporatlBen HllraoCh, OSC

PROJECT NUMBBI: 5990E SAMPLE TYPE Liquid

ANALYSIS PERFORMED:

Incineration Disposal

(Sample: FC-01)

DATE COMPUTED: 7/28/88 . DATERECHVH): 7/07/88

This report is "PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL" and delivered to, and intended for the exclusiveuse ol the above named client only, Environmental Testing and Certification Corp. assumes no responsibilityor liability for the reliance hereon or use hereof by anyone other than the above named client,The analyses and data Interpretation that form the basis of this report was prepared under the directsupervision and control of the undersigned who Is solely responsible for the contents and conclusionstherein,

Reviewed andApproved by:

R. J. ..Bchock, Mgr.-ETC Flndlay Laboratory ? Dale

A Subwtoy erf EnvfoxranW TrenrmtThe Environmental Services

7/28/881

PROJECT B990E,

SUMMARY REPORT OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES

1. INTRODUCTION

Environmental Testing 5 Certification Corp. (ETC) FindlayLaboratory received samples from O.H. Materials Corp. Thesesamples were acquired by their technical personnel and trans-ferred to the laboratory complete with a chain-of-custody record,a copy of which is attached for reference. These samples werecomposited and analyzed for Incineration Disposal parameters.

2. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

Metals

Samples were prepared and analyzed according to USEPA TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Wastes. Physical/ChemicalMethods, SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1982. Samples wereprepared by Method 3010, 3030, 3050, or 1310 as appropriatefor the following metals: antimony, arsenic, barium,beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc, sample analyses forthese metals were performed according to Method 6010,Inductively Coupled Plasma Method (SW-846 Proposed Samplingand Analytical Methodologies, 1984).Density

Densities were determined by either ASTM Method D1298-90 forliquids or by Method 213E for solids, Standard Methods for theExamination of Water and Wastewater. 16th edition, 1985.

BTU Content-Solids and Liquids

The BTU content of the samples was determined by either ASTME711-81, Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Refuse DerivedFuel (RDF-3) by Bomb Calorimeter, Section II, Vol. 11.04 or byASTM D240-76, Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydro-carbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, Section 5, Vol. 05.01.

Ash Content

The ash content of the samples was determined by either ASTME830-81, Test Method for Ash in the Analysis Samples of Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF-3), Section II, Vol. 11.04, or by ASTM D482-80Test Method for Ash from Petrleura Products, Section 5, Vol.05.01.

HFHUUU22

7/28/882

PROJECT 5990E

SUMMARY REPORT OF ANAYTICAL SERVICES

Sulfur Content

The sulfur content of the samples was determined by either ASTME775-81, rest Methods for Total Sulfur in the Anaysis Sample ofRefuse-Derived Fuel, Section II, Vol. 11.04, or by ASTM D129-64(1978), Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (GeneralBomb Method), Section 5, Vol. 05.01.

Pesticides and PCS Content

Samples were prepared by Method 3510, 3540, or 3550 as appropri-ate; and analyzed according to Method 80EO of USEPA Test Methodsfor Evaluating Solic Wastes. Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846,2nd edition, July 1982.

Chlorine Content

The sampled were analyzed for percent chlorine according toAmerican Society. for Testing and Materials, Section 5, MethodD803-CJL, chlorine in New and Used Petroleum Products (BombMethod.

Viscosity

Organic liquids were analyzed using a Brookfield viscometeraccording to ASTM D2983, Volume 5.03, 1983.Water and Sediment Content

Organic liquids were analyzed for percent levels of water andsediment according to ASTM D4007, Volume 5.03, 1983, CentrifugeMethod.

GC/H5 Volatile Organic Analyses and Screens

Volatile analysis of the samples are performed using methodsbased on USEPA Test, Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes.Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846, July 1982; Method 8240, GC/MSMethods for Volatile organics.GC/HS Semi-Volatile Organic Analyses and Screens

Acid and base neutral extractables are prepared and analyzedusing methods based on USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating SolidWastes. Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, July 1982; Method8240, GC/MS Methods for Semi-Volatile organics.

A R I U U 0 2 3

7/28/883

PROJECT 5990E

SUMMARY REPORT OP ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Flash Point (Pensky-Martens)

Flash points were performed according to the procedure specifiedin USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes. Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1982; Method 1010,Pensky-Martens Closed-cup Method.

3. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The following tables detail the analytical results for samplesI5990E-FC-01.

«ft i 00021*

7/28/884

PROJECT 5990E,

TABLE 1 - INCINERATION DISPOSAL ANALYSIS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Flammable Liquid CompositeETC SAMPLE NUMBER: 5990E-FC-01

Parameter Result

color Brown

Number of Phases 1

Percent by volume of phases 100

Physical state of phases Liquid

Density 0.97 g/cra3

Flash Point, PM, cc , 20°c

Viscosity, Brookefield 65 cpu

BTU Content 7,280 BTU/lb

Ash Content 2.06% by weight

chlorine content 0.11% by weight.

sulfur Content < 0.1% by weight

Moisture Content 5.0% Moisture

Sediment Content 1.6% Sediment

7/28/885

PROJECT S990E

TABLE 2 - VOLATILE ORGANICS


Compound Concentration (mg/Kg)

Acrolein BDL*Acrylonitrile BDL*Benzene BDLBromomethane BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform BDLC.hloronethane ' BDLDibromochloromethane ' BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Diohlorobenzene BDL1,1-Dichloroethane BDL1,2-Dichloroethane BDL1,1-Diohloroethene BDLTrans-l,2-Dichloroethene BDL1,2-Dichloropropane BDLcis-l,2-Dichloropropene BDLTrans-l,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 11,500Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluoromethane BDLToluene 142,000Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 77,800

*Limit of Detection = 10,000 irg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)Limit of Detection = 500 rag/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL = Below Detection Limit

U0026

7/28/886

PROJECT 59903

TABLE 3 - VOLATILE HSL COMPOUNDS


Concentration DetectionCompound (ing/Kg) Limit (rag/Kg)

Acetone 13,600 5,000

2-Butanone (MEK) BDL 500

carbon Disulfide BDL 500

Ethyl ether BDL 500

Ethylene Dibromide BDL 5002-Hexanone ' BDL 500

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 500Styrene BDL 500

Tetrahydrofuran BDL 500

l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2~trifluoroethane (Freon 113) BDL 500

mg/Kg = ppn (parts-per-million)BDL B Below Detection Limit

PROJECT 599QETABLE 4 - VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS


BiK^KpsSKKKKS^jBKKKpSKKWKHS^KRaKSSKSissSKSsssjss^sKKjSRSWKwsBKsBSSssKSBjiSKKKs;

Compounds Concentration (mg/Kg)BKassjssraKKSKHssswassKWEsjsKKsaKssswsKKKWWHjsKSKSSKHjssKSKJSss^sSKSssiHKSJSsc

Aliphatic hydrocarbons 16,100Ethyl-cyclohexane 9,800

"9/Kg « ppw (parts-per-million,

A R I O O D 2 8

7/28/888

PROJECT 599QE.

TABLE 5 - BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS


Concentra-Compound tion (rag/Kg)

Aenaphthene BDLAcenaphthylene BDLAnthracene BDLBenzidine BDLBenzo(a) anthracene BDLBenzo(b)fluoranthene BDLBen2o(k)fluoranthene BDLBenzo (a) pyrene BDLBenzo (g,h,i)perylene BDLBis(2-chloroethyl) -ether BDL

Bis(2-chloroethoxy) -methane BDL

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate 434

Bis(2-chloroiso-propyl) ether BDL

4-Bromophenyl phenylether BDL

Butyl benzylphthalate 1,520

2-Chloronaphthalene BDL4-chlorophenyl phenylether BDL

chrysene BDLDibenzo(a,h)anthracene BDLDi-n-butylphthalate 1031, 3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL

Concentra-Compound tion

3,3'-Dichloro-benzidine BDL

Diethylphthalate BDLDimethylphthalate BDL2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL2,6-dinitrotoluene BDLDioctylphthalate BDL1,2-Diphenylhydrazine BDL

Fluoranthene BDL'Fluorene BDLHexachlorobenzene BDLHexachlorobutadiene BDLHexachloroethane BDLHexachlorocyclo-pentadiene BDL

Indeno-(l,2,3-cd)pyrene BDL

Isophorone BDLNaphthalene 418Nitrobenzene BDLN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BDL

N-Nitrosodiphenyl-amine BDL

Phenanthrene BDLPyrene BDL1,2,4-Trichloro-benzene BDL

Limit of Detection « 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL = Below Detection Limit

7/28/889

PROJECT 599 OE.TABLE 6 - ACID EXTRACTABLE;


aaaassaa ——— .aaasiaaaassgagaaaaaaaaaasiasiasaasaiasassaassaaaaciasiaaaaaaaaaaa

Compound Concentration (mg/Kg)

4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol BDL

2-chlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dichlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dimethylphenol BDL

2,4-Dinitrophenol BDL*

2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol BDL*

2-Nitrophenol BDL

4-Nitrophenol BDL

Pentachlorophenol BDL

Phenol BDL

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BDL

*Limit of Detection = 1,000 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)Limit of Detection

7/28/8810

PROJECT S990E,

TABLE 7 - ADDITjrONAL SEMI-VOLATILE; flSL COMPOUNDS


Compound concentration (mg/Kg)

Aniline BDL

Benzyl Alcohol BDL

4-Chloroaniline BDL

Dibenzofuran BDL

2-Methylnaphthalene BDL2-Methylphenol BDL

4-Methylphenol BDL

2-Nitroaniline BDL

3-Nitroaniline BDL

4-Nitroaniline BDL2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BDL

Limit of Detection « 100 mg/Kg ppw (parts-per-nillion)BDL ~ Below Detection Limit

7/28/8811

PROJECT 5990E

TABLE 8 - SEMI-VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS


Compounds Concentration (rog/Kg)aaaa~~;»i~asaa?;aa;;aaF3ac;~:aaaaaaRaaaac:c;:sa;3aai3:ŝ ;3s~s;aaaaaKS?;a:~aaaaas3s;aE;;5

3-Oxapentyl acetate (ethyl glycoacetate) 24,300

Butylglycolacetate 569

Gasoline range hydrocarbons 180,000

Limit of Detection^ 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)

7/28/8812

PROJECT 5990E

TABLE 9 - PESTICIDES AND PCBS


Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit (mg/Kg)sassKs^^sss^sKSKSssHKscnKsBsBBSBKCisHSKKssaHKKSssMKBWKKHssssss^BKPSEsssH:

Aldrin BDL 1.0BHC-alpha BDL l.oBHC-beta BDL 1.0BHC-gamma BDL 1.0BHC-delta BDL 1.0Chlordane BDL 10.04, 4 '-ODD BDL 1.04, 4 '-DDE BDL 1.04, 4 '-DOT BDL 1.0Dieldrin , BDL 1.0Endosulfan-alpha BDL 1.0 •Endosul fan-beta BDL 1.0Endosulfan sulfate BDL l.oEndrin BDL l.oEndrin aldehyde BDL 1.0Heptachlor BDL 1.0Heptachlor expoxide BDL 1.0Toxaphene BDL 10.0

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS

Aroclor 1016 BDL 10.0Aroclor 1221 BDL 10.0Aroclor 1232 BDL 10.0Aroclor 1242 BDL 10.0Aroclor 1248 BDL 10.0Aroclor 1254 BDL 10.0Aroclor 1260 BDL 10.0

mg/Kg = ppm (parts-per-million)BDL = Below Detection Limit

7/28/8813

PROJECT S99QE

TABLE 10 - TOTAL METALS FOR INCINERATION DISPOSAL


Concentration DetectionCompound (rag/Kg) Limit (rag/Kg)

Antimony BDL 10.0

Arsenic BDL 10.0

Barium 50.0 l.o

Beryllium BDL 1.0

Cadmium BDL 1 . 0

Chromium 151 1.0Copper 15.4 1.0

Iron 2,030

Lead 876 1.0

Manganese 33.5 1.0

Mercury BDL 0.2

Nickel 4.15 1.0

Selenium BDL 1.0

Silver BDL 1.0

Thallium BDL 3.0Zinc 9.38 l.o

mg/Kg = pp (parts-per-illion)BDL = Below Detection Limit

Aft,

7/28/8814

PROJECT S990E

TABLE 11 - TEST BULKING RESULTS


Test Bulking Parameters

Date of Test Bulk: July B, 1988

Samples Bulked: D01A + D02A + D02B + D03A,1 •)• D03A,2

Temperature Rise: < 2.0°C

Gas Evolved: None observed

Precipitate: None observed

Gelling or Solidification: None observed

A R I O U G 3 5

7/28/8815

PROJECT 5990E

PC SUMMARY

A. Conventionals: I Spike Recovery

BTU 103Sulfur 104Chloride 97.3

B. GC/MS Priority Pollutant Volatile Organics:

BFB Tune File: See attachedSurrogate Recoveries:

Blank FC-Ol

Benzene-d6 99.9 100BFB 104 105Toluene-ds 99.7 106

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)

Acrolein 66.0 73.7Acrylonitrile 85.6 85.9Benzene 102 103Bromodichloromethane 103 103Bromofonn 100 103Bromomethane 105 104carbon Disulfide 103 103Carbon Tetrachloride 103 104Chlorobenzene 104 102Chloroethane 105 1052-Chloroethylvinyl ether 78.7 82.3Chloroform 109 109Chloromethane 56.2 50.7Dibromochloromethane 103 1061,3-Dichlorobenzene 105 1021,4-Dichlorobenzene 104 1031,2-Dichlorobenzene 104 1041,1-Dichloroethane 106 1051,2-Dichloroethane 107 • 1061,1-Dichloroethene 108 109trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 120 1211,2-Dichloropropane 102 102cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 99.3 99.7trans-l,3-Dihloropropene 97.7 101Ethylbenzene ' 107 104Ethylene dibromide 101 103

7/28/8816

PROJECT 599OE

PC SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)Ethyl ether 101 102Freon 113 109 1092-Hexanone 93.0 100Methyl ethyl ketone 97.1 99.7Methylene chloride 99.2 101Methyl isobutyl ketone 93.4 99.1Styrene 103 1021,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 90.9 90.6Tetrachloroethene 112 110Tetrahydrofuran 92.9 93.3Toluene 105 1031,1,1-Trichloroethane 97.7 98.51,1,2-Trichloroethane 100 101Trichloroethene 112 115Trichlorofluoromethane 113 113Vinyl acetate 88.0 75.7Vinyl Chloride • . Ill 112m+p-Xylenes (Total Cone.) 109 112o-Xylene 109 106Benzene-d6 94.7 96.3Bromofluorobenzene (SUKR) 101 99.5Toluene-d8 (SURR) 98.6 97.8

C. Pesticides: Percent Spike Recoveries

PCB 110D. Metals: Percent Spike Recoveries

Antimony 104 61.0Arsenic 103Barium 9B.3Beryllium 117 102Cadmium 108 89.3Chromium 101Copper 102Iron 103Lead 104Manganese 102Mercury 88.2 96.7Nickel 102 96.4Selenium 101Silver 68.5 81.8Thallium 109 77.3Zinc 109 82.9

iR 100037

.sirsflillIt. SHI ro£ cc1°oz

SU3NIVJ.N03 1Q

^°- *o

§.«JS

3

a.ECOO

3CP

X6

Tct .jI<

20950

QuO

2§S

evus

Xomda -. . . . . v -

•5

» \

X V.*

cO

r.

Q^

;J

Q

o

sfSo

;ti} JI!

T<

N

ANALYTICAL REPORT16406 U.S. Route 224 EM

P.O. Box 1404FindUy, Ohio 45839-1404

ETC-FINDLAY LABORATORY

CUBfT: USEPA Region IIIHunClngton, HV

ATTH: J. LeporatiBen Wilmoth, OSC

PROJECT NUMBER; 5990E SAMPLE TYPE Solid

ANALYSIS PERFORMED:

Incineration Disposal '

(Sample: FSC-01)

DATE COMPLETED: 7/28/88 DATE RECEIVED; 7/07/88

This report is "PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL" and delivered to, and intended for the exclusiveuse of the above named client only. Environmental Testing and Certification Corp, assumes no responsibilityor liability for the reliance hereon or use hereof by anyone other than the above named client.The analyses and data interpretation that form the basis of this report was prepared under the directsupervision and control of trie undersigned who is solely responsible for the contents and conclusionstherein.

Reviewed andApproved by:

R, J. S

7/28/881

PROJECT 5990E


1. INTRODUCTION

Environmental Testing & Certification Corp. (ETC) FindlayLaboratory received samples from o.H. Materials Corp. Thesesamples were acquired by their technical personnel and trans-ferred to the laboratory complete with a chain-of-custody record,a copy of which is attached for reference. These samples werecomposited and analyzed for Incineration Disposal parameters.

2. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY

Metals

Samples were prepared and analyzed according to USEPA TestMethods for Evaluating Solid Wastes. Physical/ChemicalMethods, SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1982. Samples wereprepared by Method 3010, 3030, 3050, or 1310 as appropriatefor the following metals: antimony, arsenic, barium,,beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc. Sample analyses forthese metals were performed according to Method 6010,Inductively coupled Plasma Method (SW-846 Proposed Samplingand Analytical Methodologies, 1984).

Densities were determined by either ASTM Method D1298-90 forliquids or by Method 213E for solids, Standard Methods for theExamination of Water and Wastewater, 16th edition, 1985.

BTU Content-Solids and Liquids

The BTU content of the samples was determined by either ASTME711-81, Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Refuse DerivedFuel (RDF-3) by Bomb Calorimeter, Section II, Vol. 11.04 or byAS"M D240-76, Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydro-caxbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, Section 5, Vol. 05.01.

Ash Content

The ash content of the samples was determined by either ASTME830-81, Test Method for Ash in the Analysis Samples of Refuse-Derived Fuel (RDF-3), Section II, Vol. 11.04, or by ASTM D482-80Test Method for Ash from Petrleum Products, Section 5, Vol.05.01.

0 j .';.

7/28/882

PROJECT S990E

SUMMARY REPORT OF ANAYTICAL SERVICES

Sulfur Content

The sulfur content of the samples was determined by either ASTME775-B1, Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Anaysis Sample ofRefuse-Derived Fuel, Section II, Vol. 11.04, or by ASTM D129-64(1978), Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (GeneralBomb Method), Section 5, Vol. 05.01.

Pesticides and PCB Content

Samples were prepared by Method 3510, 3540, or 3550 as appropri-ate; and analyzed according to Method 8080 of USEPA Test Methodsfor Evaluating Solid Wastes. Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846,2nd edition, July 1982.Chlorine Content

The samples were analyzed for percent chlorine according toAmerican Society for Testing and Materials. Section 5, MethodD808-81, Chlorine in New and Used Petroleum Products (BombMethod.

Viscosity

Organic liquids were analyzed using a Brookfield viscometeraccording to ASTM D2983, Volume 5.03, 1983.

GC/MS Volatile Organic Analyses and Screens

Volatile analysis of the samples are performed using methodsbased on USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes^Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, July 1982; Method 8240, GC/MSMethods for Volatile Organics.GC/HS Semi-Volatile Organic Analyses and Screens

Acid and base neutral extractables are prepared and analyzedusing' methods based on USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating SolidWastes. Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, July 1982; Method8240, GC/MS Methods for Semi-Volatile organics.

A f'i I 0 U 0 4 'i.

7/28/883

PROJECT S990E


Paint Filter Test

Percent free liquids was determined by Method 9095, SW-846.

Flash Point (Seta-Flash)

Flash points were performed at 60°c according to the procedurespecified in USEPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Hastes.Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, 2nd edition, July 1982; Method1020, Seta-flash Closed-cup Method.

Total Solids

Solid samples were analyzed for Total Solids (TS) according toStandard Methods for the Examination of Water and Hastewater,16th edition, 1985; Method 209F, Residue, Total, Gravimetric,Dried at 103°C-105°C.

3. ANALYTICAL RESULTS

The following tables detail the analytical results for samples05990E-FSC-01.

AftiOOOU

7/28/884

PROJECT 599OE

TABLE 1 - INCINERATION DISPOSAL ANALYSIS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Flammable Solid CompositeETC'SAMPLE NUMBER: 5990E-FSC-01

Parameter Resultissss^i-KSSK^KSKKKKKKKKaKjassjqssHKKKBsssss^sKKKSssissKissKJSssKKsKSKBKa

Color Brown

Number of Phases 2

Percent by volume of phases 20/80

Physical state of phases Liquid/Solid

Density 1.16 g/cm3

Flash Point, SF, cc . 20°C

Viscosity, Brookefield Solid cpu

BTU Content 1,050 BTU/lb

Ash Content 18.6% by weight

Chlorine Content 0.34% by weight

Sulfur Content < 0.1% by weight

Total Solids 33.2% by weight

Percent Free Liquids 6.5% by weight

A ft i U 0 0 If 4

7/28/88

PROJECT 5990E

TABLE 2 - VOLATILE ORGANICS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Flammable Solid CompositeETC SAMPLE NUMBER: 5990E-FSC-01

Compound Concentration (mg/Kg)SSSSKSKBSSSSSSK— KHSSKSK^KKSKHcsKssassKSSHHKSSs—s^KisKcsHSSHSSKHsssjHS^KSsssacsssH

Aorolein BDL*Acrylonitrile BDL*Benzene BDLBromomethane BDLBromodichloromethane BDLBromoform BDLCarbon Tetrachloride BDLChlorobenzene BDLChloroethane BDL2-Chloroethylvinyl ether BDLChloroform < BDLChloromethane ' BDLDibromochloromethane BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,1-Dichloroethane BDL1,2-Dichloroethane BDL1,1-Dichloroethene BDLTrans-l,2-Dichloroethene BDL1 , 2-Dichloropropane BDLCis-l,2-Dichloropropene BDLTrans-l,3-Dichloropropene BDLEthylbenzene 4,980Methylene Chloride BDL1,1,2,2 -Tetrachloroethane BDLTetrachloroethene BDL1,1,1-Trichloroethane BDL1,1,2-Trichloroethane BDLTrichloroethene BDLTrichlorofluoromethane BDLToluene 68,600Vinyl Chloride BDLTotal Xylenes 37,300

*Limit of Detection = 10,000 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)Limit of Detection = 500 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL = Below Detection Limit

7/28/886

PROJECT 5990E

TABLE 3 - VOLATILE HSL COMPOUNDS

SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: Flammable Solid compositeETC SAMPLE NUMBER: 5990E-FSC-01

Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit (mg/Kg)

Acetone BDL 5,000

2-Butanone (MEK) BDL 500

Carbon Disulfide BDL 500

Ethyl ether BDL 500

Ethylene Dibromide BDL 500

2-Hexanone ' BDL 500

4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) BDL 500

Styrene BDL 500

Tetrahydrofuran BDL 500

l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113) BDL 500

mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL a Below Detection Limit

7/28/887

PROJECT 599OE;TABLE 4 - VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS


Compounds Concentration {mg/Kg)KKHSKKK^SBBKKKSKSWKKSKSSKKSKSKSKKWKKSSSSS—SSBKSKSSSSBKE^KSSCSSSSKKKSHK—KSS

No chromatographic peaks were present with an area greater than25% of the internal standards

mg/Kg « ppm (parts-per-million)

7/28/888

PROJECT 599QE

TABLE 5 - BASE/NEUTRAL COMPOUNDS


Concentra-Compound tion (mg/Kg)

Aenaphthene BDLAcenaphthylene BDLAnthracene BDLBenzidine BDLBenzo(a)anthracene BDLBenzo(b)fluoranthene BDLBenzo(k)fluoranthene BDLBenzo(a)pyrene BDLBenzo(g,h,i)perylene BDLBis(2-chloroethyl)-ether ' BDL

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)-methane BDL

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)-phthalate 999

Bis(2-chloroiso-propyl)ether BDL

4-Bromophenyl phenylether BDL

Butyl benzylphthalate 1,070

2-chloronaphthalene BDL4-Chlorophenyl phenylether BDL

Chrysene BDLDibenzo(a,h)anthracene BDLDi-n-butylphthalate BDL1,3-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,4-Dichlorobenzene BDL1,2-Dichlorobenzene BDL

Concentra-Compound tion (mg/Kg)

3,3'-Dichloro-benzidine BDL

Diethylphthalate BDLDimethylphthalate BDL2,4-Dinitrotoluene BDL2,6-dinitrotoluene BDLDioctylphthalate BDL1,2-Diphenylhydrazine BDL

Fluoranthene BDLFluorene BDLHexachlorobenzene BDLHexachlorobutadiene BDLHexachloroethane BDLHexachlorocyclo-pentadiene BDL

Indeno-(l,2,3-cd)pyrene BDL

Isophorone BDLNaphthalene BDLNitrobenzene BDLN-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BDL

N-Nitrosodiphenyl-amine BDL

Phenanthrene BDLPyrene BDL1,2,4-Trichloro-benzene BDL

Limit of Detection « 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL = Below Detection Limit

0 u u if Q

7/28/88

PROJECT 5990E

TABLE 6 - ACID EXTRACTABLE


Compound Concentration (mg/Kg)KSBKssssKsaBSKKKSSKsKKSKSKKSKSSKSKKSsssssJSESE:— —==:s=— ===s;=:=3==;3===3=3«55:5=5=5S=:=:

4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol BDL

2-Chlorophenol BDL

2 , 4 -Dichlorophenol BDL

2,4-Dimethylphenol DDL

2,4-Dinitrophenol BDL*

2-Methyl-4,6-Dinitrophenol ' BDL*

2-Nitrophenol BDL

4-Nitrophenol BDLPentachlorophenol BDL

Phenol BDL


*Limit of Detection » 1,000 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)Limit of Detection = 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL H Below Detection Limit

7/28/8810

PROJECT S990E

TABLE 7 - ADDITIONAL SEMI-VOLATILE HSL COMPOUNDS


Compound Concentration (mg/Kg)K— ;-ŝ ;=sss;5SK;=sK̂ ;̂sssss;5S™ŝ c5Ŝ sss;̂ «ss;=̂ sKSKSS™sesc™;5Ss;=:=;=«ss=;=;ss;=s:

Aniline BDL

Benzyl Alcohol BDL

4-Chloroaniline BDL

Dibenzofuran BDL

2-Methylnaphthalene BDL

2-Methylphenol . BDL

4-Methylphenol . BDL

2-Nitroaniline BDL

3-Nitroaniline BDL

4-Nitroaniline BDL


Limit of Detection = 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-million)BDL = Below Detection Limit

ARIU0050

7/28/8811

PROJECT S990E,

TABLE 8 - SEMI-VOLATILE SCREEN RESULTS


compounds Concentration (mg/Kg)aSKnRMRSPSMESHHlKHKS^SHpSSSSSaHRnHMnaEaSHRPSSSSSCIm^i^REiCiSSESi-Rn^S^SCiiRES^^SM

3-Oxapentyl acetate (ethyl glycoacetate) 20,100

Butylglycolacetate 1,250

Gasoline range hydrocarbons 131,000

Limit of Detection^ 100 mg/Kg ppm (parts-per-nillion)

7/28/8812

PROJECT S990E

TABLE 9 - PESTICIDES AND PCBS


JS jaSSKSKS^SSJSKSKHSiSKS—SaKBKKSKKK^HHSSSSiSKRBSS; !5S:!3i= 55=3 ESSSSSSKSSCSSCaSSKja 53=3=3=3:5

Concentration DetectionCompound (rag/Kg) Limit (mg/Kg)

Aldrin BDL o.lBHC-alpha BDL 0.1BHC-beta BDL 0.1BHC-gamma BDL 0.1BHC-delta BDL 0.1Chlordane BDL 1.04,4'-DDD BDL 0.14,4'-DDE BDL 0.14,4'-DDT BDL 0.1Dieldrin , BDL 0.1Endosul fan-alpha BDL 0.1Endosul fan-beta BDL 0.1Endosulfan sulfate BDL 0.1Endrin BDL o.lEndrin aldehyde BDL o.lHeptachlor BDL 0.1Heptachlor expoxide BDL 0.1Toxaphene BDL 1 . 0

POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS

Aroclor 1016 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1221 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1232 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1242 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1248 BDL 1.0Aroclor 1254 5.26 1.0Aroclor 1260 BDL 1.0

rag/Kg ~ ppm (parts-per-million).BDL B Below Detection Limit

A R I O U 0 5 2

7/28/8813

PROJECT S990E

TABLE 10 - TOTAL METALS, FOR INCINERATION DISPOSAL


Concentration DetectionCompound (mg/Kg) Limit (mg/Kg)

Antimony BDL 60.0Arsenic BDL 80.0

Barium 386 1.0

Beryllium BDL 1.0cadmium BDL l.ochromium 1,420 1.0Copper 221 1.0

Iron 130,000 l.oLead 7,550 1.0

Manganese 415 1.0

Mercury BDL 0.2

Nickel 51,0 1.0

Selenium BDL 1.0

Silver BDL 1.0

Thallium BDL 3.0Zinc 86.8 1.0

mg/Kg •= pp (parts-per-illion)BDL ~ Below Detection Limit

A R I Q U 0 5 3

7/Z8/8814

PROJECT 5990E

TABLE 11 - TEST BULKING RESULTS


Test Bulking ParametersKSS«SSS«=KSKSSSSCSKS— ss-E5?3s?=?5=;c;ss?-p;=5Sss;p;==3Ss=;s;?;s=;ss

Date of Test Bulk: July 8, 1988

Samples Bulked: D01B + D03B + D05B

Temperature Rise: < 2.0°C

Gas Evolved: None observed

Precipitate: None observed

Gelling or Solidification: None observed

7/28/8815

PROJECT 5990E

PC SUMMARY

A. conventional: % Spike Recovery

BTU 1°3Sulfur 104Chloride 97.3

B. GC/MS Priority Pollutant Volatile Organics:BFB Tune File: See attachedSurrogate Recoveries:

Blank, Fsc-oi

Benzene-d6 99.9 97.0BFB 104 1°4Toluene-d8 99-7 102

Volatile Organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)

Acrolein « •» 73.7Acrylonitrile 85.6 85.9Benzene 102 103Broraodichloromethane 103 iojBromoform 100 103Bromomethane 105 104carbon Disulfide 103 103carbon Tetrachloride 103 104Chlorobenaene 104 102Chloroethane 105 1052-Chloroethylvinyl ether 78.7 BZ.Jchloroform 109 109chloromethane 56.2 w.iDibromochloromethane 103 io

7/28/8816

PROJECT 5990E

QC SUMMARY (CONTINUED)

Volatile organics Spike Recoveries: (In Percentages)

Ethyl ether 101 102Freon 113 109 1092-Hexanone 93.0 100Methyl ethyl ketone 97.1 99.7Methylene chloride 99.2 101Methyl isobutyl ketone 93.4 99.1Styrene 103 1021,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 90.9 90.6Tetrachloroethene 112 110Tetrahydrofuran 92.9 93.3Toluene 105 1031,1,1-Trichloroethane 97.7 98.51,1,2-Trichloroethane 100 101Trichloroethene 112 115Trichlorofluoromethane 113 113Vinyl acetate • 88.0 75.7Vinyl Chloride 111 112m+p-Xylenes (Total cone.) 109 112o-Xylene 109 106Benzene-d6 94.7 96.3Bromofluorobenzene (SURR) 101 99.5Toluene-d8 (SURR) 98.6 97.8

C. Pesticides: Percent Spike Recoveries

PCB 110

D. Metals: Percent Spike Recoveries

Antimony 104 61.0Arsenic 103Barium 98.3Beryllium 117 102Cadmium 108 89.3Chromium 101Copper 102Iron 103Lead 104Manganese 102Mercury B8.2 96.7Nickel 102 96.4Selenium 101Silver 68.5 81.8Thallium 109 77.3Zinc 109 82.9

.1f H£

b

0O fO ?w *C

Q

OllO

O

'<

-X 3

SU3NiyjNOOdObatmriN

§

a

sg3s

0~

It.

UtQH

drtoo

Va' " '———'——'———̂§

\

^i

\

0JO; 7

O.

L!

COenUD

I O

fii

StflNIMNOOiO rv ™ ^ ^ ^ ^ V. w puaannn

i

0.gUco __'' ~ r

I

2a

^•

POLREP tfl - FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WVCERCLA ASSESSMENT

ATTENTION: BOB CARON, TIM FIELDS AND STEVE JARVELAI. SITUATION (1200 HOURS - 5/10/88)A. AT THE REQUEST OF OSC BENTON WILMOTH, TAT WAS ON SCENE 5/6/88TO PERFORM AN EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT ON FIVE DRUMS (ALL BELIEVED TOBE WASTE SOLVENTS) WHICH ARE LOCATED NEAR THE DANIEL GREATHOUSE,JR. RESIDENCE. TAT OBTAINED FIVE DRUM SAMPLES, AND TWO SOILSAMPLES INCLUDING ONE BACKGROUND. AT OSC DIRECTION, TAT COVEREDTHE DRUMS WITH VISQUEEN BEFORE LEAVING SITEB. THE DRUMS, WHICH ARE ALL IN A HIGHLY DETIORATED CONDITION,ARE RESTING ON AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JIM THOMPSONAND WERE LEFT THERE BY A PRIOR RESIDENT OF THE GREATHOUSEPROPERTY. THE CONTENTS OF THE DRUMS WERE USED TO KILL WEEDS ONAN EMBANKMENT ON THE GREATHOUSE PROPERTY. THE WVDNR PERFORMEDTHE INITIAL SITE INVESTIGATION IN RESPONSE TO A COMPLAINT BY MR.GREATHOUSE WHOSE DAUGHTER HAD STUCK HER HAND THROUGH THE RUSTEDTOP OF ONE OF THE DRUMS. THE STATE HAD BANNER GUARDED THE DRUMSDURING THEIR VISIT.C. PERSONNEL ON SCENE: WVDNR - 1, TAT - 3D. WEATHER: 70 DEGREES, CLEARII. ACTIONS TAKENA. TAT PERFORMED EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT 5/6/88 ON FIVE DRUMS OFSUSPECTED SOLVENTS NEAR THE DANIEL GREATHOUSE RESIDENCE. TATOBTAINED FIVE DRUM SAMPLES AND TWO SOIL SAMPLES. TAT ACCOMPANIEDTO SITE BY WVDNR INSPECTOR BLAKE.B. AT OSC DIRECTION, THE DRUMS WERE COVERED WITH VISQUEEN ANDTHE COMPLAINTANTS ADVISED TO AVOID DRUM AREA.C. 5/10/88, OSC WILMOTH UNDER DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY 14-1-A(4-8-86) OBTAINED S19K IN CERCLA FUNDS TO INITIATE REMOVALACTION. 5/10/88 OSC ISSUED DELIVERY ORDER 07445-03-049 TO ERCSIN THE AMOUNT OF $19,000 TO BEGIN SITE STABILIZATION. ERCS TOBE ON SITE 0800 HOURS 5/12/88 TO OVERPACK DRUMS. DRUMS TOREMAIN ON SITE PENDING FINAL DISPOSAL ARRANGEMENTS.Ill, FUTURE PLANSA. EPA-FAS/TAT/ERCS TO BE ON SITE 5/12/88 TO OVERPACK 5DRUMS OF WASTE SOLVENTS. DRUMS TO REMAIN ON SITE PENDING FINALDISPOSAL APPROVAL

'̂ĴWrEMOTH;US EPA REGION IIIWHEELING, WV

ARI00059

POLREP n ~ FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WVCERCLA REMOVAL ACTIVITY

ATTENTION: BOB CARON, TIM FIELDS AND STEVE JARVELAI. SITUATION (1600 HOURS - 5/12/88)A. ERGS/TAT WERE ON SITE THIS DATE AND COMPLETED SITESTABILIZATION ACTIVITIES. ERCS BULKED LIQUIDS FROM DRUMS,OVERPACKED EMPTY DRUMS (WITH REMAINING SLUDGES), AND SCRAPED SOILFROM AREA WHERE DRUMS WERE RESTING. ALL DRUMS AND OVERPACKSSTAGED ON SITE, COVERED WITH PLASTIC AND BANNERGUARDED. TOTAL 10DRUMS/OVERPACKS TO REMAIN ON SITE PENDING FINAL DISPOSAL APPROVAL.B. ERCS COLLECTED ALL DISPOSAL SAMPLES REQUIRED, BACKGROUND SOILSAMPLE AND QA SOIL SAMPLE. STAGED ON SITE ARE DRUMS IN THEFOLLOWING QUANTITIES:

BULKED LIQUIDS 17H DRUMS (3 EA)OVERPACKED DRUMS (5 EA)CONTAMINATED SOIL/CLOTHING 17H DRUMS (2 EA)

C. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE: (COB 5/12/88)AGENCY COSTS CEILINGEPA $ 250 $ 5,000TAT 1,700 7,500ERCS 2,500 19,000

D. PERSONNEL ON SCENE: TAT - 2, ERCS - 3E. WEATHER: 75 DEGREES, SUNNYII. ACTIONS TAKENA. ERCS/TAT ON SITE 5/12/88 AND COMPLETED BULKING OF LIQUIDSFROM DRUMS, OVERPACKING OF DRUMS AND SOJL REMOVAL UTILIZING HANDTOOLS.B. ALL DRUMS/OVERPACKS STAGED ON SITE, BANNERGUARDED AND COVEREDWITH PLASTIC.C. OSC CONTACTED AFFECTED RESIDENTS (GREATHOUSE) TO GIVE PRIORNOTICE OF THE REMOVAL ACTIVITY.D. OSC NOTIFIED WVDNR (HAYES) OF EPA REMOVAL ACTIVITY AT SITE..III. FUTURE PLANSA. ALL STAGED DRUMS/OVERPACKS TO REMAIN ON SITE AWAITING FINALDISPOSAL APPROVAL. ERCS TO ARRANGE ALL ANALYTICAL FOR SAMPLESOBTAINED.B. OSC TO REMAIN IN CONTACT WITH SITE RESIDENTS (GREATHOUSE) TOPROVIDE PROJECT STATUS/INFORMATION.C. OSC TO CONTINUE TO COORDINATE SITE ACTIVITIES AND PROVIDE

BENTON M. WILMOTH, SR. OSCUS EPA REGION IIIWHEELING, WV

AftiGOGSO

POLREP |3 - FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WVCERCLA REMOVAL ACTIVITY

ATTENTION: CHARLIE KLEEMAN, TIM FIELDS AND STEVE JARVELAI. SITUATION (1200 HOURS - 10/28/88)A. ERCS/TAT ON SITE 5/12/88 AND COMPLETED OVERPACKING OF DRUMS,

BULKING OF LIQUIDS FROM DRUMS AND SOIL EXCAVATION.B. OSC IN RECEIPT OF COMPATIBILITY TEST RESULTS FROM SAMPLES

COLLECTED 5/12/88.C. STAGED ON SITE ARE DRUMS IN THE FOLLOWING QUANTITIES:

BULKED LIQUIDS 17H DRUMS (3 EA)OVERPACKED DRUMS (5 EA)CONTAMINATED SOIL/CLOTHING 17H DRUMS (2 EA)

D. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE: (COB 10/28/88)AGENCY COSTS CEILINGEPA $ 250 $ 5,000TAT 2,100 7,500ERCS 6,400 19,000

II. FUTURE PLANSA. ALL STAGED DRUMS/OVERPACKS TO REMAIN ON SITE AWAITING FINAL

DISPOSAL APPROVAL. ERCS TO ARRANGE ALL ANALYTICAL FORSAMPLES OBTAINED.

B. OSC TO CONTINUE TO COORDINATE SITE ACTIVITIES AND PROVIDE,, SITE STATUS TO WVDNR AND SITE RESIDENTS (GREATHOUSE) .JL*Ĵ MJ£J&e$ VBENTON M. WILMOTH, SR. OSCUS EPA REGION IIIWHEELING, WV

06 i

POLREP |4 - FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WVCERCLA REMOVAL ACTIVITY

ATTENTION: CHARLIE KLEEMAN, TIM FIELDS AND STEVE JARVELAI. SITUATION (1600 HOURS - 11/1/88)A. OSC CONTACTED ERCS FOR STATUS OF TRANSPORT SCHEDULE FOR

DRUMS AT SITE. ACCORDING TO ERCS, DRUMS TO PICKED UP 11/7/88AND TRANSPORTED FOR DISPOSAL AT THERMALKEM, ROCK HILL, SC.

B. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE: (COB 11/1/88)AGENCY COSTS CEILINGEPA $ 250 $ 5,000TAT 2,100 7,500ERCS 6,400 19,000

II. ACTIONS TAKENA. OSC DISCUSSED DISPOSAL PLANS WITH ERCS DISPOSAL COORDINATOR

(KELLEY) IN PRINCETON, NJ.II. FUTURE PLANSA. OSC WAITING ON ERCS DRUM REMOVAL AND TRANSPORT 11/7/88.B. OSC TO CONTINUE TO COORDINATE SITE ACTIVITIES AND PROVIDEA J£TyrtST£>!;l!iJS WVDNR AND SITE RESIDENTS (GREATHOUSE).


POLREP #5 - FIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WVCERCLA REMOVAL ACTIVITY

ATTENTION: CHARLIE KLEEMAN, TIM FIELDS AND STEVE JARVELAI. SITUATION (1600 HOURS - 11/11/88)A. ERCS ON SITE 11/1188 TO REMOVE ALL TEN DRUMS (3-FLAMMABLE

LIQUID, 7-FLAMMABLE SOLID) FOR TRANSPORTATION TO THERMALKEMIN ROCKHILL, SOUTH CAROLINA. ALL DRUMS WERE PROPERLY LABELEDAND MANIFESTED.

B. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE: (COB 11/11/88)AGENCY COSTS CEILINGEPA $ 250 $ 5,000TAT 2,100 7,500ERCS 6,400 19,000

C. PERSONNEL ON SCENE: TAT-1, ERCS-3D. WEATHER ON SCENE: SUNNY HIGH'S IN THE MID 60'S.II. FUTURE PLANSA. OSC AWAITS COPY OF MANIFEST FROM DISPOSAL FACILITY

(THERMALKEM) .B. OSC REPORT TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITHIN NCP

REQUIREMENTS.


POLREP j| 6 AMD FINALFIFTH STREET DRUM DUMPHUNTINGTON, WAYNE COUNTY, WVCERCLA REMOVAL ACTIVITYATTENTION: CHARLIE KLEEMAN, TIM FIELDS AND STEVE JARVELAI. SITUATION (1600 HOURS - 1/11/89)A. OSC IN RECEIPT OF COPY OF WASTE MANIFEST FROM 10 DRUMS WHICHWERE TRANSPORTED TO THE DISPOSAL FACILITY - THERMALKEM, ROCKHILL, SOUTH CAROLINA.B. THE OSC OFFICIALLY CLOSED THIS PROJECT AS OF 1/11/89.B. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS TO DATE: (COB 1/11/89)

AGENCY COSTS CEILINGEPA $ 250 $ 5,000TAT 2,100 7,500ERCS 16,400 19,000

II. FUTURE PLANSA. OSC REPORT TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED WITHIN NCP

) REQUIREMENTS.

'/JERRyliASEEN, OSC'/US EM REGION III/ WHEELING, WV

ARI00064

South Carolina Department of Health •—.fl.Actn: Ilencon WilraoCh (OSC)

USEPA Region III •• (304) 233-9831 •841 Chestnut Building, .Philadelphia, PA 19107 , ., ...

i U4(fADNuMi«PiAiDiOiCiAiO Ji5

Note: Transporter 1 not used.

li TMMPMM I C«nfHny NMM ' .Trucks. Iim.

.Environmental Options.

Themi.lKEM. Inc. ' • ' 'Route 5, Vemndale Ro«d IP.O. Box 2644. CRSIKodiHill. SC 2&730 ' . • . . .

*>.' Waste Flammable,'Solid, n.o.a. 'Flammable'Solid,.''UN1325- :" ' ''.•.":• ••'

'Haste Flammable, liquid, n.o.s.Flammable Liquid, UN1993 .

Cfr/v;-•••••••• •• •••'•'• •.•••%$*_

Shippers Authorization Nob 90837.

EMERGENCY CONTACT: JR Kelley, O.H. Materials Corporation. (609)

IlliClilVlill IIV:

Illil'OllTlili TO

KltC IIV!

SI'HLliK:

LOCATION:

SI'11,1, DATA:

•

1MCUM1NU SI'lU. lllil'UIlT

IIIIC '• Unto Cuse No! WI'O

' Time KllC

WI'O Unto Ju^ — ft'

Time InvestlKutor:

Name £,... Hfn /: , fW J1....JW*

Oriianizution

Address |'̂ |̂ vvur/-A- Vt>iW\A,P G.ty> iXwfit|fu

1 flUw P'l^'\VlC>*-i1~tlr ft-ii-iift. 4 t'*ti l^tti..

Date /(. 7/1. f/l /.Time wvH«iy>

Mutcrinl /j .,«,£,, >/„ ,X~ .. ,,. , / ,.ĵ . , ,',/=

(lunntity r V,,,.,.>.i

Source t, ,, ft

Ciuiso

Coiitaiiiiiicnt

Clcnnup

'I,

Aililitiunnl coniiiiL'ii!::; oil back

SITE/SAFETY PROTOCOLFifth Street Drum Site

Huntington, Wayne County, West Virginia

GENERAL.

This protocol addresses the safety procedures that will befollowed by any and all personnel visiting the site or involvedin the CERCLA removal activity at the Fifth street Drum Site.All personnel entering the site shall read and sign this safetyplan. The protocol will remain in effect until the osc certifiesthat the activity is terminated. It does not supercede anyFederal OSHA or state or local regulations but is in addition tothem. In the event of a conflict between this protocol and aregulation, the more stringent of the two will be in force.

Since data available av the present time does not allow acomplete characterization of the drums on site, levels ofprotection for personnel will be set in accordance with thehazard of the job function and location on-site as indicated onthe attached diagram.Respiratory protection Program

All contractor and governmental personnel involved in on-siteactivities shall have a written respiratory protection programand prove that they are physically fit to wear a respirator. Allpersonnel wearing air-purifying respirators on-site are requiredto be fit tested, while those wearing pressure-demand self-containing breathing apparatus or air-line apparatus, must beproperly trained and experienced in their use. All respiratoryprotection equipment is to be properly decontaminated at the endof each workday.Persons having beards or facial hair must not wear a respirator.Training and Medical Monitoring Program

Personnel will have both formal training and on-the-job training,in accordance with OSHA regulations, for those tasks they areassigned to perform on the active site. All unfamiliaractivities will be rehearsed beforehand.

All contractor and governmental personnel who are exposed tohazardous levels of chemicals shall prove that they are enrolledin a medical monitoring program.

ARI00067

Fifth Street Drum SiteHuntington, Wayne County, West Virginia

Page 2General Safety Rules and Equipment

a. There will be no eating, drinking or smoking in the ExclusionArea or hot side of the Contamination Reduction Area.

b. All personnel must pass through the Contamination ReductionArea to enter the Exclusion Area.

c. An emergency eye wash will be on the hot side of theContamination Reduction Area.

d. As a minimum, an emergency deluge shower/spray can is to belocated on the clean side of the Contamination Reduction Area.

e. At the end of the work, all personnel working in theExclusion Area shall take a hygenie shower.

f. All supplied breathing- air shall be certified as Grade D orbetter.

g. Where practical, all tools/equipment will be spark proof,explosion resistant and/or bonded and grounded.

h. Fire extinguishers will be on-site for equipment or personnelfires only.

i. A first-aid kit will be on-scene at all times duringoperational hours. An oxygen inhalator respirator will beavailable. The location of these items on-site will be posted.

j. Persons having beards or facial hair must not wearrespirators.

k. No work will be performed in the exclusion area during hoursof darkness as determined by the site safety officer.

Morning Safety Meeting

A morning safety meeting will be conducted each day for all sitepersonnel who sign a daily attendance sheet. The safetyprocedures, evacuation procedures, and escape procedures, as wellas the day's planned operations, should be discussed.

flfilQ0068

Fifth Street Drum Site,Huntington, Wayne County, West Virginia

Page 3CONTROL AT THE SITE

Access to the site will be restricted by a site security officerand banner guard installed during the immediate removal phase atthis site and exit from the site shall be through the gate in theContamination Reduction Area except in a life threateningemergency.

All persons entering the site shall sign in and out at the osccommand post or with the site security officer.DESIGNATION OF WORK AREAS AT THE SITE

The entire site will be divided into three areas: (l) ExclusionArea which known to be or have a potential for becomingcontaminated: (2) the contamination Reduction Area wheredecontamination of personnel and equipment exiting the ExclusionArea is performed; (3) the Support Area which is notcontaminated.

The Exclusion Area (EA)At the Fifth Street Drum Site, the Exclusion Area shall

Initially include all areas inside the banner guard.The Contamination Reduction Area (CRA)At the Fifth Street Drum Site,the Contamination Reduction

Area will be located immediately outside the Exclusion area andwill be delineated by roped off area.

The Support Area (SA)At the Fifth Street Drum site, the support Area will be

the area outside the Exclusion Area and Contamination ReductionArea.Changes in Designation of Work Areas

As work progress on-side, the osc may determine that an areapreviously designed an EA Jc-no longer classified In that manner.It Is not intended, however, to change the designation of the CRAsince this may involve the movement of the decontaminationfacilities and added expense.SAFETY PROCEDURES AND LEVELS OF PROTECTION

Exclusion Area

1. All personnel shall enter and exit the Exclusion Area throughthe Contamination Reduction Area.

A-RI00069

Fifth Street Drum SiteHuntington, Wayne county, West VirginiaPage 4

2. Emergency escape routes from the Exclusion Area will beestablished and reviewed as appropriate at each morningsafety meeting.

SAFETY PROCEDURES AND LEVELS OF PROTECTION

Exclusion Area

3. All personnel in the Exclusion Area shall use the protectiveequipment designed for their job function but in no case shallless than LEVEL B be used.

4. Personnel performing the following job functions in theExclusion Area will utilize the designed level of protectionequipment.

Contamination Reduction Area

1. Personnel and equipment decontamination will be performed inLevel c.

2. All personnel entering the CRA will utilize a minimum ofLevel c protection.

3. All personnel entering the CRA must decontaminate which willbe performed in Level_c.

4. All equipment entering the CRA must be decontaminated priorto leaving the CRA.

Support Area

1. No contaminated equipment or personnel may enter the SupportArea.

2. Except in the case of a release of a Toxic vapor, Level Dwill be appropriate for all personnel in the support Area,

Prime Contractor

1. Barrel opening, sampling, and overpacking will be performedin level B. This applies to anyone involved, Includingequipment operators.

DECONTAMUlA'nQH PROTOCOL

All equipment and personnel entering the site must be thoroughlydecontaminated prior to leaving the site. Since there are

ARI00070

Fifth street Drum Site,Huntington, Wayne County, West VirginiaPage 5

various protocol and equipment available for this purpose, theOSC will determine if the proposed decontamination techniques areapplicable. Such determinations will be made on a day-to-daybasis as on-slte operations dictate.

EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

In the event of a medical or other emergency, the osc or hisdesignee will notify the appropriate authority. The followinglist of phone numbers will be posted prominently at eachtelephone on-site:

1. Fire - (304) 696-5950

2. Ambulance - (304) 696-4444

3. Police - (304) 696-4470

4. Federal Government -1-800-424-8802

5. EPA Environmental Response Team '

6. Hospitals - (304) 526-9111

Special Safety considerations At The Fifth street Drum Site.

1) Due to the highly deteriorated nature of the drums, greatcare should be taken when handling the drums to avoid anypersonal injury.

/JÛ ./ĉ

Ĵ*-̂

ARI0007I

APPENDIX IGlossary of Abbreviations

Presented here Is a glossary of acronyms used throughoutthis report.

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation, andLiability Act

EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA HQ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HeadquartersERCS Emergency Response Cleanup Services

OHM O.H. Materials, Inc., Flndlay, Ohio

osc U.S. EPA On-Scene Coordinator

POLREPs Pollution ReportsPRP Potential Responsible Party

QA Quality Assurance ,

SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorlzation ActTAT Roy F. Weston, Inc. Technical Assistance Team

WVDNR West Virginia Department of Natural Resources

ARI00072

ARIGU003 · 2021. 1. 19. · 3 federal on-scene coordinator's report for fifth street drum dump...

Documents

Transcript of ARIGU003 · 2021. 1. 19. · 3 federal on-scene coordinator's report for fifth street drum dump...